Modelling quantitative structure activity–activity relationships (QSAARs): auto-pass-pass, a new approach to fill data gaps in environmental risk assessment under the REACH regulation

References

• Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/reach_intro.htm.
   Google Scholar
• M.T. Cronin, A.O. Aptula, J.C. Duffy, T.I. Netzeva, P.H. Rowe, I.V. Valkova, and T.W. Schultz, Comparative assessment of methods to develop QSARs for the prediction of the toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis, Chemosphere 49 (2002), pp. 1201–1221. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00508-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A.H. Schwöbel, Y.K. Koleva, S.J. Enoch, F. Bajot, M. Hewitt, J.C. Madden, D.W. Roberts, T.W. Schultz, and M.T.D. Cronin, Measurement and estimation of electrophilic reactivity for predictive toxicology, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011), pp. 2562–2596. doi:10.1021/cr100098n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Schüürmann, A.O. Aptula, R. Kühne, and R.-U. Ebert, Stepwise discrimination between four modes of toxic action of phenols in the Tetrahymena pyriformis assay, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 16 (2003), pp. 974–987. doi:10.1021/tx0340504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.I. Netzeva, A.P. Worth, T. Aldenberg, R. Benigni, M.T.D. Cronin, P. Gramatica, J.S. Jaworska, S. Kahn, G. Klopman, C.A. Marchant, G. Myatt, N. Nikolova-Jeliazkova, G.Y. Patlewicz, R. Perkins, D. Roberts, T. Schultz, D.W. Stanton, J.J.M. van de Sandt, W. Tong, G. Veith, and C. Yang, Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships, Altern. Lab. Anim. 33 (2005), pp. 155–173. doi:10.1177/026119290503300209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.C. von der Ohe, R. Kühne, R.-U. Ebert, R. Altenburger, M. Liess, and G. Schüürmann, Structural alerts. A new classification model to discriminate excess toxicity from narcotic effect levels of organic compounds in the acute daphnid assay, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 18 (2005), pp. 536–555. doi:10.1021/tx0497954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kienzler, M.G. Barron, S.E. Belanger, A. Beasley, and M.R. Embry, Mode of action (MOA) assignment classifications for ecotoxicology: An evaluation of approaches, Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (2017), pp. 10203–10211. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b02337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.J.M. Verhaar, C.J. van Leeuwen, and J.L.M. Hermens, Classifying environmental pollutants, Chemosphere 25 (1992), pp. 471–491. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(92)90280-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.G. Barron, C.R. Lilavois, and T.M. Martin, MOAtox: A comprehensive mode of action and acute aquatic toxicity database for predictive model development, Aquat. Toxicol. 161 (2015), pp. 102–107. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Ellison, P. Piechota, J.C. Madden, S.J. Enoch, and M.T.D. Cronin, Adverse outcome pathway (AOP) informed modelling of aquatic toxicology: Qsars, read-across, and interspecies verification of modes of action, Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (2016), pp. 3995–4007. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.O. Aptula, T.I. Netzeva, I.V. Valkova, M.T.D. Cronin, T.W. Schultz, R. Kühne, and G. Schüürmann, Multivariate discrimination between modes of toxic action of phenols, Quant. Struct. Relat. 21 (2002), pp. 12–22. doi:10.1002/1521-3838(200205)21:1<12::AID-QSAR12>3.0.CO;2-M.
   Google Scholar
• G. Patlewicz, N. Jeliazkova, R.J. Safford, A.P. Worth, and B. Aleksiev, An evaluation of the implementation of the Cramer classification scheme in the toxtree software, SAR QSAR Environ. Res 19 (2008), pp. 495–524. doi:10.1080/10629360802083871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati and A. Lombardo, VEGAHUB for ecotoxicological QSAR modelling, in Ecotoxicological QSARs, K. Roy, ed., Humana, New York, NY, 2020, pp. 759–787.
   Google Scholar
• L.Y. Fan, D. Zhu, Y. Yang, Y. Huang, S.N. Zhang, L.C. Yan, S. Wang, and H.Y. Zhao, Comparison of modes of action among different trophic levels of aquatic organisms for pesticides and medications based on interspecies correlations and excess toxicity: Theoretical consideration, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 177 (2019), pp. 25–31. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Cassani, S. Kovarich, E. Papa, P.P. Roy, L. van der Wal, and P. Gramatica, Daphnia and fish toxicity of (benzo)triazoles: Validated QSAR models, and interspecies quantitative activity-activity modelling, J. Hazard. Mater. 258–259 (2013), pp. 50–60. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wang, B. Fan, M. Fan, S. Belanger, J. Li, J. Chen, X. Gao, and Z. Liu, Development and use of interspecies correlation estimation models in China for potential application in water quality criteria, Chemosphere 240 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.J. Zhang, H.W. Qin, L.M. Su, W.C. Qin, M.Y. Zou, L.X. Sheng, Y.H. Zhao, and M.H. Abraham, Interspecies correlations of toxicity to eight aquatic organisms: Theoretical considerations, Sci. Total Environ. 408 (2010), pp. 4549–4555. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Tugcu, M.D. Ertürk, and M.T. Saçan, On the aquatic toxicity of substituted phenols to Chlorella vulgaris: QSTR with an extended novel data set and interspecies models, J. Hazard. Mater. 339 (2017), pp. 122–130. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.06.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wang, C. Sun, Y. Wang, and L. Wang, Quantitative structure-activity relationships for the inhibition toxicity to root elongation of Cucumis sativus of selected phenols and interspecies correlation with Tetrahymena pyriformis, Chemosphere 46 (2002), pp. 153–161. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00133-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Aruoja, M. Sihtmäe, H.C. Dubourguier, and A. Kahru, Toxicity of 58 substituted anilines and phenols to algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and bacteria Vibrio fischeri: Comparison with published data and QSARs, Chemosphere 84 (2011), pp. 1310–1320. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Raimondo, D.N. Vivian, and M.G. Barron, Web-based Interspecies Correlation Estimation (Web-ICE) for acute toxicity: User manual version 3.3, EPA/600/R-15/192, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Gulf Ecology Division, Gulf Breeze, Florida, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• M.T.D. Cronin, J.C. Dearden, and A.J. Dobbs, QSAR studies of comparative toxicity in aquatic organisms, Sci. Total Environ. 109110 (1991), pp. 431–439. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(91)90198-N.
   Google Scholar
• J. Devillers and H. Devillers, Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity from QSARs and interspecies correlations, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 20 (2009), pp. 467–500. doi:10.1080/10629360903278651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kar and K. Roy, First report on interspecies quantitative correlation of ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals, Chemosphere 81 (2010), pp. 738–747. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Raimondo, P. Mineau, and M.G. Barron, Estimation of chemical toxicity to wildlife species using interspecies correlation models, Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (2007), pp. 5888–5894. doi:10.1021/es070359o.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Li, X.J. Zhang, Y. Yang, T. Huang, C. Li, L. Su, Y.H. Zhao, and M.T.D. Cronin, Development of thresholds of excess toxicity for environmental species and their application to identification of modes of acute toxic action, Sci. Total Environ. 616–617 (2018), pp. 491–499. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Li, X.H. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Wen, W.C. Qin, L.M. Su, and Y.H. Zhao, Discrimination of excess toxicity from narcotic effect: Influence of species sensitivity and bioconcentration on the classification of modes of action, Chemosphere 120 (2015), pp. 660–673. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Kahn, U. Maran, E. Benfenati, T.I. Netzeva, T.W. Schultz, and M.T.D. Cronin, Comparative quantitative structure-activity-activity relationships for toxicity to Tetrahymena pyriformis and Pimephales prometas, ATLA 35 (2007), pp. 15–24. doi:10.1177/026119290703500112.
   Google Scholar
• A. Furuhama, T.I. Hayashi, and H. Yamamoto, Development of QSAAR and QAAR models for predicting fish early-life stage toxicity with a focus on industrial chemicals, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 30 (2019), pp. 825–846. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2019.1669707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sangion and P. Gramatica, Ecotoxicity interspecies QAAR models from Daphnia toxicity of pharmaceuticals and personal care products, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 27 (2016), pp. 781–798. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2016.1233139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Furuhama, T.I. Hayashi, and H. Yamamoto, Development of models to predict fish early-life stage toxicity from acute Daphnia magna toxicity, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 29 (2018), pp. 725–742. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2018.1513423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Castillo-Garit, Y. Marrero-Ponce, J. Escobar, F. Torrens, and R. Rotondo, A novel approach to predict aquatic toxicity from molecular structure, Chemosphere 73 (2008), pp. 415–427. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.05.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Pérez González, H. González Díaz, M.A. Cabrera, and R. Molina Ruiz, A novel approach to predict a toxicological property of aromatic compounds in the Tetrahymena pyriformis, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 12 (2004), pp. 735–744. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2003.11.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.T.D. Cronin and T.W. Schultz, Structure-toxicity relationships for three mechanisms of action of toxicity to Vibrio fischeri, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 39 (1998), pp. 65–69. doi:10.1006/eesa.1997.1618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Dimitrov, Y. Koleva, T.W. Schultz, J.D. Walker, and O. Mekenyan, Interspecies quantitative structure-activity relationship model for aldehydes: Aquatic toxicity, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23 (2004), pp. 463–470. doi:10.1897/02-579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Katritzky, P. Oliferenko, A. Oliferenko, A. Lomaka, and M. Karelson, Nitrobenzene toxicity: QSAR correlations and mechanistic interpretations, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 16 (2003), pp. 811–817. doi:10.1002/poc.643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Schramm, A. Müller, H. Hammer, A. Paschke, and G. Schüürmann, Epoxide and thiirane toxicity in vitro with the ciliates Tetrahymena pyriformis: Structural alerts indicating excess toxicity, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2011), pp. 5812–5819. doi:10.1021/es200081n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.W. Schultz, Tetratox: Tetrahymena pyriformis population growth impairment endpoint - A surrogate for fish lethality, Toxicol. Methods 7 (1997), pp. 289–309. doi:10.1080/105172397243079.
   Google Scholar
• T.W. Schultz, T.I. Netzeva, D.W. Roberts, and M.T.D. Cronin, Structure-toxicity relationships for the effects to Tetrahymena pyriformis of aliphatic, carbonyl-containing, α,β-unsaturated chemicals, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 18 (2005), pp. 330–341. doi:10.1021/tx049833j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, A. Manganaro, and G. Gini, VEGA-QSAR: AI inside a platform for predictive toxicology, CEUR Workshop Proc. 1107 (2013), pp. 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA, ECOTOX, 2017. USA. Available at http://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/.
   Google Scholar
• Results of eco-toxicity tests of chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan, 2016. Available at http://www.env.go.jp/chemi/sesaku/02e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• L.M. Su, X. Liu, Y. Wang, J.J. Li, X.H. Wang, L.X. Sheng, and Y.H. Zhao, The discrimination of excess toxicity from baseline effect: Effect of bioconcentration, Sci. Total Environ. 484 (2014), pp. 137–145. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Gómez-Ganau, M. Marzo, R. Gozalbes, and E. Benfenati, Computational Approaches to Evaluate Ecotoxicity of Biocides: Cases from the Project COMBASE, In Ecotoxicological QSARs. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology, K. Roy, (eds.), Humana, New York, 2020, pp. 387–404.
   Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini and V. Consonni, Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry Wiley, Weinheim, Germany, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• M.R. Berthold, N. Cebron, F. Dill, T.R. Gabriel, T. Kötter, and T. Meinl, KNIME - The Konstanz information miner: Version 2.0 and beyond, SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11 (2009), pp. 26–31. doi:10.1145/1656274.1656280.
   Google Scholar
• D.D. Varsou, S. Nikolakopoulos, A. Tsoumanis, G. Melagraki, and A. Afantitis, ENALOS+ KNIME nodes: New cheminformatics tools for drug discovery, Methods Mol. Biol. 1824 (2018), pp. 113–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• P. Gramatica, Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external, QSAR Comb. Sci. 26 (2007), pp. 694–701. doi:10.1002/qsar.200610151.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, S. Cassani, P.P. Roy, S. Kovarich, C.W. Yap, and E. Papa, QSAR modelling is not “push a button and find a correlation”: A case study of toxicity of (benzo-)triazoles on algae, Mol. Inform. 31 (2012), pp. 817–835. doi:10.1002/minf.201200075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Melagraki, A. Afantitis, H. Sarimveis, O. Igglessi-Markopoulou, P.A. Koutentis, and G. Kollias, In silico exploration for identifying structure-activity relationship of MEK inhibition and oral bioavailability for isothiazole derivatives, Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 76 (2010), pp. 397–406. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0285.2010.01029.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Afantitis, G. Melagraki, P.A. Koutentis, H. Sarimveis, and G. Kollias, Ligand - based virtual screening procedure for the prediction and the identification of novel  β-amyloid aggregation inhibitors using Kohonen maps and counterpropagation artificial neural networks, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 46 (2011), pp. 497–508. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.11.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Afantitis, G. Melagraki, H. Sarimveis, P.A. Koutentis, O. Igglessi-Markopoulou, and G. Kollias, A combined LS-SVM & MLR QSAR workflow for predicting the inhibition of CXCR3 receptor by quinazolinone analogs, Mol. Divers. 14 (2010), pp. 225–235. doi:10.1007/s11030-009-9163-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tropsha and A. Golbraikh, Predictive QSAR modelling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening, Curr. Pharm. Des. 13 (2007), pp. 3494–3504. doi:10.2174/138161207782794257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Golbraikh and A. Tropsha, Beware of q2!, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20 (2002), pp. 269–276. doi:10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Bouhedjar, A.K. Nacereddine, H. Ghorab, and A. Djerourou, QSPR modelling for critical temperatures of organic compounds using hybrid optimal descriptors, Int. J. Quant. Struct. Relat. 4 (2019), pp. 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• P.P. Roy, S. Paul, I. Mitra, and K. Roy, On two novel parameters for validation of predictive QSAR models, Molecules 14 (2009), pp. 1660–1701. doi:10.3390/molecules14051660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.P. Roy and K. Roy, On some aspects of variable selection for partial least squares regression models, QSAR Comb. Sci. 27 (2008), pp. 302–313. doi:10.1002/qsar.200710043.
   Google Scholar
• K. Roy, On some aspects of validation of predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship models, Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2 (2007), pp. 1567–1577. doi:10.1517/17460441.2.12.1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.T. Leonard and K. Roy, On selection of training and test sets for the development of predictive QSAR models, QSAR Comb. Sci. 25 (2006), pp. 235–251. doi:10.1002/qsar.200510161.
   Google Scholar
• P.P. Roy, J.T. Leonard, and K. Roy, Exploring the impact of size of training sets for the development of predictive QSAR models, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 90 (2008), pp. 31–42. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2007.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, N. Chirico, E. Papa, S. Cassani, and S. Kovarich, QSARINS: A new software for the development, analysis, and validation of QSAR MLR models, J. Comput. Chem. 34 (2013), pp. 2121–2132. doi:10.1002/jcc.23361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, S. Cassani, and N. Chirico, QSARINS-chem: Insubria datasets and new QSAR/QSPR models for environmental pollutants in QSARINS, J. Comput. Chem. 35 (2014), pp. 1036–1044. doi:10.1002/jcc.23576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini, V. Consonni, A. Mauri, and M. Pavan, Detecting “bad” regression models: Multicriteria fitness functions in regression analysis, Anal. Chim. Acta 515 (2004), pp. 199–208. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2003.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini, V. Consonni, and A. Maiocchi, The K correlation index: Theory development and its application in chemometrics, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 46 (1999), pp. 13–29. doi:10.1016/S0169-7439(98)00124-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.M. Shi, H. Fang, W. Tong, J. Wu, R. Perkins, R.M. Blair, W.S. Branham, S.L. Dial, C.L. Moland, and D.M. Sheehan, QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41 (2001), pp. 186–195. doi:10.1021/ci000066d.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• G. Schüürmann, R.-U. Ebert, J. Chen, B. Wang, and R. Kühne, External validation and prediction employing the predictive squared correlation coefficient — Test set activity mean vs training set activity mean, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 48 (2008), pp. 2140–2145. doi:10.1021/ci800253u.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Consonni, D. Ballabio, and R. Todeschini, Comments on the definition of the Q2 parameter for QSAR validation, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49 (2009), pp. 1669–1678. doi:10.1021/ci900115y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Chirico and P. Gramatica, Real external predictivity of QSAR models. Part 2. New intercomparable thresholds for different validation criteria and the need for scatter plot inspection, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52 (2012), pp. 2044–2058. doi:10.1021/ci300084j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Chirico and P. Gramatica, Real external predictivity of QSAR models: How to evaluate it? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51 (2011), pp. 2320–2335. doi:10.1021/ci200211n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tropsha, P. Gramatica, and V. Gombar, The importance of being earnest: Validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models, QSAR Comb. Sci. 22 (2003), pp. 69–77. doi:10.1002/qsar.200390007.
   Google Scholar
• P.K. Ojha and K. Roy, Comparative QSARs for antimalarial endochins: Importance of descriptor-thinning and noise reduction prior to feature selection, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 109 (2011), pp. 146–161. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Lessigiarska, A.P. Worth, B. Sokull-Klüttgen, S. Jeram, J.C. Dearden, T.I. Netzeva, and M.T.D. Cronin, QSAR investigation of a large data set for fish, algae and Daphnia toxicity, SAR QSAR Environ. Res 15 (2004), pp. 413–431. doi:10.1080/10629360412331297416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Hansch and T. Fujita, p -σ-π analysis. A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86 (1964), pp. 1616–1626. doi:10.1021/ja01062a035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Furuhama, T.I. Hayashi, and N. Tatarazako, Acute to chronic estimation of Daphnia magna toxicity within the QSAAR framework, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 27 (2016), pp. 833–850. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2016.1243151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar