Exploring Urban Data Visualization and Public Participation in Planning

Bibliography

• J. Abrams and P. Hall, “Where/Abouts,” in J. Abrams and P. Hall, eds., Else/Where: Mapping New Cartographies of Networks and Territories (Minnesota: University of Minnesota Design Institute, 2006) 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• S. Arnstein, “A Ladder of Citizen Participation,” Journal of the American Institute of planners 35: 4 (1969) 216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Aspen, “Urban Planning as Representation,” in C. Hermansen Cordua, ed., Manifestoes and Transformations in the Early Modernist City (Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate, 2010) 271–289.
   Google Scholar
• J. Bacon, “Unstable Archives: Language and Myths of the Visible,” in G. Borggreen and R. Gade, eds., Performing Archives/Archives of Performance (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2013) 23–91.
   Google Scholar
• M. Barndt, “Public Participation GIS—Barriers to Implementation,” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 25: 2 (1998) 105–112. doi: 10.1559/152304098782594607
   Google Scholar
• E. Ben-Joseph, H. Ishii, J. Underkoffler, B. Piper and L. Yeung, “Urban Simulation and the Luminous Planning Table: Bridging the Gap between the Digital and the Tangible,” Journal of planning Education and Research 21: 2 (2001) 196–203. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0102100207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Booher and J.E. Innes, “Network Power in Collaborative Planning,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 21 (2002) 221–236. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0202100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Public Records Act, Laws of California (1994).
   Google Scholar
• J. Creighton, The public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement. (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• T. Delman, T. Løssing, and R. Nielsen, “Planlægning på Spil: en Undersøgelse af Spil Som Redskab til Borgerinddragelse i (By)Planlægningsprocesser” (Planning at Stake: An Investigation Into Games as Tool for Citizen Participation in (Urban) Planning Processes), Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 16: 3 (2003) 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• P. Dourish and G. Bell, Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. (Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• European Union, “On the Re-use of Public Sector Information,” EU Directive, Official Journal of the European Union (L) 98 (2003) 90–96.
   Google Scholar
• J. Evans-Cowley and J. Hollander, “The New Generation of Public Participation: Internet-Based Participation Tools,” Planning Practice & Research 25 (2010) 397–408. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2010.503432
   Google Scholar
• J. Forester, Planning in the Face of Power (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989).
   Google Scholar
• J. Forester, The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes (Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• M. Foth, “Preface,” in M. Foth, ed., Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City (Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2009) xxviii–xxxii.
   Google Scholar
• M. Foth, B. Bajracharya, R. Brown, and G. Hearn, “The Second Life of Urban Planning? Using NeoGeography Tools for Community Engagement,” Journal of Location Based Services 3: 2 (2009) 97–117. doi: 10.1080/17489720903150016
   Google Scholar
• L. Forlano, “Making Waves: Urban Technology and the Co–production of Place,” First Monday, 18: 11 (2013) http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4968/3797 Accessed February 15, 2015. doi: 10.5210/fm.v18i11.4968
   Google Scholar
• G. Gartner, “Web mapping 2.0,” in M. Dodge, R. Kitchin, and C. Perkins, eds., Rethinking Maps. New Frontiers in Cartographic Theory (London/New York: Routledge, 2009) 68–82.
   Google Scholar
• A. González-Torres, F. García-Peñalvo, and R. Therón, “How Evolutionary Visual Software Analytics Supports Knowledge Discovery,” Journal of Information Science and Engineering 29 (2013) 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Gordon and G. Koo, “Placeworlds: Using Virtual Worlds to Foster Civic Engagement,” Space and Culture 11: 3 (2008) 204–221. doi: 10.1177/1206331208319743
   Google Scholar
• E. Gordon and E. Manosevitch, “Augmented Deliberation: Merging Physical and Virtual Interaction To Engage Communities In Urban Planning,” New Media & Society 13: 1 (2011) 75–95. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Graham, The Cybercities Reader (London/New York: Routledge, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• A. Greenfield and M. Shepard, Urban Computing and Its Discontents (New York: Architectural League of New York, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• M. Gurstein, What is Community Informatics (And Why Does It Matter)? (Milan: Polimetrica s.a.s., 2007).
   Google Scholar
• M. Gurstein, “Towards an Urban Community Informatics” (Gurstein's Community Informatics, 2010) http://gurstein.wordpress.com/2010/08/28/towards-an-urban-community-informatics-movement/ Accessed March 11, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• P. Healey, “Planning Through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory,” Town Planning Review 63: 2 (1996) 143–162. doi: 10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• P. Hemmersam, J. Aspen, A. Morrison, I. Sem, and M. Havnør, “Exploring Locative Media for Cultural Mapping,” in A. de Souza e Silva and M. Sheller, eds., Mobility and Locative Media: Mobile Communication in Hybrid Spaces (London/New York: Routledge, 2014) 167–187.
   Google Scholar
• J. Innes, “Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 14: 3 (1995) 183–189. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9501400307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Innes and D.E. Booher, “Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century,” Planning Theory & Practice 5: 4 (2004) 419–436. doi: 10.1080/1464935042000293170
   Google Scholar
• H. Jenkins, Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (New York: NYU Press, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• L. Kurgan, Close Up at a Distance: Mapping, Technology and Politics (New York: Zone Books, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• S. Lash, Intensive Culture: Social Theory, Religion and Contemporary Capitalism (London: Sage, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• A. Lau and A. Moere, “Towards A Model of Information Aesthetics in Information Visualization,” in E. Banissi, R. Burkhard, G. Grinstein, U. Cvek, M. Trutschl, L. Stuart, T. Wyeld, G. Andrienko, J. Dykes, M. Jern, D. Groth, and A. Ursyn, eds, Information Visualization: IV '07. 11th International Conference Information Visualization, 4–6 July 2007, Zurich, Switzerland) (Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2007) 87–92.
   Google Scholar
• Lov 19. mai 2006 nr 16 om Rett til Innsyn i Dokument i Offentleg Verksemd (Freedom of Information Act) (Norway, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• L. Manovich, The Language of New Media (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• L. Manovich, “Data Visualisation as New Abstraction and Anti-Sublime” (2002) manovich.net Accessed May 12, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• kV. Mayer-Schönberger and K. Cukier, Big Data (London: John Murray, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• A. Moere and D. Hill, “Designing for the Situated and Public Visualization of Urban Data,” Journal of Urban Technology 19: 2 (2012) 25–46. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2012.698065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Morrison, ed., Inside Multimodal Composition (Cresskill: Hampton Press, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• A. Morrison, J. Aspen, and E. Westvang, “Making the Mobile and Networked City Visible by Design,” paper presented at Crafting the Future, 10th European Academy of Design Conference (Gothenburg, 17–19 April, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• T. O'Reilly, “What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software,” Oreilly.com (2005) http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html Accessed June 18, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• E. Paulos, R. Honicky, and B. Hooker, “Citizen Science: Enabling Participatory Urbanism,” in M. Foth, ed., Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City (Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2009) 414–436.
   Google Scholar
• B. Pitkin, “Community Informatics: Hope or Hype?” Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (IEEE, 2001) 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• B. Pitkin, “Community Informatics for Community Development: The “Hope or Hype” Issue Revisited,” in P. Purcell, ed., Networked Neighborhoods (Berlin: Springer, 2006) 77–98.
   Google Scholar
• C. Ratti and D. Berry, “Sense of the City: Wireless And the Emergence of Real-Time Urban Systems,” in V. Chatelet, ed., Interactive Cities (Orleans: Editions HYX, 2007) 124–145.
   Google Scholar
• C. Rinner, “Argumentation Maps: GIS-based Discussion Support for On-line Planning,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 6 (2001) 847–863. doi: 10.1068/b2748t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Robinson, M. Rittenbruch, M. Foth, D. Filonik and S. Viller, “Street Computing: Towards an Integrated Open Data API for Cities,” Journal of Urban Technology 19: 2 (2012) 1–23. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2012.698064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Salim, “Probing Streets and the Built Environment with Ambient and Community Sensing,” Journal of Urban Technology 19: 2 (2012) 47–67. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2012.698066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Savage, E. Ruppert, and J. Law, Digital Devices: Nine Thesis (Manchester/Milton Keynes: CRESC Working Paper Series. Working paper No 86, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• M. Schraefel, “What Does It Look Like, Really? Imagining How Citizens Might Effectively, Usefully and Easily Find, Explore, Query and Re-Present Open/Linked Data,” in P. Patel-Schneider, Y. Pan, P. Hitzler, P. Mika, L. Zhang, J. Pan, I. Horrocks, and B. Glimm, eds, The Semantic Web – ISWC 2010 (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2010) 356–369.
   Google Scholar
• T. Segaran and J. Hammerbacher, Beautiful Data. (Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• M. Shepard, ed., Sentient City (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• N. Shadbolt, K. O'Hara, T. Berners-Lee, N. Gibbins, H. Glaser, W. Hall, and M. Schraefel, “Linked Open Government Data: Lessons from Data.gov.uk,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27: 3 (2012) 16–24. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2012.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Shipley and S. Utz, “Making it Count: A Review of the Value and Techniques for Public Consultation,” Journal of Planning Literature 27: 1 (2012) 22–42. doi: 10.1177/0885412211413133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Steele and N. Iliinsky, Beautiful Visualization (Sebastopol: O'Reilley Media, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• A. Townsend, “Foreword,” in M. Foth, ed., Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of The Real-Time City (Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2009) xxiii–xxvi.
   Google Scholar
• N. Thrift, “Movement-Space: the Development of New Kinds of Spatial Awareness” paper presented at Alternative Mobility Futures Conference (Lancaster 9–11 January, 2004) http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/centres/cemore/pastevents/altmobs/thrift.doc Accessed May 12, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• K. Unsworth, A. Forte and R. Dilworth, “Urban Informatics: The Role of Citizen Participation in Policy Making,” Journal of Urban Technology, 21: 4 (2014) 1–5. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.971527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Verhoeff, “Navigating Screenspace. Toward Performative Cartography,” in P. Snickars and P. Vonderau, eds, Moving Data. The iPhone and the Future of Media (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012) 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• N. Vossoughian, Otto Neurath: The Language of the Global Polis (Rotterdam: NAi Publishers, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• I. Wagner, M. Basile, L. Ehrenstrasser, V. Maquil, J. Terrin, and M. Wagner, “Supporting Community Engagement in the City: Urban Planning in the MR-tent,” Proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies (New York: ACM, 2009) 185–194.
   Google Scholar
• M. Weiser, “The Computer for the 21st Century,” Scientific American 265: 3 (1991) 94–104. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Williams, E. Robles, and P. Dourish, “Urbane-ing The City: Examining and Refining the Assumptions Behind Urban Informatics,” in M. Foth, ed., Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City (Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2009) 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• A. Yaneva, Mapping Controversies in Architecture (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• N. Yau, Data Points (Indianapolis: Wiley, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• H. Yu and D. Robinson, The New Ambiguity of ‘Open Government' (Princeton, NJ/New Haven, CT: Princeton CITP/Yale ISP Working Paper, 2012).
   Google Scholar