Who is the Expert? Integrated Urban Modeling and the Reconfiguration of Expertise

Bibliography

• V. Albino, U. Berardi, and R.M. Dangelico, “Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives,” Journal of Urban Technology 22: 1 (2015) 3–21. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Ascher, “The Forecasting Potential of Complex Models,” Policy Sciences 13: 3 (1981) 247–267. doi: 10.1007/BF00138485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Batty, “Progress, Success, and Failure in Urban Modelling,” Environment and Planning A 11 (1979) 863–878. doi: 10.1068/a110863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Batty, “A Chronicle of Scientific Planning: The Anglo-American Modeling Experience,” Journal of the American Planning Association 60: 1 (1994) 7–16. doi: 10.1080/01944369408975546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Batty, K.W. Axhausen, F. Giannotti, A. Pozdnoukhov, A. Bazzani, M. Wachowicz, G. Ouzounis, and Y. Portugali, “Smart Cities of The Future,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics 214 (2012) 481–518. doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Brenner, “Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe,” Review of International Political Economy 5: 1 (1998) 1–37. doi: 10.1080/096922998347633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.D. Brewer, Politicians, Bureaucrats, and the Consultant: A Critique of Urban Problem Solving (New York: Basic Books, 1973).
   Google Scholar
• R.D. Brunner and W. Ascher, “Science and Social Responsibility,” Policy Sciences 25: 3 (1992) 295–331. doi: 10.1007/BF00138787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Bulmer, “Applied Social Research. A Reformulation of ‘Applied’ and ‘Enlightenment’ Models,” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 3: 2 (1981) 187–209. doi: 10.1177/107554708100300205
   Google Scholar
• P. Burnham, “New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticisation,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3: 2 (2001) 127–149. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00054
   Google Scholar
• M. Callon, “Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction : la domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc,” L’Année sociologique 36 (1981) 169–208.
   Google Scholar
• F.S. Chapin Jr. and E.J. Kaiser, Urban Land Use Planning, 3rd ed. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1979).
   Google Scholar
• E. Clarence, “Technocracy Reinvented: The New Evidence Based Policy Movement,” Public Policy and Administration 17: 3 (2002) 1–11. doi: 10.1177/095207670201700301
   Google Scholar
• H.M. Collins and R. Evans, “The Third Wave of Science Studies,” Social Studies of Science 32: 2 (2002) 235–296. doi: 10.1177/0306312702032002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Dennis, T. Fox, M. Fuentes, A. Gilliland, S. Hanna, C. Hogrefe, J. Irwin, S.T. Rao, R. Scheffe, K. Schere, D. Steyn, and A. Venkatram, “A Framework for Evaluating Regional-Scale Numerical Photochemical Modeling Systems,” Environmental Fluid Mechanics 10 (2010) 471–489. doi: 10.1007/s10652-009-9163-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-F. Deroubaix, “The Co-production of a "Relevant" Expertise &– Administrative and Scientific Cooperation in the French Water Policies Elaboration and Implementation,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 4 (2007) 3771–3792. doi: 10.5194/hessd-4-3771-2007
   Google Scholar
• W.M. Dunn, “Measuring Knowledge Use,” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 5: 1 (1983) 120–133.
   Google Scholar
• G. Dupuy, Urbanisme et technique: chronique d’un mariage de raison (Paris: Centre Technique de l’Urbanisme, 1978).
   Google Scholar
• D. Evers and J. De Vries, “Explaining Governance in Five Mega-City Regions: Rethinking the Role of Hierarchy and Government,” European Planning Studies 21: 4 (2013) 536–555. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Fischer, “Reconstructing Policy Analysis: A Postpositivist Perspective,” Policy Sciences 25: 3 (1992) 333–339. doi: 10.1007/BF00138788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Flinders and J. Buller, “Depoliticisation: Principles, Tactics and Tools,” British Politics 1 (2006) 293–318. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200016
   Google Scholar
• J.W. Forrester, “System Dynamics—A Personal View of the First Fifty Years,” System Dynamics Review 23: 2-3 (2007) 345–358. doi: 10.1002/sdr.382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Garfinkel, Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1967).
   Google Scholar
• T.F. Gieryn, “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists,” American Sociological Review 48: 6 (1983) 781–795. doi: 10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Goldner, “The Lowry Model Heritage,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 37: 2 (1971) 100–110. doi: 10.1080/01944367108977364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Harris, “Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in Urban Planning,” in J.R. Pack, ed., Proceedings of the Conference on the Use of Models by Planning Agencies (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1975).
   Google Scholar
• B. Harris, “The Real Issues Concerning Lee’s “Requiem”,” Journal of the American Planning Association 60: 1 (1994) 31–34. doi: 10.1080/01944369408975548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.H. Haveman and K. Hollenbeck, Microeconomic Simulation Models For Public Policy Analysis (New York: Academic Press, 1980).
   Google Scholar
• M. Janowitz, “Sociological Models and Social Policy,” ARSP: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 55: 3 (1969) 305–321.
   Google Scholar
• S. Jasanoff, “Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science,” Social Studies of Science 17: 2 (1987) 195–230. doi: 10.1177/030631287017002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Johnston and T. de la Barra, “Comprehensive Regional Modeling for Long-Range Planning: Linking Integrated Urban Models and Geographic Information Systems,” Transportation Research Part A 34 (2000) 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• L.F. Konikow and J.D. Bredehoeft, “Ground-Water Models Cannot Be Validated,” Advances in Water Resources 15 (1992) 75–83. doi: 10.1016/0309-1708(92)90033-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.S. Korfmacher, “Water Quality Modeling for Environmental Management: Lessons from the Policy Sciences,” Policy Sciences 31: 1 (1998) 35–54. doi: 10.1023/A:1004334600179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.D. Larkey and L.S. Sproull, “Models in Theory and Practice; Some Examples, Problems, and Prospects,” Policy Sciences 13: 3 (1981) 233–246. doi: 10.1007/BF00138484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.D. Lasswell, A Pre-View of Policy Sciences (New York: American Elsevier, 1971).
   Google Scholar
• B. Latour, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987).
   Google Scholar
• B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1979).
   Google Scholar
• C. Lawson, “Microsimulation for Urban Transportation Planning: Miracle or Mirage?,” Journal of Urban Technology 13: 1 (2006) 55–80. doi: 10.1080/10630730600752868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.B. Lee Jr., “Requiem for Large-Scale Models,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 39: 3 (1973) 163–178. doi: 10.1080/01944367308977851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Lefèvre, “Metropolitan Government and Governance in Western Countries: A Critical Review,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22: 1 (1998) 9–25. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Maasen and P. Weingart, Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• P. Matarasso, “Integrated Assessment Models of Global Change,” in T. Munn and M.K. Tolba, eds., Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, 4 (New York: Wiley, 2001) 253–260.
   Google Scholar
• C.W. Mills, “Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive,” American Sociological Review 5: 6 (1940) 904–913. doi: 10.2307/2084524
   Google Scholar
• R.E. Nance and R.G. Sargent, “Perspectives on the Evolution Of Simulation,” Operations Research 50: 1 (2002) 161–172. doi: 10.1287/opre.50.1.161.17790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nilsson, A. Jordan, J. Turnpenny, J. Hertin, B. Nykvist, and D. Russel, “The Use and Non-use of Policy Appraisal Tools in Public Policy Making: an Analysis of Three European Countries and The European Union,” Policy Sciences 41: 4 (2008) 335–355. doi: 10.1007/s11077-008-9071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OJEU, “Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy,” Official Journal of the European Union L 327 (2000) 1–73.
   Google Scholar
• OJEU, “Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner air for Europe,” Official Journal of the European Union L 152 (2008) 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• N. Oreskes, K. Shrader-Frechette and K. Belitz, “Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences,” Science New Series 263: 5147 (1994) 641–646. doi: 10.1126/science.263.5147.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Owens, T. Rayner and O. Bina, “New Agendas for Appraisal: Reflections on Theory, Practice, and Research,” Environment and Planning A 36 (2004) 1943–1959. doi: 10.1068/a36281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Pack and J.R. Pack, “Urban Land-Use Models: The Determinants of Adoption and Use,” Policy Sciences 8: 1 (1977) 79–101. doi: 10.1007/BF01727603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.R. Pack, “The Use of Urban Models: Report on a Survey of Planning Organizations,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 41: 3 (1975) 191–199. doi: 10.1080/01944367508977877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Pierre, “Models of Urban Governance: The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics,” Urban Affairs Review 34: 3 (1999) 372–396. doi: 10.1177/10780879922183988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Putnam, Integrated Urban Models. Policy Analysis of Transportation and Land Use (London: Pion, 1983).
   Google Scholar
• D.A. Schön and M. Rein, Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies (New York: Basic Books, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• C. Seigneur, B. Pun, P. Pai, J.-F. Louis, P. Solomon, C. Emery, R. Morris, M. Zahniser, D. Worsnop, P. Koutrakis, W. White, and I. Tombach, “Guidance for the Performance Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Air Quality Modeling Systems for Particulate Matter and Visibility,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 50 (2000) 588–599. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P. Shim, M. Warkentin, J.F. Courtney, D.J. Power, R. Sharda, and C. Carlsson, “Past, Present, and Future of Decision Support Technology,” Decision Support Systems 33 (2002) 111–126. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00139-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.A. Simon, “From Substantive to Procedural Rationality,” in S. Latsis, ed., Method and Appraisal in Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976) 129–148.
   Google Scholar
• S.L. Star and J.R. Griesemer, “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39,” Social Studies of Science 19: 3 (1989) 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Todd and I. Benbasat, “The Use of Information in Decision Making: an Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer-Based Decision Aids,” MIS Quarterly 16: 3 (1992) 373–393. doi: 10.2307/249534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Voinov and H.H. Shugart, “‘Integronsters’, Integral and Integrated Modeling,” Environmental Modelling & Software 39 (2013) 149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wegener, “Operational Urban Models State of the Art,” Journal of the American Planning Association 60: 1 (1994) 17–29. doi: 10.1080/01944369408975547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Wenger, “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems,” Organization 7 (2000) 225–246. doi: 10.1177/135050840072002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.H. Weiss, Using Social Research in Public Policy Making (Lexington: Lexington Books, 1977).
   Google Scholar
• C.H. Weiss, “Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion,” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1: 3 (1980) 381–04.
   Google Scholar
• C.H. Weiss, “The Circuitry of Enlightenment. Diffusion of Social Science Research to Policymakers,” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8: 2 (1987) 274–281.
   Google Scholar
• K.P. Whyte and R.P. Crease, “Trust, Expertise, and the Philosophy of Science,” Synthese 177 (2010) 411–425. doi: 10.1007/s11229-010-9786-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar