Building City Dashboards for Different Types of Users

References

• J. Attard, F. Orlandi, S. Scerri, and S. Auer, “A Systematic Review of Open Government Data Initiatives,” Government Information Quarterly 32: 4 (2015) 399–418. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. S. Becker, Art Worlds (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982).
   Google Scholar
• R. D. Behn, The Performance Stat Potential: A Leadership Strategy for Producing Results (New York: Institution Press, Ash Center 2014).
   Google Scholar
• H. Beyer and K. Holtzblatt, “Contextual Design.” Interactions, 6: 1 (1999) 32–42. doi: 10.1145/291224.291229
   Google Scholar
• Å. Blomquist and M. Arvola, “Personas in Action: Ethnography in an Interaction Design Team” Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, (2002) 197–200.
   Google Scholar
• S. Bødker, Prototyping Revisited: Design with Users in A Cooperative Setting, Report of DAIMI Series 233 (Aarhus: Aarhus University, 1987) <www.researchgate.net/profile/Susanne_Bodker/publication/295899948_Prototyping_Revisited_-_design_with_users_in_a_cooperative_setting/links/576b6fac08ae6e772780bc4a.pdf> Accessed August 12, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• S. Bødker, E. Christiansen and M. Thüring, A Conceptual Toolbox for Designing CSCW Applications, Report of DAIMI Series 489 (Aarhus: Aarhus University, 1994) <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Susanne_Bodker/publication/228800099_A_conceptual_toolbox_for_designing_CSCW_applications/links/09e4150d1cf59f40ea000000.pdf > Accessed August 12, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• S. Bødker and E. Christiansen. Scenarios as Springboards in The Design Of CSCW, Report of DAIMI Series 488 (Aarhus: Aarhus University, 1994) <https://tidsskrift.dk/daimipb/article/download/6982/5946> Accessed August 12, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• S. Bødker and E. Christiansen, Designing for Ephemerality and Prototypicality, paper presented at DIS'04, Cambridge, August 1–4, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• S. Bødker, E. Christiansen, T. Nyvang and P. O. Zander, “Personas, People and Participation: Challenges from The Trenches of Local Government,” paper presented at the Twelfth Participatory Design Conference: ACM Research Papers Vol 1, Roskild, August 12–16, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• D. T. Bourgeois and T. A. Horan, “A Design Theory Approach to Community Informatics: Community-Centered Development and Action Research Testing of Online Social Networking Prototype,” The Journal of Community Informatics 3: 1 (2007) Retrieved from http://jat.gws.uky.edu/index.php/ciej/article/view/308 doi: 10.15353/joci.v3i1.2384
   Google Scholar
• Building City Dashboards Project website, “Homepage” (2017), <http://dashboards.maynoothuniversity.ie> Accessed January 11, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• CASA, “London Dashboard” (2012) <http://citydashboard.org/london/> Accessed October 11, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• A. Cooper, The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High-Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (Indianapolis: Sams, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• W. W. Cotterman and K. Kumar, “User Cube: A Taxonomy of End-Users,” Communications of the ACM 32: 11 (1989) 1313–1320. doi: 10.1145/68814.68816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Corbett and C. A. Le Dantec, “Going the Distance: Trust Work for Citizen Participation,” paper presented at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montréal, April 21–26, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Data USA, “New York, NY” (2014) <https://datausa.io/profile/geo/new-york-ny/> Accessed October 11, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• K. C. Desouza and A. Bhagwatwar, “Technology-Enabled Participatory Platforms for Civic Engagement: The Case of US Cities,” Journal of Urban Technology 21: 4 (2014) 25–50. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.954898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. I. Fusch and L. R. Ness, “Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research,” The Qualitative Report 20: 9 (2015) 1408–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. P. Geiger and J. von Lucke, “Open Government And (Linked) (Open) (Government) (Data),” JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 4: 2 (2012) 265–278. doi: 10.29379/jedem.v4i2.143
   Google Scholar
• J. Giacomin, “What is Human-Centered Design?” The Design Journal 17: 4 (2014) 606–623. doi: 10.2752/175630614X14056185480186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• J. Grudin and J. Pruitt, “Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement,” paper presented at Participatory Design Conference, Malmo, 23–25 June, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• W. J. Hansen, “User Engineering Principles for Interactive Systems,” Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference (1971) 523–532.
   Google Scholar
• A. Harley, “Personas Make Users Memorable for Product Team Members” (2015) <www.nngroup.com/articles/persona/> Accessed March 9, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• J. Hatfield and D. Weider-Hatfield, “The Comparative Utility of Three Types of Behavioral Units for Interaction Analysis,” Communications Monographs 45: 1 (1978) 44–50. doi: 10.1080/03637757809375950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hawley, “Laddering: A Research Interview Technique for Uncovering Core Values” (2009) <www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2009/07/laddering-a-research-interview-technique-for-uncovering-core-values.php> Accessed September 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• P. Hemmersam, N. Martin, E. Westvang, J. Aspen, and A. Morrison, “Exploring Urban Data Visualization and Public Participation in Planning,” Journal of Urban Technology 22: 4 (2015) 45–64. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2015.1073898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Holgersson, “User Participation in Public e-Service Development: Guidelines for Including External Users,” (PhD diss. University of Skövde, Skövde, 2014) <www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A760905&dswid=orcid.widget> Accessed September 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• J. Holgersson, B. Alenljung, and E. Söderström, “User Participation at a Discount: Exploring the Use and Reuse of Personas in Public Service Development,” paper presented at the European Conference on Information Systems, Münster, May 26–29, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• D. Idoughi, A. Seffah, and C. Kolski, “Adding User Experience into The Interactive Service Design Loop: A Persona-Based Approach,” Behavior and Information Technology 31: 3 (2012) 287–303. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.563799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kapoor, V. Weerakkody and U. Sivarajah, “Open Data Platforms and their Usability: Proposing A Framework for Evaluating Citizen Intentions,” paper presented at the Springer conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, Delft, October 13–15, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• R. Kitchin, T. Lauriault, and G. McArdle, “Knowing and Governing Cities Through Urban Indicators, City Benchmarking and Real-Time Dashboards,” Regional Studies, Regional Science 2: 1 (2015) 6–28. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2014.983149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kitchin, S. Maalsen, and G. McArdle, “The Praxis and Politics of Building Urban Dashboards,” Geoforum 77: 1 (2016) 93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.006
   Google Scholar
• R. Kitchin and G. McArdle, “Urban Data and City Dashboards: Six Key Issues,” in R. Kitchin, G. McArdle, and T. Lauriault, eds, Data and the City (London: Routledge, 2017) 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kubler, J. Robert, Y. Le Traon, J. Umbrich, and S. Neumaier, “Open Data Portal Quality Comparison Using AHP,” paper presented at the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research, Shanghai, June 8–10, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• H. Kuusela and P. Paul, “A Comparison of Concurrent and Retrospective Verbal Protocol Analysis,” American Journal of Psychology 113: 3 (2000) 387–404. doi: 10.2307/1423365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Lauriault, and M. Francoli, “Openness, Transparency, Participation,” in R. Kitchin, G. McArdle, and M. Wilson, eds, Understanding Spatial Media (London: Sage, 2017) 188–203.
   Google Scholar
• C. Lewis, “Thinking-Aloud in User Interface Design: A Method Promoting Cognitive Ergonomics,” Ergonomics 33: 4 (1990) 501–507. doi: 10.1080/00140139008927157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Lněnička and R. Máchová, “Open (Big) Data and The Importance of Data Catalogs and Portals for the Public Sector,” paper presented at Global Virtual Conference: The Third International Global Virtual Conference, Zilina, April 1, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• R. P. Lourenço, “An Analysis of Open Government Portals: A Perspective of Transparency for Accountability,” Government Information Quarterly 32: 3 (2015) 323–332. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Máchová and M. Lněnička, “Evaluating the Quality of Open Data Portals on the National Level,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 12: 1 (2017) 21–41. doi: 10.4067/S0718-18762017000100003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Mack, Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide (Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• K. Malterud, V. D. Siersma, and A. D. Guassora, “Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power,” Qualitative Health Research 26: 13 (2016) 1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Matthews, T. Judge, and S. Whittaker, “How Do Designers and User Experience Professionals Actually Perceive and Use Personas?” paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin TX, May 5–10, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• G. McArdle and R. Kitchin, “Improving the Veracity of Open and Real-Time Urban Data,” Built Environment 42: 3 (2016a) 446–462. doi: 10.2148/benv.42.3.457
   Google Scholar
• G. McArdle and R. Kitchin, “The Dublin Dashboard: Design and Development of a Real-Time Analytical Urban Dashboard,” ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 3: 4 (2016b) 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• S. Mulder and Z. Yaar, The User Is Always Right: A Practical Guide to Creating and Using Personas for The Web (San Francisco: New Riders, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• NIRSA, “Dublin Dashboard” (2014) <www.dublindashboard.ie/pages/index> Accessed October 11, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• J. Nielsen, “The Matters That Really Matter for Hypertext Usability,” paper presented at the ACM Hypertext 89 Conference, Pittsburgh PA, November 5–8, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• J. Pruitt and J. Grudin, “Personas: Practice and Theory,” paper presented at the ACM Designing for User Experiences, San Francisco, June 6–7, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• M. B. Rivera, E. Eriksson, and J. Wangel, “ICT Practices in Smart Sustainable Cities,” paper in the EnviroInfo and ICT for Sustainability Conference, Copenhagen, September 7–9, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• L. Rosenfeld, and P. Morville, Information Architecture for The World Wide Web (Newton: O’Reilly Media, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• L. Ross, D. Greene, and P. House, “The ‘False Consensus Effect’: An Egocentric Bias in Social Perception and Attribution Processes,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13: 3 (1977) 279–301. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Shin and D. Shin, “Community Informatics and the New Urbanism: Incorporating Information and Communication Technologies into Planning Integrated Communities,” Journal of Urban Technology 19: 1 (2012) 23–42. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2012.626698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Shneiderman, Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human–Computer Interaction (Delhi: Pearson Education India, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Smart London Board, Smart London Plan: Using the Creative Power of New Technologies to Serve London And Improve Londoners’ Lives (London: Greater London Authority, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• State of Hawaii, “Open Performance Hawaii” (2014) <https://dashboard.hawaii.gov/> Accessed October 11, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• K. Unsworth, A. Forte, and R. Dilworth, “Urban Informatics: The Role of Citizen Participation in Policy Making,” Journal of Urban Technology 21: 4 (2014) 1–5. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.971527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. W. Young and R. Kitchin, “Creating Design Guidelines for Building City Dashboards from a Users’ Perspectives,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 140 (2020) 102429. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Zhu, H. H. Yang, and L. Feng. “Visualizing and Understanding the Digital Divide,” paper presented at the International Conference on Hybrid Learning and Continuing Education, Wuhan, July 27–29, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, and C. Davis, “Innovation with Open Data: Essential Elements of Open Data Ecosystems,” Information Polity 19 (2014) 17–33. doi: 10.3233/IP-140329
   Google Scholar