Assembling Sustainable Smart City Transitions: An Interdisciplinary Theoretical Perspective

References

• M. Angelidou, “Smart Cities: A Conjuncture of Four Forces,” Cities 47 (2015) 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. P. Appio, M. Lima, and S. Paroutis, “Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation Ecosystems, Technological Advancements, and Societal Challenges,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142 (2019) 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Barba-Sánchez, E. Arias-Antúnez, and L. Orozco-Barbosa, “Smart Cities as a Source for Entrepreneurial Opportunities: Evidence for Spain,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 148 (2019) 119713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Batty, Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent Based Models and Fractals (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• M. Batty, “Cities as Complex Systems: Scaling, Interaction, Networks, Dynamics and Urban Morphologies,” in R. A. Meyers, ed., Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science (New York City: Springer, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• M. Batty, “Building a Science of Cities,” Cities 29 (2012) S9–S16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Batty, “Big Data, Smart Cities and City Planning,” Dialogues in Human Geography 3: 3 (2013a) 274–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. Batty, The New Science of Cities (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013b).
   Google Scholar
• M. Batty, “Benedikt’s Challenge: Reconstructing the Whole from the Parts,” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 44: 3 (2017) 395–397.
   Google Scholar
• G. Baxter and I. Sommerville, “Socio-Technical Systems: From Design Methods to Systems Engineering,” Interacting with Computers 23: 1 (2011) 4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ben Letaifa, “How to Strategize Smart Cities: Revealing the SMART Model,” Journal of Business Research 68: 7 (2015) 1414–1419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Bertolini, “Evolutionary Urban Transportation Planning: An Exploration,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39: 8 (2007) 1998–2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. E. Bijker, “How is Technology Made? That is the Question!” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 1 (2010) 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.E. Bijker, J. Law, eds, Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Socio-Technical Change (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992).
   Google Scholar
• O. Bina, A. Inch, and L. Pereira, “Beyond Techno-Utopia and its Discontents: On the Role of Utopianism and Speculative Fiction in Shaping Alternatives to the Smart City Imaginary,” Futures 115 (2020) 102475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.-C. Boudreau and D. Robey, “Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective,” Organization Science 16: 1 (2005) 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Brey, “The Strategic Role of Technology in a Good Society,” Technology in Society 52 (2018) 39–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Bridge, S. Bouzarovski, M. Bradshaw, and N. Eyre, “Geographies of Energy Transition: Space, Place and the Low-Carbon Economy,” Energy Policy 53 (2013) 331–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Britton, “Smart Meter Data and Equitable Energy Transitions: Can Cities Play a Role?” Local Environment 24: 7 (2019) 595–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. R. Brown, M. A. Farrelly, and D. A. Loorbach, “Actors Working the Institutions in Sustainability Transitions: The Case of Melbourne's Stormwater Management,” Global Environmental Change 23: 4 (2013) 701–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bulkeley and V. Castán Broto, “Government by Experiment? Global Cities and the Governing of Climate Change,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38: 3 (2013) 361–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bulkeley, L. Coenen, N. Frantzeskaki, C. Hartmann, A. Kronsell, L. Mai, S. Marvin, K. McCormick, F. Van Steenbergen, and Y. Voytenko Palgan, “Urban Living Labs: Governing Urban Sustainability Transitions,” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22 (2016a) 13–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bulkeley, P. M. McGuirk, and R. Dowling, “Making a Smart City for the Smart Grid? The Urban Material Politics of Actualising Smart Electricity Networks,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48: 9 (2016b) 1709–1726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Butt, “Herding by Mobile Phone: Technology, Social Networks and the ‘Transformation’ of Pastoral Herding in East Africa,” Human Ecology 43: 1 (2015) 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. P. Caird and S. H. Hallett, “Towards Evaluation Design for Smart City Development,” Journal of Urban Design 24: 2 (2019) 188–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Carayon, “Human Factors of Complex Sociotechnical Systems,” Applied Ergonomics 37: 4 (2006) 525–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Carvalho, “Smart Cities from Scratch? A Socio-Technical Perspective,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 1 (2015) 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Castán Broto, “Contradiction, Intervention, and Urban Low Carbon Transitions,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33: 3 (2015) 460–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Castells, The Rise of the Network Society (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• I. C. C. Chang, S.-C. Jou, and M.-K. Chung, “Provincialising Smart Urbanism in Taipei: The Smart City as a Strategy for Urban Regime Transition,” Urban Studies (2020) 1–17, DOI:10.1177/0042098020947908.
   Google Scholar
• B. Cohen, E. Almirall, and H. Chesbrough, “The City as a Lab,” California Management Review 59: 1 (2016) 5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Colding, M. Colding, and S. Barthel, “The Smart City Model: A New Panacea for Urban Sustainability or Unmanageable Complexity?,” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47: 1 (2020) 179–187.
   Google Scholar
• M. Cook, R. Horne, S. Potter, and A.-M. Valdez, “Exploring the Epistemic Politics of Urban Niche Experiments,” in J. S. Jensen, et al., eds., The Politics of Urban Sustainability Transitions: Knowledge, Power and Governance (Abingdon: Routledge, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• P. D. Corner and M. Ho, “How Opportunities Develop in Social Entrepreneurship,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34: 4 (2010) 635–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Datta, “New Urban Utopias of Postcolonial India,” Dialogues in Human Geography 5: 1 (2015) 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. De Jong, S. Joss, D. Schraven, C. Zhan, and M. Weijnen, “Sustainable–Smart–Resilient–Low Carbon–Eco–Knowledge Cities; Making Sense of a Multitude of Concepts Promoting Sustainable Urbanization,” Journal of Cleaner Production 109 (2015) 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Deakin, Smart Cities: Governing, Modelling and Analysing the Transition (New York: Routledge, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• M. Deakin and A. Reid, “Smart Cities: Under-Gridding the Sustainability of City-Districts as Energy Efficient-Low Carbon Zones,” Journal of Cleaner Production 173 (2018) 39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Dodson, “Suburbia Under an Energy Transition: A Socio-technical Perspective,” Urban Studies 51: 7 (2014) 1487–1505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Dolata, “Technological Innovations and Sectoral Change,” Research Policy 38: 6 (2009) 1066–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Eames, T. Dixon, T. May, and M. Hunt, “City Futures: Exploring Urban Retrofit and Sustainable Transitions,” Building Research and Information 41: 5 (2013) 504–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Ehnert, F. Kern, S. Borgström, L. Gorissen, S. Maschmeyer, and M. Egermann, “Urban Sustainability Transitions in a Context of Multi-Level Governance: A Comparison of Four European States,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 26 (2018) 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Elsner, J. Monstadt, and R. Raven, “Decarbonising Rotterdam? Energy Transitions and the Alignment of Urban and Infrastructural Temporalities,” City, 23:4–5 (2019) 646–657.
   Google Scholar
• J. Evans, A. Karvonen, R. Raven, eds, The Experimental City (London: Routledge, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• T. J. Fararo, “Theory: Sociological,” in N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes, eds, International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• N. Frantzeskaki, V. Castán Broto, L. Coenen, D. Loorbach, eds, Urban Sustainability Transitions (New York City, NY: Routledge, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• M. Fromhold-Eisebith and G. Eisebith, “What Can Smart City Policies in Emerging Economies Actually Achieve? Conceptual Considerations and Empirical Insights from India,” World Development 123 (2019) 104614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Fuenfschilling, N. Frantzeskaki, and L. Coenen, “Urban Experimentation and Sustainability Transitions,” European Planning Studies 27: 2 (2019) 219–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Fuenfschilling and B. Truffer, “The Structuration of Socio-Technical Regimes: Conceptual Foundations from Institutional Theory,” Research Policy 43: 4 (2014) 772–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels, “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case-Study,” Research Policy 31: 8-9 (2002) 1257–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels, “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems,” Research Policy 33: 6-7 (2004) 897–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels, “The Dynamics of Transitions in Socio-Technical Systems: A Multi-Level Analysis of the Transition Pathway from Horse-Drawn Carriages To Automobiles (1860–1930),” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 17: 4 (2005) 445–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels, “Feelings of Discontent and the Promise of Middle Range Theory for STS: Examples from Technology Dynamics,” Science, Technology, and Human Values 32: 6 (2007) 627–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels, “Ontologies, Socio-Technical Transitions (to Sustainability), and the Multi-Level Perspective,” Research Policy 39: 4 (2010) 495–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels, “The Multi-Level Perspective on Sustainability Transitions: Responses to Seven Criticisms,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1: 1 (2011) 24–40.
   Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels, “A Socio-Technical Analysis of Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing the Multi-Level Perspective into Transport Studies,” Journal of Transport Geography 24 (2012) 471–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels, “Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective,” Theory, Culture and Society 31: 5 (2014) 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels, F. Kern, G. Fuchs, N. Hinderer, G. Kungl, J. Mylan, M. Neukirch, and S. Wassermann, “The Enactment of Socio-Technical Transition Pathways: A Reformulated Typology and a Comparative Multi-Level Analysis of the German and UK Low-Carbon Electricity Transitions (1990–2014),” Research Policy 45: 4 (2016) 896–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels and J. Schot, “Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways,” Research Policy 36: 3 (2007) 399–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels, B. K. Sovacool, T. Schwanen, and S. Sorrell, “The Socio-Technical Dynamics of Low-Carbon Transitions,” Joule 1: 3 (2017a) 463–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. W. Geels, B. K. Sovacool, T. Schwanen, and S. Sorrell, “Sociotechnical Transitions for Deep Decarbonization,” Science 357: 6357 (2017b) 1242–1244.
   Google Scholar
• A. Genus and A.-M. Coles, “Rethinking the Multi-Level Perspective of Technological Transitions,” Research Policy 37: 9 (2008) 1436–1445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Goyal and M. Howlett, “Who Learns What in Sustainability Transitions?,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34 (2020) 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Graham and S. Marvin, Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places (New York: Routledge, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• H. Haarstad and T. I. Wanvik, “Carbonscapes and Beyond: Conceptualizing the Instability of Oil Landscapes,” Progress in Human Geography 41: 4 (2017) 432–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Haarstad and M. W. Wathne, “Are Smart City Projects Catalyzing Urban Energy Sustainability?” Energy Policy 129 (2019) 918–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Hansen and L. Coenen, “The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17 (2015) 92–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Harrison, B. Eckman, R. Hamilton, P. Hartswick, J. Kalagnanam, J. Paraszczak, and P. Williams, “Foundations for Smarter Cities,” IBM Journal of Research and Development 54: 4 (2010) 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. A. T. Hashem, V. Chang, N. B. Anuar, K. Adewole, I. Yaqoob, A. Gani, E. Ahmed, and H. Chiroma, “The Role of Big Data in Smart City,” International Journal of Information Management 36: 5 (2016) 748–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Hens, “The Challenge of the Sustainable City,” Environment, Development and Sustainability 12: 6 (2010) 875–876.
   Google Scholar
• M. Hodson and S. Marvin, “Can Cities Shape Socio-Technical Transitions and How Would We Know if They Were?” Research Policy 39: 4 (2010) 477–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hodson and S. Marvin, “Mediating Low-Carbon Urban Transitions? Forms of Organization, Knowledge and Action,” European Planning Studies 20: 3 (2012) 421–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. G. Hollands, “Critical Interventions into the Corporate Smart City,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 1 (2015) 61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ibrahim, A. El-Zaart, and C. Adams, “Smart Sustainable Cities Roadmap: Readiness for Transformation Towards Urban Sustainability,” Sustainable Cities and Society 37 (2018) 530–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Jenkins, B. K. Sovacool, and D. McCauley, “Humanizing Sociotechnical Transitions through Energy Justice: An Ethical Framework for Global Transformative Change,” Energy Policy 117 (2018) 66–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kemp, J. Schot, and R. Hoogma, “Regime Shifts to Sustainability through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management,” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10: 2 (1998) 175–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. H. Khan, M. N. Malik, R. Zafar, F. A. Goni, A. G. Chofreh, J. J. Klemeš, and Y. Alotaibi, “Challenges for Sustainable Smart City Development: A Conceptual Framework,” Sustainable Development (2020) 1–12, DOI:10.1002/sd.2090.
   Google Scholar
• T.-H. Kim, C. Ramos, and S. Mohammed, “Smart City and IoT,” Future Generation Computer Systems 76 (2017) 159–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kitchin, “Making Sense of Smart Cities: Addressing Present Shortcomings,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 1 (2015) 131–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Kivimaa, M. Hildén, D. Huitema, A. Jordan, and J. Newig, “Experiments in Climate Governance: A Systematic Review of Research on Energy and Built Environment Transitions,” Journal of Cleaner Production 169 (2017) 17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Komninos, M. Pallot, and H. Schaffers, “Special Issue on Smart Cities and the Future Internet in Europe,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4: 2 (2013) 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• J. H. Lee, M. G. Hancock, and M.-C. Hu, “Towards an Effective Framework for Building Smart Cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 89 (2014) 80–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Leszczynski, “Speculative Futures: Cities, Data, and Governance Beyond Smart Urbanism,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48: 9 (2016) 1691–1708.
   Google Scholar
• L. Leydesdorff and M. Deakin, “The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective,” Journal of Urban Technology 18: 2 (2011) 53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Loorbach, “Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework,” Governance 23: 1 (2010) 161–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. López-García, L. Calvet-Mir, M. Di Masso, and J. Espluga, “Multi-Actor Networks and Innovation Niches: University Training for Local Agroecological Dynamization,” Agriculture and Human Values 36: 3 (2019) 567–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.-P. Lu, C.-S. Chen, and H. Yu, “Technology Roadmap for Building a Smart City: An Exploring Study on Methodology,” Future Generation Computer Systems 97 (2019) 727–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Luque-Ayala and S. Marvin, “Developing a Critical Understanding of Smart Urbanism?” Urban Studies 52: 12 (2015) 2105–2116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Manning and J. Reinecke, “A Modular Governance Architecture In-The-Making: How Transnational Standard-Setters Govern Sustainability Transitions,” Research Policy 45: 3 (2016) 618–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Markard, R. Raven, and B. Truffer, “Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field Of Research and its Prospects,” Research Policy 41: 6 (2012) 955–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Markard, M. Hekkert, and S. Jacobsson, “The Technological Innovation Systems Framework: Response to Six Criticisms,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16 (2015) 76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Martin, J. Evans, A. Karvonen, K. Paskaleva, D. Yang, and T. Linjordet, “Smart-Sustainability: A New Urban Fix?” Sustainable Cities and Society 45 (2019) 640–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. Martin, J. Evans, and A. Karvonen, “Smart and Sustainable? Five Tensions in the Visions and Practices of the Smart-Sustainable City in Europe and North America,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 133 (2018) 269–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Marvin, A. Luque-Ayala, C. McFarlane, eds., Smart Urbanism: Utopian Vision or False Dawn? (New York City, NY: Routledge, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• A. Mcafee and E. Brynjolfsson, Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future (New York: WW Norton, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• A. Mehmood, “On the History and Potentials of Evolutionary Metaphors in Urban Planning,” Planning Theory 9: 1 (2010) 63–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. V. Michelucci, A. De Marco, and A. Tanda, “Defining the Role of the Smart-City Manager: An Analysis of Responsibilities and Skills,” Journal of Urban Technology 23: 3 (2016) 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Mitchell, City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995).
   Google Scholar
• W. Mitchell, ME++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• L. Mora and R. Bolici, “How to Become a Smart City: Learning from Amsterdam,” in A. Bisello, et al., eds, Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions: Results of SSPCR 2015 (Cham: Springer, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• L. Mora, R. Bolici, and M. Deakin, “The First Two Decades of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric Analysis,” Journal of Urban Technology 24: 1 (2017) 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Mora and M. Deakin, Untangling Smart Cities: From Utopian Dreams to Innovation Systems for a Technology-Enabled Urban Sustainability (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• L. Mora, M. Deakin, and A. Reid, “Combining Co-Citation Clustering and Text-Based Analysis to Reveal the Main Development Paths of Smart Cities,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142 (2019a) 56–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Mora, M. Deakin, and A. Reid, “Strategic Principles for Smart City Development: A Multiple Case Study Analysis of European Best Practices,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142 (2019b) 70–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. T. Murphy, “Human Geography and Socio-Technical Transition Studies: Promising Intersections,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17 (2015) 73–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. C. Nagorny-Koring and T. Nochta, “Managing Urban Transitions in Theory And Practice: The Case of the Pioneer Cities and Transition Cities Projects,” Journal of Cleaner Production 175 (2018) 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Nagy, J. D. Farmer, Q. M. Bui, and J. E. Trancik, “Statistical Basis for Predicting Technological Progress,” PLOS ONE 8: 2 (2013) e52669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Nciri and A. Levenda, “Urban Policy (Im)mobilities and Refractory Policy Lessons: Experimenting with the Sustainability Fix,” Urban Geography (2019) 1–21, DOI:10.1080/02723638.2019.1575154
   Google Scholar
• P. Neirotti, A. De Marco, A. C. Cagliano, G. Mangano, and F. Scorrano, “Current Trends in Smart City Initiatives: Some Stylised Facts,” Cities 38 (2014) 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Niebel, “ICT and Economic Growth: Comparing Developing, Emerging and Developed Countries,” World Development, 104 (2018) 197–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. North and N. Longhurst, “Grassroots Localisation? The Scalar Potential of and Limits of the ‘Transition’ Approach to Climate Change and Resource Constraint,” Urban Studies 50: 7 (2013) 1423–1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Parks, “Energy Efficiency Left Behind? Policy Assemblages in Sweden’s Most Climate-Smart City,” European Planning Studies 27: 2 (2019) 318–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Paroutis, M. Bennett, and L. Heracleous, “A Strategic View on Smart City Technology: The Case of IBM Smarter Cities during a Recession,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 89 (2014) 262–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. P. Patorniti, N. J. Stevens, and P. M. Salmon, “A Sociotechnical Systems Approach to Understand Complex Urban Systems: A Global Transdisciplinary Perspective,” Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing and Service Industries 28: 6 (2018) 281–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Pesch, “Tracing Discursive Space: Agency and Change in Sustainability Transitions,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 90 (2015) 379–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Petrova, D. Posova, A. House, and L. Sykora, “Discursive Framings of Low Carbon Urban Transitions: The Contested Geographies of ‘Satellite Settlements’ in the Czech Republic,” Urban Studies 50: 7 (2013) 1439–1455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.C. Pinder, L.F. Moore, eds, Middle Range Theory and the Study of Organizations (Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, 1980).
   Google Scholar
• N. P. Rana, S. Luthra, S. K. Mangla, R. Islam, S. Roderick, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Barriers to the Development of Smart Cities in Indian Context,” Information Systems Frontiers 21: 3 (2019) 503–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Rauschmayer, T. Bauler, and N. Schäpke, “Towards a Thick Understanding of Sustainability Transitions: Linking Transition Management, Capabilities and Social Practices,” Ecological Economics 109 (2015) 211–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Raven, J. Schot, and F. Berkhout, “Space and Scale in Socio-Technical Transitions,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 4 (2012) 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• R. Raven, F. Sengers, P. Spaeth, L. Xie, A. Cheshmehzangi, and M. De Jong, “Urban Experimentation and Institutional Arrangements,” European Planning Studies 27: 2 (2019) 258–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. V. Reid, D. Chen, L. Goldfarb, H. Hackmann, Y. T. Lee, K. Mokhele, E. Ostrom, K. Raivio, J. Rockstrom, H. J. Schellnhuber, and A. Whyte, “Earth System Science for Global Sustainability: Grand Challenges,” Science 330: 6006 (2010) 916–917.
   Google Scholar
• A. Rip and R. Kemp, “Technological Change,” in S. Rayner and E. Malone, eds, Human Choice and Climate Change (Columbus, OH: Battelle Press, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• J. Rutherford and O. Coutard, “Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change,” Urban Studies 51: 7 (2014) 1353–1377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Schaffers, N. Komninos, M. Pallot, B. Trousse, M. Nilsson, and A. Oliveira, “Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation,” in J. Domingue, et al., eds, The Future Internet: Future Internet Assembly 2011: Achievements and Technological Promises (Cham: Springer, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• J. Schot and L. Kanger, “Deep Transitions: Emergence, Acceleration, Stabilization and Directionality,” Research Policy 47: 6 (2018) 1045–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. E. Sepasgozar, S. Hawken, S. Sargolzaei, and M. Foroozanfa, “Implementing Citizen Centric Technology in Developing Smart Cities: A Model for Predicting the Acceptance of Urban Technologies,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142 (2019) 105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Shelton, M. Zook, and A. Wiig, “The ‘Actually Existing Smart City’,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 1 (2015) 13–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Shove and G. Walker, “Governing Transitions in the Sustainability of Everyday Life,” Research Policy 39: 4 (2010) 471–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Simmons, J. E. D. Giraldo, Y. Truong, and M. Palmer, “Uncovering the Link Between Governance as an Innovation Process and Socio-Economic Regime Transition in Cities,” Research Policy 47: 1 (2018) 241–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Smith, J.-P. Voß, and J. Grin, “Innovation Studies and Sustainability Transitions: The Allure of the Multi-Level Perspective and its Challenges,” Research Policy 39: 4 (2010) 435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Söderström, T. Paasche, and F. R. Klauser, “Smart Cities as Corporate Storytelling,” City 18: 3 (2014) 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• B. K. Sovacool, “How Long Will It Take? Conceptualizing the Temporal Dynamics of Energy Transitions,” Energy Research and Social Science 13 (2016) 202–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Späth and H. Rohracher, “Energy Regions: The Transformative Power of Regional Discourses on Socio-Technical Futures,” Research Policy 39: 4 (2010) 449–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Timeus, J. Vinaixa, and F. Pardo-Bosch, “Creating Business Models for Smart Cities: A Practical Framework,” Public Management Review 22: 5 (2020) 726–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. M. Townsend, Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia (New York: WW Norton, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• G. Trencher, “Towards the Smart City 2.0: Empirical Evidence of Using Smartness as a Tool for Tackling Social Challenges,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142 (2019) 117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Truffer and L. Coenen, “Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies,” Regional Studies 46: 1 (2012) 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Truffer, J. T. Murphy, and R. Raven, “The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Contours of an Emerging Theme,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17 (2015) 63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations, The UN High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development, under the auspicies of the General Assembly (SDG Summit). 24–25 September 2019, UNHQ, New York. Summary of the President of the General Assembly (New York City: United Nations, 2019) <https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/25200SDG_Summary.pdf> Accessed June 16, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• A.-M. Valdez, M. Cook, and S. Potter, “Roadmaps to Utopia: Tales of the Smart City,” Urban Studies 55: 15 (2018) 3385–3403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Vallance, M. Tewdwr-Jones, and L. Kempton, “Building Collaborative Platforms for Urban Innovation: Newcastle City Futures as a Quadruple Helix Intermediary,” European Urban and Regional Studies 27: 4 (2020) 325–341, DOI:10.1177/0969776420905630.
   Google Scholar
• D. Van Den Buuse and A. Kolk, “An Exploration of Smart City Approaches by International ICT Firms,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142 (2019) 220–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Van Winden and D. Van Den Buuse, “Smart City Pilot Projects: Exploring the Dimensions and Conditions of Scaling Up,” Journal of Urban Technology 24: 4 (2017) 51–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Van Zoonen, “Privacy Concerns in Smart Cities,” Government Information Quarterly 33: 3 (2016) 472–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Viitanen and R. Kingston, “Smart Cities and Green Growth: Outsourcing Democratic and Environmental Resilience to the Global Technology Sector,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46: 4 (2014) 803–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Voordijk and S. Dorrestijn, “Smart City Technologies and Figures of Technical Mediation,” Urban Research and Practice (2019) 1–26, DOI:10.1080/17535069.2019.1634141.
   Google Scholar
• N. Walravens, “Mobile City Applications for Brussels Citizens: Smart City Trends, Challenges and a Reality Check,” Telematics and Informatics 32: 2 (2015) 282–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Watson, “The Allure of ‘Smart City’ Rhetoric,” Dialogues in Human Geography 5: 1 (2015) 36–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Welch, R. Piekkari, E. Plakoyiannaki, and E. Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, “Theorising from Case Studies: Towards a Pluralist Future for International Business Research,” Journal of International Business Studies 42: 5 (2011) 740–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Whitmarsh, “How Useful is the Multi-Level Perspective for Transport and Sustainability Research?” Journal of Transport Geography 24 (2012) 483–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Wiig, “IBM’s Smart City as Techno-Utopian Policy Mobility,” City 19: 2-3 (2015) 258–273.
   Google Scholar
• R. Williams and D. Edge, “The Social Shaping Of Technology,” Research Policy 25: 6 (1996) 865–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. B. Wironen and J. D. Erickson, “A Critically Modern Ecological Economics for the Anthropocene,” The Anthropocene Review 7: 1 (2020) 62–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Zanella, N. Bui, A. Castellani, L. Vangelista, and M. Zorzi, “Internet of Things for Smart Cities,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal 1: 1 (2014) 22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. W. Zuzul, “‘Matter Battles’: Cognitive Representations, Boundary Objects, and the Failure of Collaboration in Two Smart Cities,” Academy of Management Journal 62: 3 (2019) 739–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar