Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Sustainable Urban Innovation: An Ambidexterity Perspective toward Smart Cities

References

• H. Ahvenniemi, A. Huovila, I. Pinto-Seppä, and M. Airaksinen, “What Are the Differences Between Sustainable and Smart Cities?” Cities 60 (2017) 234–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Albino, U. Berardi, and R. Dangelico, “Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives,” Journal of Urban Technology 22: 1 (2015) 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Allwinkle and P. Cruickshank, “Creating Smart-er Cities: An Overview,” Journal of Urban Technology 18: 2 (2011) 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Amores-Salvadó, G. Martin-de Castro, and J. Navas-López, “The Importance of the Complementarity Between Environmental Management Systems and Environmental Innovation Capabilities: A Firm Level Approach to Environmental and Business Performance Benefits,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 96 (2015) 288–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Andriopoulos and M. Lewis, “Exploitation–Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation,” Organization Science 20: 4 (2009) 696–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Angelidou, “Smart City Policies: A Spatial Approach,” Cities 41 (2014) 3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Appio, M. Lima, and S. Paroutis, “Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation Ecosystems, Technological Advancements, and Societal Challenges,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142 (2019) 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Baden-Fuller and S. Haefliger, “Business Models and Technological Innovation,” Long Range Planning 46: 6 (2013) 419–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Bakıcı, E. Almirall, and J. Wareham, “A Smart City Initiative: The Case of Barcelona,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4: 2 (2013) 135–148.
   Google Scholar
• C. Baldwin and E. Von Hippel, “Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation,” Organization Science 22: 6 (2011) 1399–1417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Benner and M. Tushman, “Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited,” Academy of Management Review 28: 2 (2003) 238–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Birkinshaw and C. Gibson, “Building Ambidexterity into an Organization,” MIT Sloan Management Review 45: 4 (2004) 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• H. Bulkeley and K. McCormick, “Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions: Advancing the Role of Living Labs: JPI Urban Europe,” Impact 4 (2018) 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• H. Bulkeley and V. Castán Broto, “Government by Experiment? Global Cities and the Governing of Climate Change,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38: 3 (2013) 361–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Broto and H. Bulkeley, “Maintaining Climate Change Experiments: Urban Political Ecology and the Everyday Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37: 6 (2013) 1934–1948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Caragliu, C. Del Bo, and P. Nijkamp, “Smart Cities in Europe,” Journal of Urban Technology 18: 2 (2011) 65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Chesbrough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology (Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Press, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• L. Cooley and R. Kohl, Scaling Up From Vision to Large-Scale Change: A Management Framework for Practitioners (Washington DC: Management Systems International, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• M. De Jong, S. Joss, D. Schraven, C. Zhan, and M. Weijnen, “Sustainable–Smart–Resilient–Low Carbon–Eco–Knowledge Cities; Making Sense of a Multitude of Concepts Promoting Sustainable Urbanization,” Journal of Cleaner Production 109 (2015) 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte, Monitor Deloitte. Smart Cities … Not Just the Sum of its Parts (New York: Deloitte, 2015) <https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/xe/Documents/strategy/me_deloitte-monitor_smart-cities.pdf> Accessed October 10, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• E. Enkel, O. Gassmann, and H. Chesbrough, “Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon,” R&D Management 39: 4 (2009) 311–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC), Mapping Smart Cities in the EU (Brussels: European Commission, 2014) <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2014/507480/IPOL-ITRE_ET(2014)507480_EN.pdf> Accessed October 10, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• J. Evans and A. Karvonen, “Living Laboratories for Sustainability,” in eds. H. Bulkeley, V. Broto, M. Hodson, and S. Marvin, Cities and Low Carbon Transitions (London: Routledge, 2010) 126–141.
   Google Scholar
• J. Evans, A. Karvonen, and R. Raven, eds, The Experimental City (London: Routledge, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• L. Fuenfschilling, N. Frantzeskaki, and L. Coenen, “Urban Experimentation & Sustainability Transitions,” European Planning Studies 27: 2 (2019) 219–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Gibson and J. Birkinshaw, “The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity,” Academy of Management Journal 47: 2 (2004) 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Giffinger, C. Fertner, H. Kramar, R. Kalasek, N. Pichler-Milanovic, and E. Meijers, Smart Cities - Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities (Vienna: Centre of Regional Science, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• J. Gil-Garcia, T. Pardo, and T. Nam, “What Makes a City Smart? Identifying Core Components and Proposing an Integrative and Comprehensive Conceptualization,” Information Polity 20: 1 (2015) 61–87.
   Google Scholar
• D. Grimaldi and V. Fernandez, “The Alignment of University Curricula with the Building of a Smart City: A Case Study From Barcelona,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 123 (2017) 298–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Grossi and D. Pianezzi, “Smart Cities: Utopia or Neoliberal Ideology?” Cities 69 (2017) 79–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gupta, K. Smith, and C. Shalley, “The Interplay Between Exploration and Exploitation,” Academy of Management Journal 49: 4 (2006) 693–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Hartmann and J. Linn, “Scaling Up: A Framework and Lessons for Development Effectiveness from Literature and Practice,” Wolfensohn Center for Development (2008) <https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/10_scaling_up_aid_linn.pdf > Accessed April 1, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• H. Hielkema and P. Hongisto, “Developing the Helsinki Smart City: The Role of Competitions for Open Data Applications,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4: 2 (2013) 190–204.
   Google Scholar
• J. Jansen, F. Van Den Bosch, and H. Volberda, “Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators,” Management Science 52: 11 (2006) 1661–1674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Janssen, L. Anthopoulos, and V. Weerakkody, “A Unified Smart City Model (USCM) for Smart City Conceptualization and Benchmarking,” International Journal of Electronic Government Research 12: 2 (2016) 77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Joss, M. Cook, and Y. Dayot, “Smart Cities: Towards a New Citizenship Regime? A Discourse Analysis of the British Smart City Standard,” Journal of Urban Technology 24: 4 (2017) 29–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kern, “Cities as Leaders in EU Multilevel Climate Governance: Embedded Upscaling of Local Experiments in Europe,” Environmental Politics 28: 1 (2019) 125–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kitchin, “Reframing, Reimagining and Remaking Smart Cities,” 219–230. In: Creating Smart Cities (London: Routledge, 2018)
   Google Scholar
• N. Komninos and L. Mora, “Exploring the Big Picture of Smart City Research,” Scienze Regionali: Italian Journal of Regional Science 1 (2018) 15–38.
   Google Scholar
• KPN, KPN Lokale Overheid – Meer Maatschappelijk Rendement als Smart City (Rotterdam: KPN, 2014) <http://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/Uploads/2014/12/KPN-Lokale-Overheid-INFO-december-2014.pdf> Accessed June 1, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• KPN, De Verbonden Samenleving in de Slimme Stad (Rotterdam: KPN, 2015) <https://images.direct-email.nl/direct-email.nl/static/201501_Ebook/Whitepaper_Smart_cities_A4_interactief.pdf> Accessed June 1, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• KPN, The Technology Book V1 (Rotterdam: KPN, 2016) <https://www.kivi.nl/uploads/media/5a9539b06a1dc/1474897928_KPN_Technology_Book_2016.pdf> Accessed June 1, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• KPN, Smart Cities: Een Veranderende Wereld, Nieuwe Technologie, en Maatschappelijke Paradigma’s (Rotterdam: KPN, 2016) <https://overons.kpn/content/downloads/KPN_WHITEPAPER_SMART-CITIES.pdf> Accessed June 1, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• KPN, The Technology Book V2 (Rotterdam: KPN, 2018a) <https://overons.kpn/content/downloads/KPN012-10-Technology-book-2nd-edition-interactive-0304_180504_095030.pdf> Accessed June 1, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• KPN, Succesvol Starten met Internet of Things (Rotterdam: KPN, 2018b) <https://marketing.kpn.com/images/KPN_ZM/LCE/klant/iot18/downloads/Whitepaper_KPN-Succesvol_starten_met_IoT.PDF?campaignid=em:d=01011900:mk=zm:cn=:ds=kpn_gz_lm+whitepaper+downloadpage_prod:typ=service:pos=200> Accessed June 1, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• KPN, Stakeholderdialoog 2018 – Go Digital, Stay Human (Rotterdam: KPN, 2018c) <https://overons.kpn/content/downloads/Report-Stakeholder-Dialogue-2018-Smart-Cities-Eng.pdf> Accessed June 1, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• KPN, KPN Data Services Hub (Rotterdam: KPN, n.d.) <https://marketing.kpn.com/images/KPN_ZM/LCE/whitepapers/pdf/M180333%20SALESKIT%20DATA%20SERVICES%20HUB_CF_V8.pdf?campaignid=em:d=01011900:mk=zm:cn=:ds=kpn_gz_lm+whitepaper+downloadpage_prod:typ=service:pos=200> Accessed June 1, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• S. Latre, P. Leroux, T. Coenen, B. Braem, P. Ballon, and P. Demeester, “City of Things: An Integrated and Multi-Technology Testbed for IoT Smart City Experiments,” IEEE International Smart Cities Conference Trento, Italy (September 12–15, 2016) 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• K. Laursen and A. Salter, “Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance Among UK Manufacturing Firms,” Strategic Management Journal 27: 2 (2006) 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Lazzarotti and R. Manzini, “Different Modes of Open Innovation: A Theoretical Framework and an Empirical Study,” International Journal of Innovation Management 13: 4 (2009) 615–636.
   Google Scholar
• S. Leminen, M. Westerlund, and A. Nyström, “Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks,” Technology Innovation Management Review 2: 9 (2012) 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Lin, H. Yang, and I. Demirkan, “The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations: Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing,” Management Science 53: 10 (2007) 1645–1658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. March, “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” Organization Science 2: 1 (1991) 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Marvin, H. Bulkeley, L. Mai, K. McCormick, and Y. Palgan, eds, Urban Living Labs: Experimenting with City Futures (London: Routledge, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• S. Marvin and J. Silver, “The Urban Laboratory and Emerging Sites of Urban Experimentation,” in eds. J. Evans, A. Karvonen, and R. Raven, The Experimental City (London: Routledge, 2016) 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• A. Meijer and M. Bolívar, “Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance,” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82: 2 (2016) 392–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mina, E. Bascavusoglu-Moreau, and A. Hughes, “Open Service Innovation and the Firm's Search for External Knowledge,” Research Policy 43: 5 (2014) 853–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Mora, R. Bolici, and M. Deakin, “The First Two Decades of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric Analysis,” Journal of Urban Technology 24: 1 (2017) 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Mora and M. Deakin, Untangling Smart Cities: From Utopian Dreams to Innovation Systems for a Technology-Enabled Urban Sustainability (London: Elsevier, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• F. Nevens, N. Frantzeskaki, L. Gorissen, and D. Loorbach, “Urban Transition Labs: Co-Creating Transformative Action for Sustainable Cities,” Journal of Cleaner Production 50 (2013) 111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. O’Reilly and M. Tushman, “Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future,” The Academy of Management Perspectives 27: 4 (2013) 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Paroutis, M. Bennett, and L. Heracleous, “A Strategic View on Smart City Technology: The Case of IBM Smarter Cities During a Recession,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 89 (2014) 262–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Paskaleva “The Smart City: A Nexus for Open Innovation?” Intelligent Buildings International 3: 3 (2011) 153–171.
   Google Scholar
• J. Pinkse and D. van den Buuse, The Development and Commercialization of Solar PV Technology in the Oil Industry,” Energy Policy 40 (2012) 11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Raven, “Niche Accumulation and Hybridization Strategies in Transition Processes Towards a Sustainable Energy System: An Assessment of Differences and Pitfalls,” Energy Policy 35: 4 (2007) 2390–2400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Raisch, J. Birkinshaw, G. Probst, and M. Tushman, “Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance,” Organization Science 20: 4 (2009) 685–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Rothaermel and D. Deeds, “Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development,” Strategic Management Journal 25: 3 (2004) 201–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Schaffers, N. Komninos, M. Pallot, B. Trousse, M. Nilsson, and A. Oliveira, “Smart Cities and The Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation,” The Future Internet (2011) 431–446.
   Google Scholar
• V. Scuotto, A. Ferraris, and S. Bresciani, “Internet of Things: Applications and Challenges in Smart Cities: A Case Study of IBM Smart City Projects,” Business Process Management Journal 22: 2 (2016) 357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Sengers, P. Späth, and R. Raven, “Smart City Construction: Towards an Analytical Framework for Smart Urban Living Labs,” in eds., S. Marvin, H. Bulkeley, L. Mai, K. McCormick, and Y. Voytenko Palgan. Urban Living Labs (London: Routledge, 2018) 88–102.
   Google Scholar
• B. Silva, M. Khan, and K. Han, “Towards Sustainable Smart Cities: A Review of Trends, Architectures, Components, and Open Challenges in Smart Cities,” Sustainable Cities and Society 38 (2018) 697–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Söderström, T. Paasche, and F. Klauser, “Smart Cities as Corporate Storytelling,” City 18: 3 (2014) 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• D. van den Buuse and A. Kolk, “An Exploration of Smart City Approaches by International ICT Firms,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142 (2019) 220–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. van Winden and D. van den Buuse, “Smart City Pilot Projects: Exploring the Dimensions and Conditions of Scaling Up,” Journal of Urban Technology 24: 4 (2017) 51–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. van Winden, I. Oskam, D. van den Buuse, W. Schrama, and E. Van Dijck, Organizing Smart City Projects: Lessons From Amsterdam (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• T. Von Wirth, L. Fuenfschilling, N. Frantzeskaki, and L. Coenen, “Impacts of Urban Living Labs on Sustainability Transitions: Mechanisms and Strategies for Systemic Change Through Experimentation,” European Planning Studies 27: 2 (2019) 229–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Voytenko, K. McCormick, J. Evans, and G. Schliwa, “Urban Living Labs for Sustainability and Low Carbon Cities in Europe: Towards a Research Agenda,” Journal of Cleaner Production 123 (2016) 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN), World Urbanization Prospects (New York: United Nations, 2014) <https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.pdf> Accessed March 20, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• P. Uvin, “Fighting Hunger at the Grassroots: Paths to Scaling Up,” World Development 23: 6 (1995) 927–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. West and M. Bogers, “Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 31: 4 (2014) 814–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. West and M. Bogers, “Open Innovation: Current Status and Research Opportunities,” Innovation 19: 1 (2017) 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. West, A. Salter, W. Vanhaverbeke, and H. Chesbrough, “Open Innovation: The Next Decade,” Research Policy 43 (2014) 805–811.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, Reducing Poverty on a Global Scale (Washington DC: World Bank, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, Practical Guidance for Scaling Up Health Service Innovations (Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• T. Yigitcanlar, M. Kamruzzaman, L. Buys, G. Ioppolo, J. Sabatini-Marques, E. Da Costa, and J. Yun, “Understanding ‘Smart Cities’: Intertwining Development Drivers with Desired Outcomes in a Multidimensional Framework,” Cities 81 (2018) 145–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Zanella, N. Bui, A. Castellani, L. Vangelista, and M. Zorzi, “Internet of Things for Smart Cities,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal 1: 1 (2014) 22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar