Planning First, Tools Second: Evaluating the Evolving Roles of Planning Support Systems in Urban Planning

References

• N. Afzalan and B. Muller, “Online Participatory Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges for Enriching Participatory Planning,” Journal of the American Planning Association 84: 2 (2018) 162–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.R. Alexander, “After Rationality, What? A Review of Responses to Paradigm Breakdown,” Journal of the American Planning Association 50: 1 (1984) 62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.R. Alexander, “Rationality Revisited: Planning Paradigms in a Post-Postmodernist Perspective,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19: 3 (2000): 242–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Alexander, “After Rationality: Towards a Contingency Theory for Planning,” in eds., S. Mandelbaum, S. Mazza, and R. Burchell, Explorations in Planning Theory (New York: Routledge, 2017) 45–64.
   Google Scholar
• C. Ansell and J. Torfing, eds., Handbook on Theories of Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• A. Anttiroiko, “Digital Urban Planning Platforms: The Interplay of Digital and Local Embeddedness in Urban Planning,” International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR) 10: 3 (2021) 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• M. Batty, K. W. Axhausen, F. Giannotti, A. Pozdnoukhov, A. Bazzani, M. Wachowicz, G. Ouzounis, and Y. Portugali, “Smart Cities of the Future,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics 214: 1 (2012) 481–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Beauregard, “Planning Practice,” Urban Geography 7: 2 (1986) 172–178.
   Google Scholar
• R.A. Beauregard, “Progress Report: The Object of Planning,” Urban Geography 8: 4 (1987) 367–373.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Bernstein, The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1976).
   Google Scholar
• S Biermann, “Planning Support Systems in a Multi-Dualistic Spatial Planning Context,” Journal of Urban Technology 18: 4 (2011) 5–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. D. Bishop, “Planning Support: Hardware and Software in Search of a System,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 22: 3 (1998) 189–202.
   Google Scholar
• R.K. Brail, Microcomputers in Urban Planning (New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, 1987).
   Google Scholar
• M. T. Brömmelstroet and P. M. Schrijnen, “From Planning Support Systems to Mediated Planning Support: A Structured Dialogue to Overcome the Implementation Gap,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37: 1 (2010) 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• G.A. Chadwick, A Systems View of Planning (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1971).
   Google Scholar
• G. De Roo and J. Hillier, Complexity and Planning: Systems, Assemblages, and Simulations (New York: Routledge, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• B. Deal, H. Pan, V. Pallathucheril, and G. Fulton, “Urban Resilience and Planning Support Systems: The Need for Sentience,” Journal of Urban Technology 24: 1 (2017) 29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.J. Densham and G. Rushton, “Decision Support Systems for Locational Planning,” in R. G. College and H. Timmermaus, eds., Behavioural Modelling in Geography and Planning (London: Croom Helm, 1988).
   Google Scholar
• S. Fainstein, “New Directions in Planning Theory,” Urban Affairs Review 35: 4 (2000) 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Fainstein, The Just City (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• A. Faludi, “Introduction: What is Planning Theory,” in A. Faludi, ed., A Reader in Planning Theory (Oxford: Pergamon, 1973).
   Google Scholar
• J. Flacke, S. Rehana, and A. Rosa, “Strengthening Participation Using Interactive Planning Support Systems: A Systematic Review,” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9: 1 (2020) 49.
   Google Scholar
• J. Friedmann, Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987).
   Google Scholar
• J. Friedmann and A. Sorensen, “City Unbound: Emerging Mega-Conurbations in Asia,” International Planning Studies 24: 1 (2019) 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Geertman, “Participatory Planning and GIS: A PSS to Bridge the Gap,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29: 1 (2002) 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Geertman, “Potentials for Planning Support: A Planning-Conceptual Approach,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33: 6 (2006) 863–880.
   Google Scholar
• S. Geertman, “Planning Support Systems: A Planner’s Perspective,” in K.B Richard, eds., Planning Support Systems for Cities and Regions (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• S. Geertman, “PSS: Beyond the Implementation Gap,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 104: (2017) 70–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Geertman and J. Stillwell, “Planning Support Systems: An Inventory of Current Practice,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28: 4 (2004) 291–310.
   Google Scholar
• S. Geertman and J. Stillwell, Handbook of Planning Support Science (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• S. Geertman, F. Toppen, and J. Stillwell, Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development (London: Springer, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• G. Gorry and M. Scott Morton, A Framework for Management Information Systems (Boston, MA: MIT Press, 1971).
   Google Scholar
• B. Harris, “Plan or Projection: An Examination of the Use of Models in Planning,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 26: 4 (1960) 265–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Harris, “Beyond Geographic Information Systems,” Journal of the American Planning Association 55: 1 (1989) 85–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Hartmann and S. Geertman, “Planning Theory,” in eds. C. Ansell and J. Torfing, Handbook on Theories of Governance (UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016) 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• B. Harris and M. Batty, “Locational Models, Geographic Information and Planning Support Systems,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 12: 3 (1993) 184–198.
   Google Scholar
• P. Healey, Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (London: Macmillan International Higher Education, 1997).
   Google Scholar
• P. Healey, “The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 28: 3 (2009) 277–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Holgersen, “Spatial Planning as Condensation of Social Relations: A Dialectical Approach,” Planning Theory 14: 1 (2015) 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. D. Hopkins, “Progress and Prospects for Planning Support Systems,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25: 7 (1998) 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• B. M. Hudson, T. D. Galloway, and J. L. Kaufman, “Comparison of Current Planning Theories: Counterparts and Contradictions,” Journal of the American Planning Association 45: 4 (1979) 387–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. E. Huxhold, An Introduction to Urban Geographic Information Systems (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991).
   Google Scholar
• J. E. Innes, Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 14: 3 (1995)183–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. E. Innes and D. E. Booher, Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy (Abingdon: Routledge, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• H. Jiang, Smart Urban Governance: Governing Cities in the “Smart” Era (Utrecht: Utrecht University, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• H. Jiang, S. Geertman, and P. Witte, “Smart Urban Governance: An Urgent Symbiosis?” Information Polity 24: 3 (2019) 245–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Jiang, S. Geertman, and P. Witte, “Avoiding the Planning Support System Pitfalls? What Smart Governance can Learn from the Planning Support System Implementation Gap,” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47: 8 (2020a) 1343–1360.
   Google Scholar
• H. Jiang, S. Geertman, and P. Witte, “Smart Urban Governance: An Alternative to Technocratic ‘Smartness’,” GeoJournal (2020b) 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10326-w
   Google Scholar
• H. Jiang, S. Geertman, and P. Witte, “Smartening Urban Governance: An Evidence-Based Perspective,” Regional Science Policy and Practice 13: 3 (2021a) 744–758.
   Google Scholar
• H. Jiang, S. Geertman, and P. Witte, “The Effects of Contextual Factors on PSS Usefulness: An International Questionnaire Survey,” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 14: 2 (2021b) 221–245.
   Google Scholar
• M. P. Johnson, J. B. Hollander, and E. D. Whiteman, “Data and Analytics for Neighborhood Development: Smart Shrinkage Decision Modeling in Baltimore, Maryland,” in S. Geertman, J. Ferreira, R. Goodspeed, and J. Stillwell, eds., Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities (Berlin: Springer, 2015) 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• M. J. Kiernan, “Ideology, Politics, and Planning: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Urban Planning,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 10: 1 (1983) 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• R. E. Klosterman, “Large-Scale Urban Models Retrospect and Prospect,” Journal of the American Planning Association 60: 1 (1994) 3–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. B. Lane, “Public Participation in Planning: An Intellectual History,” Australian Geographer 36: 3 (2005) 283–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. B. Lee Jr, “Requiem for Large-Scale Models,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 39: 3 (1973) 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• S. McEvoy, F. H. van de Ven, A. G. Santander, and J. H. Slinger, “The Influence of Context on the Use and Added Value of Planning Support Systems in Workshops: An Exploratory Case Study of Climate Adaptation Planning in Guayaquil, Ecuador,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 77: (2019) 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• P. Newman and A. Thornley, Planning World Cities: Globalization and Urban Politics (New York: Macmillan International Higher Education, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering (San Diego: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993).
   Google Scholar
• S. Openshaw, “Towards A New Planning System for the 1990s and Beyond,” Planning Outlook 29: 2 (1986) 66–70.
   Google Scholar
• C. Otioma, A. M. Madureira, and J. Martinez, “Spatial Analysis of Urban Digital Divide in Kigali, Rwanda,” GeoJournal 84: 3 (2019) 719–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Papa, P. Coppola, G. Angiello, and G. Carpentieri, “The Learning Process of Accessibility Instrument Developers: Testing the Tools in Planning Practice,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 104: (2017) 108–120.
   Google Scholar
• H. Pan and B. Deal, “Reporting on the Performance and Usability of Planning Support Systems—Towards a Common Understanding,” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 13: 1 (2020) 137–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Pelzer, Usefulness of Planning Support Systems: Conceptual Perspectives and Practitioners’ Experiences (Utrecht: InPlanning, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• P. Pelzer, “Usefulness of Planning Support Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Empirical Illustration,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 104: (2017) 84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Pettit, A. Bakelmun, S. Lieske, S. Glackin, G. Thomson, H. Shearer, H. Dia, and P. Newman, “Planning Support Systems for Smart Cities,” City, Culture and Society 12: (2018) 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• J. Pick, B. James, S. Avijit, and J. Jeremy, “United States Digital Divide: State Level Analysis of Spatial Clustering and Multivariate Determinants of ICT Utilization,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 49: (2015) 16–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. W. Rittel and M. M. Webber, “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning,” Policy Sciences 4: 2 (1973) 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. D. Rugg, “A Feature-Based Planning Support System,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 16: 3 (1992) 219–226.
   Google Scholar
• P. Russo, R. Lanzilotti, M. F. Costabile, and C. J. Pettit, “Towards Satisfying Practitioners in Using Planning Support Systems,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 67: (2018) 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Shiode, “Urban Planning, Information Technology, and Cyberspace,” Journal of Urban Technology 7: 2 (2000) 105–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Silva, L. Bertolini, M. te Brömmelstroet, D. Milakis, and E. Papa, “Accessibility Instruments in Planning Practice: Bridging the Implementation Gap,” Transport Policy 53: (2017) 135–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Stratigea, P. Chrysaida-Aliki, and M. Panagiotopoulou, “Tools and Technologies for Planning the Development of Smart Cities,” Journal of Urban Technology 22: 2 (2015) 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. te Brömmelstroet, “Equip the Warrior Instead of Manning the Equipment: Land Use and Transport Planning Support in the Netherlands,” Journal of Transport and Land Use 3: 1 (2010) 25–41.
   Google Scholar
• M. te Brömmelstroet, “Performance of Planning Support Systems: What is It, and How Do We Report on It?” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 41: (2013) 299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. te Brömmelstroet, “Towards a Pragmatic Research Agenda for the PSS Domain,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 104: (2017a) 77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. te Brömmelstroet, “PSS are More User-Friendly, But are They also Increasingly Useful?” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 104: (2017b) 96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Tomor and S. Geertman, “The Influence of Political Context on Smart Governance Initiatives in Glasgow, Utrecht, and Curitiba,” in eds. S. Geertman and J. Stillwell, Handbook of Planning Support Science (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020) 238–256.
   Google Scholar
• G. Vonk, “Improving Planning Support: The Use of Planning Support Systems for Spatial Planning (Utrecht: KNAG/Netherlands Geographical Studies, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• G. Vonk and S. Geertman, “Improving the Adoption and Use of Planning Support Systems in Practice,” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 1: 3 (2008) 153–173.
   Google Scholar
• G. Vonk, S. Geertman, and P. Schot, “A SWOT Analysis of Planning Support Systems,” Environment and Planning A 39: 7 (2007) 1699–1714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Vonk and A. Ligtenberg, “Socio-Technical PSS Development to Improve Functionality and Usability—Sketch Planning Using a Maptable,” Landscape and Urban Planning 94: 3–4 (2010) 166–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. Webster, “GIS and the Scientific Inputs to Urban Planning. Part 1: Description,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20: 6 (1993) 709–728.
   Google Scholar
• J. F. Wolfswinkel, E. Furtmueller, and C. Wilderom, “Using Grounded Theory as a Method for Rigorously Reviewing Literature,” European Journal of Information Systems 22: 1 (2013) 45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar