Exploring the User Base of Online Neighborhood Networks: Determinants of Online Neighborhood Network Membership and Uses

References

• N. Afzalan and J. Evans-Cowley, “Planning and Social Media: Facebook for Planning at the Neighbourhood Scale,” Planning Practice and Research 30: 3 (2015) 270–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Albanesi, E. Cicognani, and B. Zani, “Sense of Community, Civic Engagement and Social Well-Being in Italian Adolescents,” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 17: 5 (2007) 387–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. J. Ball-Rokeach, Y.-C. Kim, and S. Matei, “Storytelling Neighborhood Paths to Belonging in Diverse Urban Environments,” Communication Research 28: 4 (2001) 392–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. van den Berg, T. Arentze, and H. Timmermans, “A Multilevel Analysis of Factors Influencing Local Social Interaction,” Transportation 42: 5 (2015) 807–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Bingham-Hall and S. Law, “Connected or Informed? Local Twitter Networking in a London Neighbourhood,” Big Data and Society 2: 2 (2015) 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• J. M. Booth, Y.-R. Lin, and K. Wei, “Neighborhood Disadvantage, Residents’ Distress, and Online Social Communication: Harnessing Twitter Data to Examine Neighborhood Effects,” Journal of Community Psychology 46: 7 (2018) 829–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. G. Bouko and L. Calabrese, “« T’es un Vrai … Si …  » : Quand les Seniors Aiment leur Ville Au Sein de Groupes Facebook,” Canadian Journal of Communication 42: 2 (2017) 311–330.
   Google Scholar
• N. R. Buchan, R. T. A. Croson, and R. M. Dawes, “Swift Neighbors and Persistent Strangers: A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Trust and Reciprocity in Social Exchange,” American Journal of Sociology 108: 1 (2002) 168–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. S. Burt, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• G. Capece and R. Costa, “The New Neighbourhood in the Internet Era: Network Communities Serving Local Communities,” Behaviour & Information Technology 32: 5 (2013) 438–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. Carroll and M. B. Rosson, “Developing the Blacksburg Electronic Village,” Communications of the ACM 39: 12 (1996) 69–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Courtois and P. Verdegem, “With a Little Help from my Friends: An Analysis of the Role of Social Support in Digital Inequalities,” New Media and Society 18: 8 (2016) 1508–1527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. De Meulenaere, C. Courtois, and K. Ponnet, “Bottom-up Hyperlocal Media in Belgium: Facebook-Groups as Collaborative Neighborhood Awareness Systems,” in A. Gulyas and D. Baines, eds, Routledge Companion to Local News and Journalism (Oxford: Routledge, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• J. De Meulenaere, B. Baccarne, C. Courtois, and K. Ponnet, “The Development and Psychometric Testing of the Expressive and Instrumental Online Neighborhood Network Uses Scale (ONNUS),” Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace (2021).
   Google Scholar
• A. J. A. M. van van Deursen and J. A. van Dijk, “The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in Usage,” New Media and Society 16: 3 (2014) 507–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. G. Ellen and M. A. Turner, “Does Neighborhood Matter? Assessing Recent Evidence,” Housing Policy Debate 8: 4 (1997) 833–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. B. Ellison, R. Gray, C. Lampe, and A. T. Fiore, “Social Capital and Resource Requests on Facebook,” New Media and Society 16: 7 (2014) 1104–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. R. Y. Gan, J. C. Fung, and I. S. Cho, “Neighborhood Experiences of People Over Age 50: Factor Structure and Validity of a Scale,” ed. S. Meeks, The Gerontologist 60: 8 (2020) e559–e571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. Granovetter, “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology 78: 6 (1973) 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. M. Guest, J. K. Cover, R. L. Matsueda, and C. E. Kubrin, “Neighborhood Context and Neighboring Ties,” City and Community 5: 4 (2006) 363–385.
   Google Scholar
• K. Hampton and B. Wellman, “Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in a Wired Suburb,” City and Community 2: 4 (2003) 277–311.
   Google Scholar
• K. N. Hampton, “Neighborhoods in the Network Society: the e-Neighbors Study,” Information, Communication and Society 10: 5 (2007) 714–748.
   Google Scholar
• W. Hardyns, V. Vyncke, L. Pauwels, and S. Willems, “Study Protocol: SWING—Social Capital and Well-Being in Neighborhoods in Ghent,” International Journal for Equity in Health 14: 36 (2015) 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• W. Hardyns, T. Snaphaan, L. J. R. Pauwels, V. Vyncke, and S. Willems, “A Multilevel Analysis of Collective Efficacy, Neighborhood Disorder, and Individual Social Capital on Avoidance Behavior,” Crime and Delinquency 65: 7 (2018) 994–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Hargittai and A. Hinnant, “Digital Inequality: Differences in Young Adults’ Use of the Internet,” Communication Research 35: 5 (2008) 602–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. J. Johnson and G. R. Halegoua, “Potential and Challenges for Social Media in the Neighborhood Context,” Journal of Urban Technology 21: 4 (2014) 51–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. L. Kavanaugh, D. D. Reese, J. M. Carroll, and M. B. Rosson, “Weak Ties in Networked Communities,” The Information Society 21: 2 (2005) 119–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-C. Kim and S. J. Ball-Rokeach, “Civic Engagement from a Communication Infrastructure Perspective,” Communication Theory 16: 2 (2006a) 173–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-C. Kim and S. J. Ball-Rokeach, “Community Storytelling Network, Neighborhood Context, and Civic Engagement: A Multilevel Approach,” Human Communication Research 32: 4 (2006b) 411–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-C. Kim, E. Shin, A. Cho, E. Jung, K. Shon, and H. Shim, “SNS Dependency and Community Engagement in Urban Neighborhoods the Moderating Role of Integrated Connectedness to a Community Storytelling Network,” Communication Research 46: 1 (2015) 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Y.-C. Kim and E.-K. Shin, “Localized Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Seoul’s Urban Neighborhoods,” American Behavioral Scientist 60: 1 (2016) 81–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Konsti-Laakso, “Stolen Snow Shovels and Good Ideas: The Search for and Generation of Local Knowledge in the Social Media Community,” Government Information Quarterly 34: 1 (2017) 134–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. J. Lawler and J. Yoon, “Commitment in Exchange Relations: Test of a Theory of Relational Cohesion,” American Sociological Review 61: 1 (1996) 89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. López, B. Butler, and P. Brusilovsky, “Does Anything Ever Happen Around Here? Assessing the Online Information Landscape for Local Events,” Journal of Urban Technology 21: 4 (2014) 95–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. López and R. Farzan, “Lend Me Sugar, I Am Your Neighbor! A Content Analysis of Online Forums for Local Communities,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, C&T ‘15 (New York: ACM, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• V. Lub, Neighbourhood Watch in a Digital Age: Between Crime Control and Culture of Control (New York: Springer International, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• G. Mollenhorst, B. Völker, and V. Schutjens, “Neighbour Relations in the Netherlands—a Decade of Evidence,” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 100: 4 (2009) 549–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Musterd and F. M. Pinkster, “Unraveling Neighborhood Effects: Evidence from Two European Welfare States,” in F. Hendriks, ed., City in Sight (Amsterdam University Press, 2009) 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• S. Nah and M. Yamamoto, “Civic Technology and Community Building: Interaction Effects Between Integrated Connectedness to a Storytelling Network (ICSN) and Internet and Mobile Uses on Civic Participation,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22: 4 (2017) 179–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Ognyanova, N.-T. N. Chen, S. Ball-Rokeach, Z. An, M. Son, M. Parks, and D. Gerson, “Online Participation in a Community Context: Civic Engagement and Connections to Local Communication Resources,” International Journal of Communication 7 (2013) 2433–2456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Perrin and M. Anderson, “Share of US Adults Using Social Media, Including Facebook, is Mostly Unchanged Since 2018,” Pew Research Center (2019) <https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-social-media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018/> Accessed September 26, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• T. Postmes, R. Spears, and M. Lea, “The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication,” Human Communication Research 26: 3 (2000) 341–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. J. Sampson, S. W. Raudenbush, and F. Earls, “Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy,” Science 277: 5328 (1997) 918–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Silverstone and L. Haddon, “Design and Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical Change and Everyday Life,” in R. Mansell and R. Silverstone, eds, Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• A. Smith, “Neighbors Online: One in Five Americans Use Digital Tools to Communicate with Neighbors and Monitor Community Developments, Research Report (Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2010) <http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Neighbors-Online.aspx> Accessed March 11, 2019
   Google Scholar
• J. Suler, “The Online Disinhibition Effect,” CyberPsychology and Behavior 7: 3 (2004) 321–326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• P. A. Thoits, “Mechanisms Linking Social Ties and Support to Physical and Mental Health,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 52: 2 (2011) 145–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Tselios, I. Noback, J. van Dijk, and P. McCann, “Integration of Immigrants, Bridging Social Capital, Ethnicity, and Locality,” Journal of Regional Science 55: 3 (2015) 416–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Turner, “Good Dog, Bad Dog: Exploring Audience Uses and Attitudes to Hyperlocal Community News Media through the Prism of Banal Pet Stories,” Anthropological Notebooks 21: 3 (2015) 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Van den Berg and H. Timmermans, “A Multilevel Path Analysis of Social Networks and Social Interaction in the Neighbourhood,” Region 2: 1 (2015) 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• B. Vanhaelewyn and L. De Marez, imec Digimeter 2018, Research Report (Gent: imec, 2018) <https://www.imec-int.com/drupal/sites/default/files/inline-files/457015-IMEC-DIGIMETER-2019-NL-v9.pdf> Accessed September 26, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• J. Vitak, “Unpacking Social Media's Role in Resource Provision: Variations across Relational and Communicative Properties,” Societies 4: 4 (2014) 561–586.
   Google Scholar
• D. Wong, “The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP),” in A. S. Fotheringham and P. A. Rogerson, eds, The SAGE Handbook of Spatial Analysis (London: Sage, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• M. Yamamoto, “Assessing the Role of Local Communication Networks in Neighborhood Disorder and Crime,” Communication Research 45: 6 (2015) 887–908.
   Google Scholar
• E. York Cornwell and R. L. Behler, “Urbanism, Neighborhood Context, and Social Networks,” City and Community 14: 3 (2015) 311–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar