A Common Management Framework for European Smart Cities? The Case of the European Innovation Partnership for Smart Cities and Communities Six Nations Forum

References

• AENOR, UNE-ISO 37120:2015. Sustainable Development of Communities: Indicators for City Services and Quality of Life (Madrid: Asociación Española de Normalización, 2015a) <https://tienda.aenor.com/norma-une-iso-37120-2015-n0054983> Accessed April 28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• AENOR, UNE 178303:2015. Smart Cities: City Asset Management. Specifications. (Madrid: Asociación Española de Normalización, 2015b) <https://tienda.aenor.com/norma-une-178303-2015-n0054948> Accessed April 28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• C. Bell, Smart Cities Special: Six Steps for Smart City Procurement (London: Supply Management, 2018) <https://www.cips.org/supply-management/analysis/2018/september/smart-cities-special-six-steps-for-smart-city-procurement/> Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• BBSR and BMUB, Smart City Charta: Digitale Transformation in den Kommunen Nachhaltig Gestalten. (Bonn: Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung [BBSR] and Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit [BMUB], 2017) <https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Veroeffentlichungen/Sonderveroeffentlichungen/2017/smart-city-charta-dl.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2> Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• BIS, The Smart City Market: Opportunities for the UK (London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 2013) <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/249423/bis-13-1217-smart-city-market-opportunties-uk.pdf > Accessed December 20, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution, BS ISO 37106: 2018 Sustainable Cities and Communities. Guidance on Establishing Smart City Operating Models for Sustainable Communities. (Milton Keynes: BSI, 2018) <https://www.iso.org/standard/62065.html > Accessed April 28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office and Government Digital Service, Government Transformation Strategy 2017–2020. (London: Cabinet Office and Government Digital Service, 2017) <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-transformation-strategy-2017-to-2020> Accessed April 28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• P. Dunleavy, H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler, Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and E-Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• EIP-SCC, Commitment 6746.: Six Nations Forum (Brussels: European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities, 2012) <https://eu-smartcities.eu > Accessed March 1, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• EIP-SCC, Strategic Implementation Plan (Brussels: European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities, 2013) <https://www.nachhaltigwirtschaften.at/resources/e2050_pdf/strategic_implementationplan_eip_summary.pdf > Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• EIP-SCC, Six Nations Smart City Workshop (London, European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• EIP-SCC, Six Nations Forum Paris Meeting Report (Paris: European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities, Six Nations Forum, 2016a).
   Google Scholar
• EIP-SCC, Consolidated EIP-SCC 6N Forum Blueprint < https://smart-cities-marketplace.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/Blueprint%206-N%20consolidated%20-%20anonymous.pdf> (Brussels, EIP-SCC, 2016b) Accessed August 1, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• EIP-SCC, Clarifying Central Government Roles (Brussels: European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities Six-Nations Forum, 2016c).
   Google Scholar
• EIP-SCC, Humble Lamppost Survey Insight Paper (Brussels: EIP-SCC Integrated Infrastructure Action Cluster, 2017) <https://www.luciassociation.org/humble-lamppost-survey-insights/> Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• EIP-SCC, “Towards a Joint Investment Programme for European Smart Cities: A Consultation Paper to Stimulate Action” (Brussels: EIP-SCC, 2018) <https://cupdf.com/document/towards-a-joint-investment-programme-for-european-smart-a-4-towards-a-joint.html > Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• EIP-SCC, The Marketplace of the European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities <https://eu-smartcities.eu> (Brussels, EIP-SCC, 2019) Accessed December 20, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, Mapping Smart Cities in the EU (Brussels: Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, “Morgenstadt: City Insights. Joint Research Project on Today’s Cities as Future Markets for Systems Innovations Towards Smart and Sustainable Cities” (Stuttgart, DE: Fraunhofer, 2012) <www.fraunhofer.de > Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• A. Frascella, A. Brutti, N. Gessa, P. De Sabbata, and C. Novelli, “A Minimum Set of Common Principles for Enabling Smart City Interoperability,” Techne: Journal of Architecture and Environment, Special Issue 1: European Pathways for the Smart Cities to Come (2018) <https://jpi-urbaneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/European-Pathways-for-the-Smart-Cities-to-Come-1.pdf > Accessed April 29, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• S. Graham, “Software-Sorted Geographies,” Progress in Human Geography 29 (2005) 562–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Graham and S. Marvin, Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (London: Routledge, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• H. Haarstad, “Who is Driving the ‘Smart City’ Agenda? Assessing Smartness as a Governance Strategy for Cities in Europe,” in A.: Jones, P. Strom, B. Hermelin, and G. Rusten, eds., Services and the Green Economy (UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016) 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• A. Immendoerfer, M. Winkelmann, and V. Stelzer, Energy Solutions for Smart Cities and Communities Recommendations for Policy Makers from the 58 Pilots of the CONCERTO Initiative (Brussels: European Commission, 2014) <https://smartcities-infosystem.eu/sites/default/files/concerto_files/concerto_publications/2014-01_concerto_premium_recommendations_for_policy_makers_final.pdf > Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/IEC, Smart Cities: Preliminary Report 2014 (Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2014) <https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/developing_standards/docs/en/smart_cities_report-jtc1.pdf > Accessed April 28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, ISO 37107:2019 Sustainable Cities and Communities—Maturity Model for Smart Sustainable Communities (Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2019) <https://www.iso.org/standard/62066.html > Accessed April 28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, #Worldsmartcity (Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2022) <https://www.iso.org/sites/worldsmartcity/> Accessed April 26, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• S. Joss, M. Cook, and Y. Dayot, “Smart Cities: Towards a New Citizenship Regime? A Discourse Analysis of the British Smart City Standard,” Journal of Urban Technology 24: 4 (2017) 29–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JPI Urban Europe, JPI Urban Europe: The Knowledge Hub for Urban Transitions (Vienna: Joint Programming Initiative, 2019) <https://jpi-urbaneurope.eu > Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• R. Kitchin, “The Real-time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism,” GeoJournal 79: 1 (2014a) 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• R. Kitchin, The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and their Consequences (London: Sage, 2014b).
   Google Scholar
• R. Kitchin and M. Dodge, Code/space: Software and Everyday Life (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• R. Kitchin and M. Dodge “The (In)Security of Smart Cities: Vulnerabilities,: Risks, Mitigation, and Prevention,” Journal of Urban Technology 26: 2 (2019) <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108010630732.2017.1408002> Accessed April 28, 2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Klauser, T. Paasche, and O. Söderstrom, “Michel Foucault and the Smart City: Power Dynamics Inherent in Contemporary Governing through Code,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32: 5 (2014) 869–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KLEIN, The Climate and Energy Fund (Vienna: Federal Ministry for Sustainability and Tourism, 2020) <https://www.bmnt.gv.at/english/environment/Climateprotect/The-Climate-and-Energy-Fund.html > Accessed January 20, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Klima und Energiefonds, The Smart Cities Member States Initiative (Vienna: Klima und Energiefonds, 2018) <https://smartcities.at/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/Smart-Cities-Initiative-2.pdf /> Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• A. Leszczynski, “Speculative Futures: Cities,: Data, and Governance Beyond Smart Urbanism,” Environment and Planning A 48: 9 (2016) 1691–1708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Leszczynski, “Glitchy Vignettes of Platform Urbanism,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38: 2 (2020) 189–208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Light, From Warfare to Welfare: Defense Intellectuals and Urban Problems in Cold War America (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• P. Lombardi and A. Vanolo, “Smart City as a Mobile Technology: Critical Perspectives on Urban Development Policies,” in Rodrìguez-Bolívar, ed., Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities (Cham: Springer, 2015) 147–161.
   Google Scholar
• A. Luque-Ayala and S. Marvin, “Developing a Critical Understanding of Smart Urbanism?” Urban Studies 52: 12 (2015) 2105–2116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Luque-Ayala and S. Marvin, “The Maintenance of Urban Circulation: An Operational Logic of Infrastructural Control,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34: 2 (2016) 191–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Marvin, A. Luque-Ayala, and C. McFarlane, Smart Urbanism: Utopian Vision or False Dawn? (London: Routledge, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• S. Marvin and A. Luque-Ayala, “Urban Operating Systems: Diagramming the City,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41: 1 (2017) 84–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Meijer and M. Rodriguez Bolivar, “Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance,” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82: 2 (2016) 392–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Energía, Turismo y Agenda Digital, Plan Nacional de Ciudades Inteligentes (Madrid, Ministerio de Energía, Turismo y Agenda Digital, 2015) <http://www.agendadigital.gob.es/planes-actuaciones/Bibliotecaciudadesinteligentes/Detalle%20del%20Plan/Plan_Nacional_de_Ciudades_Inteligentes_v2.pdf > Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• The Netherlands Smart City Strategy Group, NL Smart City Strategy: The Future of Living (Amsterdam, The Netherlands Smart City Strategy Group, 2017) <http://digitalestedenagenda.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/NL-Smart-City-Strategie-.pdf > Accessed December 20, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• A. Russell, Open Standards and the Digital Age: History, Ideology, and Networks (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• F. Russo, C. Rindone, and P. Panuccio, “European Plans for the Smart City: From Theories and Rules to Logistics Test Case,” European Planning Studies 24: 9 (2016) 1709–1726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Schindler and S. Marvin, “Constructing a Universal Logic of Urban Control? International Standards for City Data, Management, and Interoperability,” City 22: 2 (2018) 298–307.
   Google Scholar
• C. Smigiel, “Urban Political Strategies in Times of Crisis: A Multi-scalar Perspective on Smart Cities in Italy,” European Urban and Regional Studies 26: 4 (2018) 336–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Smith and P. Prieto Martín, “Going Beyond the Smart City? Implementing Technopolitical Platforms for Urban Democracy in Madrid and Barcelona,” Journal of Urban Technology 28: 1-2 (2020) <https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1786337> Accessed April 28, 2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Söderstrom, T. Pasche, and F. Klauser “Smart Cities as Corporate Storytelling,” City 18: 3 (2014) 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• N. Taylor Buck and A. While “Competitive Urbanism and the Limits to Smart City Innovation: The UK Future Cities Initiative,” Urban Studies 54: 2 (2015) 501–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK DCMS and BIS, Evidence Check: Smart Cities. Government Statement (London, Department for Culture, Media and Sport and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 2016) <https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/science-technology/evidence-tests/Smart-Cities.pdf > Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• UrbanDNA, UrbanDNA: Innovate, Incubate, Accelerate (Abingdon: UrbanDNA, 2019) <http://www.urbandna.eu > Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• L. Van Nistelrooij, “Smart Cities: EU Needs Greater Coherence in City Policies,” The Parliament Magazine, 12 October (2015) <https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/news/article/smart-cities-eu-needs-greater-coherence-in-city-policies> Accessed January 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Vienna City Administration, Smart City Wien: Framework Strategy (Vienna: City of Vienna, 2014) <https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/studien/pdf/b008384b.pdf > Accessed April 28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• J. M. White, “On the Difficulty of Agreeing upon a Universal Logic for City Standards: A Response to Schindler and Marvin,” City 23: 2 (2019) 245–255.
   Google Scholar