Protecting Street Art Rights Using an NFT-Based System

References

• A. N. Alves, “Why Can’t Our Wall Paintings Last Forever?,” Street Art and Urban Creativity Scientific Journal 3: 1 (2017) 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• B. O. Ansah, W. Voss, K. O. Asiama, and I. Y. Wuni, “A Systematic Review of the Institutional Success Factors for Blockchain-Based Land Administration,” Land Use Policy 125:February (2023) 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• A. J. Ashley, “Beyond the Aesthetic,” Journal of Planning History 14: 1 (2015) 38–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. J. Ashley, “The Micropolitics of Performance: Pop-Up Art as a Complementary Method for Civic Engagement and Public Participation,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 41: 2 (2021) 173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Austin, “More to See Than a Canvas in a White Cube: For an Art in the Streets,” City 14: 1–2 (2010) 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• N. Asokan, V. Niemi, and P. Laitinen,"On the Usefulness of Proof-Of-Possession,” 2nd Annual PKI Research Workshop (2003) 122–127.
   Google Scholar
• M. Back, “Managing Community Murals in an Urban Preservation Framework.” Master’s Thesis, University of Pennsylvania (2019).
   Google Scholar
• BANKSY, “Wall and piece,” Random House (2005).
   Google Scholar
• M. Blumenthal, “Encryption: Strengths and Weaknesses of Public-Key Cryptography,” CSRS (2007) 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• R. M. Bennett, M. Pickering and J. Sargent, “Transformations, Transitions, or Tall Tales? A Global Review of the Uptake and Impact of NoSQL, Blockchain, and Big Data Analytics on the Land Administration Sector,” Land Use Policy 83 (2019) 435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Bonadio, “Street Art, Graffiti and the Moral Right of Integrity: Can Artists Oppose the Destruction and Removal of Their Works?,” Nuart Journal 1: 1 (2018a) 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• E. Bonadio, “Graffiti, Street Art and Copyright,” Street Art Urban Creativity Journal 4: 1 (2018b) 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• E. Bonadio, The Cambridge Handbook of Copyright in Street Art and Graffiti, Cambridge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019a).
   Google Scholar
• E. Bonadio, “Despite Saying Copyright Is for Losers, Banksy Finally Goes to Court,” The Wire (2019b). <https://thewire.in/the-arts/despite-saying-Copyright-is-for-losers-banksy-finally-goes-to-court > Accessed September 5, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• E. Bonadio, “Banksy Brands Under Threat After Elusive Graffiti Artist Loses Trademark Legal Dispute,” The Conversation (2020). <https://theconversation.com/banksy-brands-under-threat-after-elusive-graffiti-artist-loses-trademark-legal-dispute-146642> Accessed July 20, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• J. D. Boy and J. Uitermark, “Reassembling the City Through Instagram,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42: 4 (2017) 612–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Budge, “Visually Imagining Place: Museum Visitors, Instagram, and the City,” Journal of Urban Technology 27: 2 (2020) 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Chandra and B. Rangaraju, Blockchain for Property A Roll Out Road Map for India (Delhi, India: India Institute, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• M. Chatzidakis, “Street Art Conservation in Athens: Critical Conservation in a Time of Crisis,” Studies in Conservation 61: 2 (2016) 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• S. Cloon, “Incentivizing Graffiti: Extending Copyright Protection to a Prominent Artistic Movement,” Notre Dame L. Rev. Online 92 (2016) 54.
   Google Scholar
• D. Crinnion, “Get Your Own Street Cred: An Argument for Trademark Protection for Street Art,” BCL Rev. 58 (2017) 257–285.
   Google Scholar
• L. Davi, D. Hatebur, M. Heisel, and R. Wirtz, “Combining Safety and Security in Autonomous Cars Using Blockchain Technologies,” International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (2019) 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• D. Droney, “The Business of ‘Getting Ip:’ Street Art and Marketing in Los Angeles,” Visual Anthropology 23: 2 (2010) 98–114.
   Google Scholar
• G. Eder, “Digital Transformation: Blockchain and Land Titles,” OECD Global Anti-Corruption & Integrity Forum (2019).
   Google Scholar
• S. A. Evans, “Taking Back the Streets ? How Street Art Ordinances Constitute Government Takings,” Fordham Intell. Prop. Media and Ent. L.J. 25 (2015) 685–746.
   Google Scholar
• M. S. Ferdous, M. J. M. Chowdhury, K. Biswas, N. Chowdhury, and V. Muthukkumarasamy, “Immutable Autobiography of Smart Cars Leveraging Blockchain Technology,” Knowledge Engineering Review 35:E3 (2019) 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• J. Ferrell, Graffiti, Street Art and the Dialectics of the City. In Graffiti and Street Art: Reading, Writing and Representing the City (London: Routledge, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• S. F. Fischer, “Who’s the Vandal? The Recent Controversy over the Destruction of 5Pointz and How Much Protection Does Moral Rights Law Give to Authorized Aerosol Art?,” The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law 14 (2015) 326–356.
   Google Scholar
• E. Gaetani, L. Aniello, R. Baldoni, F. Lombardi, A. Margheri, and V. Sassone, “Blockchain-Based Database to Ensure Data Integrity in Cloud Computing Environments,” paper presented at Italian Conference on Cybersecurity. Venice, Italy, Jan 17-20, 20170 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• C. H. Gebotys, Security in Embedded Devices (Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009) 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• B. Gipp, N.: Meuschke, J. Beel, and C. Breitinger, “Using the Blockchain of Cryptocurrencies for Timestamping Digital Cultural Heritage,” IEEE Technical Committee on Digital Libraries 13: 1 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• A. M. Graf, “Facets of Graffiti Art and Street Art Documentation Online: A Domain and Content Analysis.” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania (2018).
   Google Scholar
• C. Grodach, “Art Spaces in Community and Economic Development: Connections to Neighborhoods, Artists, and the Cultural Economy,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 31: 1 (2011) 74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Halsey and B. Pederick, “The Game of Fame: Mural, Graffiti, Erasure,” City 14: 1–2 (2010) 82–98.
   Google Scholar
• S. Hansen, “Heritage Protection for Street Art? The Case of Banksy’s Spybooth,” Nuart Journal 1: 1 (2018) 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• C. D. Honig, and L. MacDowall, “Spatio-Temporal Mapping of Street Art Using Instagram,” First Monday 22: 3 (2017)
   Google Scholar
• W. Huang, and F. Dai. “Research on Digital Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage Based on Blockchain Technology,” Information Management and Computer Science 2: 2 (2019) 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• M. Iljadica, Copyright Beyond Law: Regulating Creativity in the Graffiti Subculture (London: Hart Publishing, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• M. Kaur, “Graffiti: On the Fringes of Art; Protected at the Edges of the Law,” Law School Student Scholarship Student Work 967, (2019).
   Google Scholar
• K. A. Kelly, “Moral Rights and the First Amendment: Putting Honor Before Free Speech?,” University of Miami Entertainment and Sports Law Review 11 (1993) 211–250.
   Google Scholar
• E. Kinsella, “A Stunning Legal Decision Just Upheld a $6.75 Million Victory for the Street Artists Whose Works Were Destroyed at the 5Pointz Graffiti Mecca,” Artnet news (2020) <https://news.artnet.com/art-world/5pointz-ruling-upheld-1782396> Accessed September 5, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• R. Kramer, “Painting with Permission: Legal Graffiti in New York City,” Ethnography 11: 2 (2010) 235–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kramer, “Gain Copyright Protection by Using an Anonymous LLC,” Law 4 Small business (2019) <https://www.l4sb.com/blog/leveraging-an-anonymous-llc-for-trademark-and-copyright-protection/> Accessed September 5, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Y. K. Lee, H. Seung-wan, L. Sok-joon, C. Byung-ho, and G. L. Deok, “Anonymous Authentication System Using Group Signature,” paper presented at International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, 1235–1239, Fukuoka, Japan (March 16–19, 2009) 135-1239. IEEE, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• C. Lerman, “Protecting Artistic Vandalism: Graffiti and Copyright Law,” NYU Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law 2 (2013) 295–337.
   Google Scholar
• H. Liu, “Blockchain and Bills of Lading: Legal Issues in Perspective,” In P. Mukherjee, M. Mejia, and J. Xu, ed., Maritime Law in Motion (Cham: Springer, 2000) 413–435.
   Google Scholar
• L. MacDowall, “In Praise of 70K: Cultural Heritage and Graffiti Style” Continuum 20: 4 (2006) 471–484.
   Google Scholar
• T. Marks, “The Saga Of 5Pointz : VARA’s Deficiency In Protecting Notable Collections Of Street Art,” Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Law Reviews 35 (2015) 281–318.
   Google Scholar
• C. McAuliffe, “Legal Walls and Professional Paths: The Mobilities of Graffiti Writers in Sydney,” Urban Studies 50: 3 (2013) 518–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Mendelson-Shwartz and N. Mualam, “Taming Murals in the City: A Foray into Mural Policies, Practices, and Regulation,” International Journal of Cultural Policy 27: 1 (2020) 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Mendelson-Shwartz and N. Mualam, “ Challenges in the Creation of Murals: A Theoretical Framework,” Journal of Urban Affairs 44: 4-5 (2021) 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Merrill, “Keeping it Real? Subcultural Graffiti, Street Art, Heritage and Authenticity,” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21: 4 (2015) 369–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Nomeikaite, “Street Art, Heritage and Embodiment,” Street Art and Urban Creativity Scientific Journal 3: 1 (2017) 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• D. Poisner, Inventor, Trusted System Clock (Patent No. US20040128549A1). Patent Application Publication. (2002) https://patents.google.com/patent/US20040128549
   Google Scholar
• M. L. Psiaki and T. E. Humphreys, “GNSS Spoofing and Detection,” Proceedings of the IEEE (2016) 104(6), 1258–1270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. A. Riggle, “Street Art: The Transfiguration of the Commonplaces,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68:3 (2010) 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and L. Adleman, “A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems” Communications of the ACM 21:2 (1978) 120–126.
   Google Scholar
• T. Rychlicki,: “Legal Questions About Illegal Art,” Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 3: 6 (2008) 393–401.
   Google Scholar
• P. N. Salib, “The Law of Banksy: Who Owns Street Art?,” The University of Chicago Law Review 82: 4 (2015) 2293–2328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Savelyev,: “Copyright in the Blockchain Era: Promises and Challenges,” Computer Law and Security Review 34: 3 (2018) 550–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. D. Schwender, “Does Copyright Law Protect Graffiti and Street Art?” Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art (London: Routledge, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• P. K.: Sharma, N. Kumar, and J. H.,: Park. “Blockchain-Based Distributed Framework for Automotive Industry in a Smart City,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 15: 7 (2018) 4197–4205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Y. Smith, “Street Art: An Analysis under US Intellectual Property Law and Intellectual Property's Negative Space Theory,” DePaul J. Art Tech. and Intell. Prop. L 24 (2013) 259–293.
   Google Scholar
• V. Thakur, M. N. Doja, K. Yogesh, Y. K. Dwivedi, T. Ahmad, and G. Khadanga, “Land Records on Blockchain for Implementation of Land Titling in India,” International Journal of Information Management 52 (2020) 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Vishwa, and F. K. Hussain, “A Blockchain-Based Approach for Multimedia Privacy Protection and Provenance,” IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (2018) 1941–1945.
   Google Scholar
• B. Yapicioglu and R. Leshinsky. “Blockchain as a Tool for Land Rights: Ownership of Land in Cyprus,” Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law 12: 2 (2020) 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• A. Young, Street Art, Public City (London: Routledge, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Z. Yousefi and H. Dadashpoor, “How do ICTs Affect Urban Spatial Structure? A Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Urban Technology 27: 1 (2020) 47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar