Toward transformation: Digital tools for online dance pedagogy

References

• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States, 2013.  Oakland, CA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved from http://www.itcnetwork.org/webinars/898-grade-change-tracking-online-education-in-the-united-states-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Angiello, R. (2010). Study looks at online learning vs. traditional instruction. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 76(2), 56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Angelino, L. M., & Natvig, D. (2009). A conceptual model for engagement of the online learner. Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), n1.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, R., Abbott, L., Mulkeen, A., & Metcalfe, N. (2003). The global classroom: collaboration and cultural awareness in the north and south of Ireland. Coleraine, Ireland: University of Ulster.
   Google Scholar
• Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139–153.
   Google Scholar
• Bonk, C. J., & Khoo, E. (2014). Adding some TEC-VARIETY: 100 +activities for motivating and retaining learners online. Bloomington, IN: Open World Books.
   Google Scholar
• Conte, C. (2001). Networking the land: Rural America in the information age. Washinton, DC: U. S. Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelli, M. (2004). Videoconferencing programs let student explore the world without leaving the classroom. THE Journal, 32(2), 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (Ed.). (2013). Connecting the dots: New technology-based models for postsecondary learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 48(5). Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/10/connecting-the-dots-new-technologybased-models-for-postsecondary-learning
   Google Scholar
• Eyrich, N., Padman, M. L., & Sweetser, K. D. (2008). PR practitioners’ use of social media tools and communication technology. Public Relations Review, 34(4), 412–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fineman, J. (2010). Networked performing arts. Retrieved from https://wiki.internet2.edu/confluence/display/NPA/Networked+Performing+Arts
   Google Scholar
• Fish, W. W., & Wickersham, L. E. (2009). Best practices for online instructors: Reminders. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(3), 279–284.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, M. A., & Kaufield, K. J. (2008). Reciprocal mentorship: An effective support for online instructors. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(3), 311–327.
   Google Scholar
• Garbett, C. (2011). Activity-based costing models for alternative modes of delivering on-line courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and Learning, 1, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, I., & Naugle, L. M. (1997). A university dance course in cyberspace: The telelearning experience. Journal of Distance Education, 12(1/2), 257–269.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (2014, June 26). Video assessment in dance. Presented at the Dancing into New Media Workshop, Greensboro, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., & Gungor, A. (2014, August 16). Record, upload, converse: Transforming assessment through acclaim's collaborative video platform. Presented at the Impact Conference: Creative Collaboration in Technology and Arts, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Harris Interactive. (2008). A generation unplugged. Retrieved from http://www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/aID/11483
   Google Scholar
• Hauber, J., Regenbrecht, H., Hills, A., Cockburn, A., & Billinghurst, M. (2005). Social presence in two-and three-dimensional videoconferencing. In PRESENCE 2005: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Workshop on Presence, London, United Kingdom, September 21–23 (pp. 189–198). Retrieved from https://ispr.info/presence-conferences/previous-conferences/presence-2005/
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Smythe, T. (2009). The 2009 horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. (2013). Synthesizing MOOC completion rates. Retrieved from http://moocmoocher.Wordpress.com/2013/02/13/synthesisingmooc-completion-rates
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, P. B., & Mohan, J. (2009). Video use and higher education: Options for the future. Retrieved from http://library.nyu.edu/about/Video_Use_in_Higher_Education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser Family Foundation. (2010). Generation m2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/mh012010pkg.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Kaku, M. (2014). Physics of the future: How science will shape human destiny and our daily lives by the year 2100. Retrieved from http://knopfdoubleday.com/2011/03/14/your-cell-phone/
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175–185. doi:10.1080/01587910802154970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koplowitz, S. (2014, September). Online learning and MOOCs in dance. Conference session at the 2014 National Association of Schools of Dance conference, Sandy, Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Leask, M., & Pachler, N. (Eds.). (2013). Learning to teach using ICT in the secondary school: A companion to school experience. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, J. D., & Richardson, J. (2007). Linking teacher preparation programs with k–12 schools via video conferencing: Benefits and limitations. Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, L., & Borstel, J. (2003). Liz Lerman's Critical Response Process: A method for getting useful feedback on anything you make, from dance to dessert. Liz Lerman Dance Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B., & Schrum, L. (2012). Leading technology-rich schools: Award-winning models for success. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Magjuka, R. J., Bonk, C. J., & Lee, S. H. (2006). Does sense of community matter? An examination of participants’ perspectives in online courses. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 2006(1), 2615–2621.
   Google Scholar
• Major, C. H. (2010). Do virtual professors dream of electric students? University faculty experiences with online distance education. Teacher College Record, 112(8), 2154–2208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. (2014). 300+ hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute. Retrieved from http://www.reelseo.com/youtube-300-hours/
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. (2005). Seeing is believing: The role of videoconferencing in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 397–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, S. (2014). Active learning white paper. Columbia University Graduate School. Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/cu/tat/pdfs/active%20learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen. (2012, February 20). Survey new U.S. smartphone growth by age and income. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2012/survey-new-u-s-smartphone-growth-by-age-and-income.html
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, J. S., Reardon, R. M., Smith, F. G., Rhodes, J. A., Zander, M. J., & Carter, T. J. (2008). Exploring faculty learning communities: Building connections among teaching, learning, and technology. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Passey, D. (2006). Digital video technologies enhancing learning for pupils at risk and those who are hard to reach. In M. Childs, M. Cuttle, & K. Riley (Eds.), DIVERSE proceedings: 2005 & 2006: 5th International DIVERSE Conference, July 5–7, 2005, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA; 6th International DIVERSE Conference, July 5–7, 2006, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK. (pp. 156–168). Glasgow, Scotland: Glasgow Caledonian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, C. (2013). Times higher education. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/05/10/new-study-low-mooc-completion-rates.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, M. (2001). Integrating technology into the teaching and learning of dance. Journal for the National Dance Education Organization, 1(1), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, M. (2007). Technology in dance education. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 1381–1397). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, M. (2008). Dancing the distance: iDance Arizona videoconferencing reaches rural communities. Research in Dance Education, 9(2), 187–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish, M. (2009). Reaching rural communities: Videoconferencing in K–12 dance education. Journal for Learning Through the Arts, 5(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pew. (2012). Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/04/20/chapter-two-how-phones-are-used-with-friends-what-they-can-do-and-how-teens-use-them/
   Google Scholar
• Pope, J. (2014). What are MOOCs good for?. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/review/533406/what-are-moocs-good-for/
   Google Scholar
• Puteh, M. (2008). E-learning concepts and literature review. In M. F. M. Salleh (Ed.), E-learning issues in Malaysia higher education (pp. 1–22). Johor, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Risner, D., & Anderson, J. (2008). Digital Dance Literacy: An integrated dance technology curriculum pilot project 1. Research in Dance Education, 9(2), 113–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. A., Yaya, L. H. P., & Manolis, C. (2014). The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(4), 254–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roethel, K. (2014). College students spending hours daily on smartphones. Retrieved from http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/College-students-spending-hours-daily-on-5745673.php
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. (2011). Teaching the iGeneration. Retrieved from http://www.steveclarkprincipal.com/uploads/1/6/5/2/16527520/teaching_the_igeneration.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online ( 3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Orellana, A. (2011). Distance education research: A review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 124–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavredes, T. (2011). Effective online teaching: Foundations and strategies for student success ( 2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Stavredes, T. M., & Herder, T. M. (2014). Engaging students in an online environment. In S. R. Harper & S. J. Quaye (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations ( 2nd ed., pp. 257–270). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teacher Tech. (2009). Prezi: Just plain good for content. Wordpress. Retrieved from https://rsu2teachertech.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/prezi-just-plain-good-for-content/
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dusen, G. C. (2014). Digital dilemma: Issues of access, cost, and quality in media-enhanced and distance education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 27(5). Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series.
   Google Scholar
• Watrall, E. (2009). Challenging the presentation paradigm: Prezi. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/challenging-the-presentation-paradigm-prezi/22646
   Google Scholar
• Willmot, P., Bramhall, M., & Radley, K. (2012). Using digital video reporting to inspire and engage students. Royal Academy of Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/other/using-digital-video-reporting
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Yu, B., Wu, W., Diankov, R., & Bajscy, R. (2006). Collaborative dancing in tele-immersive environment. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 723–726). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., & Bonk, C. J. (2009). Addressing diverse learner preferences and intelligences with emerging technologies: Matching models to online opportunities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 34(2). Canadian Network for Innovation in Education.
   Google Scholar