Cultural aspects of drama: the effect of Australian drama assessment policy on practice

References

• ACT Board of Senior Secondary Studies (n.d). BSSS | ACT Grade Moderation Model. Retrieved from http://www.bsss.act.edu.au/grade_moderation/act_grade_moderation_model.
   Google Scholar
• ACT Board of Senior Secondary Studies. (2010). Performing Arts (Dance and Drama) Course Framework. Retrieved from http://www.bsss.act.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/30880/Perform_Arts_Fwkfinal04.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, V. (2007). Laughing it off: Uncovering the everyday work experience of nurses. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(1), 1–15. doi:10.1177/160940690700600101
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) (2014). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professionalstandards-for-teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, D. (1993). Authentic performance assessments. Childhood Education, 70(2), 99–102. doi:10.1080/00094056.1993.10521005
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA) (2012). Intercultural studies project. Retrieved from http://www.carla.umn.edu/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cockett, S. (1998). Formative assessment in drama. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 3(2), 248–250. doi:10.1080/1356978980030210
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, R. (2003). The status of arts assessment: Examples from music. Arts Education Policy Review, 105(2), 11–29. doi:10.1080/10632910309603457
   Google Scholar
• de la Harpe, B., Peterson, J. F., Frankham, N., Zehner, R., Neale, D., Musgrave, E., & McDermott, R. (2009). Assessment focus in studio: What is most prominent in architecture, art and design? International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28(1), 37–51. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01591.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dunsmoor, J. E., Prince, S. E., Murty, V. P., Kragel, P. A., & Labar, K. S. (2011). Neurobehavioral mechanisms of human fear generalization. NeuroImage, 55(4), 1878–1888. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. S., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. S., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An Overview. Historical Social Research, 36(4), 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, M. (2012). The Arts in Education: An Introduction to Aesthetics, Theory and Pedagogy. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, K. C., & Keck, A. (2004). Einstein A to Z. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, M. B., Skidmore, S. T., Bustamante, R. M., & Holzweiss, P. C. (2016). Empirically exploring higher education cultures of assessment. The Review of Higher Education, 39(3), 395–429. doi:10.1353/rhe.2016.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. New York: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. (2010). The ‘art’ of creative teaching: Implications for higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 607–613. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.493349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X033003003
   Google Scholar
• Guetterman, T. C., & Mitchell, N. (2016). The role of leadership and culture in creating meaningful assessment: A mixed methods case study. Innovative Higher Education, 41(1), 43–57. doi:10.1007/s10755-015-9330-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L., Smith, L., & Worthington, K. (2008). Fitting the methodology with the research: An exploration of narrative, self-study and auto-ethnography. Studying Teacher Education, 4(1), 17–28. doi:10.1080/17425960801976321
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, B. (2003). Policy issues in arts assessment in Canada: ‘Let’s get real. Arts Education Policy Review, 105(1), 33–37. doi:10.1080/10632910309600750
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, D. (2012). Professional learning culture and its effect on teacher efficacy. Australian Educational Leader, 34(3), 33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. Toronto: OISE Press
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hatton, C. (2004). On the edge of realities: Drama, learning and adolescent girls. NJ (Drama Australia Journal), 28(1), 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hatton, C., & Lovesy, S. (2009). Young at art: Classroom playbuilding in practice. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, A. (2017). Because then you could never ever get a job!’: children’s constructions of NAPLAN as high-stakes. Journal of Education Policy, 32(5), 564–587. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1305451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R. (2016). Using scripts and stories to illustrate educational research. NJ (Drama Journal), 40(1), 53–65. doi:10.1080/14452294.2016.1239514
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R. (2016b). Challenges of drama performance assessment. Drama Research, 7(1), 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R. (2017). Six critical issues in senior secondary drama performance assessment in Australia. NJ ( Nj, ), 41(2), 127–140. doi:10.1080/14452294.2017.1438043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschenbaum, H., Napier, R. W., & Simon, S. B. (1971). Wad-ja-get? The grading game in American education. New York: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiman, P. (2005). Beyond the tingle factor: Creativity and assessment in higher education. Paper presented at the ESRC Creativity Seminar, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Landy, R. J. (2006). Assessment through drama. In P. Taylor (ed.), Assessment in arts education (pp. 83–106). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Lesko, N. (1996). Denaturalizing Adolescence. Youth & Society, 28(2), 139–161. doi:10.1177/0044118X96028002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (2003). Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lovesy, S. (2002). Performing an essay. NJ (Drama Journal), 26(2), 83–91. doi:10.1080/14452294.2002.11649451
   Google Scholar
• Macgregor, R. N., Lemerise, S., Potts, M., & Roberts, B. (1994). Assessment in the arts: A cross-Canada study. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Morrish, I. (2012). Aspects of educational change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nabi Karimi, M. (2011). The effects of professional development initiatives on EFL teachers’ degree of self-efficacy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(6), 50–62.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. D., & Nelson, J. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice and the culture of adolescence. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 41(4), 305–311. doi:10.1037/a0020328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbit, T. (2000). Cultures of Teaching. In Proceedings of the Adult Education Research Conference. Vancouver: New Prairie Press.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Board of Studies (n.d). HSC Drama marking guidelines — practical tasks and submitted works. Retrieved from http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/syllabus_hsc/pdf_doc/drama_mark_. guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NSW Board of Studies. (2009). Drama Stage 6 Syllabus. Retrieved 17 June 2010 from http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/syllabus_hsc/drama.html.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, J., Stinson, M., & Moore, T. (2009). Drama and curriculum: A giant at the door. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oreck, B., Owen, S., & Baum, S. (2003). Validity, reliability and equity issues in an observational talent assessment process in the performing arts. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(1), 62–94. doi:10.1177/016235320302700105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry: A Personal, Experiential Perspective (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. D., & Deal, T. E. (2009). The shaping school culture fieldbook (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, G., & MacLean, M. (2004). Ethical considerations for research in higher education. (Working paper No. 1). Retrieved from UBC Institute for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning http://www.tag.ubc.ca/about/institute/Working%20Paper%20ISoTL1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reed-Danahay, D. E. (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social. Oxford, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T. L. (2010). Assessing outcomes and improving achievement: Tips and tools for using rubrics. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D., Henriksen, L., & Foehr, U. (2009). Adolescence, adolescents, and media. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 314–344). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Self-fulfilling prophecies and teacher expectations. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston
   Google Scholar
• Schonmann, S. (2007). Wrestling with Assessment in Drama Education. International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, 16(3), 409–422.
   Google Scholar
• Smigiel, H. M., & Barrett, M. (2005). Young voices: New perspectives. NJ (Drama Australia Journal), 29(2), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2005). Epistemological Intimacy: A Move to Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(2), 68–76. doi:10.1177/160940690500400206
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, G. (2001). Are you old enough?: Research ethics and young people. Youth Studies Australia, 20(4), 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A., & Millard, B. (2006). Towards enhancing student learning and examiner reliability with criterion-referenced assessment in the creative arts: The case of music. Paper presented at the Evaluations and Assessment Conference 2006, Perth. Retrieved from http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/. eac2006/papers/thomasmillard.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). Grading for success. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 12–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M. D. (2010). Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357–381. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. (1995). Representation in ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, M. (2011). The senior secondary curriculum in NSW: Academic traditions face issues of retention. In Yates, L., Collins, C., & O’Connor, K. (Eds). Australia's Curriculum Dilemmas: State Cultures and the Big Issues. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne Univ. Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlstrom, R. L., & Seashore Louis, K. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl Fictions. London: Verso
   Google Scholar
• Watson, G. (2006). Technology professional development: Long-term effects on teacher self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 151–166.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby, M., Feifs, H., Baenen, N., & Grimes, E. (1995). Behind the scenes: Measuring student progress in the arts and beyond. Raleigh, NC: Wake County Public School System.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. (1990). On seeking – and rejecting – Validity in qualitative research. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 121–152). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L., Collins, C., & O’Connor, K. (2011). Australia's Curriculum Dilemmas: State Cultures and the Big Issues. (2011). Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne Univ. Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ylonen, A., Gillespie, H., & Green, A. (2018). Disciplinary differences and other variations in assessment cultures in higher education: Exploring variability and inconsistencies in one university in England. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 1009–1017. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1425369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoeckler, I. (2007). Moral aspects of grading: A study of high school English teachers perception. American Secondary Education, 35(2), 83–102.
   Google Scholar