Music teacher perceptions of evaluation: a case study of the Tennessee fine arts portfolio model

References

• Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Collins, C. (2012). The SAS Education Value-Added Evaluation System (SAS-EVAAS) in the Houston Independent School District (HISD): Intended and unintended consequences. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(12), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v20n12.2012
   Google Scholar
• Baker, V. D. (2007). Relationship between job satisfaction and the perception of administrative support among early career secondary choral music educators. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 17(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837070170010111
   Google Scholar
• Berberick, D. M., Clementson, C. J., Hawkinson, J. K., & Rolandson, D. M. (2016). A comparison of principal practices and music educator perceptions regarding teacher evaluation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 209, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.209.0043
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. (2001). Research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, C. F. (2015). Ensemble educators, administrators, and evaluation: Support, survival, and navigating change in a high-stakes environment [Doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3704455)
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, D. (2007). Teacher perceptions on student portfolio evaluation and implementation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Rowan University.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. F. (2013). Teacher supervision and evaluation: A case study of administrators’ and teachers’ perceptions of mini observations [Doctoral dissertation]. Northeastern University. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3556916)
   Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., & Christensen, S. (2006). Professional development and the music teacher. Contributions to Music Education, 33(1), 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, D. (2014). TN fine arts student growth measures. https://nafme.org/wp-content/files/2014/06/TN-evaluation-Dru-Davidson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davison, D., & Fisher, R. (2019). Music teacher evaluation and student growth in music. In T. Brophy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evaluation policy and practice in music education (Vol. 1, pp. 851–869). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doss, J. A. (2016). Perceived stress among public school music educators: Stress over time, demographic differences, common self-identified factors of stress, and relationships between demographic differences and emergent stress themes [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri-Kansas City.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. (2012, September 23). The Tennessee story [Blog post]. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/arne-duncan/the-tennesseestory_ b_1695467.html
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. (1995). Strategies for interpreting qualitative data. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., Schorr, R. Y., & Monfils, L. F. (Eds.). (2004). The ambiguity of teaching to the test: Standards, evaluation, and educational reform. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, T. G., Van Sickle, M. E., Clark, L. V., Fazio-Brunson, M., & Schween, D. C. (2017). Teacher self-efficacy, professional commitment, and high-stakes teacher evaluation policy in Louisiana. Educational Policy, 31(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815586855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foust, B. (2017). Measuring arts integration teacher effectiveness in non-arts classrooms through student growth [Doctoral dissertation]. Boston University. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10606850)
   Google Scholar
• Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1408–1416. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, R., & Woulfin, S. (2017). Making teacher evaluation work: A guide for literacy teachers and leaders. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. (2010). Should I stay or should I go? Factors that influence the retention, turnover, and attrition of K–12 music teachers in the United States. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(3), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632910903458896
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A. D. (2016). The Framework for 21st Century Learning: A first-rate foundation for music education evaluation and teacher evaluation. Arts Education Policy Review, 117(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2014.966285
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, D., & Imse, L. A. (2016). Student-centered classrooms: Past initiatives, future practices. Music Educators Journal, 103(2), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432116671785
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., Sørensen, T. B., & Verger, A. (2017). Global perspectives on high-stakes teacher accountability policies: An introduction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(85), 85–18. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.3325
   Google Scholar
• Horsley, S. (2017). Curriculum as policy. In P. Schmidt & R. Colwell (Eds.), Policy and the political life of music education (pp. 11–36). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kallio, A. A., Westerlund, H., & Partti, H. (2014). The quest for authenticity in the music classroom: Sinking or swimming? Nordic Research in Music Education, 15, 205–224.
   Google Scholar
• Kappler-Hewitt, K. (2015). Educator evaluation policy that incorporates EVAAS value-added measures: Undermined intentions and exacerbated inequities. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(76), 76–49. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1968
   Google Scholar
• Katz-Cote, H. (2016). A matrix of music supervisors’ stories in the midst of school reform [Doctoral dissertation]. Boston University. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3704455)
   Google Scholar
• Kinzer, E., & Luna, L. (2013). TVAAS focus session. http://team-tn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/June-23-TVAAS-Focus-Training-FINAL-PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Koza, J. E. (2002). Corporate profit at equity’s expense: Codified standards and high-stakes evaluation in music teacher preparation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 152, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Koziel, E. B. (2018). Are We Lovin’ It?: The edTPA and the McDonaldization of Music Teacher Training [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Memphis. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10788085)
   Google Scholar
• Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Exploring the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1–29. http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, W. S. (2014). Understanding classroom assessment in dilemmatic spaces: Case studies of Singaporean music teachers’ conceptions of classroom assessment. Music Education Research, 16(4), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2013.878325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. (2012). Fine-tuning teacher evaluation. Music Education Research, 70(3), 50–53. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/nov12/vol70/num03/Fine-Tuning_Teacher_Evaluation.aspx https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2013.878325
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. (2014). An exploratory study of music teacher evaluation practices in multiple states with Race to the Top funding: K-12 music educators’ experiences, perspectives and recommendations [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Colorado Boulder. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3672459)
   Google Scholar
• McWhirter, J. L. (2013, September 27). A survey examining the dispositions of music teachers regarding the new teacher evaluation system in Tennessee and the possible impact on teacher retention and recruitment. Poster presented at the Biennial Symposium of the Society for Music Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Morganstein, D., & Wasserstein, R. (2014). ASA statement on value-added models. Statistics and Public Policy, 1(1), 108–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/2330443X.2014.956906
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Teacher Quality. (2019). State of the states 2019: Teacher & principal evaluation policy. https://www.nctq.org/pages/State-of-the-States-2019:-Teacher-and-Principal-Evaluation-Policy
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, G. (2020). (Open market + deregulation) ÷ competition = innovation + excellence: The experiences of music teachers in the age of neoliberal reform [Doctoral dissertation]. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 28022500)
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, K. A., Rohwer, D., & Davison, D. (2015). Measuring student music growth with blind-reviewed portfolios: A pilot study. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 203, 23–44. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.203.0023
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. (2005). The impact of beginning music teacher evaluation on the evaluators: Notes from experienced teachers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 164, 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. (2015). The inchworm and the nightingale: On the (mis)use of data in music teacher evaluation. Arts Education Policy Review, 116(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2014.944966
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. (2019). Music teachers’ perceptions of high stakes teacher evaluation. Arts Education Policy Review, 120(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1373380
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Brown, K. W. (2005). Legislating competence: The motivational impact of high-stakes testing as an educational reform. In C. Dweck & A. Elliot (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 354–372). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Weinstein, N. (2009). Undermining quality teaching and learning: A self- determination theory perspective on high-stakes testing. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104327
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2008). Research question. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2, pp. 786–787). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P. (2017). Why policy matters. In P. Schmidt & R. Colwell (Eds.), Policy and the political life of music education (pp. 11–36). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. D. (2016a). Arts teacher evaluation: How did we get here? Arts Education Policy Review, 117(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2014.992083
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. D. (2016b). Music teacher stress in the era of accountability. Arts Education Policy Review, 117(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2015.1005325
   Google Scholar
• Shelby County Schools. (2015). The teacher effectiveness manual. http://www.scsk12.org/uf/memo/files/files/15-16%20TEM%20Manual-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shuler, S. C. (2012). Music education for life: Music evaluation, part 2—instructional improvement and teacher evaluation. Music Educators Journal, 98(3), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432112439000
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, J. (2014). NAfME’s teacher evaluation workbook. https://nafme.org/teacherevaluationworkbook/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2017). Music teacher evaluation: New Jersey music teacher attitudes and perceptions of evaluator types and evaluation model types and their interaction [Doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers University. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10586279)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. C., & Kubacka, K. (2017). The emphasis of student test scores in teacher appraisal systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(86), 29–86. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2889
   Google Scholar
• Society for Music Teacher Education. (2017). Teacher evaluation. http://smte.us/aspas/aspasteacher-evaluation/
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (2003). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 134–164). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, W., & Carter, E. (2014). Evaluating music teachers through portfolios of student growth. Orff Echo, 46(4), 26–29. https://openmusiclibrary.org/article/188564/
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Z. (2017). The rise of student growth portfolio models in Tennessee. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572949.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Code § 49-1-302 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Department of Education. (2014). New tenure law. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/education/legal/legal_tenure_faq.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Department of Education. (2015). Teacher and administrator evaluation in Tennessee. Retrieved from http://team-tn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/rpt_teacher_evaluation_year_32.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Department of Education. (2017a). Attachment 2: Shelby County salary schedule. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/stateboardofeducation/documents/meetingfiles/8-25-17_IV_B_LEA_Alternative_Salary_Schedule_Attachment_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Department of Education. (2017b). Tennessee educator acceleration model: Evaluation. http://team-tn.org/evaluation/
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Department of Education. (2018a). Tennessee educator acceleration model: Fine arts. https://team-tn.org/non-tested-grades-subjects/fine-arts/
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Department of Education. (2018b). Tennessee value-added assessment system. https://www.tn.gov/education/data/tvaas.html
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2015). Incheon Declaration, Education 2030: Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. https://en.unesco.org/world-education-forum-2015/incheondeclaration
   Google Scholar
• Vaillant, D., & Gonzalez-Vaillant, G. (2017). Within the teacher evaluation policies black box: Two case studies. Teacher Development, 21(3), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1259649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar