Hidden Depths and Everyday Secrets: How Audience Sense- Making Can Inform Arts Policy and Practice

References

• Alexander, V. 2009, August 8–11. “Excellence, Audiences, the Creative Economy and British Arts Policy.” Conference Paper, American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Americans for the Arts. 2012. Arts & Economic Prosperity IV. Washington, DC: Americans for the Arts. http://www.americansforthearts.org/sites/default/files/pdf/information_services/research/services/economic_impact/aepiv//AEP4_NationalSummaryReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E., and O. Bennett. 2007. “Determinants of Impact: Towards a Better Understanding of Encounters with the Arts.” Cultural Trends 16 (3):225–275.
   Google Scholar
• Bertacchini, E., and F. Morando. 2013. “The Future of Museums in the Digital Age: New Models for Access to and Use of Digital Collections.” International Journal of Arts Management 15 (2):60–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boorsma, M., and F. Chiaravalloti. 2010. “Arts Marketing Performance: An Artistic-Mission-Led Approach to Evaluation.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 40 (4):297–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. F. 2003. “Communication: A Harder Science.” In Communication: A Different Kind of Horse Race: Essays Honoring Richard F. Carter, edited by B. Dervin, S. H. Chaffee, and L. Foreman-Wernet, 369–76. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cherbo, J. M. 1998. “The Arts Sector: Introduction.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society 28 (2):99–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, L. 2013. Audience Engagement and the Role of Arts Talk in the Digital Era. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• DeNora, T. 2000. Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, B. 2003. “Sense-Making's Journey from Metatheory to Methodology to Method: An Example Using Information Seeking and Use as Research Focus.” In Sense-Making Methodology Reader: Selected Writings of Brenda Dervin, edited by B. Dervin and L. Foreman-Wernet, 133–163. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, B., and L. Foreman-Wernet, eds. 2003. Sense-Making Methodology Reader: Selected Writings of Brenda Dervin. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Easter, D. 2010. “From Audiences to Collaborators: The Dialogical Turn in Art.” In Audiences and the Arts: Communication Perspectives, edited by L. Foreman-Wernet and B. Dervin, 173–90. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class and How it's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foreman-Wernet, L., and B. Dervin. 2005. “Comparing Arts and Popular Culture Experiences: Applying a Common Methodological Framework.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 35 (3):169–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman-Wernet, L., and B. Dervin. 2006. “Listening to Learn: ‘Inactive’ Publics of the Arts as Exemplar.” Public Relations Review 32 (3):287–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman-Wernet, L., and B. Dervin. 2011. “Cultural Experience in Context: Sense-Making the Arts.” Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 41 (1):1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman-Wernet, L., and B. Dervin. 2013. “In the Context of their Lives: How Audience Members Make Sense of Performing Arts Experiences.” In The Audience Experience: A Critical Response to the Intrinsic Needs of Audiences in the Performing Arts, edited by J. Radbourne, H. Glow, and K. Johanson, 67–82. Bristol, UK: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Foreman-Wernet, L., B. Dervin, and C. Funk. 2014. “Standing in Two Worlds Looking at an Art Exhibition: Sense-Making in the Millennial Generation.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 44 (2):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, Y., and S. Runyard. 2011. Marketing and Public Relations for Museums, Galleries, Cultural and Heritage Attractions. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J. 2015. “Countering Critique: Expressing the Value of the Arts through the Artistic Rebuttal Project.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society 45 (2):100–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetland, L., and E. Winner. 2001. “The Arts and Academic Achievement: What the Evidence Shows.” Arts Education Policy Review 102 (5):3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ivey, B. 2008. Arts, Inc.: How Greed and Neglect have Destroyed our Cultural Rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M.-R., and J. Herranz, Jr. 2002. Culture Counts in Communities: A Framework for Measurement. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Janes, R. R. 2009. Museums in a Troubled World: Renewal, Irrelevance or Collapse? London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keaney, E. 2008. “Understanding Arts Audiences: Existing Data and What it Tells Us.” Cultural Trends 17 (2):97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, D. 2012. “Public Culture in America: A Review of Cultural Policy Debates.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society 42 (1):11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., D. Hessekiel, and N. R. Lee. 2012. Good Works! Marketing and Corporate Initiatives That Build a Better World… And the Bottom Line. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, L. M. C., C. J. Urquhart, and B. Dervin. In press. “Sense-Making/Sensemaking.” In Oxford Bibliographies in Communication, edited by P. Moy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, C. 2006. “The Public Access Debate.” In The Responsive Museum, edited by C. Lang, J. Reeve, and V. Woollard, 29–40. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, S., and R. Mukai. 2016. “Foundation Grants to Arts and Culture, 2013: A One-Year Snapshot.” Grantmakers in the Arts Reader 27 (1):2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. 2013. “How the Arts Generate Social Capital to Foster Intergroup Social Cohesion.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society 43 (1):4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, S. 2010. “Composing Reflexivity: The Social Studies Project.” In Audiences and the Arts: Communication Perspectives, edited by L. Foreman-Wernet and B. Dervin, 123–50. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, K. V. 2006. “Cultural Policy: Definitions and Theoretical Approaches.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 35 (4):319–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Endowment for the Arts. 2010. Audience 2.0: How Technology Influences Arts Participation. Research Report #50. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Novak-Leonard, J. L., and A. S. Brown. 2011. “Beyond Attendance: A Multi-Modal Understanding of Arts Participation.” Research Report #54. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, A., and R. Rentschler. 2010. “Conversation, Collaboration, and Cooperation: Courting New Audiences for a New Century.” In Marketing the Arts: A Fresh Approach, edited by D. O'Reilly and F. Kerrigan, 54–71. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A., and R. M. Kern. 1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.” American Sociological Review 61 (5):900–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, S. E. 2005. “What Makes an Audience? Investigating the Roles and Experiences of Listeners at a Chamber Music Festival.” Music & Letters 86 (2):257–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radbourne, J., H. Glow, and K. Johanson. 2010. “Measuring the Intrinsic Benefits of Arts Attendance.” Cultural Trends 19 (4):307–324.
   Google Scholar
• Rectanus, M. W. 2002. Culture Incorporated: Museums, Artists, and Corporate Sponsors. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rentschler, R. 2002. “Museum and Performing Arts Marketing: The Age of Discovery.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 32 (1):7–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumbold, K. 2008. “The Arts Council England's ‘Arts Debate.’” Cultural Trends 17 (3):189–95.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, A. 2011. “Transformations in Cultural Communication: Social Media, Cultural Exchange, and Creative Connections.” Curator 54 (3):327–346.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, E. 2011. “Investigating the Impact of Contrasting Paradigms of Knowledge on the Emancipatory Aims of Gallery Programmes for Young People.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 30 (3):409–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, R. 2012. “Chiming in on Museums and Participatory Culture.” Curator 55 (2):215–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, M. J., and S. C. Seifert. 2005. Philadelphia and Camden Cultural Participation Benchmark Project. Philadelphia, PA: Social Impact of the Arts Project, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, D., D. Rowe, and K. McKay. 2010. “Convergence in British Cultural Policy: The Social, the Cultural, and the Economic.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 40 (4):248–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs, R., and H. Clapp. 2015. “Public Funding for the Arts: 2015 Update.” Grantmakers in the Arts Reader 26 (3):5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wali, A., and J. Ostergaard. 2010. “Toward a More Inclusive Approach to Participation: The Varieties of Art Experiences.” In Audiences and the Arts: Communication Perspectives, edited by L. Foreman-Wernet and B. Dervin, 43–60. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, S. E. 1999. “From Being about Something to Being for Somebody: The Ongoing Transformation of the American Museum.” Daedalus 128 (3):229–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, T. R., and A.-M. Hede. 2008. “Using Narrative Inquiry to Explore the Impact of Art on Individuals.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society 38 (1):19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyszomirski, M. J. 2000. “Raison D'Etat, Raisons des Arts: Thinking about Public Purposes.” In The Public Life of the Arts in America, edited by J. M. Cherbo and M. J. Wyszomirski, 50–78. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zolberg, V. 2003. “Current Challenges for Cultural Policy: New Meanings of Community.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 32 (4):295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar