Managing Autonomy: Analyzing Arts Management and Artistic Autonomy through the Theory of Justification

References

• Boltanski, L., and È. Chiapello. 2007. The New Spirit of Capitalism, Le Nouvel Esprit du Capitalisme. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 1999. “The Sociology of Critical Capacity.” European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3):359–77. doi: 10.1177/136843199002003010.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1996. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiapello, E. 1998. Artistes versus Managers: Le Management Culturel Face à la Critique Artiste [Artists Versus Managers: Cultural Management Facing Art Criticism]. Paris, France: Métailié.
   Google Scholar
• Daigle, P., and L. Rouleau. 2010. “Strategic Plans in Arts Organizations: A Tool of Compromise between Artistic and Managerial Values.” International Journal of Arts Management 12 (3):13–30.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. 1988. Managers of the Arts: Careers and Opinions of Senior Administrators of U.S. Art Museums, Symphony Orchestras, Resident Theatres, and Local Arts Agencies. Santa Ana, CA: Seven Locks Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, J., L. E. Hansen, and Q. L. V. derHoogen. 2017. The Problem of Theatrical Autonomy: Analysing Theatre as a Social Practice. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eikhof, D. R., and A. Haunschild. 2007. “For Art's Sake! Artistic and Economic Logics in Creative Production.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 28 (5):523–38. doi: 10.1002/job.462.
   Google Scholar
• Ejgod Hansen, L. 2004. “Hollandsk Teaterpolitik [Dutch Theater Policy].” Nordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidsskrift (2):179–214.
   Google Scholar
• Ellmeier, A. 2003. “Cultural Entrepreneurialism: On the Changing Relationship between the Arts, Culture and Employment.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 9 (1):3–16. doi: 10.1080/1028663032000069158a.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim, M., and J. Potthast. 2012. “Symmetrical Twins: On the Relationship between Actor-Network Theory and the Sociology of Critical Capacities.” European Journal of Social Theory 15 (2):157–78. doi: 10.1177/1368431011423601.
   Google Scholar
• Hamersveld, I. V. 2009. Cultural Policy in The Netherlands. The Hague, The Netherlands: Boekmanstudies.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, V., C. Bilton, and S. Cummings. 2014. “Promoting Ensemble: Creative Leadership in Practice at the Royal Shakespeare Company.” In Handbook of Management and Creativity, edited by C. Bilton and S. Cummings, 249–270. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M., H. Ansio, and P. Houni. 2015. “New Variations of Dual Leadership: Insights from Finnish Theatre.” International Journal of Arts Management 17 (3):16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kann-Rasmussen, N. 2016. “For Samfundets Skyld: Kulturlederes Forestillinger om Legitimitet og Omverden [For the Sake of Society: Arts Managers' Notions About Legitimacy and the Environment].” The Nordic Journal of Cultural Policy 19 (2):201–221.
   Google Scholar
• Kleppe, B. 2016. “The Autonomous World Reversed: Comparing Liberal Policy and Autonomy in the Performing Arts.” International Journal of Cultural Policy. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2016.1184659.
   Google Scholar
• Kleppe, B., P. Mangset, and S. Røyseng. 2010. Kunstnere i Byråkratisk Jernbur? Kunstnerisk Arbeid i Utøvende Kunstinstitusjoner, TF-rapport nr. 343 [Artists in an Iron Cage? Artists' Work in Performing Arts Institutions]. Bø, Norway: Telemarksforsking.
   Google Scholar
• Kuesters, I. 2010. “Arts Managers as Liaisons between Finance and Art: A Qualitative Study Inspired by the Theory of Functional Differentiation.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 40 (1):43–57. doi: 10.1080/10632921003603976.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. 1992. Money, Morals and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. 2013. “Legitimation Work in State Cultural Organizations: The Case of Norway.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 20 (4):456–70. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2013.850497.
   Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S., and T. B. Lawrence. 2003. “Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark: Understanding Failure in Organizational Strategizing.” Journal of Management Studies 40 (1):109–39. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.t01-2-00006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangset, P., B. Kleppe, and S. Røyseng. 2012. “Artists in an Iron Cage? Artists’ Work in Performing Arts Institutions.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 42 (4):156–75. doi: 10.1080/10632921.2012.727773.
   Google Scholar
• Nijzink, D., Q. L. V. denHoogen, and P. Gielen. 2015. “The Creative Industries: Conflict or Collaboration? An Analysis of the Perspectives from Which Policymakers, Art Organizations and Creative Organizations in the Creative Industries are Acting.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 21:1–21. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2015.1069824.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, M. 2013. “New Perspectives on Instrumentalism: An Empirical Study of Cultural Diplomacy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 19 (5):557–575.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A. 1986. “From Impresario to Arts Administrator: Formal Accountability in Nonprofit Cultural Organizations.” In Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Constraint, edited by P. DiMaggio, vol. XV, 161–183. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ringdal, N. J. 2000. Nationaltheatrets Historie, 1899–1999 [The History of The National Theatre (Oslo), 1899-1999]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Røyseng, S. 2007. “Den Gode, Hellige og Disiplinerte Kunsten: Forestillinger om Kunstens Autonomi i Kulturpolitikk og Kunstledelse [Good, Sacred and Disciplined Art: Ideas on the Autonomy of Art in Cultural Policy and Arts Management].” Avhandling for dr.polit. graden, Telemarksforsking-Bø, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Røyseng, S. 2008. “Arts Management and the Autonomy of Art.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 14 (1):37–48. doi: 10.1080/10286630701856484.
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51 (2):273–86.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L., M. Moody, and C. Lafaye. 2000. “Forms of Valuing Nature: Arguments and Modes of Justification in French and American Environmental Disputes.” In Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States, edited by M. Lamont and L. Thévenot, 229–272. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Maanen, H. 2002. “The Dutch Theatre System: A World of Independents.” Theatre Research International 2:178–91.
   Google Scholar
• van Maanen, H. 2008. “One Hundred and Fifty Sources after ‘The Introduction’: On the Importance of Being Autonomous.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 14 (3):281–97. doi: 10.1080/10286630802281863.
   Google Scholar
• van Maanen, H. 2009. How to Study Art Worlds: On the Societal Functioning of Aesthetic Values. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar