The Mechanics of Cultural Diplomacy: A Comparative Case Study Analysis from the European Context

References

• Arndt, R. T. 2005. The First Resort of Kings: American Cultural Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century. Washington, DC: Potomac Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. 2002. “Art as a Means of Alleviating Social Exclusion: Does it Really Work? A Critique of Instrumental Cultural Policies and Social Impact Studies in the UK.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 8 (1):91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. 2004. “Auditing Culture: The Subsidised Cultural Sector in the New Public Management.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 10 (2):183–202.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. 2012. “Defensive Instrumentalism and the Legacy of New Labour's Cultural Policies.” Cultural Trends 21 (2):103–111.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, O. K. 2016. “Cultural Diplomats at Work: The Foreign Cultural Policy of the Norwegian Foreign Service.” Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Cultural Policy Research. Accessed October 27, 2017. https://www.telemarksforsking.no/publikasjoner/filer/3094.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenreich, U. 2016. “Germany: Historical Perspective: Cultural Policies and Instruments.” Compendium of Cultural Policies and Trends in Europe. Accessed October 30, 2017. http://www.culturalpolicies. net/web/germany.php.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• British Council. 2013. “Management Statement.” Accessed June 6, 2017. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/july_2013_management_statement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• British Council. 2016. “Annual Report and Accounts 2015–2016.” Accessed June 6, 2017. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/annual-report-2015-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, D. 2015. “Living with Instrumentalism: The Academic Commitment to Cultural Diplomacy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 21 (4):478–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartrand, H. H., and C. McCaughey. 1989. “The Arm's Length Principle and the Arts: An International Perspective: Past, Present and Future.” In Who's to Pay for the Arts: The International Search for Models of Support, edited by M. C. Cummings, Jr. and J. M. Davidson Schuster, 43–80. Washington, DC: American Council for the Art.
   Google Scholar
• Commission des Affaires Étrangères, de la Défense et des Forces Armées. 2017. “Rapport d'Information sur le Contrat d'Objectifs et de Moyens 2017–2019 de l'Institut français [Report of Information on the Contract of Objectives and Aims 2017–2019 of the Institut français].” Accessed June 2, 2017. http://www.senat.fr/rap/r16-419/r16-4190.html (in French).
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., and D. Miller. 2000. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.” Theory Into Practice 39 (3):124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duignan, P., and L. H. Gann. 1996. The Rebirth of the West: The Americanization of the Democratic World, 1945–1958. Boston, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., and A. Mische. 1998. “What is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103 (4):962–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, European External Action Service. 2016. “Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council: Towards an EU Strategy for International Cultural Relations.” JOIN/2016/029 final. Accessed June 2, 2017. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=JOIN%3A2016%3A29%3AFIN.
   Google Scholar
• European Cultural Foundation. 2005. “Country Profiles: Sweden.” Accessed October 23, 2017. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/526e5978e4b0b83086a1fede/t/546f4d46e4b071e8d7e7f253/1416580422756/Sweden.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Cultural Institutes Abroad. 2016. “European Parliament, Committee on Culture and Education, Directorate-General for Internal Policies.” Accessed June 2, 2017. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/supporting-analyses-search.html.
   Google Scholar
• Facchinetti, R., M. Krug, and F. Palmer, eds. 2003. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. 2002. “Local Government and the Arts.” Local Government Studies 28 (1):77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. 2007. “Commodification and Instrumentality in Cultural Policy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 13 (2):203–215.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. 2008. “Instrumental Policies: Causes, Consequences, Museums and Galleries.” Cultural Trends 17 (4):209–222.
   Google Scholar
• Goethe-Institut e.V. Munich. 2004. “Basic Agreement.” Accessed June 2, 2017. https://www.goethe.de/resources/files/pdf17/Goethe-Institut_Basic-Agreement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Government Offices for Sweden. 2015. “This is the Ministry of Culture.” Accessed October 23, 2017. http://www.government.se/information-material/2015/12/this-is-the-ministry-of-culture/.
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, S., and C. Gray. 2017. “Hyperinstrumentalism and Cultural Policy: Means to an End or an End to Meaning?” Cultural Trends 26 (2):95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HFC Budget of Income and Expenses. 2014. Document retrieved after personal communication with the Department of Public Institutions, Financial Analysis and Sponsorships of the Greek Ministry of Culture and Sports (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Hughson, J., and D. Inglis. 2001. “‘Creative Industries’ and the Arts in Britain: Towards a ‘Third Way’ in Cultural Policy?” International Journal of Cultural Policy 7 (3):457–478.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Cervantes. 2017. “Quiénes Somos, Órganos Rectores, Patronato [Who We Are, Governing Bodies, Board of Trustees].” Accessed October 23, 2017. http://www.cervantes.es/sobre_instituto_cervantes/informacion.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kawashima, N. 1995. “Comparing Cultural Policy: Towards the Development of Comparative Study.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 1 (2):289–307.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, P. 2007. “Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4):804–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, B., G. Smith, G. Bagnall, G. Crawford, and M. Ogborn, eds. 2008. Introducing Cultural Studies, 2nd ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère de l'Europe et des Affaires étrangères. 2015. “L'Institut français et l'Alliance française, Acteurs de l'Action Culturelle Extérieure [The Institut français and Alliance française, Actors of External Cultural Action].” Accessed October 23, 2017. http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/politique-etrangere-de-la-france/diplomatie-culturelle/le-reseau-culturel-francais-a-l-etranger/article/l-institut-francais-et-lQ14alliance-francaise-acteurs-de-l-action-culturelle (in French).
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación. 2015. “Estrategia de Acción Exterior [Strategy of External Action].” Accessed June 2, 2017. http://www.exteriores.gob.es/Portal/es/SalaDePrensa/Multimedia/Publicaciones/Documents/ESTRATEGIA%20DE%20ACCION%20EXTERIOR%20castellano.pdf (in Spanish).
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, M. 2013. “New Perspectives on Instrumentalism: An Empirical Study of Cultural Diplomacy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 19 (5):557–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamment, J. 2012. New Public Diplomacy in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of Policy and Practice. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paschalidis, G. 2009. “Exporting National Culture: Histories of Cultural Institutes Abroad.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 15 (3):275–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R.-B. 1997. “Distance or Intimacy? The Arm's Length Principle, the British Government and the Arts Council of Great Britain.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 4 (1): 127–159.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, T. 2015. “Distinguishing Cultural Relations from Cultural Diplomacy: The British Council's Relationship with Her Majesty's Government.” USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School. Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa Press. Accessed November 3, 2017. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/useruploads/u33041/Distinguishing%20Cultural%20Relations%20From%20Cultural%20Diplomacy%20-%20Full%20Version%20%281%29.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shmagin, Y. 2008. “Cultural Attachés, Forward!” International Affairs 54 (4):105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. 1997. “‘Arm's Length but Hands On.’ Mapping the New Governance: The Department of National Heritage and Cultural Politics in Britain.” Public Administration 75 (3):441–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestheim, G. 1994. “Instrumental Cultural Policy in Scandinavian Countries: A Critical Historical Perspective.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 1 (1):57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. 1961. “United Nations Conference on Diplomatic Intercourse and Immunities.” Accessed October 23, 2017. http://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1964/06/19640624%2002-10%20AM/Ch_III_3p.pdf.
   Google Scholar