Keeping Creativity Downtown: Policy Learning from San Francisco, Seattle, and Vancouver for Municipal Cultural Planning in Toronto

References

• Bellini, N., and Pasquinelli, C. (eds). 2016. Tourism in the City: Towards an Integrative Agenda on Urban Tourism. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J. 1991. “What is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?” British Journal of Political Science 21 (2):215–233. doi:10.1017/S0007123400006116.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J., and M. Howlett. 1992. “The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change.” Policy Sciences 25 (3):275–94. doi:10.1007/BF00138786.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, T. A. 2016. “Urban Mascots and Poverty Fetishism: Authenticity in the Postindustrial City.” Sociological Perspectives 59 (2):460–478.
   Google Scholar
• Boddy, M., and M. Parkinson. 2004. City Matters: Competitiveness, Cohesion and Urban Governance, 1st ed. Bristol, UK: Policy Press at the University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Borrup, T. 2015. Creativity in Urban Placemaking. Los Angeles, CA: Antioch University.
   Google Scholar
• City of Seattle. 2016a. Visiting Seattle. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• City of Seattle. 2016b. Arts and Cultural Districts. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• City of Seattle. 2016c. Seattle's Draft Comprehensive Plan. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• City of Seattle. 2016d. Cultural Space. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• City of Seattle. 2016e. Cultural Facilities Fund: Grants. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• City of Toronto. 2002. Creative Capital Gains an Action Plan for Toronto. Toronto, Canada: City of Toronto Economic Development Committee and Toronto City Council.
   Google Scholar
• City of Toronto. 2003. Culture Plan for the Creative City 2003. Toronto, Canada: Cultural Services & Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• City of Toronto. 2013. Economic Impact of the Toronto Culture Sector Briefing Note. Toronto, Canada: Economic Development & Culture Division.
   Google Scholar
• City of Toronto. 2014. Making Space for Culture Community Consultation Summaries. Toronto, Canada: City of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver. 1996a. Artist Studios: Interpretation of Regulations. Vancouver, Canada: Community Services.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver. 1996b. Downtown District and IC-3 District Policies and Procedures for Low Cost Rental Artist Studios. Vancouver, Canada: Land Use and Development.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver. 2006. Artist Studio Guidelines. Vancouver, Canada: City Council.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver. 2008. Culture Plan for Vancouver 2008–2018. Vancouver, Canada: Creative City Task Force.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver. 2015. Cultural Spaces Map Online Map Dataset & Resource Report. Vancouver, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Currid, E. 2010. “Symposium Introduction—Art and Economic Development: New Directions for the Growth of Cities and Regions.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 29 (3):257–61. doi:10.1177/0739456X09355135.
   Google Scholar
• Delisle, F., and R. Shearmur. 2010. “Where Does All the Talent Flow? Migration of Young Graduates and Nongraduates, Canada 1996–2001.” Canadian Geographer 54 (3):305–23. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2009.00276.x.
   Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 1996. “Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature.” Political Studies 44:343–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x.
   Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., and D. Marsh. 2012. “The Future of Policy Transfer Research.” Political Studies Review 10 (3):339–45. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00274.x.
   Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., and D. Medearis. 2009. “Considerations of the Obstacles and Opportunities to Formalizing Cross-National Policy Transfer to the United States: A Case Study of the Transfer of Urban Environmental and Planning Policies from Germany.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27 (4):684–97. doi:10.1068/c0865j.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. 1979. “Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions.” Political Science Quarterly 94 (4):601–16. doi:10.2307/2149628.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. 1983. Forward and Backward Mapping: Reversible Logic in the Analysis of Public Policy. Seattle, WA: Washington University at Seattle's Intuition for Public Policy and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. 2009. “Creative Cities, Creative Places and Urban Policy.” Urban Studies 46 (5&6):1003–1040. doi:10.1177/0042098009103853.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M., and J. Marsh. 1999. “Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-Level, Multidisciplinary Perspective.” Public Administration 77 (2):361–385. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00158.
   Google Scholar
• Ezell, K. 2014. Designing Local: Revealing Our Truest Communities. Columbus, OH: Design Local, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. L. 2012. The Rise of the Creative Class, Revisited. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Post. 2014. “North America's Top 20 Housing Markets: Vancouver, Toronto, Calgary Among Most Expensive on Continent.” Accessed November 28, 2014. http://business.financialpost.com/personal-finance/mortgages-real-estate/north-americas-top-20-housing-markets-vancouver-the-most-expensive-on-continent-while-toronto-calgary-beat-new-york-city.
   Google Scholar
• Foroozani, M. I. 2011. “The Creative Hub Strategy, Recreating the Historic Centre of the City.” The Scientific Journal of Nazar 19:80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Giffinger, R., and H. Gudrun. 2010. “Smart Cities Ranking: An Effective Instrument for the Positioning of Cities?” Architecture, City and Environment / Arquitectura, Ciudad y Entorno 4 (12):7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. B. D. 2012. “The Role of Arts and Culture in Modern Cities: Making Art Work in Toronto and New York.” Ph.D. diss., New School University, Ann Arbor, MI. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, http://proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/login?url = https://search-proquest-com.proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/docview/924484887?accountid = 9783.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg-Miller, S. B. D. 2017. Planning for a City of Culture: Creative Urbanism in Toronto and New York. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg-Miller, S. B. D., and E. F. Fregetto. 2016. “Urban Creativity: An Entrepreneurial Focus.” Journal of Enterprising Culture 24 (1):79–99. doi:10.1142/S0218495816500047.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg-Miller, S. B. D., and J. E. Heimlich. 2017. “Creatives' Expectations: The Role of Supercreatives in Cultural District Development.” Cities 62:120–130. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.011.
   Google Scholar
• Grodach, C. 2017. “Urban Cultural Policy and Creative City Making.” Cities 68:82–91. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.05.015.
   Google Scholar
• Grodach, C., N. Foster, and J. Murdoch. 2014. “Gentrification and the Artistic Dividend: The Role of the Arts in Neighborhood Change.” Journal of the American Planning Association 80 (1):21–35. doi:10.1080/01944363.2014.928584.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, S., and N. Campbell. 2015. “Central City Vibrancy and New Business Venturing.” Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy 4 (2):257–71. doi:10.1108/JEPP-01-2014-0002.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. 2014. “Leading the Inclusive City: International Lesson Drawing for Future Urban Governance.” Paper presented at European Urban Research Association City Futures, Paris, France, June 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2008. “Wicked Problems in Public Policy.” Public Policy 3 (2):101.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, L. A. 2006. Return to the Center: Culture, Public Space, and City Building in a Global Era. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hospers, G.-J. 2003. “Creative Cities: Breeding Places in the Knowledge Economy.” Knowledge, Technology & Policy 16 (3):143–162. doi:10.1007/s12130-003-1037-1.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and M. Ramesh. 2002. “The Policy Effects of Internationalization: A Subsystem Adjustment Analysis of Policy Change.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 4:31–50. doi:10.1080/13876980208412669.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and S. R. Weehuizen. 2005. “Policy Learning: What Does it Mean and How Can We Study It?” Report No. D15, NIFU-STEP, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, N. M., and B. Donald. 2009. “A New Rubric for ‘Creative City' Potential in Canada's Smaller Cities.” Urban Studies 47 (1):29–54.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. 2006. “Urban Development and the Politics of a Creative Class: Evidence from a Study of Artists.” Environment and Planning 38 (10):1921–40. doi:10.1068/a38179.
   Google Scholar
• Marling, G., O. B. Jensen, and H. Kiib. 2009. “The Experience City: Planning of Hybrid Cultural Projects.” European Planning Studies 17 (6):863–85. doi:10.1080/09654310902794018.
   Google Scholar
• Millward & Associates. 2017, January. King-Spadina Cultural Spaces Retention Study: Strengthening the Creative Economy in Toronto's Downtown Core. Toronto, Canada: City of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M., M. Rein, and R. Goodin. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosher, J., and D. M. Trubek. 2003. “Alternative Approaches to Governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy.” Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (1):63–88. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00411.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, P. 2017. How to Kill a City. New York, NY: Nation Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mould, O. 2014. “Tactical Urbanism: The New Vernacular of the Creative City.” GEC3 Geography Compass 8 (8):529–39. doi:10.1111/gec3.12146.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. The Innovation Policy Platform: Policy Learning. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Penco, L. 2015. “The Development of the Successful City in the Knowledge Economy: Toward the Dual Role of Consumer Hub and Knowledge Hub.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 6 (4):818–37. doi:10.1007/s13132-013-0149-4.
   Google Scholar
• Pfister, T. 2009. “Governing the Knowledge Society: Studying Lisbon as Epistemic Setting.” European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 13 (1):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, P. 2010. “Policy Transfer as Policy Assemblage: Making Policy for the Creative Industries in New Zealand.” Environment and Planning A 42:169–86. doi:10.1068/a4224.
   Google Scholar
• Quiroz, A., M. Parashar, N. Gnanasambandam, and N. Sharma. 2010. “Autonomic Management of Distributed Systems Using Online Clustering.” Paper presented at ICAC'10 Conference Proceeding, Reston, VA, June 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, K. N., and H. McLean. 2015. “Governing the Commercial Streets of the City: New Terrains of Disinvestment and Gentrification in Toronto's Inner Suburbs.” Antipode 47 (1):216–39. doi:10.1111/anti.12096.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 2008. “Policy Network Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, edited by M. Moran, M. Rein, and R. E. Goodin, 425–443. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, K. A. 1995. “Downtown Redevelopment Strategies in the United States: An End-of-the-Century Assessment.” Journal of the American Planning Association 61 (4):429–37. doi:10.1080/01944369508975655.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. 1991. “What is Lesson Drawing?” Journal of Public Policy 11 (1):3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, M. 2009. “Re-imaging the City Centre for the Middle Classes: Regeneration, Gentrification and Symbolic Policies in ‘Loser Cities.’” International Journal of Urban & Regional Research 33 (3):770–88. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00004918.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., and H. Jenkins-Smith. 1999. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by P. Sabatier, and C. Weible, 183–224. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., and C. M. Weible. 2007. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by P. Sabatier, and C. Weible, 2nd ed., 189–217. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• San Francisco Arts Commission. 2014. Frequently Asked Questions for Non-Profit Displacement Supplemental Funds. San Francisco, CA: City of San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• San Francisco Arts Commission. 2016. “Access to Housing: San Francisco Artist & Arts Worker Outreach Program.” Accessed November 28, 2017. http://www.sfartscommission.org/CAE/announcements/2016/07/12/access-to-housing-san-francisco-artist-arts-worker-outreach-program/.
   Google Scholar
• San Francisco Department of Planning. 2014. The Pipeline Report. San Francisco, CA: Department of Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, D. 2011. From the Ground Up: Growing Toronto's Cultural Sector. Toronto, Canada: City of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M. J., and S. C. Seifert. 2007. “Cultivating ‘Natural’ Cultural Districts.” Creativity and Change Report Series. Rockefeller Institute, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2003. “Transnational Transfer Agents and Global Networks in the Internationalization of Policy.” Internationalization and Policy Transfer Workshop, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Theil, J. 2017. “Creative Cities and the Reflexivity of the Urban Creative Economy.” European Urban and Regional Studies 24 (1):21–34. doi:10.1177/0969776415595105.
   Google Scholar
• Timberg, S. 2015. Culture Crash: The Killing of the Creative Class. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Steen, M., and J. Groenewegen. 2008. “Exploring Policy Entrepreneurship.” Working Paper 2008–01, Discussion Paper Series on the Coherence Between Institutions and Technologies in Infrastructures, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Delft Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gossum, P. L. L., B. J. M. Arts, and K. Verheyen. 2008. “Implementation Failure of the Forest Expansion Policy in Flanders (Northern Belgium) and the Policy Learning Potential.” Forest Policy and Economics 10:515–22. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. 2010. “Selling City Futures: The Financialization of Urban Redevelopment Policy.” Economic Geography 86 (3):251–274. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01077.x.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, M. 2017. “City Moves to Save 401 Richmond and other Cultural Institutions.” Toronto Star, January 31. Accessed November 28, 2017. https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/visualarts/2017/01/31/city-moves-to-save-401-richmond-and-other-cultural-institutions.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wyszomirski, M. J., and S. B. D. Goldberg-Miller. 2016. “Adapting the Promethean Fire of Business for Arts and Cultural Entrepreneurship.” In Creating Cultural Capital, edited by O. Kuhlke, A. Schramme, and R. Kooyman, 80–89. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., and M. E. Warner. 2010. “Business Incentive Use Among U.S. Local Governments: A Story of Accountability and Policy Learning.” Economic Development Quarterly 24 (4):325–36. doi:10.1177/0891242410376237.
   Google Scholar
• Zukin, S., and L. Braslow. 2011. “The Life Cycle of New York's Creative Districts: Reflections on the Unanticipated Consequences of Unplanned Cultural Zones.” City, Culture and Society 2 (3):131–40. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2011.06.003.
   Google Scholar