Private Property Concerning Digitized Cultural Goods: Artificial Scarcity and Appropriation through Reproduction

References

• Anderson, L. 2012. “There is No Alternative: The Critical Potential of Alternative Media for Challenging Neoliberal Discourse.” tripleC – Communication Capitalism & Critique 10 (2):752–64. http://www.triplec.at/index.php/tripleC/article/viewFile/357/417
   Google Scholar
• Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society (ALCS). 2007. “What are Words Worth? Counting the Cost of a Writing Career in the 21th Century: A Survey of 25,000 Writers.”
   Google Scholar
• Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society (ALCS). 2013. “A Free for All? Findings from a Survey of Freelance Newspaper and Magazine Journalists.” Accessed May 29, 2017. https://wp.alcs.co.uk/app/uploads/2017/07/A-free-for-all-research.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society (ALCS). 2014. “What are Words Worth Now? A Survey of Authors’ Earnings.” Accessed May 29, 2017. https://wp.alcs.co.uk/app/uploads/2017/07/Authors-earning_2017-download-version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barcellona, P. 1996. El individualismo propietario [Proprietary Individualism]. Madrid, Spain: Trotta.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. 2008. The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blondeau, O., N. D. Whiteford, C. Vercellone, A. Kyrou, A. Corsani, E. Rullani, Y. Moulier Boutang, and M. Lazzarato. 2004. Capitalismo cognitivo. Propiedad intelectual y creación colectiva [Cognitive Capitalism. Intellectual Property and Collective Creation]. Madrid, Spain: Traficantes de sueños.
   Google Scholar
• Boldrin, M., and D. Levine. 2009. “Does Intellectual Monopoly Help Innovation?” Review of Law & Economics 5 (3):991–1024. doi:10.2202/1555-5879.1438.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2000. Poder, derecho y clases sociales [Power, Law and Social Classes]. Bilbao, Spain: Desclée de Brouwer.
   Google Scholar
• Ceruzzi, P. 2012. A History of Modern Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. 1995. “Information Feudalism in the Information Society.” The Information Society 11:209–22. doi:10.1080/01972243.1995.9960193.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. 2011. “When Cosmology Meets Property: Indigenous People's Innovation and Intellectual Property.” Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation 29 (3):233–52. doi:10.1080/08109028.2011.638213.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, B. 1980. La práctica ideológica del derecho. Elementos para una teoría marxista del derecho [Ownership of the Image: Elements for a Marxist Theory of Law]. Madrid, Spain: Tecnos.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. 2012. “Google Capitalism.” tripleC – Communication¸ Capitalism & Critique 10 (1):42–48. http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/304/
   Google Scholar
• García Sanz, R. M. 2005. Derechos de autor en internet [Copyright on the Internet]. Madrid, Spain: Colex.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, M. 2003. “Los bienes de información [Experience Goods].” In Manual de economía de la cultura [A Handbook of Cultural Economics], edited by R. Towse, 119–27. Madrid, Spain: Fundación Autor.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, H., and M. McAllister. 2011. “Selling You and Your Clicks: Examining the Audience Commodification of Google.” tripleC – Communication¸ Capitalism & Critique 9 (2):141–53. http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/255
   Google Scholar
• Koloğlugil, S. 2015. “Digitizing Karl Marx: The New Political Economy of General Intellect and Immaterial Labor.” Rethinking Marxism 27:123–27. doi:10.1080/08935696.2014.980678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, D. 2011. “Social Networking and Transnational Capitalism.” tripleC – Communication¸ Capitalism & Critique 9 (2):689–701. http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/264
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M. 2005. “Artists’ Earnings and Copyright: A Review of British and German Music Industry Data in the Context of Digital Technologies.” First Monday 10 (1). doi:10.5210/fm.v10i1.1200.
   Google Scholar
• Mitsui, T. 1993. “Copyright and Music in Japan: A Forced Grafting and its Consequences.” In Music and Copyright, edited by S. Frith, 125–145. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navarrete, T. 2014. “Becoming Digital: A Dutch Heritage Perspective.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society 44:153–68. doi:10.1080/10632921.2014.938385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, S. 1997. “Rights, Freedoms and Phonograms: Moral Rights and Adaptation Rights in Music and Other Copyright Works.” Computer Law & Security Report 1:22–28. doi:10.1016/S0267-3649(97)81188-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos Toledano, J. 2017. “Vivir del arte [Making a Living from Art].” mientrastanto.e, 155 (1):11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Roberge, J., and P. Chantepie. 2017. “The Promised Land of Comparative Digital Cultural Policy Studies.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society 47 (5):295–99. doi:10.1080/10632921.2017.1398584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodotà, S. 1986. El terrible derecho. Estudios sobre la propiedad privada [The Terrible Law]. Madrid, Spain: Civitas.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, S. 2004. “Life after TRIPS – Aggression and Opposition.” In The WTO, Intellectual Property Rights and the Knowledge of Economy, edited by K. Maskus, 73–119. Cheltenham, UK: Edwar Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, M. 2000. “Aboriginal Heritage Art and Moral Rights.” Annals of Tourism Research 27 (2):412–31. doi:10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00070-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towse, R. 2010. A Textbook of Cultural Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S. 2011. “La interferencia de las patentes en el ejercicio del derecho de libertad de investigacióvn [The Interference of Patents in the Excercise of the Right of Freedom of Investigation].” PhD diss., University of A Coruña. Accessed May 29, 2017. http://ruc.udc.es/dspace/handle/2183/10075
   Google Scholar