Comparison between reactive MgO- and Na₂SO₄-activated low-calcium fly ash-solidified soils dredged from East Lake, China

References

• Abdalqader, A. F., F. Jin, and A. Al-Tabbaa. 2016. Development of Greener Alkali-Activated Cement: Utilisation of Sodium Carbonate for Activating Slag and Fly Ash Mixtures. Journal of Cleaner Production 113: 66–75. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM E81-96. 2017. Standard test method for preparing quantitative pole figures. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E2402-11. 2017. Standard test method for mass loss and residue measurement validation of thermogravimetric analyzers. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D4404-18. 2018. Standard test method for determination of pore volume and pore volume distribution of soil and rock by mercury intrusion porosimetry. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• Atiş, C. D., E. B. Görür, O. Karahan, C. Bilim, S. İlkentapar, and E. Luga. 2015. Very High Strength (120 MPa) Class F Fly Ash Geopolymer Mortar Activated at Different NaOH Amount, Heat Curing Temperature and Heat Curing Duration. Construction and Building Materials 96: 673–678. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criado, M., A. Fernández Jiménez, and A. Palomo. 2010. Effect of Sodium Sulfate on the Alkali Activation of Fly Ash. Cement and Concrete Composites 32 (8): 589–594. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristelo, N., S. Glendinning, L. Fernandes, and A. T. Pinto. 2012. Effect of Calcium Content on Soil Stabilisation with Alkaline Activation. Construction and Building Materials 29: 167–174. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vargas, A. S., D. C. C. Dal Molin, A. C. F. Vilela, F. J. Da Silva, B. Pavão, and H. Veit. 2011. The Effects of Na2O/SiO2 Molar Ratio, Curing Temperature and Age on Compressive Strength, Morphology and Microstructure of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Composites 33 (6): 653–660. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donatello, S., A. Fernández-Jiménez, and A. Palomo. 2013. Very High Volume Fly Ash Cement. Early Age Hydration Study Using Na2SO4 as an Activator. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 96 (3): 900–906. doi:10.1111/jace.12178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández Jiménez, A., I. García-Lodeiro, and A. Palomo. 2007. Durability of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash Cementitious Materials. Journal of Materials Science 42: 3055–3065. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0584-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GB/T50123-1999. 2007. GB/T 50123 – 1999 Standard for Soil Test Methods.” the National Standards Compilation Group of PRC. Beijing: China Planning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, D. D. 2007. GGBS and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Construction Materials 160 (3): 99–101. doi:10.1680/coma.2007.160.3.99.
   Google Scholar
• Horpibulsuk, S., R. Rachan, A. Chinkulkijniwat, Y. Raksachon, and A. Suddeepong. 2010. Analysis of Strength Development in Cement-Stabilized Silty Clay from Microstructural Considerations. Construction and Building Materials 24 (10): 2011–2021. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, F., and A. Al-Tabbaa. 2014. Strength and Hydration Products of Reactive MgO-Silica Pastes. Cement and Concrete Composites 52: 27–33. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JTG E40-2007. 2007. Test Method of Soils for Highway Engineering. Ministry of Transport of PRC. Beijing: China Communications Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, X., and B. Bate. 2016. Shear Wave Velocity and Its Anisotropy of Organically Modified High Volume Class F Fly Ash Kaolinite Mixtures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 142 (12): 04016068. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N. K., J. G. Jang, and H. K. Lee. 2014. Shrinkage Characteristics of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash/Slag Paste and Mortar at Early Ages. Cement and Concrete Composites 53: 239–248. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjanović, N., M. Komljenović, Z. Baščarević, V. Nikolić, and R. Petrović. 2015. Physical-Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash-Blast Furnace Slag Blends. Ceramics International 41 (1): 1421–1435. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsuda, T., and H. Taguchi. 1977. Formation of Magnesium Silicate Hydrate and Its Crystallization to Talc. Cement and Concrete Research 7 (3): 223–230. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(77)90083-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okoye, F. N., J. Durgaprasad, and N. B. Singh. 2015. Mechanical Properties of Alkali Activated Fly Ash/Kaolin Based Geopolymer Concrete. Construction and Building Materials 98: 685–691. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomo, A., M. W. Grutzeck, and M. T. Blanco. 1999. Alkali-Activated Fly ashes - A Cement for the Future. Cement and Concrete Research 29 (8): 1323–1329. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis, J. L., and J. S. J. V. Deventer. 2014. Alkali Activated Materials: State-of-the-Art Report. RILEM TC 224-AAM, ISBN 978-94-007-7672-2.
   Google Scholar
• Puertas, F., S. Martı́nez-Ramı́rez, S. Alonso, and T. Vázquez, 2000. Alkali-Activated Fly Ash/Slag Cement. Strength Behaviour and Hydration Products. Cement and Concrete Research 30 (10): 1625–1632. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00298-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, S., N. Cristelo, A. V. D. Fonseca, and C. Ferreira. 2016. Structural Performance of Alkali-Activated Soil Ash versus Soil Cement. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 28 (2): 04015125. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, C., D. Roy, and P. Krivenko. 2006. Alkali-Activated Cements and Concretes. London and New York: Taylor and Francis, ISBN 9780415700047.
   Google Scholar
• Tartaglione, G., D. Tabuani, and G. Camino. 2008. Thermal and Morphological Characterisation of Organically Modified Sepiolite. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 107 (1–2): 161–168. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velandia, D. F., C. J. Lynsdale, J. L. Provis, F. Ramirez, and A. C. Gomez. 2016. Evaluation of Activated High Volume Fly Ash Systems Using Na2SO4, Lime and Quicklime in Mortars with High Loss on Ignition Fly Ashes. Construction and Building Materials 128: 248–255. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., R. Zentar, and N. E. Abriak. 2013. Co-Valorisation of Dunkirk Dredged Sediments and Siliceous-Aluminous Fly Ash Using Lime. Road Materials and Pavement Design 14 (2): 415–431. doi:10.1080/14680629.2013.779309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., H. Wang, and Y. Jiang. 2019. Water Immersion-Induced Strength Performance of Solidified Soils with Reactive MgO - a Green and Low Carbon Binder. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 47 (2): 20170098. doi:10.1520/JTE20170098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Y. Du, and J. Xiao. 2019. Shear Properties of Stabilized Loess Using Novel Reactive Magnesia-Bearing Binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 31 (5): 04019039. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., H. Wang, and S. Di. 2019. Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Magnesia-Fly Ash Pastes. Road Materials and Pavement Design 20 (5): 1243–1254. doi:10.1080/14680629.2018.1439400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., X. Gao, R. Wang, S. Larsson, and M. Benzerzour. 2019d. Elevated Curing Temperature-Associated Strength and Mechanisms of Reactive MgO-Activated Industrial by-Products Solidified Soils. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology. doi:10.1080/1064119X.2019.1610817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, J., Q. Yu, W. Zhang, and H. Zhang. 2011. Reaction Products of MgO and Microsilica Cementitious Materials at Different Temperatures. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology—Mater. Sci. Ed. 26 (4): 745–748. doi:10.1007/s11595-011-0304-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Y., A. Al-Tabbaa, and M. Liska. 2014. Properties and Microstructure of GGBS-Magnesia Pastes. Advances in Cement Research 26 (2): 114–122. doi:10.1680/adcr.13.00005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., C. R. Cheeseman, and L. J. Vandeperre. 2011. Development of Low pH Cement Systems by Forming Magnesium Silicate Hydrate (M-S-H). Cement and Concrete Research 41 (4): 439–422. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., J. Zou, B. Wang, Z. Wu, Y. Jia, and C. R. Cheeseman. 2018. Characterization of Magnesium Silicate Hydrate (MSH) Gel Formed by Reacting MgO and Silica Fume. Materials 11 (6): 909. doi:10.3390/ma11060909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar