Effect of strain rate on triaxial extension behavior of silty clay

References

• Andersen, K. H. 2009. Bearing Capacity under Cyclic Loading—Offshore, along the Coast, and on Land. The 21st Bjerrum Lecture Presented in Oslo, 23 November 2007. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 46 (5): 513–535. doi:10.1139/T09-003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bemben, S. M., and H. J. Myers. 1974. The Influence of Rate of Penetration on Static Cone Resistance in Connecticut River Valley Varved Clay. Proceedings of the European Symposium on Penetration Testing, 2 (2): 33–43. Stockholm: National Swedish Council for Building Research.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, P., and W. Finn. 1978. Breakout of Submerged Structures Buried to Shallow Depth. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 15 (2): 146–154. doi:10.1139/t78-015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabalar, A. F., and R. A. Hasan. 2013. Compressional behaviour of various size/shape sand–clay mixtures with different pore fluids. Engineering Geology 164 (Complete): 36–49.
   Google Scholar
• Cabalar, A. F., and S. Demir. 2019. Fall-cone testing of unsaturated sand-clay mixtures. Geotechnical Engineering 172 (5): 432–441.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, R., C. Gaudin, and M. J. Cassidy. 2012. Investigation of the Vertical Uplift Capacity of Deep Water Mudmats in Clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 49 (7): 853–865. doi:10.1139/t2012-037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, E. D., S. Carstensen, M. T. Madsen, P. A. Hesselbjerg, and C. J. Nielsen. 2017. Pore Water Pressure under a Gravity Based Structure under the Influence of Waves. ASME 2017 36th International Conference on Ocean, V010T09A085–V010T09A085. Offshore and Arctic Engineering American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. F. 2005. Characterisation of Soft Soils for Deep Water Developments. PhD thesis., University of Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. F., M. F. Randolph, and J. A. Schneider. 2006. Effect of Penetration Rate on Penetrometer Resistance in Clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 132 (9): 1188–1196. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:9(1188).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, J., H. Alguire, and D. Muir Wood. 2012. Evaluating Modified Cam Clay Parameters from Undrained Triaxial Compression Data Using Targeted Optimization. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 49 (11): 1285–1292. doi:10.1139/t2012-088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y. B. 2013. Compression and Extension Yield of an Anisotropically Consolidated Soil. Soils and Foundations 53 (3): 431–442. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2013.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffari, S. A., E. Sattari, A. Hamidi, G. Tavakoli Mehrjardi, and A. Farshi Homayoun Rooz. 2021. Experimental Study on Bearing Capacity of Shell Strip Footings near Geotextile-Reinforced Earth Slopes. Journal of Central South University 28 (8): 2527–2543. doi:10.1007/s11771-021-4784-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourvenec, S., M. F. Randolph, and H. E. Acosta-Martinez. 2012. Centrifuge Study of Capacity of a Skirted Foundation under Eccentric Transient and Sustained Uplift. Géotechnique 62 (4): 317–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., J. H. Crooks, and A. L. Bell. 1983. Time Effects on the Stress-Strain Behaviour of Natural Soft Clays. Géotechnique 33 (3): 327–340. doi:10.1680/geot.1983.33.3.327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeri, S. M., and A. Hamidi. 2005. Steady State and Liquefaction Characteristics of Gravely Sands. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 23 (2): 141–156. doi:10.1007/s10706-003-4995-x.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchberger, S. D., and R. K. Rowe. 1998. Modelling the Rate-Sensitive Characteristics of the Gloucester Foundation Soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 35 (5): 769–789. doi:10.1139/t98-037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, A. R., J. R. M. S. Oliveira, and M. F. Randolph. 2001. Evaluating the Coefficient of Consolidation Using Penetration Tests. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 1 (3): 17–25. doi:10.1680/ijpmg.2001.010302.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., M. Huang, and J. Ding. 2018. Calculation of Tangent Modulus of Soils under Different Stress Paths. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018 (PT 5): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lehane, B. M., C. Gaudin, D. J. Richards, and M. J. Rattley. 2008. Rate Effects on the Vertical Uplift Capacity of Footings Founded in Clay. Géotechnique 58 (1): 13–21. doi:10.1680/geot.2008.58.1.13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Y. Tian, C. Gaudin, and M. J. Cassidy. 2015. Comparative Study of the Compression and Uplift of Shallow Foundations. Computers and Geotechnics 69: 38–45. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. P., J. T. Yi, F. H. Lee, S. H. Goh, and J. Hu. 2018. Effect of Lattice Leg and Sleeve on the Transient Vertical Bearing Capacity of Deeply Penetrated Spudcans in Clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 144 (5): 04018019. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitra, S., D. White, S. Chatterjee, and D. Choudhury. 2019. Numerical Modelling of Seepage and Tension beneath Plate Anchors. Computers and Geotechnics 108: 131–142. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Water Resources (MWR). 1999. Specification of Soil Tests, SL 237-1999. Nanjing, China: National Standards of People’s Republic of China (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Randolph, M. F., C. Gaudin, S. M. Gourvenec, D. J. White, N. Boylan, and M. J. Cassidy. 2011. Recent Advances in Offshore Geotechnics for Deep Water Oil and Gas Developments. Ocean Engineering 38 (7): 818–834. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph, M. F., and S. Hope. 2004. Effect of Cone Velocity on Cone Resistance and Excess Pore Water Pressures. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Practice and Performance of Soft Deposits (is-Osaka 2004), 147–152. Osaka, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, M., M. Tremblay, F. Tavenas, and P. La Rochelle. 1982. Development of Pore Pressures in Quasi-Static Penetration Tests in Sensitive Clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 19 (2): 124–138. doi:10.1139/t82-015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheahan, T. C., C. C. Ladd, and J. T. Germaine. 1996. Rate-Dependent Undrained Shear Behavior of Saturated Clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 122 (2): 99–108. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:2(99).
   Google Scholar
• Skempton, A. W. 1954. The Pore-Pressure Coefficients a and B. Géotechnique 4 (4): 143–147. doi:10.1680/geot.1954.4.4.143.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L., Y. Qi, X. Feng, and Z. Liu. 2020. Tensile Capacity of Offshore Bucket Foundations in Clay. Ocean Engineering 197: 106893. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, H., A. Tsutsumi, and T. Ohashi. 2014. Unloading Behavior of Clays Measured by CRS Test. Soils and Foundations 54 (2): 81–93. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2014.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thieken, K., M. Achmus, and C. Schröder. 2014. On the Behavior of Suction Buckets in Sand under Tensile Loads. Computers and Geotechnics 60: 88–100. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, P. G., N. Suemasa, and M. F. Randolph. 2000. Evaluating Undrained Shear Strength Using the Vane Shear Apparatus. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Offshore and Polar Engineering, ISOPE 00, 2, 485–493, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, S., J. Zhang, Y. Tian, and L. Sun. 2016. Pore Water Pressure Characteristics in Isotropic Consolidated Saturated Clay under Unloading Conditions. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 24 (1): 19–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., and H. V. Nguyen. 2011. Laboratory Study on Soil Shear Stiffness and Strength under Unloading Conditions. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 39 (5): 821–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar