Memorable Metaphor: How Different Elements of Visual Rhetoric Affect Resource Allocation and Memory for Advertisements

References

• Aubrey, Jennifer S., and Ashton Gerding. 2015. “The Cognitive Tax of Self-Objectification: Examining Sexually Objectifying Music Videos and Female Emerging Adults’ Cognitive Processing of Subsequent Advertising.” Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications 27:22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, Alan. 1998. “Recent Developments in Working Memory.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 8:234–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, Margaret M., and Peter J. Lang. 1994. “Measuring Emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.” Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25:49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, Sandy, and Margo Buchanan-Oliver. 2004. “Meaningless or Meaningful? Interpretation and Intentionality in Post-Modern Communication.” Journal of Marketing Communications 10:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, Russell N., and Joel R. Levin. 2002. “Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students’ Learning from Text.” Educational Psychology Review 14:5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, Brittany R. L., and Ronald J. Faber. 2011. “Missing the Mark: Advertising Avoidance and Distractor Devaluation.” Journal of Advertising 40:51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forceville, Charles. 2002. “The Identification of Target and Source in Pictorial Metaphors.” Journal of Pragmatics 34:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorovici, Dan M., and Corina D. Constantin. 2004. “Experiencing Interactive Advertising Beyond Rich Media: Impacts of Ad Type and Presence on Brand Effectiveness in 3D Gaming Immersive Virtual Environments.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 5:22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, John A., and Jagdish N. Sheth. 1969. The Theory of Buyer Behavior, Vol. 14. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, Se-Hoon. 2008. “Visual Metaphor in Advertising: Is the Persuasive Effect Attributable to Visual Argumentation or Metaphorical Rhetoric?” Journal of Marketing Communications 14:59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koller, Veronika. 2005. “Designing Cognition: Visual Metaphor as a Design Feature in Business Magazines.” Information Design Journal 13:136–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, Annie. 2000. “The Limited Capacity Model of Mediated Message Processing.” Journal of Communication 50:46–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, Annie, Samuel D. Bradley, Byungho Park, Mija Shin, and Yongkuk Chung. 2006. “Parsing the Resource Pie: Using STRTs to Measure Attention to Mediated Messages.” Media Psychology 8:369–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, Annie, Byungho Park, Ashley N. Sanders-Jackson, Brian D. Wilson, and Zheng Wang. 2007. “Cognition and Emotion in TV Message Processing: How Valence, Arousing Content, Structural Complexity, and Information Density Affect the Availability of Cognitive Resources.” Media Psychology 10:317–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshner, Glenn, and I-Huei Cheng. 2009. “The Effects of Frame, Appeal, and Outcome Extremity of Antismoking Messages on Cognitive Processing.” Health Communication 24:219–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, Joel. 1979. “On Functions of Pictures in Prose.” In Report From the Project on Studies in Language: Reading and Communication, edited by Francis J. Pirozzolo and Merlin C. Wittrock, 203–28. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, Joel, and Richard E. Mayer. 1993. “Understanding Illustrations in Text.” In Learning from Textbooks: Theory and Practice, edited by Bruce K. Britton, Arthur Woodward, and Marilyn Binkley, 95–113. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, Emily E., and Marilyn Domas White. 2003. “A Taxonomy of Relationships Between Images and Text.” Journal of Documentation 59:647–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David Glen Mick. 1996. “Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language.” Journal of Consumer Research, 22:424–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David Glen Mick. 1999. “Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-Response Analyses.” Journal of Consumer Research 26:37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and Barbara J. Phillips. 2005. “Indirect Persuasion in Advertising: How Consumers Process Metaphors Presented in Pictures and Words.” Journal of Advertising 34:7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Barbara, and Edward F. McQuarrie. 2002. “The Development, Change, and Transformation of Rhetorical Style in Magazine, 1954–1999.” Journal of Advertising 31:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Barbara, and Edward F. McQuarrie. 2004. “Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising.” Marketing Theory 4:113–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sadoski, Mark, and Allan Paivio. 2001. Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Toncar, Mark, and James Munch. 2001. “Consumer Responses to Tropes in Print Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 30:55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mulken, Margot, Andreu van Hooft, and Ulrike Nederstigt. 2014. “Finding the Tipping Point: Visual Metaphor and Conceptual Complexity in Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 43:333–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, Arthur. 1993. “Do Illustrations Serve an Instructional Purpose in U.S. Textbooks?” In Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice, edited by Bruce K. Britton, Arthur Woodward, and Marilyn Binkley, 115–34. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar