Digital Body Disturbances in Advertising: Attraction or Repulsion?

References

• Aamot, Solveig. 1978. “Reactions to Facial Deformities: Autonomic and Social Psychological.” European Journal of Social Psychology 8 (3): 315–333. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420080305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alden, Dana L., Ashesh Mukherjee, and Wayne D. Hoyer. 2000. “The Effects of Incongruity, Surprise and Positive Moderators on Perceived Humor in Television Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 29 (2): 1–15. doi:10.1080/00913367.2000.10673605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrow, Daniel G., and Donald A. Norman. 1975. “Some Principles of Memory Schemata.” In Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, edited by Daniel G. Bobrow and Allan Collins, 131–149. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruzzi, Stella, and Pamela Church Gibson. 2000. Fashion Cultures: Theories, Explanations, and Analysis. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, John T., Richard E. Petty, and Katherine Morris. 1983. “Effects of Need for Cognition on Message Evaluation, Recall, and Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (4): 805–818. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callister, Mark A., and Lesa A. Stern. 2007a. “The Role of Visual Hyperbole in Advertising Effectiveness.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 29 (2): 1–14. doi:10.1080/10641734.2007.10505212.
   Google Scholar
• Callister, Mark A, and Lesa A. Stern. 2007b. “Inspecting the Unexpected: Schema and the Processing of Visual Deviations.” In Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric, edited by Edward F. McQuarrie andBarbara J. Phillips, 137–156. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Cosper, Darcy. 1997. “Shock Value.” Print 51 (6): 38–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Darren W., Kristina D. Frankenberger, and Rajesh V. Manchanda. 2003. “Does It Pay to Shock? Reactions to Shocking and Non-Shocking Advertising Content among University Students.” Journal of Advertising Research 43 (3): 268–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlen, Micael, Sara Rosengren, Fredrik Torn, and Niclas Ohman. 2008. “Could Placing Ads Wrong Be Right? Advertising Effects of Thematic Incongruence.” Journal of Advertising 37 (3): 57–67. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367370305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dens, Nathalie, Patrick De Pelsmacker, and Wim Janssens. 2008. “Exploring Consumer Reactions to Incongruent Mild Disgust Appeals.” Journal of Marketing Communications 14 (4): 249–269. doi:10.1080/13527260802141231.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Joseph H., and Xerxes P. Kotval. 1999. “Computer Interface Evaluation Using Eye Movements: Methods and Constructs.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 24 (6): 631–645. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00068-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkias, Georglos, and Flora Kokkinaki. 2013. “Increasing Advertising Effectiveness through Incongruity-Based Tactics: The Moderating Role of Consumer Involvement.” Journal of Marketing Communications 19 (3): 182–197. doi:10.1080/13527266.2011.592346.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon-Kizer, Tracy R. 2017. “The Effects of Schema Congruity on Consumer Response to Celebrity Advertising.” Journal of Marketing Communications 23 (2): 162–175. doi:10.1080/13527266.2014.975831.
   Google Scholar
• Heckler, Susan E., and L. Terry, and T. L. Childers. 1992. “The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What is Incongruency?” Journal of Consumer Research 18 (4): 475–492. doi:10.1086/209275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooge, Ignace T. C., and Casper J. Erkelens. 1996. “Control of Fixation Duration in a Simple Search Task.” Perception & Psychophysics 58 (7): 969–976. doi:10.3758/BF03206825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhmann, Bruce A., and Pia A. Albinsson. 2019. “Assessing the Usefulness of Taxonomies of Visual Rhetorical Figures.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 40 (2): 171–195. doi:10.1080/10641734.2018.1503106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, Rober J. K., and Keith S. Karn. 2003. “Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research: Ready to Deliver the Promises.” In The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, edited by Jukka Hyönä, Ralph Radach, and Heiner Deubel, 573–605. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science BV.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, Se-Hoon. 2008. “Visual Metaphor in Advertising: Is the Persuasive Effect Attributable to Visual Argumentation or Metaphorical Rhetoric?” Journal of Marketing Communications 14 (1): 59–73. doi:10.1080/14697010701717488.
   Google Scholar
• Just, Marcel Adam, and Patricia A. Carpenter. 1976. “Eye Fixations and Cognitive Processes.” Cognitive Psychology 8 (4): 441–480. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowler, Eileen. 2011. “Eye Movements: The Past 25 Years.” Vision Research 51 (13): 1457–1483. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, Annie. 2000. “The Limited Capacity Model of Mediated Message Processing.” Journal of Communication 50 (1): 46–70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, RichardS. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Eun-Ju, and David W. Schumann. 2004. “Explaining the Special Case of Incongruity in Advertising: Combining Classic Theoretical Approaches.” Marketing Theory 4 (1-2): 59–90. doi:10.1177/1470593104044087.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, Sonia, and Tim Markham. 2008. “The Contribution of Media Consumption to Civic Participation.” The British Journal of Sociology 59 (2): 351–371. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00197.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, Richard J., Scott B. McKenzie, and George E. Belch. 1983. “Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: Determinants and Consequences.” ACR North American Advances 10 (1): 532–539.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Lili, Shuang Chen, Zhou, M. Mingjie, and Jianxin Zhang. 2012. “Social Axioms and Implicit Attitudes about People with Disabilities.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 40 (2): 251–258. doi:10.2224/sbp.2012.40.2.251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manceau, Delphine, and Elisabeth Tissier Desbordes. 2006. “Are Sex and Death Taboos in Advertising? An Analysis of Taboos in Advertising and a Survey of French Consumer Perceptions.” International Journal of Advertising 25 (1): 9–33. doi:10.1080/02650487.2006.11072949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler, George P. 1982. “The Structure of Value: Accounting for Taste.” In Affect and Cognition: The Seventeenth Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, edited by Margaret Sydnor Clark and Susan T. Fiske, 3–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Margariti, Kostoula, Christina Boutsouki, Leonidas Hatzithomas, and Yorgos Zotos. 2019. “Visual Metaphors in Food Advertising: A Cross-Cultural Study.” Food Research International (Ottawa, Ont.) 115 (1): 338–351. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.030.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David Glen Mick. 1996. “Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language.” Journal of Consumer Research 22 (4): 424–437. doi:10.1086/209459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David Glen Mick. 1999. “Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text Interpretations, Experimental, Reader Response Methodologies.” Journal of Consumer Research 26 (1): 37–54. doi:10.1086/209549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David Glen Mick. 2003a. “Visual and Verbal Rhetorical Figures under Directed Processing versus Incidental Exposure to Advertising.” Journal of Consumer Research 29 (4): 579–587. doi:10.1086/346252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David Glen Mick. 2003b. “The Contribution of Semiotic and Rhetorical Perspective to the Explanation of Visual Persuasion in Advertising.” In Persuasive Images: A Consumer Response Perspective, edited by Linda M. Scott and Rajeev Batra, 191–221. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, Joan, and Alice M. Tybout. 1989. “Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation.” Journal of Consumer Research 16 (1): 39–54. doi:10.1086/209192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mick, David Glen. 1992. “Levels of Subjective Comprehension in Advertising Processing and Their Relations to Ad Perceptions, Attitudes, and Memory.” Journal of Consumer Research 18 (4): 411–424. doi:10.1086/209270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, Praggyan, and S. Ratneshwar. 2015. “Did You Get It? Factors Influencing Subjective Comprehension of Visual Metaphors in Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 44 (3): 232–242. doi:10.1080/00913367.2014.967424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, Susan D., George D. Deitz, Bruce A. Huhmann, Subhash Jha, and Jennifer H. Tatara. 2020. “An Eye-Tracking Study of Attention to Brand-Identifying Content and Recall of Taboo Advertising.” Journal of Business Research 111: 176–186. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newhagen, John E. 1998. “TV News Images That Induce Anger, Fear, and Disgust: Effects of Approach-Avoidance and Memory.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 42 (2): 265–276. doi:10.1080/08838159809364448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, Sara, Rosalind Jones, Philip Stern, and Matthew Robinson. 2013. “‘Shockvertising’: An Exploratory Investigation into Attitudinal Variations and Emotional Reactions to Shock Advertising.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 12 (2): 112–121. doi:10.1002/cb.1430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peracchio, Laura A., and Alice M. Tybout. 1996. “The Moderating Role of Prior Knowledge in Schema-Based Product Evaluation.” Journal of Consumer Research 23 (3): 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Barbara. 1997. “Thinking into It: Consumer Interpretation of Complex Advertising Images.” Journal of Advertising 26 (2): 77–87. doi:10.1080/00913367.1997.10673524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Barbara. 2003. “Understanding Visual Metaphor in Advertising.” In Persuasive Images: A Consumer Response Perspective, edited by Linda M. Scott and Rajeev Batra, 297–310. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Barbara, and Edward F. McQuarrie. 2010. “Narrative and Persuasion in Fashion Advertising.” Journal of Consumer Research 37 (3): 368–392. doi:10.1086/653087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, Alex, Linden J. Ball, and Peter Phillips. 2005. “In Search of Salience: A Response-Time and Eye-Movement Analysis of Bookmark Recognition.” In People and Computers XVIII—Design for Life, edited by Sally Fincher, Panos Markopolous, David Moore, and Roy Ruddle, 363–378. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, Keith. 1998. “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research.” Psychological Bulletin 124 (3): 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, Keith, and Alexander Pollatsek. 1989. The Psychology of Reading. New York, NY: Psychology Press..
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Jeffrey B., and Jay Schulkin. 1998. “From Normal Fear to Pathological Anxiety.” Psychological Review 105 (2): 325–350. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumsey, Nichola, Ray Bull, and Denis Gahagan. 1982. “The Effect of Facial Disfigurement on the Proxemic Behavior of the General Public.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 12 (2): 137–150. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1982.tb00855.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Stephen, Megan Oaten, Richard J. Stevenson, and Trevor I. Case. 2012. “Facial Disfigurement is Treated like an Infectious Disease.” Evolution and Human Behavior 33 (6): 639–646. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabri, Ouidad, and Carl Obermiller. 2012. “Consumer Perception of Taboo in Ads.” Journal of Business Research. 65 (6): 869–873.
   Google Scholar
• Schutzwohl, Achim, and Rainer Reisenzein. 1999. “Children’s and Adults’ Reaction to a Schema-Discrepant Event: A Developmental Analysis of Surprise.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 23 (1): 37–62. doi:10.1080/016502599383991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Linda M. 1990. “Understanding Jingles and Needledrop: A Rhetorical Approach to Music in Advertising.” Journal of Consumer Research 17 (2): 223–236. doi:10.1086/208552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Linda M. 1994. “Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (2): 252–273. doi:10.1086/209396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanmugarajah, Kumaran, Safina Gaind, Alex Clarke, and Peter E. M. Butler. 2012. “The Role of Disgust Emotions in the Observer Response to Facial Disfigurement.” Body Image 9 (4): 455–461. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, Lesa A., and Mark Callister. 2020. “Exploring Variations of Hyperbole and Puffery in Advertising.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 41 (1): 71–87. doi:10.1080/10641734.2019.1580230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenage, Sarah V., and Catherine Furness. 2008. “The Influence of Disfigurement on Conversational Recall.” Journal of Health Psychology 13 (8): 1113–1118. doi:10.1177/1359105308095965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Anna, and Anita Potton. 2014. “Emotional Responses to Disfigured Faces: The Influences of Perceived Anonymity, Empathy, and Disgust Sensitivity.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 36 (6): 520–532. doi:10.1080/01973533.2014.958491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrizzi, John A., Natalie J. Shook, and Michael A. McDaniel. 2013. “The Behavioral Immune System and Social Conservatism: A Meta-Analysis.” Evolution and Human Behavior 34 (2): 99–180. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, Esther. 1990. “Consumer Processing of Advertising.” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 12 (1-2): 197–230.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, Hye Jin. 2013. “Understanding Schema Incongruity as a Process in Advertising: Review and Future Recommendations.” Journal of Marketing Communications 19 (5): 360–376. doi:10.1080/13527266.2012.671187.
   Google Scholar
• Zaltman, Gerald. 1997. “Rethinking Market Research: Putting People Back.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (4): 424–437. doi:10.1177/002224379703400402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarzosa, Jennifer, and Bruce A. Huhmann. 2019. “Measures of Aesthetic Dimensions and Reactions in Advertising.” International Journal of Advertising 38 (2): 258–275. doi:10.1080/02650487.2018.1442632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar