Effects of Disclosure, Placement Type, and Ad–Context Congruence on Brand and Advertising Recognition: An Exploration of CARE Model Processing

References

• Amazeen, M. A., and B. W. Wojdynski. 2020. “The effects of disclosure format on native advertising recognition and audience perceptions of legacy and online news publishers.” Journalism. 21 (12): 1965–1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behe, B. K., M. Bae, P. T. Huddleston, and L. Sage. 2015. “The Effect of Involvement on Visual Attention and Product Choice.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 24: 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benes, R. 2019. “Driven by Social, Native Accounts for Nearly Two-Thirds of Display Ad Spend.” April 16. https://www.emarketer.com/content/driven-by-social-native-accounts-for-nearly-two-thirds-of-display-ad-spend
   Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., and E.A. van Reijmersdal. 2016. “Informing Consumers about “Hidden” Advertising: A Literature Review of the Effects of Disclosing Sponsored Content,” De Pelsmacker, P. (Ed.) Advertising in New Formats and Media.” Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley. pp. 115-146. doi:10.1108/978-1-78560-313-620151005.
   Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., E. A. van Reijmersdal, and P. C. Neijens. 2012. “Sponsorship Disclosure: Effects of Duration on Persuasion Knowledge and Brand Responses.” Journal of Communication 62 (6): 1047–1064. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01677.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., E. A. van Reijmersdal, and P. C. Neijens. 2014. “Effects of Sponsorship Disclosure Timing on the Processing of Sponsored Content: A Study on the Effectiveness of European Disclosure Regulations.” Psychology & Marketing 31 (3): 214–224. doi:10.1002/mar.20688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., E. A. van Reijmersdal, E. Rozendaal, and A. L. Dima. 2018. “Development of the Persuasion Knowledge Scales of Sponsored Content (PKS-SC).” International Journal of Advertising 37 (5): 671–697. doi:10.1080/02650487.2018.1470485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., L. M. Willemsen, and E. P. Van Der Aa. 2017. “‘This Post Is Sponsored’: Effects of Sponsorship Disclosure on Persuasion Knowledge and Electronic Word of Mouth in the Context of Facebook.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 38: 82–92. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2016.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, R. M. 2011. “Embedded Advertising on Television: Disclosure, Deception, and Free Speech Right.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 30 (2): 226–238. doi:10.1509/jppm.30.2.226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., J. Cohen, and J. Ma. 2014. “Advertisements Just Aren’t Advertisements Anymore: A New Typology for Evolving Forms of Online ‘Advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 54 (1): 7–10. doi:10.2501/JAR-54-1-007-010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., and N. J. Evans. 2018. “The Role of a Companion Banner Ad and Sponsorship Transparency in Recognizing and Evaluating Article-Style Native Advertising.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 43: 17–32. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2018.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C., G. S. Mohr, and P. W. J. Verlegh. 2013. “Can Disclosures Lead Consumers to Resist Covert Persuasion? The Important Roles of Disclosure Timing and Type of Response.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 23 (4): 483–495. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauberghe, V., P. De Pelsmacker, and W. Janssens. 2010. “Simultaneous Exposure to a Program and Advertising Content in an Interactive Context: Perceptual and Semantic Interference and Reinforcement.” Journal of Business Research 63 (9-10): 972–978. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, I., S. Hosany, M.-S. S. Wu, C.-H. S. Chen, and B. Nguyen. 2018. “Size Does Matter: Effects of in-Game Advertising Stimuli on Brand Recall and Brand Recognition.” Computers in Human Behavior 86 (September): 311–318. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.007.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. E., H. E. Egeth, and S. Yantis. 2004. “Visual Attention: Bottom-Up versus Top-Down.” Current Biology 14 (19): R850–52. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers, T. L., and M. J. Houston. 1984. “Conditions for a picture-superiority effect on consumer memory.” Journal of consumer research 11 (2): 643–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell, T. B., C. S. Weeks, and D. P. Roy. 2005. “Sponsorship-Linked Marketing: Opening the Black Box.” Journal of Advertising 34 (2): 21–42. doi:10.1080/00913367.2005.10639194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M., S. Rosengren, F. Törn, and N. Öhman. 2008. “Could Placing Ads Wrong Be Right?: Advertising Effects of Thematic Incongruence.” Journal of Advertising 37 (3): 57–67. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367370305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durso, F. T., and M. K. Johnson. 1979. “Facilitation in Naming and Categorizing Repeated Pictures and Words.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory 5 (5): 449–459. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.5.5.449.
   Google Scholar
• Edell, J. A., and R. Staelin. 1983. “The Information Processing of Pictures in Print Advertisements.” Journal of Consumer Research 10 (1): 45–61. doi:10.1086/208944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M., E. A. van Reijmersdal, S. C., Boerman, and F. Tarrahi. 2020. “A meta-analysis of the effects of disclosing sponsored content.” Journal of Advertising 49 (3): 344–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisinga, R., M. T. Grotenhuis, and B. Pelzer. 2013. “The Reliability of a Two-Item Scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?” International Journal of Public Health 58 (4): 637–642. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, N. J., and M. G. Hoy. 2016. “Parents’ Presumed Persuasion Knowledge of Children’s Advergames: The Influence of Advertising Disclosure Modality and Cognitive Load.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 37 (2): 146–164. doi:10.1080/10641734.2016.1171181.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N. J., and D. Park. 2015. “Rethinking the Persuasion Knowledge Model: Schematic Antecedents and Associative Outcomes of Persuasion Knowledge Activation for Covert Advertising.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 36 (2): 157–176. doi:10.1080/10641734.2015.1023873.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N. J., J. Phua, J. Lim, and H. Jun. 2017. “Disclosing Instagram Influencer Advertising: The Effects of Disclosure Language on Advertising Recognition, Attitudes, and Behavioral Intent.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 17 (2): 138–149. doi:10.1080/15252019.2017.1366885.
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., and P. Wright. 1994. “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1086/209380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germelmann, C. C., J. Herrmann, M. Kacha, and P. R. Darke. 2020. “Congruence and Incongruence in Thematic Advertisement–Medium Combinations: Role of Awareness, Fluency, and Persuasion Knowledge.” Journal of Advertising 49 (2): 141–124. doi:10.1080/00913367.2020.1745110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuens, M., and P. De Pelsmacker. 2017. “Planning and conducting experimental advertising research and questionnaire design.” Journal of Advertising 46 (1): 83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, B., T. H. A. Bijmolt, and J. C. Hoekstra. 2017. “Digital Native Advertising: Practitioner Perspectives and a Research Agenda.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 17 (2): 80–91. doi:10.1080/15252019.2017.1357513.
   Google Scholar
• Heckler, S. E., and T. L. Childers. 1992. “The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What is Incongruency?” Journal of Consumer Research 18 (4): 475–492. doi:10.1086/209275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrewijn, L., and K. Poels. 2015. “The Impact of Social Setting on the Recall and Recognition of in-Game Advertising.” Computers in Human Behavior 53 (December): 544–55. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.012.
   Google Scholar
• Hockley, W. E. 2008. “The Picture Superiority Effect in Associative Recognition.” Memory & Cognition 36 (7): 1351–1359. doi:10.3758/MC.36.7.1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, D. A., D. Franklyn, C. Yee, and M. Rahmati. 2017. “Going native: Can consumers recognize native advertising: Does it matter.” Yale JL & Tech., 19: 77.
   Google Scholar
• Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB). 2013. “The Native Advertising Playbook.” December 4, http://www.iab.net/media/file/IAB-Native-Advertising-Playbook2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, M., B. A. McKay, J. I. Richards, and W. Snyder. 2017. “Now You See Me, but You Don’t Know: Consumer Processing of Native Advertisements in Online News Sites.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 17 (2): 92–108. doi:10.1080/15252019.2017.1399839.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, E. 2019. “The Responsive Website Font Size Guidelines (updated for 2019) – Learn UI Design.” https://learnui.design/blog/mobile-desktop-website-font-size-guidelines.html
   Google Scholar
• Kent, R. J., and C. T. Allen. 1994. “Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity.” Journal of Marketing 58 (3): 97–105. doi:10.1177/002224299405800307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., D. Choi, and H. Kim. 2019. “Advertising Nativeness as a Function of Content and Design Congruence.” International Journal of Advertising 38 (6): 845–866. doi:10.1080/02650487.2018.1535224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., S. Youn, and D. Yoon. 2019. “Consumers’ Responses to Native vs. Banner Advertising: Moderation of Persuasion Knowledge on Interaction Effects of Ad Type and Placement Type.” International Journal of Advertising 38 (2): 207–236. doi:10.1080/02650487.2018.1451208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., and H. Lo. 2015. “Do You Recognize Its Brand? The Effectiveness of Online in-Stream Video Advertisements.” Journal of Advertising 44 (3): 208–218. doi:10.1080/00913367.2014.956376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, K. R., R. E. Burnkrant, and H. R. Unnava. 2001. “The Effects of Program-Induced Mood States on Memory for Commercial Information.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 23 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/10641734.2001.10505110.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, K. A., and R. J. Lutz. 1977. “Effects of Interactive Imagery on Learning: Application to Advertising.” Journal of Applied Psychology 62 (4): 493–498. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.4.493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, R. M., and S. J. McKelvie. 1990. “Effects of Ethnic Imagery on Recall of Brand Names.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration 7 (3): 1–9. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.1990.tb00528.x.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., and R. L. Lutz. 1989. “An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad.” Journal of Marketing 53 (2): 48–65. doi:10.1177/002224298905300204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maille, V., and N. Fleck. 2011. “Perceived Congruence and Incongruence: Toward a Clarification of the Concept, Its Formation and Measure.” Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) 26 (2): 77–113. doi:10.1177/205157071102600204.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. 1982. “The Structure of Value: Accounting for Taste.” In Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, edited by M. S. Clark and S. T. Fiske, 3–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mckelvie, S. J., and R. M. Macgregor. 1996. “Effects of Interactive Pictures and Ethnicity on Recall of Brand Names.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration 13 (1): 33–45. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.1996.tb00100.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, J., and A. M. Tybout. 1989. “Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation.” Journal of Consumer Research 16 (1): 39–54. doi:10.1086/209192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R. S., C. A. Stammerjohan, and R. A. Coulter. 2005. “Banner Advertiser-Web Site Context Congruity and Color Effects on Attention and Attitudes.” Journal of Advertising 34 (2): 71–84. doi:10.1080/00913367.2005.10639189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, M., P. C. Neijens, and E. G. Smit. 2002. “The Effects of Magazine-Induced Psychological Responses and Thematic Congruence on Memory and Attitude toward the Ad in a Real-Life Setting.” Journal of Advertising 31 (4): 27–40. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MRI Simmons. 2017. “Consumer Attitudes, Behaviors, and Psychographics—MRI-Simmons.” https://www.mrisimmons.com/
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. R., M. L. Wood, and H. J. Paek. 2009. “Increased Persuasion Knowledge of Video News Releases: Audience Beliefs about News and Support for Source Disclosure.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (4): 220–237. doi:10.1080/08900520903332626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. 1971. Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Pieters, R., and M. Wedel. 2004. “Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects.” Journal of Marketing 68 (2): 36–50. doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.2.36.27794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2019. “Programmatic Native Advertising? Get the Best Practices Right Here.” https://nativeadvertisinginstitute.com/blog/best-practices-programmatic-native-advertising/
   Google Scholar
• Potter, M. C., V. V. Valian, and B. A. Faulconer. 1977. “Representation of a Sentence and Its Pragmatic Implications: Verbal, Imagistic, or Abstract?” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80002-9.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., C. M. Rotello, A. J. Stewart, J. Keir, and S. A. Duffy. 2001. “Integrating Text and Pictorial Information: eye Movements When Looking at Print Advertisements.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7 (3): 219–226. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.7.3.219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., and M. Vanderwart. 1980. “A Standardized Set of 260 Pictures: Norms for Name Agreement, Image Agreement, Familiarity, and Visual Complexity.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6 (2): 174–215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sobel, K. V., M. P. Gerrie, B. J. Poole, and M. J. Kane. 2007. “Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Visual Search: The Roles of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processing.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14 (5): 840–845. doi:10.3758/bf03194109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. 2000. “Multimedia Effects on Processing and Perception of Online News: A Study of Picture, Audio, and Video Downloads.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77 (3): 480–499. doi:10.1177/107769900007700302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutaj, K., and E. A. van Reijmersdal. 2012. “Effects of Online Advertising Format and Persuasion Knowledge on Audience Reactions.” Journal of Marketing Communications 18 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/13527266.2011.620765.
   Google Scholar
• Van Reijmersdal, E. A., K. Tutaj, and S. C. Boerman. 2013. “The Effects of Brand Placement Disclosures on Skepticism and Brand Memory.” Communications 38 (2): 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Villalobos, L. Y. 1991. “A Comparison of the Psychological Processes in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processing of Information in Schema Theory.” Letras 1 (25): 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and Y. Li. 2017. “Understanding ‘Native Advertising’ from the Perspective of Communication Strategies.” Journal of Promotion Management 23 (6): 913–929. doi:10.1080/10496491.2017.1323264.
   Google Scholar
• Wlosik, M., and M. Zawadziński. 2019. “Contextual Targeting: What It Is and How Does It Work?” September 6. https://clearcode.cc/blog/contextual-targeting/
   Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W. 2016. “Native Advertising: Engagement, Deception, and Implications for Theory.” In The New Advertising: Branding, Content and Consumer Relationships in a Data-Driven Social Media Era, edited by R. Brown, V. K. Jones, and B. M. Wang, 203–236. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger/ABO Clio.
   Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W., and N. J. Evans. 2014. “Deception by Design: Analyzing Native Advertising Practices on News Web Sites.” Paper Presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W., and N. J. Evans. 2016. “Going Native: Effects of Disclosure Position and Language on the Recognition and Evaluation of Online Native Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 45 (2): 157–168. doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1115380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W., and N. J. Evans. 2020. “The Covert Advertising Recognition and Effects (CARE) Model: Processes of Persuasion in Native Advertising and Other Masked Formats.” International Journal of Advertising 39 (1): 4–31. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1658438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W., N. J Evans, and M. G. Hoy. 2018. “Measuring sponsorship transparency in the age of native advertising.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 52 (1): 115–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. J. 2013. “Understanding Schema Incongruity as a Process in Advertising: Review and Future Recommendations.” Journal of Marketing Communications 19 (5): 360–376. doi:10.1080/13527266.2012.671187.
   Google Scholar
• Zanjani, S. H., W. D., Diamond, and K Chan. 2011. “Does ad-context congruity help surfers and information seekers remember ads in cluttered e-magazines? Journal of Advertising 40 (4): 67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., and Z. Katon. 2012. “Contextual Advertising.” Marketing Science 31 (6): 980–994. doi:10.1287/mksc.1120.0740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar