The Ideal Advertising Professor: A ZMET-Based Inquiry

References

• Abdulkarim, J. 2018. “Creativity, Bravery and the Need for Agencies to Adapt to the Challenge of Technology.” Journal of Communication Management 22 (4): 490–493. doi:10.1108/JCOM-06-2018-0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. R. 2003. “Class Acts: Outstanding College Teachers and the Difference They Make.” Criminal Justice Review 28 (2): 215–231. doi:10.1177/073401680302800202.
   Google Scholar
• Algozzine, B., R. Putnam, and R. Horner. 2010. “Postscript: What We Know about the Relationship between Achievement and Behavior.” In Preventing Problem Behaviors: Schoolwide Programs and Classroom Practices, edited by B. Algozzine, R. Algozzine, A. P. Daunic, and S. W. Smith, 223–226. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Alps, T. 2006, January 23. “Why the Medium and the Message Matter Equally.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/jan/23/mondaymediasection.advertising
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. 1998. “Gender Relations and Identity at Work: A Case Study of Masculinities and Femininities in an Advertising Agency.” Human Relations 51 (8): 969–1005. doi:10.1023/A:1016955712575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. 1983. “A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22 (3): 261–295. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., D. Bothell, M. D. Byrne, S. Douglass, C. Lebiere, and Y. Qin. 2004. “An Integrated Theory of the Mind.” Psychological Review 111 (4): 1036–1060. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, J. C., S. Lysonski, and S. Durvasula. 1991. “Understanding Cross-Cultural Student Perceptions of Advertising in General: Implications for Advertising Educators and Practitioners.” Journal of Advertising 20 (2): 15–28. doi:10.1080/00913367.1991.10673210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anghelcev, G., M. Chung, S. Sar, and B. R. L. Duff. 2015. “A ZMET-Based Analysis of Perceptions of Climate Change among Young South Koreans: Implications for Social Marketing Communication.” Journal of Social Marketing 5 (1): 56–82. doi:10.1108/JSOCM-12-2012-0048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachen, C. M., M. M. McLoughlin, and S. S. Garcia. 1999. “Assessing the Role of Gender in College Students’ Evaluations of Faculty.” Communication Education 48 (3): 193–210. doi:10.1080/03634529909379169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banning, S. A., and J. C. Schweitzer. 2007. “What Advertising Educators Think about Advertising Education.” Journal of Advertising Education 11 (2): 10–20. doi:10.1177/109804820701100205.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R., and S. Heath. 1977. Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Basow, S. A., J. E. Phelan, and L. Capotosto. 2006. “Gender Patterns in College Students’ Choices of Their Best and Worst Professors.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 30 (1): 25–35. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00259.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., M. Wallendorf, and J. F. Sherry, Jr. 1989. “The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey.” Journal of Consumer Research 16 (1): 1–38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2489299. doi:10.1086/209191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., and R. Iyengar. 2013. “Communication Channels and Word of Mouth: How the Medium Shapes the Message.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (3): 567–579. doi:10.1086/671345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, A. E., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “The Effects of Instructors’ Autonomy Support and Students’ Autonomous Motivation on Learning Organic Chemistry: A Self-Determination Theory and Perspective.” Science Education 84 (6): 740–756. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6 < 740::AID-SCE4 > 3.0.CO;2-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobe, B. J., and B. J. Cooper. 2020. “Accounting Students’ Perceptions of Effective Teaching and Approaches to Learning: Impact on Overall Student Satisfaction.” Accounting & Finance 60 (3): 2099–2143. doi:10.1111/acfi.12364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breed, F. S. 1927. “Factors Contributing to Success in College Teaching.” The Journal of Educational Research 16 (4): 247–253. doi:10.1080/00220671.1927.10879789.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. 2003. “Incorporating Diversity into the Advertising Curriculum.” Journal of Advertising Education 7 (2): 12–14. doi:10.1177/109804820300700206.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., P. Xie, J. Dong, and T. Wang. 2019. “Understanding Programmatic Creative: The Role of AI.” Journal of Advertising 48 (4): 347–355. doi:10.1080/00913367.2019.1654421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. K., T. Roskams, and D. Fisher. 2006. “Enhancement of Creativity through a One-Semester Course in University.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 40 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01264.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, G. L., and J. C. Olson. 2002. “Mapping Consumers’ Mental Models with ZMET.” Psychology and Marketing 19 (6): 477–501. doi:10.1002/mar.10021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2006. “Sound, Presence, and Power: ‘Student Voice’ in Educational Research and Reform.” Curriculum Inquiry 36 (4): 359–390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotzias, C. G. 1996. “How to Develop Advertising Concepts and Demystify the Creative Process.” Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 51 (2): 80–84.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, R. A., G. Zaltman, and K. S. Coulter. 2001. “Interpreting Consumer Perceptions of Advertising: An Application of the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique.” Journal of Advertising 30 (4): 1–21. doi:10.1080/00913367.2001.10673648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J., II, J. L. Boyles, T. Hernandez, C. Lou, H. Cheng, and D. Perlmutter. 2020. “Opportunities and Challenges: Professional Development Programming in Media and Communication Education.” Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 75 (4): 436–452. doi:10.1177/1077695820926835.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2008. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, J., and S. E. Williams. 2012. “The Role of Imagery in Performance.” In The Oxford Handbook of Sport and Performance Psychology, edited by S. M. Murphy, 213–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M., S. Rosengren, and F. Törn. 2008. “Advertising Creativity Matters.” Journal of Advertising Research 48 (3): 392–403. doi:10.2501/S002184990808046X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damásio, A. 1994. Descartes’ Error and the Future of Human Life. New York: Putnam’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Danileț, M., and C. I. Stoian. 2017. “Using ZMET for Investigating the Role of Social Media in the Employment Process.” Review of Economic and Business Studies 10 (1): 9–32. doi:10.1515/rebs-2017-0046.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. 2013, May 22. “Medium Has Become ‘More Important’ Than Message, Says Sir Martin Sorrell.” The Drum. https://www.thedrum.com/news/2013/05/22/medium-has-become-more-important-message-says-sir-martin-sorrell
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., R. Koestner, and R. M. Ryan. 1999. “A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (6): 627–668. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., R. Koestner, and R. M. Ryan. 2001. “Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again.” Review of Educational Research 71 (1): 1–27. doi:10.3102/00346543071001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. 1998. The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, H., and P. Devine-Wright. 2009. “Social Representations of Electricity Network Technologies: Exploring Processes of Anchoring and Objectification through the Use of Visual Research Methods.” The British Journal of Social Psychology 48 (Pt 2): 357–373. doi:10.1348/014466608x349504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douna, P., A. Kyridis, C. Zagkos, Z. Ziontaki, and P. Pandis. 2015. “The Ideal University Teacher According to the Views of Greek Students.” International Journal of Higher Education 4 (2): 145–158. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p145.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, G. M. 1992. Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. M., and M. A. Healy. 2001. “Key Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction Related to Recruitment and Retention.” Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 10 (4): 1–11. doi:10.1300/J050v10n04_01.
   Google Scholar
• El-Murad, J., and D. C. West. 2004. “The Definition and Measurement of Creativity: What Do We Know?” Journal of Advertising Research 44 (2): 188–201. doi:10.1017/S0021849904040097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F., W. Wei, and H. Huang. 2019. “Keeping up with Fast-Paced Industry Changes – Digital Media Education in US Advertising and PR Programs.” Journal of Advertising Education 23 (2): 80–99. doi:10.1177/1098048219877765.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. A. 1988. “Effective College Teaching from the Students’ and Faculty’s View: Matched or Mismatched Priorities?” Research in Higher Education 28 (4): 291–329. doi:10.1007/BF01006402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feryok, A., and M. Pryde. 2012. “Images as Orienting Activity: Using Theory to Inform Classroom Practices.” Teachers and Teaching 18 (4): 441–54. doi:10.1080/13540602.2012.696045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, T., and F. Hoefel. 2018, November 12. “‘True Gen’: Generation Z and Its Implications for Companies.” McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies
   Google Scholar
• Fullerton, J. A., and A. Kendrick. 2017. “Profiles of Advertising Students: Are “Creatives” Different from the Rest?.” Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 72 (3): 349–365. doi:10.1177/1077695817712289.
   Google Scholar
• Fullerton, J., A. Kendrick, and C. Frazier. 2009. “Advertising Student Career Preferences: A National Survey.” Journal of Advertising Education 13 (2): 70–4. doi:10.1177/109804820901300211.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., J. P. Gall, and W. R. Borg. 2003. Educational Research: An Introduction. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, K., and B. Robbs. 2004. “Enhancing Strategic Thinking throughout the Advertising Curriculum: An account Planning Perspective.” Journal of Advertising Education 8 (2): 8–16. doi:10.1177/109804820400800204.
   Google Scholar
• Gangadharbatla, H. 2020. “What We Stand to Lose with Fully Online Advertising Education.” Journal of Advertising Education 24 (1): 74–80. doi:10.1177/1098048220916919.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Jr. 2011. “Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” Discourse Processes 48 (8): 529–562. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S. 1995. “Commentary on Nonliteral Language: Processing and Use.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10 (1): 47–57. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1001_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, T. 2004. “Shall We Converge? The Embedding of New Media into Advertising Curricula.” Journal of Advertising Education 8 (2): 33–42. doi:10.1177/109804820400800206.
   Google Scholar
• Gravett, K., I. M. Kinchin, and N. E. Winstone. 2020. “‘More than Customers’: Conceptions of Students as Partners Held by Students, Staff, and Institutional Leaders.” Studies in Higher Education 45 (12): 2574–2587. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1623769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grow, J. M., and S. J. Broyles. 2011. “Unspoken Rules of the Creative Game: Insights to Shape the Next Generation from Top Advertising Creative Women.” Advertising & Society Review 12 (1). doi:10.1353/asr.2011.0009.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, T., A. Reppel, and R. Voss. 2010. “Understanding the Characteristics of Effective Professors: The Student’s Perspective.” Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 20 (2): 175–190. doi:10.1080/08841241.2010.526356.
   Google Scholar
• Grumbein, A. 2018. “From the Recipient of the 2017 AEJMC Advertising Division Early Career Teaching Award: Why I Teach Advertising.” Journal of Advertising Education 22 (1): 57–60. doi:10.1177/1098048218768591.
   Google Scholar
• Habib, S. 2015. “Teaching Approaches in Advertising: Creativity and Technology.” Journal of Advertising Education 19 (1): 17–25. doi:10.1177/109804821501900104.
   Google Scholar
• Hachtmann, F. 2014. “International Advertising Education: Curriculum and Pedagogy.” In The Handbook of International Advertising Research, edited by H. Cheng, 1st ed., 575–591. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781118378465.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, D. 2002. “Talking about Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation.” Visual Studies 17 (1): 13–26. doi:10.1080/14725860220137345.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, A. D. 2000. “Public Perceptions of Global Warming.” Human Ecology Review 7 (1): 25–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24706893.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. S., and T. Y. Christian. 2012. “College Student Perceptions and Ideals of Teaching: An Exploratory Pilot Study.” College Student Journal 46 (3): 589–602.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B. 1987. “What Is Consumer Research?” Journal of Consumer Research 14 (1): 128–32. doi:10.1086/209099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeck, R. P. 1996. “Introduction: Figurative Language and Cognitive Science–past, Present, and Future.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 11 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1101_1.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, J. L. 1994. “The Role of Figurative Language in Psychotherapy: A Methodological Examination.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9 (4): 271–288. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms0904_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. 2003. “Case-Based Learning and Reticence in a Bilingual Context: Perceptions of Business Students in Hong Kong.” System 31 (4): 457–469. doi:10.1016/j.system.2003.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M., M. Yakhou, and G. Stone. 2005. “An Educational Institution’s Quest for Service Quality: Customers’ Perspective.” Quality Assurance in Education 13 (1): 66–82. doi:10.1108/09684880510578669.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, S. 2016. “Teachers Who Attract or Repel: A Glimpse at Student Expectations of Their Tertiary-Level Teachers.” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 15 (2): 21–31. http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/590
   Google Scholar
• Kanwisher, N., and E. Wojciulik. 2000. “Visual Attention: Insights from Brain Imaging.” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 1 (2): 91–100. doi:10.1038/35039043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. 2012. “The Current Status of Digital Media Education in Advertising and Other Communication Disciplines.” Journal of Advertising Education 16 (2): 27–36. doi:10.1177/109804821201600204.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and S. Patel. 2012. “Teaching Advertising Media Planning in a Changing Media Landscape.” Journal of Advertising Education 16 (2): 15–26. doi:10.1177/109804821201600203.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo-Lattimore, C., M. Thyne, and K. Robertson. 2009. “The ZMET Method: Using Projective Technique to Understand Consumer Home Choice.” The Marketing Review 9 (2): 139–154. doi:10.1362/146934709X442674.
   Google Scholar
• Knoster, K., A. Goodboy, M. Martin, and A. Thomay. 2021. “What Matters Most? A Prioritization of Medical Students’ Preferences for Effective Teaching.” Communication Education 70 (2): 183–200. doi:10.1080/03634523.2020.1841254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan, L. R., R. Schoenfeld-Tacher, and P. W. Hellyer. 2010. “Student Evaluations of Teaching: Perceptions of Faculty Based on Gender, Position, and Rank.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (6): 623–636. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.491911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp, R. R. 1995. Metaphor Therapy: Using Client-Generated Metaphors in Psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M., J. A. Margolis, A. M. Barrett, E. J. Goldknopf, and P. F. Daly. 1990. “Age Differences in Imagery Abilities.” Child Development 61 (4): 995–1010. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02837.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. M., H. E. Katz, and J. Cho. 1990. “Advertising Faculty Describes Theory v. practice Debate.” The Journalism Educator 45 (1): 9–21. doi:10.1177/107769589004500102.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, P. V., and M. E. Len-Rios. 2006. “Integration of Advertising and Public Relations Curricula: A 2005 Status Report of Educator Perceptions.” Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 61 (1): 33–47. doi:10.1177/107769580606100106.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. S. Y., P. J. McGoldrick, K. A. Keeling, and J. Doherty. 2003. “Using ZMET to Explore Barriers to the Adoption of 3G Mobile Banking Services.” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 31 (6): 340–348. doi:10.1108/09590550310476079.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T.-T., and W. E. Ryan. 2005. “Advertising Creative Practitioners on the Value of Advertising Education: An Overview.” Journal of Advertising Education 9 (2): 14–21. doi:10.1177/109804820500900205.
   Google Scholar
• Lempp, H., and C. Seale. 2004. “The Hidden Curriculum in Undergraduate Medical Education: Qualitative Study of Medical Students’ Perceptions of Teaching.” BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 329 (7469): 770–773. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7469.770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, I.-L., C.-M. Yang, Y.-F. Liu, and Y.-H. Tsai. 2009. “Penetrating Adolescents’ Mental Models of MP3 with ZMET.” Adolescence 44 (176): 821–834. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18687-0_24.
   Google Scholar
• Love, D. A., and M. J. Kotchen. 2010. “Grades, Course Evaluations, and Academic Incentives.” Eastern Economic Journal 36 (2): 151–163. https://environment.yale.edu/kotchen/pubs/gradeval.pdf. doi:10.1057/eej.2009.6
   Google Scholar
• Mallia, K. 2009, August 31. “Creativity Knows No Gender, But Agency Creative Departments Sure Do.” AdAge. https://adage.com/article/talentworks/advertising-motherhood-mix-creative-directing/138709
   Google Scholar
• Mallia, K. 2014. “Women Now 11% of Ad Agency Creative Directors. Hooray?” Media Report to Women 42 (4): 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Mallia, K. 2017. “The Creative Career Dilemma: No Wonder Ad Women Are Mad Women.” In Feminists, Feminisms and Advertising: Some Restrictions Apply, edited by K. Golombisky and P. Kreshel, 177–206. London: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Marzo-Navarro, M., M. Pedraja-Iglesias, and M. P. Rivera-Torres. 2005. “Measuring Customer Satisfaction in Summer Courses.” Quality Assurance in Education 13 (1): 53–65. doi:10.1108/09684880510578650.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. 1992. “Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research.” Harvard Educational Review 62 (3): 279–301. doi:10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCorkle, D. E., J. M. Payan, J. Reardon, and N. D. Kling. 2007. “Perceptions and Reality: Creativity in the Marketing Classroom.” Journal of Marketing Education 29 (3): 254–261. doi:10.1177/0273475307306892.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, I., T. Ramsoy, M. Stephens, and F. Kotsi. 2019. “A Study of Unconscious Emotional and Cognitive Responses to Tourism Images Using a Neuroscience Method.” Journal of Islamic Marketing 10 (2): 543–564. doi:10.1108/JIMA-09-2017-0098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. A., and M. Chamberlin. 2000. “Women Are Teachers, Men Are Professors: A Study of Student Perceptions.” Teaching Sociology 28 (4): 283–298. doi:10.2307/1318580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron, M., and E. Segal. 1978. “The Good University Teacher’ as Perceived by the Students.” Higher Education 7 (1): 27–34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3445885. doi:10.1007/BF00129788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. H., N. M. Burns, J. D. Leckenby, D. K. Morrison, and J. I. Richards. 2001. Advertising Education Summit: Findings and Recommendations (December). Austin, TX: University of Texas, Department of Advertising.
   Google Scholar
• Neill, M. S., and E. Schauster. 2015. “Gaps in Advertising and Public Relations Education: Perspectives of Agency Leaders.” Journal of Advertising Education 19 (2): 5–17. doi:10.1177/109804821501900203.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. R. 2021. “AAA Resources for Multicultural and International Advertising Teaching and Research.” Journal of Advertising Education 25 (2): 146–150. doi:10.1177/10980482211045117.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., A. E. Witcher, K. M. T. Collins, J. D. Filer, C. D. Wiedmaier, and C. W. Moore. 2007. “Students’ Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective College Teachers: A Validity Study of a Teaching Evaluation Form Using a Mixed-Methods Analysis.” American Educational Research Journal 44 (1): 113–160. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30069473. doi:10.3102/0002831206298169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pepe, J. W., and M. C. Wang. 2012. “What Instructor Qualities Do Students Reward?” College Student Journal 46 (3): 603–614. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ996959
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind. London: The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramocki, S. P. 2014. “Teaching Creativity in the Marketing Curriculum.” Marketing Education Review 24 (3): 183–196. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008240301.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, L. N. 1977. “Are Advertising Educators Good Judges of Creative Talent?.” Journal of Advertising 6 (3): 41–43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4188124. doi:10.1080/00913367.1977.10672707.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, T. J., and J. Gutman. 1988. “Laddering Theory, Method, Analysis, and Interpretation.” Journal of Advertising Research 28 (1): 11–31. http://thomasjreynolds.com/pdf/Reynolds.Laddering.Theory.Method.Analysis.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, V. M., and M. K. E. Lahman. 2015. “Photo-Elicitation: Reflexivity on Method, Analysis, and Graphic Portraits.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 38 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2013.843073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbs, B. 1995. “The Advertising Curriculum and the Needs of Creative Students.” Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 50 (4): 25–34. doi:10.1177/107769589505000403.
   Google Scholar
• Robbs, B., and S. J. Broyles. 2012. “Learning from the Best: A Study of the Growth, Goals and Methods of Exemplary Teachers.” Journal of Advertising Education 16 (2): 5–14. doi:10.1177/109804821201600202.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. 2011. Out of Our Minds: Learning to Be Creative. New York: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780857086549.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, P., and B. Robbs. 2001. “Multicultural Issues in the Advertising Curriculum.” Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 55 (4): 30–8. doi:10.1177/107769580105500403.
   Google Scholar
• Ruel, E., W. E. Wagner, III, and B. J. Gillespie. 2015. The Practice of Survey Research: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, M. M., R. Martinez-Pecino, Y. T. Rodriguez, and P. T. Melero. 2011. “Student Perspectives on the University Professor Role.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 39 (4): 491–496. doi:10.2224/sbp.2011.39.4.491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandage, C. H. 1955. “A Philosophy of Advertising Education.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 32 (2): 209–211.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, K. B., and D. K. Morrison. 2009. “The Creativity Challenge: Media Confluence and Its Effects on the Evolving Advertising Industry.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 9 (2): 40–43. doi:10.1080/15252019.2009.10722154.
   Google Scholar
• Slayden, D., S. J. Broyles, and A. Kendrick. 1998. “Content and Strategy in the Entry-Level Advertising Portfolio.” Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 53 (3): 13–27. doi:10.1177/107769589805300302.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton-Jackson, J. A., D. L. Jackson, and J. Reinhardt. 2010. “Students as Consumers of Knowledge: Are They Buying What We’re Selling?” Innovative Higher Education 35 (5): 343–358. doi:10.1007/s10755-010-9151-y.
   Google Scholar
• Sojka, J., A. K. Gupta, and D. R. Deeter-Schmelz. 2002. “Student and Faculty Perceptions of Student Evaluations of Teaching: A Study of Similarities and Differences.” College Teaching 50 (2): 44–49. doi:10.1080/87567550209595873.
   Google Scholar
• Strage, A. 2008. “Traditional and Non-Traditional College Students’ Descriptions of the ‘Ideal’ Professor, the ‘Ideal’ Course, and Their Own Experience.” College Student Journal 42 (1): 225–231.
   Google Scholar
• Stuhlfaut, M. W., and M. Berman. 2010. “Rethinking Learning Objectives of a Campaigns Approach to Advertising Capstone Courses.” Journal of Advertising Education 14 (1): 46–52. doi:10.1177/109804821001400110.
   Google Scholar
• Stuhlfaut, M. W., and B. G. Vanden Bergh. 2014. “Creativity Is…: A Metaphoric Model of the Creative Thought Process.” Journal of Marketing Communications 20 (6): 383–396. doi:10.1080/13527266.2012.710644.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson-Whiteside, H., S. Turnbull, and L. Howe-Walsh. 2021. “Advertising: Should Creative Women Be Expected to ‘Fake It?’” Journal of Marketing Management 37 (3-4): 294–319. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2019.1707704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R. 2004. “Survey Research and Societal Change.” Annual Review of Psychology 55 (1): 775–801. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trammell, B. A., and R. S. Aldrich. 2016. “Undergraduate Students’ Perspectives of Essential Instructor Qualities.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 16 (1): 15–30. doi:10.14434/josotl.v16i1.19178.
   Google Scholar
• Uttl, B., C. A. White, and D. W. Gonzalez. 2017. “Meta-Analysis of Faculty’s Teaching Effectiveness: Student Evaluation of Teaching Ratings and Student Learning Are Not Related.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 54:22–42. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkola, J. 2012. Thoughts on Images: A Philosophical Evaluation. Bucharest: Zeta Books.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, R., T. Gruber, and I. Szmigin. 2007. “Service Quality in Higher Education: The Role of Student Expectations.” Journal of Business Research 60 (9): 949–959. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. L. 2018, November 15. “Generation Z Is the Most Racially and Ethnically Diverse Yet.” National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2018/11/15/668106376/generation-z-is-the-most-racially-and-ethnically-diverse-yet
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L. 2009. “What’s in a Name? Commonalities and Differences in Public Understanding of ‘Climate Change’ and ‘Global Warming’.” Public Understanding of Science 18 (4): 401–420. doi:10.1177/0963662506073088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. R., and K. Whitehouse. 2015. “Photo Elicitation and the Visual Sociology of Religion.” Review of Religious Research 57 (2): 303–318. doi:10.1007/s13644-014-0199-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windels, K., W.-N. Lee, and Y.-H. Yeh. 2010. “Does the Creative Boys’ Club Begin in the Classroom?” Journal of Advertising Education 14 (2): 15–24. doi:10.1177/109804821001400206.
   Google Scholar
• Wolburg, J., R. E. Taylor, M. Weigold, S. Moriarty, K. W. King, C. La Ferle, E. Haley, and E. Thorson. 2011. “Advertising Education and Scholarship: What Will Change, What Will Endure?.” American Academy of Advertising Conference Proceedings, Lubbock, 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. A., B. R. Brunner, and M. Fitch-Hauser. 2008. “A Major Decision: Students’ Perceptions of Their Print Journalism Education and Career Preparation.” Simile: Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education 8 (1): 1–11. doi:10.3138/sim.8.1.002.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, R. H., Jr., D. M. Badzinski, J. M. H. Fritz, and S. E. Yeates. 2012. “The ‘Ideal Professor’ and Gender Effects in Christian Higher Education.” Christian Higher Education 11 (3): 158–176. doi:10.1080/15363759.2011.598378.
   Google Scholar
• Worchel, S., V. Andreoli, and J. Eason. 1975. “Is the Medium the Message? A Study of the Effects of Media, Communicator, and Message Characteristics on Attitude Change.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 5 (2): 157–172. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1975.tb01305.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Q., E. Schauster, and M. S. Neill. 2018. “Expectations for Advertising and Public Relations Education from Agency Executives: A Comparative Study between China and the United States.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 39 (3): 289–307. doi:10.1080/10641734.2018.1490358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S., L. Rush, and D. G. Shaw. 2009. “Evaluating Gender Bias in Ratings of University Instructors’ Teaching Effectiveness.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3 (2): 1–14. doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030219.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S., and D. G. Shaw. 1999. “Profiles of Effective College and University Teachers.” The Journal of Higher Education 70 (6): 670–686. doi:10.1080/00221546.1999.11780803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research, Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zaltman, G. 1997. “Rethinking Market Research: Putting People Back in.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (4): 424–437. doi:10.2307/3151962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaltman, G., and R. A. Coulter. 1995. “Seeing the Voice of the Customer: Metaphor-Based Advertising Research.” Journal of Advertising Research 35 (4): 35–51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235361006_Seeing_the_Voice_of_the_Customer_Metaphor-Based_Advertising_Research
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar