External validation of prognostic models for preeclampsia in a Dutch multicenter prospective cohort

References

• Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33:130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananth CV, Keyes KM, Wapner RJ. Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010: age-period-cohort analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f6564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, et al. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the international society for the study of hypertension in pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy. 2001;20:IX–XIV.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberge S, Nicolaides KH, Demers S, et al. Prevention of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcome using low-dose aspirin: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol. 2013;41:491–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr JG, Lawrie TA, Atallah AN, et al. Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;6:CD001059.
   Google Scholar
• LeFevre ML. Low-dose aspirin use for the prevention of morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:819–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in pregnancy. NICE guideline CG107; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinrouweler CE, Cheong-See FM, Collins GS, et al. Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:79–90.e36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunelli VB, Prefumo F. Quality of first trimester risk prediction models for pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. BJOG. 2015;122:904–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rubaie Z, Askie L, Ray J, et al. The performance of risk prediction models for pre-eclampsia using routinely collected maternal characteristics and comparison with models that include specialised tests and with clinical guideline decision rules: a systematic review. BJOG. 2016;123(9):1441–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamain-de Ruiter M, Kwee A, Naaktgeboren CA, et al. External validation of prognostic models to predict risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in one Dutch cohort: prospective multicentre cohort study. BMJ. 2016;354:i4338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moons KGM, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:W1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Sarquis R, et al. Prediction of early, intermediate and late pre-eclampsia from maternal factors, biophysical and biochemical markers at 11–13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;3:66–74.
   Google Scholar
• Baschat AA, Magder LS, Doyle LE, et al. Prediction of preeclampsia utilizing the first trimester screening examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:514.e1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crovetto F, Figueras F, Triunfo S, et al. First trimester screening for early and late preeclampsia based on maternal characteristics, biophysical parameters, and angiogenic factors. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:183–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crovetto F, Figueras F, Triunfo S, et al. Added value of angiogenic factors for the prediction of early and late preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;35:258–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giguere Y, Masse J, Theriault S, et al. Screening for pre-eclampsia early in pregnancy: performance of a multivariable model combining clinical characteristics and biochemical markers. BJOG. 2015;122:402–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuc S, Koster MP, Pennings JL, et al. Metabolomics profiling for identification of novel potential markers in early prediction of preeclampsia. PLoSOne. 2014;9:e98540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuc S, Koster MPH, Franx A, et al. Maternal characteristics, mean arterial pressure and serum markers in early prediction of preeclampsia. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myatt L, Clifton RG, Roberts JM, et al. First-trimester prediction of preeclampsia in nulliparous women at low risk. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:1234–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odibo AO, Zhong Y, Goetzinger KR, et al. First-trimester placental protein 13, PAPP-A, uterine artery Doppler and maternal characteristics in the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Placenta. 2011;32:598–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plasencia W, Maiz N, Bonino S, et al. Uterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obs. 2007;30:742–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon LC, Kametas NA, Chelemen T, et al. Maternal risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a multivariate approach. JHumHypertens. 2010;24:104–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lc P, Maiz N, Valencia C, et al. First-trimester maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obs. 2009;33:23–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon LCY, Kametas NA, Pandeva I, et al. Mean arterial pressure at 11(+0) to 13(+6) weeks in the prediction of preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2008;51:1027–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scazzocchio E, Figueras F, Crispi F, et al. Performance of a first-trimester screening of preeclampsia in a routine care low-risk setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:203.e1–203.e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetzinger KR, Singla A, Gerkowicz S, et al. Predicting the risk of pre-eclampsia between 11 and 13 weeks’ gestation by combining maternal characteristics and serum analytes, PAPP-A and free beta-hCG. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30:1138–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetzinger K, Tuuli M, Cahill A, et al. Development and validation of a risk factor scoring system for first-trimester prediction of pre-eclampsia. Am J Perinatol. 2013;208:S300.
   Google Scholar
• Syngelaki A, Bredaki FE, Vaikousi E, et al. Body mass index at 11-13 weeks’ gestation and pregnancy complications. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;30:250–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donders ART, van der Heijden GJMG, Stijnen T, et al. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1087–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin D. Multiple imputation for non response in surveys. New York:  John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Steyerberg EW, Borsboom GJJM, van Houwelingen HC, et al. Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage. Stat Med. 2004;23:2567–2586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen KJM, Vergouwe Y, Kalkman CJ, et al. A simple method to adjust clinical prediction models to local circumstances. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:194–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergouwe Y, Moons KGM, Steyerberg EW. External validity of risk models: use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:971–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, et al. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology. 2010;21:128–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrel F. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, et al. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016;i1753.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, et al. ASPRE trial: performance of screening for preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(4):492–495.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira N, Magder LS, Blitzer MG, et al. First-trimester prediction of pre-eclampsia: external validity of algorithms in a prospectively enrolled cohort. Ultrasound Obs. 2014;44:279–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina A, Rapacchia G, Sterrantion AF, et al. Prospective evaluation of ultrasound and biochemical-based multivariable models for the prediction of late pre-eclampsia. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:1147–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herraiz I, Arbu J, Cama I, et al. Application of a first-trimester prediction model for pre-eclampsia based on uterine arteries and maternal history in high-risk pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2009;12:1123–1129.
   Google Scholar
• Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:613–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar