1,020
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research and Evaluation Articles

Parent–Child Conversations About Animals in Informal Learning Environments

, &

REFERENCES

  • Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259–303). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Anggoro, F., Medin, D., & Waxman, S. (2010). Language and experience influence children's biological induction. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 171–187.
  • Ash, D. (2003). Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 138–162.
  • Au, T.K., Chan, C.K. K., Chan T., Cheung, M.W. L., Ho, J.Y. S., & Ip, G.W. M. (2008). Folkbiology meets microbiology: A study of conceptual and behavioral change. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 1–19.
  • Caine, R.N., & Caine, G. (1994). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Callanan, M.A. (1985). How parents label objects for young children: The role of input in the acquisition of category hierarchies. Child Development, 56, 508–523.
  • Callanan, M., Rigney, J., Nolan-Reyes, C., & Solis, G. (2012). Beyond pedagogy: How children's knowledge develops in the context of everyday parent–child conversations. In A. Pinkham, T. Kaefer, & S. Neuman (Eds.), Knowledge development in early childhood: How young children build knowledge and why it matters (pp. 52–70). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Carey, S. (1995). On the origin of causal understanding. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A.J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition (pp. 268–301). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Chiodo, J., & Rupp, A. (1999). Setting the stage for meaningful exhibits. Exhibitionist, 18(2), 19–21.
  • Coleman, E.B., Brown, A.L., & Rivkin, I.D. (1997). The effect of instructional explanations on learning from scientific texts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 347–365.
  • Crowley, K. (2000). Parent explanations during museum visits: Gender differences in how children hear informal science. Visitor Studies, 3(3), 21–28.
  • Crowley, K., Callanan, M., Jipson, J., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent–child activity. Science Education, 85, 712–732.
  • Falk, J.H., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors’ agendas on museum learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 41, 106–120.
  • Fender, J.G., & Crowley, K. (2007). How parent explanation changes what children learn from everyday scientific thinking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 189–210.
  • Fivush, R., Hudson, J., & Nelson, K. (1984). Children's long-term memory for a novel event: An exploratory study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30, 303–316.
  • Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Frazier, B.N., Gelman, S.A., & Wellman, H.M. (2009). Preschoolers’ search for explanatory information within adult–child conversation. Child Development, 80, 1592–1611.
  • Ganea, P.A., Canfield, C.F., Ghafari, K.S., & Chou, T. (2014). Do cavies talk? The effect of anthropomorphic books on children's knowledge about animals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–9.
  • Geerdts, M., Van de Walle, G.A., & LoBue, V. (in press). Learning about real animals from anthropomorphic media. Journal of Imagination, Cognition, and Personality.
  • Geerdts, M., Van de Walle, G., & LoBue, V. (2015). Daily animal exposure and children's biological concepts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 132–146.
  • Gelman, R. & Brenneman, K. (2004). Science learning pathways for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 150–158.
  • Gelman, S.A. (2009). Learning from others: Children's construction of concepts. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 115–140.
  • Gelman, S.A., Coley, J.D., Rosengren, K.S., Hartman, E., & Pappas, A. (1998). Beyond labeling: The role of parental input in the acquisition of richly-structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63, Serial No. 253.
  • Gelman, S.A., Taylor, M.G., & Nguyen, S.P. (2004). Mother–child conversations about gender: Understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69, Serial No. 275.
  • Gleason, M.E., & Schauble, L. (2000). Parents’ assistance of their children's scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 343–378.
  • Hermann, P., Waxman, S.R., & Medin, D.L. (2010). Anthropocentrism is not the first step in children's reasoning about the natural world. PNAS, 107, 9979–9984.
  • Hickling, A.K., & Gelman, S.A. (1995). How does your garden grow? Early conceptualization of seeds and their place in the plant growth cycle. Child Development, 66, 856–876.
  • Housen, A. (1987). Three methods for understanding museum audiences. Museum Studies Journal, 2, 41–49.
  • Inagaki, K. (1990). The effects of raising animals on children's biological knowledge. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 119–129.
  • Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (1987). Young children's spontaneous personification as analogy. Child Development, 58, 1013–1020.
  • Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children's naïve thinking about the biological world. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Jaswal, V.K., & Markman, E.M. (2007). Looks aren't everything: 24-month-olds’ willingness to accept unexpected labels. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8, 93–111.
  • Jipson, J.L., & Callanan, M.A. (2003). Mother–child conversation and children's understanding of biological and nonbiological changes in size. Child Development, 74, 629–644.
  • Jipson, J.L., & Gelman, S.A. (2007). Robots and rodents: Children's inferences about living and nonliving kinds. Child Development, 78, 1675–1688.
  • Kalish, C. (1996). Causes and symptoms in preschoolers’ conceptions of illness. Child Development, 67, 1647–1670.
  • Keil, F.C., Levin, D.T., Richman, B.A., & Gutheil, G. (1999). Mechanism and explanation in the development of biological thought: The case of disease. In D.L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 285–319). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kim, K. (2008). Museum signage as distributed mediation to encourage family learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Kisiel, J., Rowe, S., Vartabedian, M.A., & Kopczak, C. (2012). Evidence for family engagement in scientific reasoning at interactive animal exhibits. Science Education, 96, 1047–1070.
  • Kopczak, C., Kisiel, J.F., & Rowe, S. (2015). Families talking about ecology at touch tanks. Environmental Education Research, 21, 129–144.
  • Legare, C.H. (2014). Contributions of explanation and exploration to children's scientific reasoning. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 101–106.
  • Legare C.H., & Lombrozo, T. (2014). Selective effects of explanation on learning in early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 198–212.
  • Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., & Knutson, K. (Eds.). (2012). Learning conversations in museums. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
  • Lombrozo, T. (2006). The structure and function of explanations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 464–470.
  • Masur, E.F. (1997). Maternal labeling of novel and familiar objects: Implications for children's development of lexical constraints. Journal of Child Language, 24, 427–439.
  • Medin, D., Waxman, S., Woodring, J., & Washinawatok, K. (2010). Human-centeredness is not a universal feature of young children's reasoning: Culture and experience matter when reasoning about biological entities. Cognitive Development, 25, 197–207.
  • Melson, G.F., & Fogel, A. (1989). Children's ideas about animal young and their care: A reassessment of gender differences in the development of nurturance. Anthrozoös, 2, 265–273.
  • Myant, K.A., & Williams J.M. (2005). Children's concepts of health and illness: Understanding of contagious illnesses, non-contagious illnesses and injuries. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 805–819.
  • Namy, L.L., & Gentner, D. (2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow's ears: Young children's use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 5–15.
  • Michaels, S., Shouse, A.W., & Schweingruber, H.A. (2007). Ready, set, science!: Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Palmquist, S., & Crowley, K. (2007). From teachers to testers: How parents talk to novice and expert children in a natural history museum. Science Education, 5, 783–804.
  • Patrick, P.G., & Tunnicliffe, S.D. (2013). Zoo talk. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S.D. (2008). Effects of keeping animals as pets on children's concepts of vertebrates and invertebrates. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 431–449.
  • Rigney, J., & Callanan, M. (2011). Patterns in parent–child conversations about animals at a marine science center. Cognitive Development, 26, 155–171.
  • Rittle-Johnson, B., Saylor, M., & Swygert, K.E. (2007). Learning from explaining: Does it matter if mom is listening? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100, 215–224.
  • Rosengren, K.S., Gelman, S.A., Kalish, C.W., & McCormick, M. (1991). As time goes by: Children's early understanding of growth. Child Development, 62, 1302–1320.
  • Ross, N., Medin, D., Coley, J.D., & Atran, S. (2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbioloigcal induction. Cognitive Development, 18, 25–47.
  • Rowe, S., & Kisiel, J. (2012). Family engagement at aquarium touch tanks: Exploring interactions and the potential for learning. In E. Davidsson & A. Jakobsson (Eds.), Understanding interactions at science centers and museums: Approaching sociocultural perspectives (pp. 63–77). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Rupp, A. (1999). Meaning-making in children's museums: Why try? Exhibitionist, 18, 42–44.
  • Siegal, M. (1988). Children's knowledge of contagion and contamination as causes of illness. Child Development, 59, 1353–1359.
  • Slaughter, V. (2005). Young children's understanding of death. Australian Psychologist, 40, 179–186.
  • Slaughter, V., Jaakkola, R., & Carey, S. (1999). Constructing a coherent theory: Children's biological understanding of life and death. In M. Siegal & C. Peterson (Eds.), Children's understanding of biology and health (pp. 71–98). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Solomon, G.E. A., & Cassimatis, N.L. (1999). On facts and conceptual systems: Young children's integration of their understandings of germs and contagion. Developmental Psychology, 35, 113–126.
  • Solomon, G.E. A., & Johnson, S.C. (2000). Conceptual change in the classroom: Teaching young children to understand biological inheritance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 81–96.
  • Solomon, G.E. A., Johnson, S.C., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1996). Like father, like son: Young children's understanding of how and why offspring resemble their parents. Child Development, 67, 151–171.
  • Springer, K. (1996). Young children's understanding of a biological basis for parent–offspring relations. Child Development, 67, 2841–2856.
  • Tare, M., French, J., Frazier, B.N., Diamond, J., & Evans, E.M. (2011). Explanatory parent–child conversation predominates at an evolution exhibit. Science Education, 95, 720–744.
  • Tarlowski, A. (2006). If it's an animal it has axons: Experience and culture in preschool children's reasoning about animates. Cognitive Development, 21, 249–265.
  • Taylor, M.G., Rhodes, M., & Gelman, S.A. (2009). Boys will be boys; cows will be cows: Children's essentialist reasoning about gender categories and animal species. Child Development, 80, 461–481.
  • Tenenbaum H.R., & Callanan, M.A. (2008). Parents’ science talk to their children in Mexican-descent families residing in the USA. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 1–12.
  • Unsworth, S.J., Levin, W., Bang, M., Washinawatok, K., Waxman, S.R., & Medin, D.L. (2012). Cultural differences in children's ecological reasoning and psychological closeness to nature: Evidence from Menominee and European American children. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 12, 17–29.
  • Vera, A.H., & Keil, F.C. (1988, November). The development of inductions about biological kinds: The nature of the conceptual base. Paper presented at the 29th meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL.
  • Waxman, S.R., Herrmann, P., Woodring, J., & Medin, D. (2014). Humans (really) are animals: Picture-book reading influences five-year-old urban children's construal of the relation between humans and non-human animals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 172.
  • Waxman, S., & Medin, D. (2007). Experience and cultural models matter: Placing firm limits on childhood anthropocentrism. Human Development, 50, 23–30.
  • Waxman S., Medin, D., & Ross, N. (2007). Folkbiological reasoning from a cross-cultural developmental perspective: Early essentialist notions are shaped by cultural beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 43, 294–308.
  • Wellman, H.M., Hickling, A.K., & Schult, C.A. (1997). Young children's psychological, physical, and biological explanations. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 75, 7–26.
  • Williams, J.M., & Smith, L.A. (2006). Social and experiential influences on the development of inheritance concepts. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 148–157.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.