How Political Identification and Individual Differences Influence Black Lives Matter Message Reactions

References

• Adorno, T. W. (1954). How to look at television. The Quarterly of Film Radio and Television, 8(3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.2307/1209731
   Google Scholar
• Alhabash, S., & McAlister, A. R. (2015). Redefining virality in less broad strokes: Predicting viral behavioral intentions from motivations and uses of Facebook and Twitter. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1317–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814523726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, B. J. (2023). Difference matters: Communicating social identity. Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Murphy, C. (2012). Polarized political communication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161100123X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizumic, B., & Duckitt, J. (2018). Investigating right wing authoritarianism with a very short authoritarianism scale. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i1.835
   Google Scholar
• Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413510932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., Rucker, D. D., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2004). Individual differences in resistance to persuasion: The role of beliefs and meta-beliefs. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 83–104). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. K., & Mourão, R. R. (2021). Protest coverage matters: How media framing and visual communication affects support for black civil rights protests. Mass Communication and Society, 24(4), 576–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1884724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. K., & Mourão, R. R. (2022). No reckoning for the right: How political ideology, protest tolerance and news consumption affect support Black Lives Matter protests. Political Communication, 39(6), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2121346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, N. (2016). All lives matter, but so does race: Black lives matter and the evolving role of social media. Humanity & Society, 40(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597616643868
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. R., Schlenker, B. R., & Collisson, B. (2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science, 24(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612447820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohrs, J. C., Duckitt, J., Funke, F., & Petzel, T. (2014). Perspectives on authoritarianism: Conclusions and future directions. In F. Funke, T. Petzel, C. Cohrs, & J. Duckitt (Eds.), Perspectives on authoritarianism. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, J. L. (1985). Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In D. Zillman & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 11–33). L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. F. (1993). Dogmatism and the persistence of discredited beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 692–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293196004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. F. (1998). Dogmatism and belief formation: Output interference in the processing of supporting and contradictory cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205284282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunivin, Z. O., Yan, H. Y., Ince, J., & Rojas, F. (2022). Black Lives Matter protests shift public discourse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(10), e2117320119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117320119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, A. M. (2021). A matter of principle? On the relationship between racial resentment and ideology. Political Behavior, 43(2), 561–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09561-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. (2016). Beyond the hashtags:#Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the online struggle for offline justice. Center for Media & Social Impact, American University.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Horne, G. (2022). Personality and demographic correlates of political ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 186, 111320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro-and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, A. M., Barberá, P., Munzert, S., & Yang, J. (2021). The consequences of online partisan media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(14), e2013464118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013464118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Edgerly, S., Akin, H., & Broesch, J. A. (2012). Partisan evaluation of partisan information. Communication Research, 39(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212441794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation. The Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, P. J., & Sears, D. O. (2002). The symbolic racism 2000 scale. Political Psychology, 23(2), 253–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, B. A. (2018). Partisanship, individual differences, and news media exposure as predictors of conspiracy beliefs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(3), 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017728919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, L. F., Ellithorpe, M. E., & Ralston, R. (2017). So why do you think that way?: Examining the role implicit attitudes and motivation play in audience’s perception of a racially charged issue. Media Psychology, 20(4), 584–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1227267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, K., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Ljungberg, E. (2013). Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveler? European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112465369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J. M. (2021, September 27). Support for Black Lives Matter declined after George Floyd protests but has remained unchanged since. Pew Research. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/09/27/support-for-black-lives-matter-declined-after-george-floyd-protests-but-has-remained-unchanged-since/
   Google Scholar
• Hotchin, V., & West, K. (2018). Openness and intellect differentially predict right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Kearney, M. W. (2021). Gendered tweets: Computational text analysis of gender differences in political discussion on Twitter. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(4), 482–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20969752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst, K. (2023, August 25). Americans are divided on whether society overlooks racial discrimination or sees it where it doesn’t exist. Pew Research. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/08/25/americans-are-divided-on-whether-society-overlooks-racial-discrimination-or-sees-it-where-it-doesnt-exist/
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J., & Kreiss, D. (2023). Recentering power: Conceptualizing counterpublics and defensive publics. Communication Theory, 33(2–3), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keib, K., Himelboim, I., & Han, J. Y. (2018). Important tweets matter: Predicting retweets in the #BlackLivesMatter talk on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgo, D., & Mourão, R. R. (2019). Media effects and marginalized ideas: Relationships among media consumption and support for Black Lives Matter. International Journal of Communication, 13, 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2012). Selective exposure and reinforcement of attitudes and partisanship before a presidential election. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 628–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01651.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., & Polavin, N. (2020). Confirmation bias, ingroup bias, and negativity bias in selective exposure to political information. Communication Research, 47(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217719596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langford, C. L., & Speight, M. (2015). #BlackLivesMatter: Epistemic Positioning, Challenges, and Possibilities. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 5 (3/4), 78–89.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 702–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, A. (2023, February 14). More than half of Republicans support Christian nationalism, according to a new survey. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2023/02/14/1156642544/more-than-half-of-republicans-support-christiannationalism-according-to-a-new-s September 12, 2023, from Christian nationalism on the rise as it enjoys more Republican support: NPR
   Google Scholar
• Malmir, M., Khanahmadi, M., & Farhud, D. (2017). Dogmatism and happiness. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 46(3), 326–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson, J. H. (2020). Right-wing authoritarianism, left-wing authoritarianism, and pandemic-mitigation authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 110251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsueda, R. L., & Drakulich, K. (2009). Perceptions of criminal injustice, symbolic racism, andracial politics. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623(1), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208330500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 91–126). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConahay, J. B., & Hough, J. C. (1976). Symbolic racism. Journal of Social Issues, 32(2), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02493.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. S., O’Dea, C. J., & Saucier, D. A. (2021). “I can’t breathe”: Lay conceptualizations of racism predict support for black lives matter. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 110625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K., & McElroy, J. C. (2012). The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosleh, M., Martel, C., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shared partisanship dramatically increases social tie formation in a Twitter field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7), e2022761118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022761118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K. (2008). Toward digital citizenship. Addressing inequality in the information age.In A. Chadwick & P. Howard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 173–185). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962541-20
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2015). The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis) trust science. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 36–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214555474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI). (2023, February 8). A Christian nation? Understanding the threat of Christian nationalism to American democracy and culture. Public Religion Research Institute. https://www.prri.org/research/a-christian-nation-understanding-the-threat-of-christiannationalism-to-american-democracy-and-culture/
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. L., & Kalin, R. (1985). Dogmatic responses to belief dissimilarity in the “bogus stranger” paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltzman, S. (2019). Political ideology over the life course. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501174
   Google Scholar
• Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1954). The nature and meaning of dogmatism. Psychological Review, 61(3), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Saucier, D. A., & Webster, R. J. (2010). Social vigilantism: Measuring individual differences in belief superiority and resistance to persuasion. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209346170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. B. (1974). The effect of confidence on selective exposure: An unresolved dilemma. The Journal of Social Psychology, 94(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1974.9923183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2003). The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 95–150). Elsevier Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37002-x.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., Van Laar, C., Carrillo, M., & Kosterman, R. (1997). Is it really racism?: The origins of White Americans’ opposition to race-targeted policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(1, Special Issue on Race), 16–53. https://doi.org/10.1086/297785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearman, S., & Levine, T. R. (2006). Dogmatism updated: A scale revision and validation. Communication Quarterly, 54(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370600877950
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Personality geneses of authoritarianism:The form and function of openness to experience. In F. Funke, T. Petzel, J. C. Cohrs, & J. Duckitt (Eds.), Perspectives on authoritarianism (pp. 169–199). VS-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2640.2724
   Google Scholar
• Stamps, D., & Mastro, D. (2020). The problem with protests: Emotional effects of race-related news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(3), 617–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019891433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. 2006.00214.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomena: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, T. G., Hameleers, M., & Kroon, A. C. (2020). Crafting our own biased media diets: The effects of confirmation, source, and negativity bias on selective attendance to online news. Mass Communication and Society, 23(6), 937–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1782432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (2021, February 23). Experts say approach must be comprehensive as roots are embedded in culture. The Harvard Gazette. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/02/solving-racial-disparities-in-policing/
   Google Scholar
• Westerwick, A., Kleinman, S. B., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013). Turn a blind eye if you care: Impacts of attitude consistency, importance, and credibility on seeking of political information and implications for attitudes. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C., Gatlin, K., Acosta, D., & Taylor, C. (2022). Portrayals of the Black Lives Matter movement in hard and fake news and consumer attitudes toward African Americans. Howard Journal of Communications, 34(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2022.2065458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar