Negotiating Discourses of Curriculum and Time: Tensions of Humanizing and Dehumanizing Discourses in an Urban Elementary School

References

• Alim, H. S. (2005). Critical language awareness in the united states: revisiting issues and revising pedagogies in a resegregated society. Educational Researcher, 34, 24–31. doi:10.3102/0013189X034007024
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (2000). How’s it going?: A practical guide to conferring with student writers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. (2015). The case against “critical thinking skills”: in pursuit of a humanizing pedagogy. Philosophical Studies in Education, 46, 83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Aronowitz, S. (2015). Against orthodoxy: Social theory and its discontents. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: high-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30, 39–62. doi:10.1177/0895904815614916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, T. (2015). Hybrid voices and collaborative change: Contextualising positive discourse analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolomé, L. I. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 173–195. doi:10.17763/haer.64.2.58q5m5744t325730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, E. B., Presiado, V., & Colomer, S. (2017). Writing through partnership: Fostering translanguaging in children who are emergent bilinguals. Journal of Literacy Research, 49, 10–37. doi:10.1177/1086296X16683417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaise, J. G. (2018). The effects of high-stakes accountability measures on students with limited English proficiency. Urban Education, 53, 1154–1181. doi:10.1177/0042085915613549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomer, R. (2011). Building adolescent literacy in today’s English classrooms. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 231–268. doi:10.3102/00028312042002231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botzakis, S., Burns, L. D., & Hall, L. A. (2014). Literacy reform and common core state standards: Recycling the autonomous model. Language Arts, 91, 223–235.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, C., Adler, M. A., & Linker, M. (2008). Resisting erasure: Cultivating opportunities for a humanizing curriculum. Multicultural Perspectives, 10, 65–72. doi:10.1080/15210960801997924
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Camangian, P. R. (2013). Seeing through lies: Teaching ideological literacy as a corrective lens. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46, 119–134. doi:10.1080/10665684.2013.750185
   Google Scholar
• Campano, G., Ghiso, M. P., & Sánchez, L. (2013). “Nobody knows the … amount of a person”: elementary students critiquing dehumanization through organic critical literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 48, 98–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter Andrews, D. J., Bartell, T., & Richmond, G. (2016). Teaching in dehumanizing times: the professionalization imperative. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 170–172. doi:10.1177/0022487116640480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter Andrews, D. J., & Castillo, B. (2016). Humanizing pedagogy for examinations of race and culture in teacher education. In F. Tuitt, C. Haynes, & S. Stewart (Eds.), Race, equity and the learning environment: The global relevance of critical and inclusive pedagogies in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Desai, K., & Knight-Manuel, M. (2016). Fostering a humanizing pedagogy: imagined possibilities for African immigrant girls. Education Leadership Review, 16, 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, D., & Lewis, T. (2005). The persistent life of oppression: the unconscious, power, and subjectivity. Interchange, 36, 313–329. doi:10.1007/s10780-005-6868-0
   Google Scholar
• Compton-Lilly, C., & Halverson, E. (2014). Time and space in literacy research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Consalvo, A. L., & Maloch, B. (2015). Keeping the teacher at arm’s length: Student resistance in writing conferences in two high school classrooms. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 50, 120–132.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. S., & Willson, A. (2015). Practices and commitments of test-centric literacy instruction: lessons from a testing transition. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 357–379. doi:10.1002/rrq.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durán, L. (2017). Audience and young bilingual writers: Building on strengths. Journal of Literacy Research, 49, 92–114. doi:10.1177/1086296X16683420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutro, E., & Haberl, E. (2018). Blurring material and rhetorical walls: Children writing the border/lands in a second-grade classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 50, 167–189. doi:10.1177/1086296X18767232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H. (2013). ReWRITING the basics: literacy learning in children’s cultures. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H., & Smitherman, G. (2009). The right (write) start: African American language and the discourse of sounding right. Teachers College Record, 111, 973–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory : ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). The order of discourse. In M. J. Shapiro (Ed.), Language and politics (pp. 108–138). New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fránquiz, M. E., & Salazar, M. C. (2004). The transformative potential of humanizing pedagogy: Addressing the diverse needs of Chicano/Mexicano students. The High School Journal, 87, 36–53. doi:10.1353/hsj.2004.0010
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970/2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P., & Macedo, D. P. (1987). Literacy: reading the word & the world. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Ghiso, M. P., & Campano, G. (2013). Coloniality and education: Negotiating discourses of immigration in schools and communities through border thinking. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46, 252–269. doi:10.1080/10665684.2013.779160
   Google Scholar
• hooks, B. (2014). Teaching to transgress. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hornof, M. (2008). Reading tests as a genre study. The Reading Teacher, 62, 69–73. doi:10.1598/RT.62.1.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huerta, T. M. (2011). Humanizing pedagogy: Beliefs and practices on the teaching of Latino children. Bilingual Research Journal, 34, 38–57. doi:10.1080/15235882.2011.568826
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. (2004). The access paradox. English in Australia, 12, 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, L. B., & Matta, G. B. D. (2009). Rooted in resistance: women teachers constructing counter‐pedagogies in post‐authoritarian Brazil. Teaching Education, 20, 215–228. doi:10.1080/10476210903096047
   Google Scholar
• Land, C., Taylor, L. A., McKinnon, B., & Lavender, H. (2018). Making space for choice, voice, and critique: Critical literacy workshop in the era of Trump. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 17, 28–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, J., & Maier, M. (2000). Co-authoring classroom texts: Shifting participant roles in writing activity. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 468–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2012). Complicating voice in a refusal to “Let participants speak for themselves”. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 745–751. doi:10.1177/1077800412453017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osorio, S. L. (2018). Toward a humanizing pedagogy: Using Latinx children’s literature with early childhood students. Bilingual Research Journal, 41, 5–22. doi:10.1080/15235882.2018.1425165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pletcher, B., & Christensen, R. (2017). Conferring in the CAFÉ: one-to-one reading conferences in two first grade classrooms. Reading Horizons, 56, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, R. (2016). In a world of disposable students: the humanizing elements of border pedagogy in teacher education. The High School Journal, 99, 337–350. doi:10.1353/hsj.2016.0013
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. (2000). Education, literacy, and humanization: exploring the work of Paulo Freire. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., & Smith, M. D. (2011). Reimagining Freirean pedagogy: Sendero for teacher education. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 9, 91.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2011). Critical approaches to discourse analysis in educational research. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed, pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, M. (2008). English or nothing: The impact of rigid language policies on the inclusion of humanizing practices in a high school ESL program. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41, 341–356. doi:10.1080/10665680802174783
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, M. (2013). A humanizing pedagogy reinventing the principles and practice of education as a journey toward liberation. Review of Research in Education, 37, 121–148. doi:10.3102/0091732X12464032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, A., Snell, J., & Lefstein, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching to the high-stakes standardised test? Research Papers in Education, 32(5), 596–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souto-Manning, M., & Cheruvu, R. (2016). Challenging and appropriating discourses of power: Listening to and learning from early career early childhood teachers of color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49, 9–26. doi:10.1080/10665684.2015.1121793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. A. (2017). Contradictions and possibilities: examining the complexities of conferring across three elementary literacy classrooms ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/47451
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2016). Critical pedagogy and sociocultural theory. In I. Esmonde & A. N. Booker (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences (pp. 139–161). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zisselsberger, M. (2016). Toward a humanizing pedagogy: Leveling the cultural and linguistic capital in a fifth-grade writing classroom. Bilingual Research Journal, 39, 121–137. doi:10.1080/15235882.2016.1167137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoch, M. (2017). “It’s important for them to know who they are”: Teachers’ efforts to sustain students’ cultural competence in an age of high-stakes testing. Urban Education, 52, 610–636. doi:10.1177/0042085915618716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar