Enhancement of mechanical and biological properties of calcium phosphate bone cement by incorporating bacterial cellulose

References

• Zhang J, Liu W, Schnitzler V, et al. Calcium phosphate cements for bone substitution: chemistry, handling and mechanical properties. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:1035–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong N, Park J, Yoo K, et al. Preparation, characterization, and in-vitro performance of novel injectable silanized-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/phase-transformed calcium phosphate composite bone cements. Curr Appl Phys. 2016;16:1523–1532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill R, Mccarthy HO, Montufar E, et al. Critical review: injectability of calcium phosphate pastes and cements. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouler JM, Pilet P, Gauthier O, et al. Biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for bone reconstruction: a review of biological response. Acta Biomater. 2017;53:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger R, Groll J. Fiber reinforced calcium phosphate cements – on the way to degradable load bearing bone substitutes?. Biomaterials. 2012;33:5887–5900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Li H, Cheng W, et al. Novel injectable calcium phosphate/chitosan composites for bone substitute materials. Acta Biomater. 2006;2:557–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barralet JE, Hofmann M, Grover LM, et al. High-strength apatitic cement by modification with α-hydroxy acid salts. Adv Mater. 2003;15:2091–2094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara RM, Orr JF, Buchanan FJ, et al. Development of a bovine collagen-apatitic calcium phosphate cement for potential fracture treatment through vertebroplasty. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:4043–4052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu T, Zhou Z, He Z, et al. Reinforcement of a new calcium phosphate cement with RGD-chitosan-fiber. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm AV, Meininger S, Tesch A, et al. The mechanical properties of biocompatible apatite bone cement reinforced with chemically activated carbon fibers. Materials. 2018;11:192.
   Google Scholar
• Nezafati N, Moztarzadeh F, Hesaraki S, et al. Synergistically reinforcement of a self-setting calcium phosphate cement with bioactive glass fibers. Ceram Int. 2011;37:927–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu HH, Eichmiller FC, Giuseppetti AA. Reinforcement of a self-setting calcium phosphate cement with different fibers. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2015;52:107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Castro AG, Polini A, Azami Z, et al. Incorporation of PLLA micro-fillers for mechanical reinforcement of calcium-phosphate cement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;71:286–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maenz S, Brinkmann O, Kunisch E, et al. Enhanced bone formation in sheep vertebral bodies after minimally invasive treatment with a novel, PLGA fiber-reinforced brushite cement. Spine J. 2017;709–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Yi Z, Qin Z, et al. Effect of ultrafine poly(ε-caprolactone) fibers on calcium phosphate cement: in vitro degradation and in vivo regeneration. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;11:163–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpf TR, Yang X, Zhang J, et al. In situ and ex situ modifications of bacterial cellulose for applications in tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2018;82:372–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoes D, Miguel SP, Ribeiro MP, et al. Recent advances on antimicrobial wound dressing: A review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;127:130–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao W, Wu J, Liu H, et al. Novel bioactive surface functionalization of bacterial cellulose membrane. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;178:270–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RanJ, JiangP, LiuS, et al. Constructing multi-component organic/inorganic composite bacterial cellulose-gelatin/hydroxyapatite double-network scaffold platform for stem cell-mediated bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;78:130–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan YZ, Huang Y, Yuan CD, et al. Biomimetic synthesis of hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2007;27:855–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan Y, Cui T, Zhang Q, et al. Submicrofiber-incorporated 3D bacterial cellulose nanofibrous scaffolds with enhanced cell performance. Macromol Mater Eng. 2018;303:1800316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond S, Maazouz Y, Montufar EB, et al. Accelerated hardening of nanotextured 3D-plotted self-setting calcium phosphate inks. Acta Biomater. 2018;75:451–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OrsheshZ, HesarakiS, KhanlarkhaniA. Blooming gelatin: an individual additive for enhancing nanoapatite precipitation, physical properties, and osteoblastic responses of nanostructured macroporous calcium phosphate bone cements. Int J Nanom edicine. 2017;12:745–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom J, Rahier H, Wastiels J. Effect of curing conditions on the dimensional and thermal stability of calcium phosphate cement for elevated temperature applications. Cem Concr Res. 2014;66:102–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Dong J, Yao F, et al. Layer-by-layer assembled bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide hydrogels with extremely enhanced mechanical properties. Nano-Micro Lett. 2018;10:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Zhang N, Gao X. Assistanted stabilizer in environment-friendly Ca/Zn composite stabilizer. Mod Plast Process Appl. 2008;20:61–63.
   Google Scholar
• Akira I, Tsuguyuki S, Hayaka F. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale. 2011;3:71–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalia BS, Guillen E, Arafat HA, et al. Nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced PVDF-HFP membranes for membrane distillation application. Desalination. 2014;332:134–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mali SA, Nune KC, Misra RDK. Biomimetic nanostructured hydroxyapatite coatings on metallic implant materials. Mater Process Rep. 2016;31:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Nune KC, Misra RD. Biological functionality of extracellular matrix-ornamented three-dimensional printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104:1343–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Mali S, Nayak SS, et al. Favorable surface adhesion response of electrocrystallized nanohydroxyapatite on ultrafine-grained/nanograined austenitic stainless steel. Scripia Materialta. 2008;59:834–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thein-Han WW, Misra RDK. Three-dimensional chitosan-nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mater. 2009;61:41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Thein-Han WW, Misra RDK. Biomimetic chitosan–nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:1182–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori R, Nakai T, Enomoto K, et al. Increased antibiotic release from a bone cement containing bacterial cellulose. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:600–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbié C, Chauveaux D, Barthe X, et al. Biological behavior of cellulosic materials after bone implantation: preliminary results. Clin Mater. 1990;5:251–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei J, Jia J, Wu F, et al. Hierarchically microporous/macroporous scaffold of magnesium–calcium phosphate for bone tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2010;31:1260–1269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabiyouni M, Brückner T, Zhou H, et al. Magnesium-based bioceramics in orthopedic applications. Acta Biomater. 2018;66:23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar