Investigation of two-body wear resistance of composite materials for biomaterial application in oral environment: the influence of antagonist material

References

• Patil SS, Misra RDK. The significance of macromolecular architecture in governing structure-property relationship for biomaterial applications: an overview. Mater Technol. 2018;33(5):364–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koottathape N, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, et al. Two- and three-body wear of composite resins. Dent Mater. 2012;28(12):1261–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, et al. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7(2):63–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent. 2000;28(5):299–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz EC, Sadeler R. Investigation of two- and three-body wear resistance on flowable bulk-fill and resin-based composites. Mech Compos Mater. 2018;54(3):395–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, et al. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. J Dent. 1996;24(1–2):141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, et al. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res. 1989;68(12):1752–1754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer NB, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res. 2011;90(4):402–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28(26):3757–3785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sideridou ID, Karabela MM, Vouvoudi EC. Dynamic thermomechanical properties and sorption characteristics of two commercial light cured dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2008;24(6):737–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altintas SH, Usumez A. Evaluation of monomer leaching from a dual cured resin cement. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2008;86b(2):523–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komurcuoglu E, Olmez S, Vural N. Evaluation of residual monomer elimination methods in three different fissure sealants in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(2):116–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leprince JG, Lamblin G, Devaux J, et al. Irradiation modes’ impact on radical entrapment in photoactive resins. J Dent Res. 2010;89(12):1494–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Two-step curing: influence on conversion and softening of a dental polymer. Dent Mater. 2003;19(6):466–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi H, Akbari B, Najafi F, et al. Evaluation of relationship among filler amount, degree of conversion, and cytotoxicity: approaching performance enhancement novel design for dental Bis-GMA/UDMA/TEGDMA composite. Int J Polym Mater Po. 2017;66(16):844–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R, et al. Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion of laboratory-processed composite materials. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12(5):432–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza JCM, Bentes AC, Reis K, et al. Abrasive and sliding wear of resin composites for dental restorations. Tribol Int. 2016;102:154–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater. 2006;22(8):712–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Marquis PM, Shortall AC. Influence of filler loading on the two-body wear of a dental composite. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(7):729–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz EC, Sadeler R. Investigation of three-body wear of dental materials under different chewing cycles. Sci Eng Compos Mater. 2018;25(4):781–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. A two-body frictional wear test. J Dent Res. 1994;73(9):1546–1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze SD, Zellweger G, Cavalleri A, et al. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods. Dent Mater. 2006;22(2):166–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahnel S, Behr M, Handel G, et al. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(4):269–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazal M, Yang B, Ludwig K, et al. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel. Dent Mater. 2008;24(4):502–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazal M, Steiner M, Kern M. Wear resistance of artificial denture teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21(2):166–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazal M, Kern M. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(5):342–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent Mater. 1994;10(4):269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, et al. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69(4):425–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaridou D, Belli R, Petschelt A, et al. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(6):1485–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahnel S, Schultz S, Trempler C, et al. Two-body wear of dental restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(3):237–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortall AC, Hu XQ, Marquis PM. Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing. Dent Mater. 2002;18(3):246–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer T, Huffmann AMS, Eichberger M, et al. Two-body wear rate of PEEK, CAD/CAM resin composite and PMMA: effect of specimen geometries, antagonist materials and test set-up configuration. Dent Mater. 2016;32(6):E127–E136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehl C, Scheibner S, Ludwig K, et al. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator. Dent Mater. 2007;23(11):1382–1389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap AUJ, Teoh SH, Tan KB. Influence of water exposure on three-body wear of composite restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53(5):547–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz E, Sadeler R. Effect of thermal cycling and microhardness on roughness of composite restorative materials. J Restor Dent. 2016;4(3):93–96.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick RG, Mccabe JF, Walls AWG, et al. The effect of storage media upon the surface microhardness and abrasion resistance of three composites. Dent Mater. 1990;6(2):123–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obrien WJ, Yee J. Microstructure of posterior restorations of composite resin after clinical wear. Oper Dent. 1980;5(3):90–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen KD. Restorative resins: abrasion vs. mechanical properties. Scand J Dent Res. 1980;88(6):557–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu BL, Gan XQ, Zhao YW, et al. TEGDMA releasing in resin composites with different filler contents and its correlation with mitochondrial mediated cytotoxicity in human gingival fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2019;107(6):1132–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Injeti VSY, Nune KC, Reyes E, et al. A comparative study on the tribological behavior of Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn alloys in simulated body fluid. Mater Technol. 2019;34(5):270–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz EC. Effects of thermal change and third-body media particle on wear behaviour of dental restorative composite materials. Mater Technol. 2019;34(11):645–651.
   Google Scholar
• Rana S, Rawat J, Misra RDK. Anti-microbial active composite nanoparticles with magnetic core and photocatalytic shell: tiO2-NiFe2O4 biomaterial system. Acta Biomater. 2005;1(6):691–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramalho A, Antunes PV. Reciprocating wear test of dental composites: effect on the antagonist. Wear. 2005;259:1005–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL. Wear and fatigue behavior of nano-structured dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2006;78b(1):196–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar