Photo-oxidation efficient As (III) under visible light using microporous Zn doped-Fe₃O₄ sphere

References

• Agrafioti E, Kalderis D, Diamadopoulos E. Arsenic and chromium removal from water using biochars derived from rice husk, organic solid wastes and sewage sludge. J Environ Manage. 2014;133:309–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Muñoz MJ, Arencibia A, Segura Y, et al. Removal of As(III) from aqueous solutions through simultaneous photocatalytic oxidation and adsorption by TiO2 and zero-valent iron. CatalToday. 2017;280:149–154.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Debsarkar A, Dutta A. Technology alternatives for decontamination of arsenic-rich groundwater—A critical review. Environ Technol Innovation. 2019;13:277–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgada ME, Levy IK, Salomone V, et al. Arsenic (V) removal with nanoparticulate zerovalent iron: effect of UV light and humic acids. CatalToday. 2009;143(3–4):261–268.
   Google Scholar
• Nidheesh PV, Singh TSA. Arsenic removal by electrocoagulation process: recent trends and removal mechanism. Chemosphere. 2017;181:418–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakoor MB, Niazi NK, Bibi I, et al. Exploring the arsenic removal potential of various biosorbents from water. Environ Int. 2019;123:567–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Han YS, Ahn JS. Comparison of arsenic co-precipitation and adsorption by iron minerals and the mechanism of arsenic natural attenuation in a mine stream. Water Res. 2016;106:295–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao L, Wang N, Wang C, et al. Arsenic removal from water and river water by the combined adsorption - UF membrane process. Chemosphere. 2018;202:768–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Lou D, Wang D, et al. Synthesis of ultrathin g-C3N4/graphene nanocomposites with excellent visible-light photocatalytic performances. Funct Mater Lett. 2019;12:195002–195007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Liu X. A novel Fe2O3–fe3O4@SiO2@TiO2–TNS–GR magnetic composite with an enhanced visible photocatalytic property. Funct Mater Lett. 2019;12:195000–195006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian W, Wang L, Wang X, et al. Facile preparation of BiOCl/Ti3C2 hybrid photocatalyst with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Funct Mater Lett. 2019;12:1850100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai T, Ding Y, Xu L. Synthesis of flower-like CuS/graphene aerogels for dye wastewater treatment. Funct Mater Lett. 2019;12:195002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui SI, Naushad M, Chaudhry SA. Promising prospects of nanomaterials for arsenic water remediation: A comprehensive review. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2019;126:60–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin S. Creation of advanced optical responsive functionality of ceramics by green processes. J Ceram Soc Jpn. 2015;123:823–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huihui SY, Yuhua W, Tsugio S. Current progress on persistent flourescence-assisted composite photocatalysts. Funct Mater Lett. 2013;6:1330005–1330031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaoyong W, Wu Z, Gaoke, et al. Photocatalytic CO2 conversion of M0.33WO3 directly from the air with high selectivity: insight into full spectrum-induced reaction mechanism. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141:5267–5274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui SI, Chaudhry SA. Iron oxide and its modified forms as an adsorbent for arsenic removal: A comprehensive recent advancement. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2017;111:592–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuntia S, Majumder SK, Ghosh P. Oxidation of As(III) to As(V) using ozone microbubbles. Chemosphere. 2014;97:120–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Qiu W, Yang C, et al. Removal of arsenic from flue gas by using NaClO solution. Chem Eng J. 2017;309:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Qiu W, Yang C, et al. Removal of arsenic from flue gas by using NaClO solution. Chem Eng J. 2017;309:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Q, Zhuang J, Wang J, et al. Novel photocatalyst, Bi2Sn2O7, for photooxidation of As(III) under visible-light irradiation. Appl Catal A Gen. 2012;425–426:74–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lescano M, Zalazar C, Brandi R. Arsenic removal from water employing a combined system: photooxidation and adsorption. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015;22:3865–3875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L-K, Wu H, Zhang H-B, et al. Graphene oxide/CuFe2O4 foam as an efficient absorbent for arsenic removal from water. Chem Eng J. 2018;334:1808–1819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Niu H, Cai Y, et al. Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on coprecipitated bimetal oxide magnetic nanomaterials: mnFe2O4 and CoFe2O4. Chem Eng J. 2010;158(3):599–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Fan J, Chang H, et al. Recent progress on mixed-anion type visible-light induced photocatalysts. Sci China Technol Sci. 2017;60:1447–1457.
   Google Scholar
• Sun T, Zhao Z, Liang Z, et al. Efficient removal of arsenite through photocatalytic oxidation and adsorption by ZrO2 -Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;416:656–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huoshi Cen C. Influence of Zn content on heterogeneous photo-Fenton catalytic performance of Zn-doped Fe3O4 for degradation of rhodamine B. Funct Mater Lett. 2019;12:1850092–1850095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun T, Zhao Z, Liang Z, et al. Efficient As(III) removal by magnetic CuO-Fe3O4 nanoparticles through photo-oxidation and adsorption under light irradiation. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;495:168–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thi TM, Trang NTH, Van Anh NT. Effects of Mn, Cu doping concentration to the properties of magnetic nanoparticles and arsenic adsorption capacity in wastewater. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;340:166–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Zhang G, Liu C, et al. Enhanced removal of arsenite and arsenate by a multifunctional Fe-Ti-Mn composite oxide: photooxidation, oxidation and adsorption. Water Res. 2018;147:264–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaiano V, Iervolino G, Rizzo L. Cu-doped ZnO as efficient photocatalyst for the oxidation of arsenite to arsenate under visible light. Appl Catal B Environ. 2018;238:471–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni SD, Kumbar S, Menon SG, et al. Magnetically separable core–shell ZnFe2O4@ZnO nanoparticles for visible light photodegradation of methyl orange. Mater Res Bull. 2016;77:70–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Bin Y, Matsuo M. Magnetic behavior of Zn-doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles estimated in terms of crystal domain size. J Phys Chem C. 2011;116(1):134–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Liu J, Zhang S, et al. Structural, magnetic, and thermodynamic evolutions of Zn-doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized using a one-step solvothermal method. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:1328–1341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Li Z, Yang Y, et al. Optimization of Zn(x)Fe(3-x)O(4) hollow spheres for enhanced microwave attenuation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(24):21911–21915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cen H, Nan Z. Monodisperse Zn-doped Fe3O4 formation and photo-Fenton activity for degradation of rhodamine B in water. J Phys Chem Solids. 2018;121:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maletin M, Moshopoulou EG, Kontos AG, et al. Synthesis and structural characterization of In-doped ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2007;27:4391–4394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng X, Guo H, Patel K, et al. High performance, recoverable Fe3O4ZnO nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of phenol. Chem Eng J. 2014;244:327–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garza-Arévalo JI, García-Montes I, Reyes MH, et al. Fe doped TiO2 photocatalyst for the removal of As(III) under visible radiation and its potential application on the treatment of As-contaminated groundwater. Mater Res Bull. 2016;73:145–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami A, Raul PK, Purkait MK. Arsenic adsorption using copper (II) oxide nanoparticles. Chem Eng Res Des. 2012;90:1387–1396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lata S, Samadder SR. Removal of arsenic from water using nano adsorbents and challenges: A review. J Environ Manage. 2016;166:387–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi W, Du D, Shen B, et al. Synthesis of yolk-shell structured Fe3O4@void@CdS nanoparticles: a general and effective structure design for photo-fenton reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:20831–22038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pholosi A, Naidoo EB, Ofomaja AE. Enhanced arsenic (III) adsorption from aqueous solution by magnetic pine cone biomass. Mater Chem Phys. 2019;222:20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Liu J, Cui F, et al. One pot synthesis of tunable Fe3O4–mnO2 core–shell nanoplates and their applications for water purification. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:9052–9057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Kim KW, Choi H, et al. Simultaneous photooxidation and sorptive removal of As(III) by TiO2 supported layered double hydroxide. J Environ Manage. 2015;161:228–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslami H, Ehrampoush MH, Esmaeili A, et al. Efficient photocatalytic oxidation of arsenite from contaminated water by Fe2O3-Mn2O3 nanocomposite under UVA radiation and process optimization with experimental design. Chemosphere. 2018;2017:303–312.
   Google Scholar
• Mahajan BK, Kumar N, Chauhan R, et al. Mechanistic evaluation of heterocyclic aromatic compounds mineralization by a Cu doped ZnO photo-catalyst. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2019;18:1540–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar