Word Recognition Processes in College-Age Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement

References

• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, M. J. (2004). Modeling the connections between word recognition and reading. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1219–1243). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ari, O. (2010). Repeated readings vs. wide reading: Effects of fluency interventions on the component reading skills of struggling college readers. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ari, O. (2011). Reading fluency interventions for developmental readers: Repeated readings and wide reading. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 28(1), 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A., Logie, R., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Brereton, N. (1985). Components of fluent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 119–131. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90019-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badian, N. (2005). Does a visual-orthographic deficit contribute to reading disability? Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 28–52. doi:10.1007/s11881-005-0003-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, L. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Reading skill: Some adult comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 244–255. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biemiller, A. (2009). Parent/caregiver narrative: Vocabulary development (0 – 60 Months). In L. M. Phillips (Ed.), Handbook of language and literacy development: A roadmap from 0 – 60 months (pp. 1–42). London, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D. P., & Mencl, W. E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 226–243. doi:10.1177/00222194070400030401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). The Nelson-Denny reading test. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Chabot, R. I., Zehr, H. D., Prinzo, O. V., & Petros, T. V. (1984). The speed of word recognition subprocesses and reading achievement in college students. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/747359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K. (1993). Children’s literacy environments and early word recognition subskills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 193–204. doi:10.1007/BF01027484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 733–740. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 264–274. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, P. R. (1979). An experimental program for teaching high speed word recognition and comprehension skills. In J. E. Button, T. C. Lovitt & T. D. Rowland (Eds.), Communications research in learning disabilities and mental retardation (pp. 33–65). Baltimore, MD: University of Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Echols, L. D., West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E., & Zehr, K. S. (1996). Using children’s literacy activities to predict growth in verbal cognitive skills: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 296–304. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2), 116–125. doi:10.1111/jrir.1995.18.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleisher, L. S., Jenkins, J. R., & Pany, D. (1979). Effects on poor readers’ comprehension of training in rapid decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 30. doi:10.2307/747430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R., & Ziegler, J. C. (2007). Speech and spelling interaction: The interdependence of visual and auditory word recognition. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 107–118). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (1998). The role of analogies in the development of word recognition. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 41–64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 1–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, V. M. (2009). Bottom-up processing and reading comrehension in experienced adult readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(3), 309–326. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homan, S. P., Klesius, J. P., & Hite, C. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetitive strategies on students’ fluency and comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 87(2), 94–99. doi:10.1080/00220671.1993.9941172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. D., & McClelland, J. L. (1979). Processing determinants of reading speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(2), 151–181. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.2.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. R. (2005). A comparative study of small group fluency instruction. Reading Psychology, 26(2), 127–146. doi:10.1080/02702710590930492
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3–21. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D. P., Fischer, F., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(74)90101-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., & Shankweiler, D. (2010). Expanding the simple view of reading in accounting for reading skills in community college students. Reading Psychology, 31(5), 454–471. doi:10.1080/02702710903241363
   Google Scholar
• Mathes, P. G., & Fuchs, L. S. (1993). Peer-mediated reading instruction in special education resource rooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8(4), 233.
   Google Scholar
• McBride-Chang, C., Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Custodio, R. G., & Doi, L. M. (1993). Print exposure as a predictor of word reading and reading comprehension in disabled and nondisabled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 230–238. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. S., & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283–306. doi:10.1007/s11881-999-0027-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D. (2005). The Howard Street tutoring manual: Teaching at-risk readers in the primary grades (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D., Trathen, W., Lomax, R. G., Perney, J., Kucan, L., Frye, E. M., … Schlagal, R. (2012). Modeling aspects of print-processing skill: Implications for reading assessment. Reading & Writing, 25(1), 189–215. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9253-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, J., Mcleod, C. M., Hunt, E., & Davidson, J. E. (1985). Information processing correlates of reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(1), 59–88. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90016-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. doi:10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. W. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(4), 461–469. doi:10.1037/h0077013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated reading. The Reading Teacher, 12, 177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information- processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, C. R., Siakaluk, P. D., Chow, V. C., & Buchanan, L. (2008). Is there an effect of print exposure on the word frequency effect and the neighborhood size effect? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 269–291. doi:10.1007/s10936-008-9071-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Katz, L., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., Brady, S., … Shaywitz, B. A. (1999). Comprehension and decoding: Patterns of association in children with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(1), 69–94. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0301_4
   Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., & Dumais, S. T. (1981). The development of automatism. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 111–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433. doi:10.2307/747605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A., & Nicholson, T. (1997). Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improves their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 276–288. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252–261. doi:10.1177/07419325040250040801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 211–239. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_2
   Google Scholar
• Zinar, S. (2000). The relative contributions of word identification skill and comprehension-monitoring behavior to reading comprehension ability. Comtemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 363–377. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar