Strategies for Increasing Faculty Involvement in Institutional or Program Assessment

References

• Alexander, F. K. (2000). The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 411–431. doi:10.2307/2649146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of Community Colleges. (2013). Community college trends and statistics. Retrieved from http://www.aacc.nche.edu/AboutCC/Trends/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, M. (2011). Managing change-engaging faculty in assessment opportunities. Innovative Higher Education, 36(4), 217–233. doi:10.1007/s10755-010-9169-1
   Google Scholar
• Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dowd, A. C. (2007). Community colleges as gateways and gatekeepers: Moving beyond the access “Saga” toward outcome equity. Harvard Educational Review, 77(4), 407–419. doi:10.17763/haer.77.4.1233g31741157227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, J. S. (2010). Accreditation and the federal future of higher education. Academe, 96 (5), 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ebersole, T., & Mince, R. (2007). The magic is in the learning not in the mandates. Community College Journal, 77(6), 37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. L., & Mandelbaum, M. (2011). That used to be us. New York, NY: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, H., & Peterson, M. (2003). Factors that promote faculty involvement in and satisfaction with institutional and classroom student assessment. Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 173–204. doi:10.1023/A:1022051728874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Learning Commission a division of North Central Accreditation (2013). Criteria for accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.ncahlc.org/Information-for-Institutions/criteria-and-core-components.html
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P. (2010). Opening doors to faculty involvement in assessment (NILOA Occasional Paper No. 4). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P. (2011). American higher education: First in the world. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(3), 7–19. doi:10.1080/00091383.2011.568896
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, M. (2011). American higher education: First in the world. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(3), 7–19. doi:10.1080/00091383.2011.568896
   Google Scholar
• Kinzie, J. (2010). Perspectives from campus leaders on the current state of student learning outcomes assessment: NILOA Focus Group Summary 2009–2010. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. (2002). The heart of change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G., & Ikenberry, S. (2009). More than you think, less than we need: Learning outcomes assessment in American higher education. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Middaugh, M. (2009). Closing the loop: Linking planning and assessment. Planning for Higher Education, 39(3), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Middaugh, M. (2010). Planning and assessment in higher education: Demonstrating institutional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, F., Couturier, L., & Scurry, J. (2004). Higher education isn’t meeting the public’s needs. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(8), B6.
   Google Scholar
• Nunley, C. R., Bers, T. H., & Manning, T. (2011). Learning outcomes assessment in community colleges. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Serban, A. M. (2004). Developing and implementing assessment of student learning outcomes. In A. M. Serban, & J. Friedlander (Eds.), New directions for community colleges (Vol. 126, pp. 17–28). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shipman, D., Aloi, S. L., & Jones, E. A. (2003). Addressing key challenges of higher education assessment. The Journal of General Education, 52(4), 335–346. doi:10.1353/jge.2004.0016
   Google Scholar
• Skolits, G. J., & Graybeal, S. (2007). Community college institutional effectiveness perspectives of campus stakeholders. Community College Review, 34(4), 302–323. doi:10.1177/0091552106299493
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, B., & Phillips, J. (2009). Assessment of student learning: A fast-track experience. Journal of Education for Business, 84(5), 258–262. doi:10.3200/JOEB.84.5.258-262
   Google Scholar
• Suskie, L. A. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• University of Florida College of Education. (2014). Community college futures assembly. Retrieved from http://education.ufl.edu/futures
   Google Scholar
• Volkwein, J. (2010). A model for assessing institutional effectiveness. In J. F. Volkwein (Ed.), Special issue: Assessing student outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(S1), 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Walvoord, B. E. (2010). Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, J. V. (2008). The higher education funding disconnect: Spending more, getting less. Change, 40(6), 18–25. doi:10.3200/CHNG.40.6.18-25
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, J. F., & Metcalf, J. (2003). Faculty and administrative support for institutional effectiveness activities: A bridge across the chasm? The Journal of Higher Education, 74(4), 445–468. doi:10.1353/jhe.2003.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar