Technology Use in Developmental Education: Experiences, Challenges, and Rationales

References

• Abreu-Ellis, C., Ellis, J., & Hayes, R. (2009). College preparedness and time of learning disability identification. Journal of Developmental Education, 32(3), 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Lederman, D., & Jaschik, S. (2012). Digital faculty: Professors, teaching and technology 2012. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. ERIC No. ED535215. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535215.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31(3), 597–606. doi:10.1177/0038038597031003015
   Google Scholar
• Ashford-Rowe, K. H., & Holt, M. (2011). Emerging educational institutional decision-making matrix. US-China Education Review, 8(3), 317–322.
   Google Scholar
• Assude, T., Buteau, C., & Forgasz, H. (2010). Factors influencing implementation of technology-rich mathematics curriculum and practices. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 405–419). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 886–924. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, T. (2009). Challenge and opportunity: Rethinking the role and function of developmental education in community college. New Directions for Community Colleges, 145, 11–30. doi:10.1002/cc.352
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, T., & Cho, S. (2010). Developmental education in community colleges ( (CCRC Issue Brief prepared for The White House Summit on Community College)). New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, T., Jenkins, D., & Leinbach, T. (2005, January). What we know about community college low-income and minority student outcomes: Descriptive statistics from national surveys. New York, NY: Community College Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, T. R., Jaggars, S. S., & Jenkins, D. (2015). Redesigning America’s Community Colleges: A clearer path to student success. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., & Federman, J. E. (2013). E-learning in postsecondary education. The Future of Children, 23(1), 165–185. doi:10.1353/foc.2013.0007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E. P., Boatman, A., & Long, B. T. (2013). Student supports: Developmental education and other academic programs. The Future of Children, 23(1), 93–115. doi:10.1353/foc.2013.0003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, S., Fay, M. P., & Trimble, M. J. (2016). Modularization in developmental mathematics in two states: Implementation and early outcomes ( (CCRC Working Paper No. 87)). New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, S., & Raufman, J. (2017). From “additive” to “integrative”: Experiences of faculty teaching developmental integrated reading and writing courses ( (CCRC Working Paper No. 96)). New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Boylan, H. R., & Bonham, B. S. (2007). 30 years of developmental education: A retrospective. Journal of Developmental Education, 30, (3), 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Britto, M., & Rush, S. (2013). Developing and implementing comprehensive student support services for online students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning. Educause Quarterly, 2002(2), 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonell, K. B., Dailey-Hebert, A., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Unleashing the creative potential of faculty to create blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 29–37. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., Borman, G. D., & Robinson, M. (2011). A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 378–398. doi:10.3102/0162373711412765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caverly, D. C., & Fitzgibbons, D. (2007). Techtalk: Assistive Technology. Journal of Developmental Education, 31(1), 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ciez-Volz, K., & Levine-Brown, P. (2010). At the crossroads of change: Redesigning developmental education for today’s learners. Jacksonville: Florida State College at Jacksonville. Retrieved from http://old.fscj.edu/district/institutional-effectiveness/compliance-cert-rpt/submission/documents/21087.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. M., Brawer, F. B., & Kisker, C. B. (2014). The American community college (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Crandall, J. R., & Soares, L. (2015). The architecture of innovation: System-level course redesign in Tennessee. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Retrieved from http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Documents/The-Architecture-of-Innovation-System-Level-Course-Redesign-in-Tennessee.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dalsgaard, C. (2006). Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 9, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Digest of Education Statistics. (2016). Table 317.20: Degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by control and classification of institution and state or jurisdiction: 2015–16. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_317.20.asp?current=yes
   Google Scholar
• EDUCAUSE. (2010). 7 things you should know about open educational resources. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7061.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Epper, R. M., & Baker, E. D. (2009). Technology solutions for developmental math: An overview of current and emerging practices. Journal of Developmental Education, 26(2), 4–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fain, P. (2012, December 13). Crash course for remediation. Insider Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/12/13/complete-college-america-steps-remedial-reform-calls
   Google Scholar
• Faulconer, J., Geissler, J., Majewski, D., & Trifilo, J. (2014). Adoption of an early-alert system to support university student success. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 80(2), 45–48.
   Google Scholar
• Fay, M. P. (2017). Computer-mediated developmental math courses in Tennessee high schools and community colleges: An exploration of the consequences of institutional context ( (CCRC Working Paper No. 91)). New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J., & Scapin, R. (2014). Digital technology, learning, and postsecondary students with disabilities: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 27(4), 369–379.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, K. E., Melguizo, R., & Prather, G. (2015). Increasing success rates in developmental math: The complementary role of individual and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 56, 719–749. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9368-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrman, S. H. (2017, February 21). Eight steps to improve the ed-tech industry. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2017/02/21/eight-steps-to-improve-the-ed-tech-industry.html
   Google Scholar
• Galliers, R. D., & Currie, W. L. (eds). (2011). The Oxford handbook of management information systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16(1), 21–46.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, A. (2010). Spring). Adapting to fit the technology: Problems and solutions for technology-based college classes. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 76(3), 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang, T. V., & Caverly, D. C. (2013). Techtalk: Mobile apps and college mathematics. Journal of Developmental Education, 37(2), 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, F. M., & Escueta, M. (2017). EdTech decision-making in higher education. New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S., Tandberg, D., Park, T., Nix, A., Collins, R., & Hankerson, D. (2014). Developmental education reform in Florida. Tallahassee, FL: Center for Postsecondary Success.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, E. (2006). Computer homework effectiveness in developmental mathematics. Journal of Developmental Education, 29(3), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Democratization of education for whom? Online learning and educational equity. Association of American Colleges & Universities, 17(1). Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/diversitydemocracy/2014/winter/jaggars
   Google Scholar
• Jaggars, S. S., Edgecombe, N., & Stacey, G. W. (2014). What we know about accelerated developmental education. New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Klempin, S., & Karp, M. M. (2018). Leadership for transformative change: Lessons from technology-mediated reform in broad-access colleges. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(1), 81–105. doi:10.1080/00221546.2017.1341754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehr, S. M., & McColskey, E. (2013). 2013 legislative session: Final report. Jacksonville: Florida State College at Jacksonville.
   Google Scholar
• MDRC. (2013, February). Developmental education: A barrier to a postsecondary credential for millions of Americans. Retrieved from http://www.mdrc.org/publication/developmental- education-barrier-postsecondary-credential-millions-Americans
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mupinga, D. M., & Maughan, G. R. (2008). Web-based instruction and community college faculty workload. College Teaching, 56(1), 17–21. doi:10.3200/CTCH.56.1.17-22
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Academic Transformation. (2008). Six models for course redesign. Retrieved from http://www.thencat.org/R2R/R2R%20PDFs/Six%20Models%20for%20Course%20Redesign.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oertle, K. M., & Bragg, D. D. (2014). Transitioning students with disabilities: Community college policies and practices. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25(1), 59–67. doi:10.1177/1044207314526435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsad, B., & Lewis, L. (2008). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006–07 ( NCES No. 2009.044). Washington, D.C.: U.S: Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Perin, D. (2002). The location of developmental education in community colleges: A discussion of the merits of mainstreaming vs. centralization. Community College Review, 30(1), 27–44. doi:10.1177/009155210203000102
   Google Scholar
• Perin, D., Raufman, J., & Kalamkarian, H. S. (2015, December). Developmental reading and English assessment in a researcher-practitioner partnership ( CCRC Working Paper No. 85), New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185–195. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, L., Richardson, J. T. E., & Jelfs, A. (2007). Face-to-face versus online tutoring support in distance education. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 1–20. doi:10.1080/03075070601004366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qutab, S., Shafi-Ullah, F., Safdar, M., & Khan, A. (2016). Sustainable LIS pedagogical skills with virtual learning environment (VLE): Collaborative career development platforms, communities and practices. IFLA WLIC Paper. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/1512/1/124-qutab-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, J. (2016). Educational technology for decision-making: Technology acquisition for 746,000 Ontario students. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 176, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2009). Face-to-face versus online tutoring support in humanities courses in distance education. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 8(1), 69–85. doi:10.1177/1474022208098303
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J. L., Roth, K. R., Huerta, A. H., & Ritter, Z. S. (2015). Tech-centric classrooms: A discussion of policy, costs, and access. In R. T. Teranishi, L. B. Pazich, M. Knobel, & W. R. Allen (Eds.), Mitigating inequality: Higher education research, policy, and practice in an era of massification and stratification (pp. 209–241). Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Skidmore, S. T., Zientek, L. R., Saxon, D. P., & Edmonson, S. L. (2014). The impact of generational status on instructors’ reported technology use. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(3), 179–197.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, B. M., & Saxon, D. P. (2016). Online versus traditional classroom instruction: An examination of developmental English courses at an Alabama community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(5), 394–400. doi:10.1080/10668926.2015.1065777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillson, H., & Alsup, J. (2003). Smart ALEKS … or not? Teaching basic algebra using an online interactive learning system. Mathematics & Computer Education, 37(3), 329–340.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, G. (2009). Tools for data-driven decision making in teacher education: Designing a portal to conduct field observation inquiry. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Higher Education Commission. (2011). Complete College Tennessee Act summary. Retrieved from http://tn.gov/thec/complete_college_tn/ccta_summary.html
   Google Scholar
• Testone, S. (2005). Using publisher resources to assist developmental mathematics students. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 21(2), 81–84.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (2012, December 1). 2012–2017 statewide developmental education plan. Austin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2011, July 15). How Khan Academy is changing the rules of education. Wired Digital. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2011/07/ff_khan/
   Google Scholar
• Twigg, C. A. (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning. Educause Review, 28, 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Twigg, C. A. (2011). The math emporium: a silver bullet for higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(3), 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Twigg, C. A. (2013). Improving learning and reducing costs: Outcomes from changing the equation. Change: the Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(4). doi:10.1080/00091383.2013.806169
   Google Scholar
• Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A. J., & Fox, J. (2016). Assessing the effects of a school- wide data-based decision-making intervention on student achievement growth in primary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 360–394. doi:10.3102/0002831216637346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernet, S. P., Olliges, R. H., & Delicath, T. A. (2000). Postcourse evaluations of WebCT (Web Course Tools) classes by social work students. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4), 487–504. doi:10.1177/104973150001000408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R. E., Waddoups, G., & Graham, C. R. (2007). Understanding the experiences of instructors as they adopt a course management system. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55(1), 1–26. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9018-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 633–659. doi:10.1353/jhe.2014.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachry, E. M., & Schneider, E. (2010). Building foundations for student readiness: A review of rigorous research and promising trends in developmental education (NCPR Working Paper). New York, NY: National Center for Postsecondary Research.
   Google Scholar