515
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research Paper

Inter-rater reliability of the McKenzie System of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy in the examination of the knee

, , &

References

  • Nguyen UDT, Zhang Y, Yanyan Z, et al. Increasing prevalence of knee pain and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: survey and cohort data. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011;155:725–732.
  • Gage BE, McIlvain NM, Collins CL, et al. Epidemiology of 6.6 million knee injuries presenting to united states emergency departments from 1999 through 2008. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2012;19:378–385.
  • Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB, et al. A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;359:1097–1107.
  • Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, et al. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear. New Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:2515–2524.
  • Thorlund JB, Juhl CB, Roos EM, et al. Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms. BMJ. 2015;350:1–9.
  • Hegedus EJ, Cook C, Hasselblad V, et al. Physical examination tests for assessing a torn meniscus in the knee: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2007;37:541–550.
  • Lange T, Freiberg A, Dröge P, et al. The reliability of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture – a systematic review. Man. Ther. 2015;20:402–411.
  • Leblanc MC, Kowalczuk M, Andruszkiewicz N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for anterior knee instability: a systematic review. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2015;23:2805–2813.
  • Beattie KB, Boulos P, Pui M, et al. Abnormalities identified in the knees of asymptomatic volunteers using peripheral magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2005;13:181–186.
  • Boks SS, Vroegindeweij D, Koes BW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in symptomatic and contralateral knees: prevalence and associations with traumatic history in general practice. Am. J. Sports Med. 2006;34:1984–1991.
  • Kaplan LD, Schurhoff MR, Selesnick H, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in asymptomatic professional basketball players. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:557–561.
  • LaPrade RF, Quinter BM, Veenstra MA, et al. The prevalence of abnormal magnetic resonance imaging findings in asymptomatic knees: with correlation of magnetic resonance imaging to arthroscopic findings in symptomatic knees. Am. J. Sports Med. 1994;22:739–745.
  • Rosedale R, Rastogi R, May S, et al. Efficacy of exercise intervention as determined by the Mckenzie System of mechanical diagnosis and therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2014;44:173–181.
  • May S, Aina A. Centralization and directional preference: a systematic review. Man. Ther. 2012;17:497–506.
  • Clare HA, Adams R, Maher CG. Reliability of McKenzie classification of patients with cervical or lumbar pain. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 2005;28:122–127.
  • Kilpikoski S, Airaksinen O, Kankaanpää M, et al. Interexaminer reliability of low back pain assessment using the McKenzie method. Spine. 2002;27:E207–E214.
  • Razmjou H, Kramer E, Yamada R. Intertester reliability of the McKenzie evaluation in assessing patients with mechanical low-back pain. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2000;30:368–389.
  • Abady AH, Rosedale R, Overend TJ, et al. Inter-examiner reliability of diplomats in the mechanical diagnosis and therapy system in assessing patients with shoulder pain. J. Man. Manipulative Ther. 2014;22:199–205.
  • May S, Ross J. The McKenzie classification system in the extremities: a reliability study using Mckenzie assessment forms and experienced clinicians. J. Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32:556–563.
  • Kelly E, May S, Ross J. The reliability of the McKenzie classification system using extremity McKenzie assessment forms. Int. J. Mech. Diag. Ther. 2008;3:3–6.
  • Evans SC, Roberts MC, Keeley JW, et al. Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 2015;15:160–170.
  • Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, et al. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004;141:771–780.
  • Rutten GMJ, Harting J, Rutten STJ, et al. Measuring physiotherapists’ guideline adherence by means of clinical vignettes: a validation study. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2006;12:491–500.
  • Gould D. Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: how valid are the findings? J. Clin. Nurs. 1996;5:207–212.
  • Veloski J, Tai S, Evans AS, et al. Clinical vignette-based surveys: a tool for assessing physician practice variation. Am. J. Med. Qual. 2005;20:151–157.
  • Rotondi MA, Donner A. A confidence interval approach to sample size estimation for interobserver agreement studies with multiple raters and outcomes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2012;65:778–784.
  • May SJ, Rosedale R. A survey of the McKenzie classification system in the extremities: prevalence of mechanical syndromes and preferred loading strategies. Phys. Ther. 2012;92:1175–1186.
  • Rotondi MA. Sample size estimation functions for studies of interobserver agreement [cited 2013 Mar 12]. Available December 16, 2013 from: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/kappaSize/index.html.
  • McKenzie R, May S. The human extremities: mechanical diagnosis and therapy. New Zealand: Spinal Publications; 2000.
  • Atzmüller C, Steiner PM. Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology. 2010;6:128–138.
  • Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 1971;76:378–382.
  • Fleiss JL, Nee JC, Landis JR. Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters. Psychol. Bull. 1979;86:974–977.
  • Cardillo G. Fleiss’es kappa: compute the Fleiss’es kappa for multiple raters [cited 2009 Dec 23]. Available March 10, 2015 from: http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/15426.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
  • O’Leary S, Lund M, Ytre-Hauge TJ, et al. Pitfalls in the use of kappa when interpreting agreement between multiple raters in reliability studies. Physiotherapy. 2014;100:27–35.
  • McKenzie DP, Mackinnon AJ, Péladeau N, et al. Comparing correlated kappas by resampling: Is one level of agreement significantly different from another? J. Psychiatr. Res. 1996;30:483–492.
  • Werneke MW, Deutscher D, Hart DL, et al. McKenzie lumbar classification: inter-rater agreement by physical therapists with different levels of formal McKenzie postgraduate training. Spine. 2014;39:E182–E190.
  • Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1993;46:423–429.
  • de Vet HC, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, et al. Clinicians are right not to like Cohen’s κ. BMJ. 2013;346:1–7.
  • Jones MA, Rivett DA. Introduction to clinical reasoning. In: Jones MA, Rivett DA, editor. Clinical Reasoning for Manual Therapists. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann; 2004. p. 16–17.
  • Cook C. The lost art of the clinical examination: an overemphasis on clinical special tests. J. Man. Manipulative Ther. 2010;18:3–4.
  • Lynch G, May S. Directional preference at the knee: a case report using mechanical diagnosis and therapy. J. Man. Manipulative Ther. 2013;21:60–66.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.