Pragmatic application of manipulation versus mobilization to the upper segments of the cervical spine plus exercise for treatment of cervicogenic headache: a randomized clinical trial

References

• Lipton RB, Stewart WF. Evaluating the IHS criteria. Cephalalgia. 1994;14(1):3–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stovner L, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(3):193–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonaci F, Fredriksen TA, Sjaastad O. Cervicogenic headache: clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, and differential diagnosis. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2001;5: 387–392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache S. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knackstedt H, Bansevicius D, Aaseth K, et al. Cervicogenic headache in the general population: the Akershus study of chronic headache. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(12):1468–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson N. The prevalence of cervicogenic headache in a random population sample of 20-59 year olds. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(17):1884–1888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall T, Chan HT, Christensen L, et al. Efficacy of a C1-C2 self-sustained natural apophyseal glide (SNAG) in the management of cervicogenic headache. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(3):100–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zito G, Jull G, Story I. Clinical tests of musculoskeletal dysfunction in the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache. Man Ther. 2006;11(2):118–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, et al. Neck Pain: revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(7):A1–A83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyling JD, Palastanga N, Grieve GP. Grieve’s Modern Manual Therapy: the Vertebral Column. 2nd. St. Louis, MO: Churchill Livingstone; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning JR, Butts R, Mourad F, et al. Upper cervical and upper thoracic manipulation versus mobilization and exercise in patients with cervicogenic headache: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griswold D, Learman K, Kolber MJ, et al. Pragmatically applied cervical and thoracic nonthrust manipulation versus thrust manipulation for patients with mechanical neck pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(3):137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relton C, Torgerson D, O’Cathain A, et al. Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the “cohort multiple randomised controlled trial” design. BMJ. 2010;340:c1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson M, Petersen S, Cook C, et al. A prescriptively selected nonthrust manipulation versus a therapist-selected nonthrust manipulation for treatment of individuals with low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(4):243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roenz D, Broccolo J, Brust S, et al. The impact of pragmatic vs. prescriptive study designs on the outcomes of low back and neck pain when using mobilization or manipulation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2018;26(3):123–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon H. The psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(7):1414–1415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauro KM, Rose MS, Becker WJ, et al. HIT-6 and MIDAS as measures of headache disability in a headache referral population. Headache. 2010;50(3):383–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young IA, Dunning J, Butts R, et al. Psychometric properties of the numeric pain rating scale and neck disability index in patients with cervicogenic headache. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(1):44–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price D, Bush F, Long S, et al. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analog and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994;56(2):217–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar J, Young JJ, La Moreaux L, et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Childs JD, Fritz JM, et al. Interrater reliability of the history and physical examination in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(10):1388–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt G. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clin Trials. 1989;10(4):407–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tubach F, Dougados M, Falissard B, et al. Feeling good rather than feeling better matters more to patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(4):526–530.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kvamme MK, Kristiansen IS, Lie E, et al. Identification of cutpoints for acceptable health status and important improvement in patient-reported outcomes, in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(1):26–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitland G. Vertebral manipulation. 5th ed. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: Butterworths; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• LH R. Methods for handling data in the behavioral neurosciences: don’t throw the baby out with the bath water. J Undergraduate Neurosci Educ. 2007;5:A71–A77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kent P, Marks D, Pearson W, et al. Does clinician treatment choice improve the outcomes of manual therapy for nonspecific low back pain? A metaanalysis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28(5):312–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowbotham MC, Gilron I, Glazer C, et al. Can pragmatic trials help us better understand chronic pain and improve treatment? Pain. 2013;154(5):643–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar