Protocol for the development of a ‘trustworthy’ living systematic review and meta analyses of manual therapy interventions to treat neuromusculoskeletal impairments

References

• Tikkinen KAO, Guyatt GH. Understanding of research results, evidence summaries and their applicability-not critical appraisal-are core skills of medical curriculum. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Oct;26(5):231–233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riley SP, Swanson BT, Shaffer SM, et al. The unknown prevalence of postrandomization bias in 15 physical therapy journals: a methods review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Sep;21:1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Riley SP, Swanson BT, Shaffer SM, et al. The unknown prevalence of postrandomization bias in 15 physical therapy journals: a methods review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Nov;51(11):542–550. DOI:10.2519/jospt.2021.10491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Bmj. 2008 Apr 26; 336(7650):924–926. DOI:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley S, Swanson BT, Sawyer SF, et al. Should low-quality evidence dominate high-level evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions. J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Aug;29(4):203–215. DOI:10.1080/10669817.2020.1839728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballos-Laita L, Jimenez-Del-Barrio S, Marin-Zurdo J, et al. Effects of dry needling in HIP muscles in patients with HIP osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Oct;43:76–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller MJ, Sorensen CJ, McGill JB, et al. Effect of a shoulder movement intervention on joint mobility, pain, and disability in people with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2018 Sep 1; 98(9):745–753. DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzy070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning JR, Butts R, Mourad F, et al. Upper cervical and upper thoracic manipulation versus mobilization and exercise in patients with cervicogenic headache: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 6; 17(1):64. DOI:10.1186/s12891-016-0912-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung E, Oh C, Wong M, et al. Non-Thrust cervical manipulations reduce short-term pain and decrease systolic blood pressure during intervention in mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2020 May;28(2):82–93. DOI:10.1080/10669817.2019.1646985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashin AG, McAuley JH. Clinimetrics: physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale. J Physiother. 2020 Jan;66(1):59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook C, Garcia AN. Post-Randomization bias. J Man Manip Ther. 2020 May;28(2):69–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harking AC, Cherry-Picking P-H. Fishing expeditions, and data dredging and mining as questionable research practices. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 18;82(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tugwell P, Welch VA, Karunananthan S, et al. When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist. Bmj. 2020 Sep 15;370:m2864. DOI:10.1136/bmj.m2864
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bragge P, Clavisi O, Turner T, et al. The global evidence mapping initiative: scoping research in broad topic areas. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jun 17; 11(1):92. DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-11-92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sampson M, Shojania KG, Garritty C, et al. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):531–536. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A, et al. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. Jama. 1998 Jul 15; 280(3):278–280. DOI:10.1001/jama.280.3.278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, et al. How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Aug 21; 147(4):224–233. DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-147-4-200708210-00179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Editors ICoMJ. What is the ICMJE definition of a clinical trial?. 2022. [cited 2022 7 29]. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/about-icmje/faqs/clinical-trials-registration/
   Google Scholar
• Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, et al. Neck pain: revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1–A83. DOI:10.2519/jospt.2017.0302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research Nio H Reviews of methodology University of York, York, UK, YO10 5DD: University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2020. [cited 2020 11 22]. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#sub_methodology
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1; 4(1):1. DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. DOI:10.1136/bmj.n160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann KE, Matchar DB, Chang SM. Assessing applicability of medical test studies in Systematic reviews. In: editors, Chang S, Matchar D, and Smetana G. Methods guide for medical test reviews. AHRQ methods for effective health care. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun. Chapter 6. 2012. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK98234/
   Google Scholar
• Organization WH. International classification of functioning disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Borrella-Andres S, Marques-Garcia I, Lucha-Lopez MO, et al. Manual therapy as a management of cervical radiculopathy: a Systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2021 ;2021:9936981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyles R, Toy P, Mellon JsJr., et al. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Aug;19(3):135–142. DOI:10.1179/2042618611Y.0000000011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bukhari SRI, Shakil-Ur-Rehamn S, Ahmad S, et al. Comparison between effectiveness of mechanical and manual traction combined with mobilization and exercise therapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(1):31–34. DOI:10.12669/pjms.321.8923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaibi A, Stavem K, Russell MB. Spinal manipulative therapy for acute neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 28;10(21):5011. DOI:10.3390/jcm10215011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu J, Allen DD, Pawlowsky S, et al. Peripheral response to cervical or thoracic spinal manual therapy: an evidence-based review with meta analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2014 Nov;22(4):220–229. DOI:10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000062
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coulter ID, Crawford C, Vernon H, et al. Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic nonspecific neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis for an appropriateness panel. Pain Physician. 2019 Mar;22(2):E55–E70. DOI:10.36076/ppj/2019.22.E55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Sylva J, Miller J, Gross A, et al. Manual therapy with or without physical medicine modalities for neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010 Oct;15(5):415–433. DOI:10.1016/j.math.2010.04.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fredin K, Loras H. Manual therapy, exercise therapy or combined treatment in the management of adult neck pain - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Oct;31:62–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacalone A, Febbi M, Magnifica F, et al. The effect of high velocity low amplitude cervical manipulations on the musculoskeletal system: literature review. Cureus. 2020 Apr 15;12(4):e7682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross A, Langevin P, Burnie SJ, et al. Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015Sep;23(9):CD004249.
   Google Scholar
• Gross A, Miller J, D’Sylva J, et al. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010Jan;20(1):CD004249.
   Google Scholar
• Gross A, Miller J, D’Sylva J, et al. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain: a Cochrane review. Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):315–333. DOI:10.1016/j.math.2010.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo B, Hall T, Bossert J, et al. The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for treating non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Nov 6;30(6):1149–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman PA, Speksnijder CM, de Wijer A. The effect of thoracic spine manipulation on pain and disability in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Sep;35(20):1677–1685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaver AM, Refshauge KM, Maher CG, et al. Conservative interventions provide short-term relief for non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2010;56(2):73–85. DOI:10.1016/S1836-9553(10)70037-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaracchio M, Kirker K, States R, et al. Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of mechanical neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0211877. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0211877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J, Gross A, D’Sylva J, et al. Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010 Jun 1; 15(4):334–354. DOI:10.1016/j.math.2010.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten-Peeters GG, Thoomes E, Konings S, et al. Is manipulative therapy more effective than sham manipulation in adults : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chiropr Man Therap. 2013 Oct 2; 21(1):34. DOI:10.1186/2045-709X-21-34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schroeder J, Kaplan L, Fischer DJ, et al. The outcomes of manipulation or mobilization therapy compared with physical therapy or exercise for neck pain: a systematic review. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2013 Apr;4(1):30–41. DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1341605
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shamsi S, Alshehri A, Torairi NA, et al. Efficacy of manual therapy in neck pain: a review. Int J Recent Innovations Med ClinRes. 2020;2(2):24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Thoomes EJ. Effectiveness of manual therapy for cervical radiculopathy, a review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(1):45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vincent K, Maigne JY, Fischhoff C, et al. Systematic review of manual therapies for nonspecific neck pain. Joint Bone Spine. 2013 Oct;80(5):508–515. DOI:10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao M, Sun YL, Dun RL, et al. Is manipulative therapy clinically necessary for relief of neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chin J Integr Med. 2017 Jul;23(7):543–554. DOI:10.1007/s11655-016-2506-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Wei X, Wang S. Does cervical spine manipulation reduce pain in people with degenerative cervical radiculopathy? A systematic review of the evidence, and a meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(2):145–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, et al. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016/07/01/;75(Supplement C):40–46. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furlan AM, Chou MD, et al. Updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane back and neck group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(21):1660–1673. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Searching for Studies. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008. pp. 95–150. DOI:10.1002/9780470712184
   Google Scholar
• Babu AS, Veluswamy SK, Rao PT, et al. Clinical trial registration in physical therapy journals: a cross-sectional study. Phys Ther. 2014 Jan;94(1):83–90. DOI:10.2522/ptj.20120531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa LO, Lin CW, Grossi DB, et al. Clinical trial registration in physiotherapy journals: recommendations from the international society of physiotherapy journal editors. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Dec;42(12):978–981. DOI:10.2519/jospt.2012.0111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003 Aug;83(8):713–721. DOI:10.1093/ptj/83.8.713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley NC, Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, et al. Estimates of quality and reliability with the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;86(6):817–824. DOI:10.1093/ptj/86.6.817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo LG, Elkins MR, Maher CG, et al. There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of physiotherapy evidence database quality scale for physiotherapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):920–925. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Maher CG, et al. Pedro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2000 Nov;5(4):223–226. DOI:10.1054/math.2000.0372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. DOI:10.1136/bmj.l4898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Current version of RoB 2. 2019. [cited 2022 3 4]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/riskofbiastool/welcome/rob-2-0-tool/current-version-of-rob-2
   Google Scholar
• Minozzi S, Cinquini M, Gianola S, et al. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Oxford, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein M. Research note: in a meta-analysis, the I(2) index does not tell us how much the effect size varies across studies. J Physiother. 2020 Apr;66(2):135–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Bmj. 2011 Jul 22;343:d4002. DOI:10.1136/bmj.d4002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pustejovsky JE, Rodgers MA. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences. Res Synth Methods. 2019 Mar;10(1):57–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DK. Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016 Dec;69(6):555–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagliaferri SD, Mitchell UH, Saueressig T, et al. Classification approaches for treating low back pain have small effects that are not clinically meaningful: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Feb;52(2):67–84. DOI:10.2519/jospt.2022.10761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwind J, Learman K, O’Halloran B, et al. Different minimally important clinical difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index for the same sample of patients. J Man Manip Ther. 2013 May;21(2):71–78. DOI:10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000028
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews JC, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):726–735. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadro JR, Ferreira G. Has physical therapists’ management of musculoskeletal conditions improved over time? Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Sep - Oct;24(5):458–462. DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley SP, Swanson BT, Shaffer SM, et al. Is the quality of systematic reviews influenced by prospective registration: a methods review of systematic musculoskeletal physical therapy reviews. J Man Manip Ther. 2022 Aug;8:1–14.
   Google Scholar