994
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Effects of Perceived CSR and Implemented CSR on Job-related Outcomes: An HR Perspective

&
Pages 41-66 | Received 12 Oct 2014, Accepted 02 Dec 2014, Published online: 11 Mar 2015

REFERENCES

  • Aguilera, R. V., D. E. Rupp, C. A. Williams, and J. Ganapathi. 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management 32 (3): 836–863.
  • Aguinis, H. 2011. Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, ed. S. Zedeck and S. Zedeck 855–879. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Aguinis, H., and A. Glavas. 2012. What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management 32 (4): 932–968.
  • Aiman-Smith, L. A., T. N. Bauer, and D. M. Cable. 2001. Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study. Journal of Business and Psychology 16 (2): 219–237.
  • Albinger, H. S., and S. J. Freeman. 2000. Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3): 243–253.
  • Allen, D. G., P. C. Bryant, and J. M. Vardaman. 2010. Retaining talent: Replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives 24 (2): 48–64.
  • Balmer, J. M. 1998. Corporate identity and the advent of corporate marketing. Journal of Marketing Management 14 (8): 963–996.
  • Bauman, C. W., and L. J. Skitka. 2012. Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior 32:63–86.
  • Bergami, M., and R. P. Bagozzi. 2000. Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology 39 (4): 555–577.
  • Bhattacharya, C. B., and S. Sen 2003. Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing 67 (2): 76–88.
  • Brammer, S., A. Millington, and B. Rayton. 2007. The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management 18 (10): 1701–1719.
  • Branco, M. C., and L. L. Rodrigues. 2006. Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2): 111–132.
  • Brown, T. J., and P. A. Dacin. 1997. The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing 61 (1): 68–85.
  • Cascio, W. F. 1998. Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
  • Cetindamar, D., and K. Husoy. 2007. Corporate social responsibility practices and environmentally responsible behavior: The case of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics 76 (2): 163–176.
  • Cochran, P. L., and R. A. Wood. 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 27 (1): 42–56.
  • Collier, J., and R. Esteban. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (1): 19–33.
  • Cummings, T. G., and C. Worley. 2005. Organization development and change. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.
  • DeSimone, R. L., J. M. Werner, and D. M. Harris 2012. Human resource development. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.
  • Dessler, G. 2013. Human resource management. Boston: Pearson.
  • Dhanesh, G. S. 2014. CSR as organization–employee relationship management strategy: A case study of socially responsible information technology companies in India. Management Communication Quarterly 28 (1): 130–149.
  • Diehl, S., B. Mueller, and R. Terlutter. 2013. The influence of demographic factors on the perception of humane-oriented (CSR) appeals in advertisements: A multi-country analysis. In Advances in advertising research (Vol. IV), ed. S. Rosengren M. Dahlén and S. Okazaki 313–327. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler.
  • Donaldson, T., and L. E. Preston. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91.
  • Dubinsky, A. J., R. D. Howell, T. N. Ingram, and D. N. Bellenger. 1986. Salesforce socialization. Journal of Marketing 50 (4): 192–207.
  • DuBois, C. L., and D. A. Dubois. 2012. Strategic HRM as social design for environmental sustainability in organization. Human Resource Management 51 (6): 799–826.
  • Easton, S. A., and D. Van Laar. 2012. User manual for the Work-Related Quality of Life (WRQoL) Scale. Portsmouth, UK: University of Portsmouth.
  • Edmans, A. 2012. The link between job satisfaction and firm value. Academy of Management Perspectives 26 (4): 1–19.
  • Efraty, D., and M. J. Sirgy. 1990. The effects of quality of working life (QWL) on employee behavioral responses. Social Indicators Research 22 (1): 31–47.
  • Folger, R., R. Cropanzano, and B. Goldman. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In Handbook of organizational justice, ed. J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt 215–245. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Fombrun, C., and M. Shanley. 1990. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33 (2): 233–258.
  • Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
  • Frynas, J. G. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in emerging economies. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 24 (Winter): 16–19.
  • Fu, W., and S. P. Deshpande. 2014. The impact of caring cimate, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment on job performance of employees in a China's insurance company. Journal of Business Ethics 124 (2): 339–349. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1876-y.
  • Gatewood, R. D., M. A. Gowan, and G. J. Lautenschlager. 1993. Corporate image, recruitment image and initial job choice decisions. Academy of Management Journal 36 (2): 414–427.
  • Gavin, J. F., and W. S. Maynard. 1975. Perceptions of corporate social responsibility. Personnel Psychology 28 (2): 377–387.
  • Glavas, A., and S. K. Piderit. 2009. How does doing good matter?: Effects of corporate citizenship on employees. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 36: 51–70.
  • Gond, J.-P., J. Igalens, V. Swaen, and A. E. Akremi. 2011. The human resources contribution to responsible leadership: An exploration of the CSR–HR interface. Journal of Business Ethics 98 (1): 115–132.
  • Griffin, J. J., and J. F. Mahon. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business Society 36 (1): 5–31.
  • Hansen, S. D., B. B. Dunford, A. D. Boss, R. W. Boss, and I. Angermeier. 2011. Corporate social responsibility and the benefits of employee trust: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (1): 29–45.
  • Haslam, S. A. 2004. Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
  • Hunt, S. D., P. L. Kiecker, and L. B. Chonko. 1990. Social responsibility and personal success: A research note. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18 (3): 239–244.
  • Judge, T. A., C. J. Thoresen, J. E. Bono, and G. K. Patton. 2001. The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin 127 (3): 376–407.
  • KPMG International. 2011. Integrated reporting: Performance insight through better business reporting. http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/integrated-reporting/Documents/integrated-reporting-issue-2.pdf (accessed July 2, 2014).
  • KPMG International. 2013. The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/corporate-responsibility/Documents/corporate-responsibility-reporting-survey-2013.pdf (accessed July 2, 2014).
  • Kraisornsuthasinee, S., and F. W. Swierczek. 2006. Interpretations of CSR in Thai companies. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 22: 53–65.
  • Laplume, A. O., K. Sonpar, and R. A. Litz. 2008. Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management 34 (6): 1152–1189.
  • Lee, S.-H., A. Singhapakdi, and L.-L. Too. 2008. Advantages of flexible over traditional benefits: A procedural justice explanation. Applied Research in Quality of Life 3 (2): 107–125.
  • Mael, F. A., and B. E. Ashforth. 1995. Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology 38 (2): 309–333.
  • Margolis, J. D., and J. P. Walsh. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (2): 265–305.
  • Martel, J.-P., and G. Dupuis. 2006. Quality of work life: Theoretical and methodical problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument. Social Indicators Research 77 (2): 333–368. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-5368-4.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
  • McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren, and T. Schneeweis. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 854–872.
  • Mitchell, T. R., B. C. Holtom, T. W. Lee, C. J. Sablynski, and M. Erez. 2001. Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy Management Journal 44 (6): 1102–1121. doi:10.2307/3069391
  • Mondy, R. W., and R. M. Noe. 2005. Human resource management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education International.
  • Morsing, M., and M. Schultz. 2006. Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review 15 (4): 323–338.
  • Muller, A., and A. Kolk. 2009. CSR performance in emerging markets evidence from Mexico. Journal of Business Ethics 85: 325–337. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9735-y.
  • Orlitzky, M., F. L. Schmidt, and S. L. Rynes. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24 (3): 403–441.
  • Peloza, J. 2009. The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management 35 (6): 1518–1541.
  • Peterson, D. K. 2004. The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business Society 43 (3): 296–319.
  • Pivato, S., N. Misani, and A. Tencati. 2008. The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review 7 (1): 3–12.
  • Pless, N. M., T. Maak, and G. K. Stahl. 2012. Promoting corporate social responsibility and sustainable development through management development: What can be learned from international service learning programs? Human Resource Management 51 (6): 873–903. doi:10.1002/hrm.21506.
  • Riketta, M. 2002. Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23 (3): 257–266.
  • Riketta, M., and R. V. Dick. 2005. Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior 67 (3): 490–510.
  • Riordan, C. M., R. D. Gatewood, and J. B. Bill. 1997. Corporate image: Employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4): 401–412.
  • Robertson, D. 2009. Corporate social responsibility and different stages of economic development: Singapore, Turkey, Ethiopia. Journal of Business Ethics 88: 617–633. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0311-x.
  • Rodrigo, P., and D. Arenas. 2008. Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2): 265–283.
  • Royle, T. 2005. Realism or idealism? Corporate social responsibility and the employee stakeholder in the global fast-food industry. Business Ethics: A European Review 14 (1): 42–55.
  • Rupp, D. E., J. Ganapathi, R. V. Aguilera, and C. A. Williams. 2006. Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27 (4): 537–543.
  • Sen, S., and C. Bhattacharya. 2001. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2): 225–243.
  • Singhapakdi, A., and S. J. Vitell. 2007. Institutionalization of ethics and its consequences: A survey of marketing professionals. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35 (2): 284–294.
  • Sirgy, M. J. 2006. Developing a conceptual framework of employee well-being (EWB) by applying goal concepts and findings from personality-social psychology. Applied Research in Quality of Life 1 (2): 7–38.
  • Sirgy, M. J., D. Efraty, P. Siegel, and D.-J. Lee. 2001. A new measure of quality of work life (QWL) based on need satisfaction and spillover theory. Social Indicators Research 55 (3): 241–302.
  • Sirgy, M. J., N. P. Reilly, J. Wu, and D. Efraty. 2008. A work-life identity model of well-being: Towards a research agenda linking quality-of-work-life (QWL) programs with quality of life (QOL). Applied Research in Quality of Life 3 (3): 181–202.
  • Sisodia, R. S., D. B. Wolfe, and J. N. Sheth. 2007. Firms of endearment: How world-class companies profit from passion and purpose. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
  • Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). 2012. 2012 employee job satisfaction and engagement. http://www.shrm.org/Research/SurveyFindings/Articles/Documents/SHRM-Employee-Job-Satisfaction-Engagement.pdf (accessed September 7, 2014).
  • Stanwick, P. A., and S. D. Stanwick. 1998. The relationship between corporate social performance and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2): 195–204.
  • Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In Psychology of intergroup relations, ed. S. Worchel and W. G. Austin 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  • Turban, D. B., and D. W. Greening. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 658–672.
  • Turker, D. 2008. How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2): 189–204.
  • Upham, S. P. 2006. A model for giving: The effect of corporate charity on employees. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 22: 81–90.
  • Valentine, S., and G. Fleischman. 2008. Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2): 159–172.
  • Van Dick, R. 2004. My job is my castle: Identification in organizational contexts. In International review of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 19, ed. C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson 171–203. Chichester: Willey. doi:10.1002/0470013311.
  • Van Knippenberg D. 2000. Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review 49 (3): 357–371.
  • Virakul, B., K. Koonmee, and G. N. McLean. 2009. CSR activities in award-winning Thai companies. Social Responsibility Journal 5 (2): 178–199.
  • Vlachos, P. A., N. G. Panagopoulos, and A. A. Rapp. 2013. Feeling good by doing good: Employee CSR-induced attributions, job satisfaction, and the role of charismatic leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 118 (3): 577–588. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1590-1.
  • Waddock, S. A., and S. B. Graves. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18 (4): 303–319.
  • Walker, J. W. 1992. Human resource strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Weiss, J. W. 2003. Business ethics: A stakeholder and issues management approach. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.
  • Welford, R. 2005. Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia: 2004 survey results. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 17 (1): 33–52.
  • Yin, J., and Y. Zhang. 2012. Institutional dynamics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in an emerging country context: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics 111: 301–316. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1243-4.
  • Zenisek, T. J. 1979. Corporate social responsibility: A conceptualization based on organizational literature. Academy of Management Review 4 (3): 359–368.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.