Socio-Institutional Environment and Innovation in Russia

REFERENCES

• Acs, Z. J., L. Anselin, and A. Varga. 2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy 31 (7): 1069–85. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00184-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., Y. Algan, P. Cahuc, and A. Shleifer. 2010. Regulation and distrust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (3): 1015–49. doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlerup, P., O. Olsson, and D. Yanagizawa. 2009. Social capital vs institutions in the growth process. European Journal of Political Economy 25 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akçomak, I. S., and B. ter Weel. 2009. Social capital, innovation and growth: Evidence from Europe. European Economic Review 53 (5): 544–67. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.10.001b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrienko, Y., and S. Guriev. 2004. Determinants of interregional mobility in Russia. The Economics of Transition 12:1–27. doi:10.1111/j.0967-0750.2004.00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., and A. Isaksen. 1997. Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway? European Planning Studies 5 (3): 299–330. doi:10.1080/09654319708720402
   Google Scholar
• Aslung, A. 1997. Observations on the development of small private enterprises in Russia. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 38:191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman. 2004. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4:2713–39. doi:10.1016/s1574-0080(04)80018-x
   Google Scholar
• Baptista, R., and P. Swann. 1998. Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy 27 (5): 525–40. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00065-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., A. Malmberg, and P. Maskell. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28 (1): 31–56. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, D., and D. N. DeJong. 2003. Policy reform and growth in Post-Soviet Russia. European Economic Review 47: 337–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, D., and D. N. Dejong. 2005. Entrepreneurship and post-socialist growth. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 67 (1): 25–46. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busenitz, L. W., C. Gomez, and J. W. Spencer. 2000. Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal 43 (5): 994–1003. doi:10.2307/1556423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., and P. K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and application. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G, S. Mancinelli, and M. Mazzanti. 2007. Social capital and innovation dynamics in district-based local systems. Journal of Socio-Economics 36 (6): 932–48. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2007.01.023
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., S. Shipp, T. Mulcahy, and T. W. Allen. 2009. Informing public policy on science and innovation: The advanced technology program's experience. The Journal of Technology Transfer 34 (3): 304–19. doi:10.1007/s10961-008-9098-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J. 2005. Innovation and competitiveness. In The Oxford handbook of innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg D. C. Mowery & R. R. Nelson 543–567. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona-Lavado, A., G. Cuevas-Rodríguez, and C. Cabello-Medina. 2010. Social and organizational capital: Building the context for innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 39 (4): 681–90. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carree, M., and R. Thurik. 2003. The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In Handbook of Entrepreneurial Research, ed. D. B. Audretsch and Z. J. Acs 437–471. Boston, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chadee, D., and B. Roxas. 2013. Institutional environment, innovation capacity and firm performance in Russia. Critical Perspectives on International Business 9 (1/2): 19–39. doi:10.1108/17422041311299923
   Google Scholar
• Chou, Y. K. 2006. Three simple models of social capital and economic growth. The Journal of Socio-Economics 35 (5): 889–912. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.053
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2006. Global bioregions: Knowledge domains, capabilities and innovation system networks. Industry & Innovation 13 (4): 437–58. doi:10.1080/13662710601032812
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., and K. Morgan. 1994. The regional innovation system in Baden-Württemberg. International Journal of Technology Management 9:394–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo, N., and M. P. Fontoura. 2007. Determinant factors of FDI spillovers – What do we really know? World Development 35:410–25. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, M. 2000. Patents, innovation and growth. Economic Record 76:255–62. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2000.tb00021.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dezhina, I. 2011. Policy framework to stimulate technological innovations in Russia. Journal of East-West Business 17:90–100. doi:10.1080/10669868.2011.634770
   Google Scholar
• Dinopoulos, D. and P. Segerstrom. 2010. Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics 92:13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D. 2002. What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society 24:243–63. doi:10.1016/s0160-791x(02)00007-6
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D. 2004. Regional innovation systems in Canada: A comparative study. Regional Studies 38 (5): 479–92. doi:10.1080/0143116042000229267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., and S. Parto. 2005. Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society 27 (2): 133–53. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Driffield, N. 2001. Inward investment, industry concentration and the speed of adjustment. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv) 137 (2): 193–214. doi:10.1007/bf02707263
   Google Scholar
• Durlauf, S., and M. Fafchamp. 2005. Social capital. In Handbook of economic growth, ed. P. Aghion and S. Durlauf 1, 1639–99. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Easterly, W., J. Ritzen, and M. Woolcock. 2006. Social cohesion, institutions, and growth. Economics and Politics 18:103–20. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0343.2006.00165.x
   Google Scholar
• Falvey, R., N. Foster, and D. Greenaway. 2007. Relative backwardness, absorptive capacity and knowledge spillovers. Economics Letters 97:230–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002a. The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002b. The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (4): 743–55. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R., and G. Gates. 2001. Technology and tolerance: The importance of diversity to high-tech growth. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Center for Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. E. 1999. Social capital: A key enabler of innovation. In Investing in innovation: Creating a research and innovation policy that works, ed. L. Branscomb and J. Keller 85–111. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, W. H., and Z. Zimmer. 2001. Defining the city. In Handbook of urban studies, ed. R. Paddison 296–308. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. 2002. Measuring the quality of regional innovation systems: A knowledge production function approach. International Regional Science Review 25:86–101. doi:10.1177/016001702762039394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and V. Slavtchev. 2007. Universities and innovation in space. Industry & Innovation 14:201–18. doi:10.1080/13662710701253466
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and V. Slavtchev. 2011. Determinants of the efficiency of regional innovation systems. Regional Studies 45 (7): 905–18. doi:10.1080/00343400802251494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2001. Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly 22 (1): 7–20. doi:10.1080/713701144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerasimenko, D. 2012. Russia's commercial policy, 2008–11: Modernisation, crisis, and the WTO accession. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 28 (2): 301–23. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grs004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianella, C., and W. Tompson. 2007. Stimulating innovation in Russia: The role of institutions and policies. Working Paper, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E., I. Kallal, H. Scheinkman, and A. Schleifer. 1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy 100:1122–52.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2004. Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth 9:271–303. doi:10.1023/b:joeg.0000038933.16398.ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E., G. Ponzetto, and A. Shleifer. 2007. Why does democracy need education? Journal of Economic Growth 12:77–99. doi:10.1007/s10887-007-9015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L. 2011. Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. Basingstoke and Oxford, UK: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, A. J., and K. Saggi. 2002. Multinational firms and technology transfer. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 104 (4): 495–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, A. J., and X. Wu. 2007. Intellectual property rights and quality improvement. Journal of Development Economics 82: 393–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokhberg, L., and T. Kuznetsova. 2010. Russian federation, in UNESCO science report. In The current status of the science around the world, 215–33. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gohberg, L., and T. Kuznetsova. 2010. New innovation policy in the context of modernization of the economy. Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association 7: 141–143.
   Google Scholar
• Golichenko, O. 2011. Modernisation and reform of Russia's innovation strategy problems and solutions. Problems of Economic Transition 53 (9): 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. 2008. Functional forms for the negative binomial model for count data. Economics Letters 99:585–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. A., B. H. Hall, and Z. Griliches. 1984. Econometric models for count data with applications to the patents R and D relationship. Econometrica 52: 909–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics 36:16–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D. 2000. Zero-inflated Poisson and binomial regression with random effects: A case study. Biometrics 56:1030–39. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.01030.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D., and N. Pain. 1998. The determinants and impact of foreign direct investment in the transition economies: A panel data analysis. In Convergence or divergence: Aspirations and reality in central and eastern Europe and Russia, ed. V. Edwards 671–695. Centre for Research into East European Business, University of Buckingham.
   Google Scholar
• Hult, G. T. 2002. Circle time and industrial marketing: An introduction by the guest editor. Industrial Marketing Management 31:287–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hult, G. T., R. Hurley, and G. A. Knight. 2004. Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management 33:429–38. doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(03)00116-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. 1968. Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT and London, England: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, M.-H., and K.-H. Tsai. 2007. Technological capability, social capital and the launch strategy for innovative products. Industrial Marketing Management 36 (4): 493–502. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S. 2005. An evolutionary integrated view of regional systems of innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives. European Planning Studies 13 (4): 497–519. doi:10.1080/09654310500107084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1985. Cities and the wealth of nations: Principles of economic life. New York, NY and Toronto, Canada: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Javorcik, B. S. 2004. Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review 94 (3): 605–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaasa, A. 2009. Effects of different dimensions of social capital on innovative activity: Evidence from Europe at the regional level. Technovation 29 (3): 218–33. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. R. 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. R. 2000. Technology, trade and factor prices. Journal of International Economics 50:51–71. doi:10.1016/s0022-1996(99)00016-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall, S. 1983. The new multinationals: The spread of third world enterprises. Chichester, West Sussex and New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lall, S. 1998. Exports of manufactures by developing countries: Emerging patterns of trade and location. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 11 (2): 54–73. doi:10.1093/oxrep/14.2.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall, S. 2004. Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy in Building Industrial Competitiveness, G-24 Discussion Paper Series, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. http://unctad.org/en/Docs/gdsmdpbg2420044_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, A., and B. A. Lundvall. 2007. The learning organisation and national systems of competence building and innovation. MPRA, No. 12320.
   Google Scholar
• Leff, N. H. 1964. Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist 8 (3): 8–14. doi:10.1177/000276426400800303
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. 2007. Price adjustment under the table: Evidence on efficiency-enhancing corruption. European Journal of Political Economy 23 (2): 423–47. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2007.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Licht, A. N., and J. I. Siegel. 2006. The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In Oxford handbook of entrepreneurship, ed. M. Casson and B. Yeung 511–539. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. 1999. Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology 25:467–87. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., and S. White. 2001. Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China's transitional context. Research Policy 30 (7): 1091–114. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00132-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L. Y., and Y. Shyan. 2004. The R&D and marketing cooperation across new product development stages: An empirical study of Taiwan's IT industry. Industrial Marketing Management 33:593–605. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. 2007. National innovation system: Analytical focusing device and policy learning tool, Working Paper No. 004, Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, J.-D. 2005. Social network structure and performance of improvement teams. International Journal of Business Performance Management 7 (2): 208–23. doi:10.1504/ijbpm.2005.006491
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, J. R. 1995. The boundaries of multinational enterprises and the theory of international trade. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2): 169–89. doi:10.1257/jep.9.2.169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P. 2001. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (4): 921–43. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.921
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. A. 2001. National systems of economic learning: The case of technology diffusion management in East Asia. International Journal of Technology Management 22 (5/6): 445–79. doi:10.1504/ijtm.2001.002973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. A. 2007. Latecomer strategies for catching-up: The cases of renewable energies and the LED programme. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 1 (1): 34–42. doi:10.1504/ijtlid.2007.015022
   Google Scholar
• Méon, P.-G., and L. Weill. 2010. Is corruption an efficient grease? World Development 38 (3): 244–59. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W., and R. Rose. 2001. What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies 34 (1): 30–62. doi:10.1177/0010414001034001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W., and R. Rose. 2005. What are the political consequences of trust? A test of cultural and institutional theories in Russia. Comparative Political Studies 38 (9): 1050–78. doi:10.1177/0010414005278419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miszal, B. 1996. Trust in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohnen, P., J. Mairesse, and M. Dagenais. 2006. Innovativity: A comparison across seven European countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4/5): 391–413. doi:10.1080/10438590500512950
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. T. 2002. Networks, trust, and innovation in Tanzania's manufacturing sector. World Development 30 (4): 591–619. doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00131-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., and K. Nelson. 2003. Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy 31:265–72. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00140-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Russia. Modernising the economy. “Better Policies” Series, April.
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, J. E. 1999. Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation 38 (3): 283–09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. C. 2004. The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Luno, A., C. C. Medina, A. C. Lavado, and G. C. Rodríguez. 2011. How social capital and knowledge affect innovation. Journal of Business Research 64:1369–76. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popov, V. 2001. Reform strategies and economic performance of Russia's regions. World Development 29 (5): 865–86. doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00006-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitiveness advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review 68 (2): 73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Boston: Harvard Business Review.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., R. Leonardi, and R. Nanetti. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, J. 1998. Urban diversity and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (2): 127–38. doi:10.1257/jep.12.2.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S. 2002. Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe: Determinants, organisers and alignments. The Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (1): 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Radygin, A., and R. Entov. 2003. Enforcement of property rights and contractual obligations. Problems of Economic Transition 46 (8): 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, W., P. Mohnen, P. Franz, and S. V. Sybrand. 2009. Innovative sales, R&D and total innovation expenditures: Panel evidence on their dynamics, cirano scientific series.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez‐Pose, A. 1999. Innovation prone and innovation averse societies: Economic performance in Europe. Growth and Change 30 (1): 75–105. doi:10.1111/0017-4815.00105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., and R. Crescenzi. 2008. Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies 42 (1): 51–67. doi:10.1080/00343400701654186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. 1998. The definition and measurement of innovation. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economics and Social Research, Working Paper No. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. 1990. Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy 98:5.
   Google Scholar
• Rutten, R., and F. Boekema. 2007. Regional social capital: Embeddedness, innovation networks and regional economic development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (9): 1834–46. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 2008. Institutions and organisations: Ideas and interests. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S., S. Venkatarman, and I. Mac-Millan. 1995. Cultural differences in innovation. Strategies Journal of Management 21 (5): 931–52.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N., E. Thomas, and C. Antoniou. 2014. Multi-national firms, corruption and innovation in Russia. In Transitional firms, markets and institutions, ed. R. Van Tulder S. Lundan & A. Verbeke 9, 349–73. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Song, M., and R. J. Thieme. 2006. A cross-national investigation of the R&D-marketing interface in the product innovation process. Industrial Marketing Management 35:308–22. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y. 2000. Spatial distribution of patents in China. Regional Studies 34 (5): 441–54. doi:10.1080/00343400050058693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabellini, G. 2008. The scope of cooperation: Values and incentives. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (3): 905–50. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15 (6): 285–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todosiichuk, A. 2011. Conditions for transition to innovation economy. Problems of Economic Transition 53 (10): 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. 2002. Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organisation: Coordination, competition, and intra-organisational knowledge sharing. Organisation Science 13 (2): 179–90. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Stel, A., M. Carree, and R. Thurik. 2005. The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics 24:311–21. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-1996-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. ed. 1970. The technology factor in international trade. New York: Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wedel, J. 2001. Collusion and collision. New York, NY: Palgrave for St. Martin's Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, E. N. 2002. How stagnant are services. In Productivity, innovation and knowledge in services, ed. J. Gadrey and F. Gallouj 3–25. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, A. 2006. Social capital and economic development in regional Australia: A case study. Journal of Rural Studies 22 (1): 83–94. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yli-Renko, H., E. Autio, H. J. Sapienza. 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young, technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal 22 (6–7): 587–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar