The Impact of Governance Quality on Subsidiaries’ Performance: A Survey Analysis from Turkey

References

• Alcacer, J. 2006. Location choices across the value chain: how activity and capability influence collocation. Management Science 52 (10):1457–1471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D. 1999. Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., and D. W. Gerbing. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3):411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, U., M. Forsgren, and U. Holm. 2001. Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs: A multi-level analysis. Organization Studies 22 (6):1013–1034. doi:10.1177/0170840601226005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, J. 1968. Industrial organization. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1):99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beamish, P. W. 1985. The characteristics of joint ventures in developed and developing countries. Columbia Journal of World Business 20 (3):13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, C. B., and J. Haleblian. 2012. How firms learn heuristics: uncovering missing components of organizational learning. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 6 (2):152–177. doi:10.1002/sej.1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., and N. Hood. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. The Academy of Management Review 23 (4):773–795. doi:10.2307/259062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., N. Hood, and S. Young. 2005. Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review 14 (2):227–248. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.0102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, J. 2010. The network structure of big business in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 27 (2):257–279. doi:10.1007/s10490-009-9153-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouthers, K. D., and L. E. Brouthers. 2000. Acquisition or greenfield start-up? Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences. Strategic Management Journal 21 (1):89–97. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1<89::AID-SMJ85>3.0.CO;2-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouthers, K. D., and J.-F. Hennart. 2007. Boundaries of the firm: insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management 33 (3):395–425. doi:10.1177/0149206307300817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouthers, K. D., L. E. Brouthers, and S. Werner. 2008. Real options, international entry mode choice and performance. Journal of Management Studies 45 (5):936–960. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00753.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., J. H. Dunning, and S. M. Lundan. 2010. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: the co-evolution of MNERs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies 41 (4):567–586. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caves, R. E., and M. E. Porter. 1978. Market structure, oligopoly, and stability of market shares. The Journal of Industrial Economics 29 (1):289–313. doi:10.2307/2098076.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, M. C. H., and V. Kumar. 2010. The impact of institutional distance on the international diversity–performance relationship. Journal of World Business 45 (1):93–103. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christmann, P., D. Day, and G. S. Yip. 1999. The relative influence of country conditions, industry structure, and business strategy on multinational corporation subsidiary performance. Journal of International Management 5 (4):241–265. doi:10.1016/S1075-4253(99)00015-0.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, C. C., and P. W. Beamish. 2005. The impact of institutional reforms on characteristics and survival of foreign subsidiaries in emerging economies. Journal of Management Studies 42 (1):35–62. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00488.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2008. The multinationalization of developing country MNEs: the case of multilatinas. Journal of International Management 14 (2):138–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuervo-Cazurra, A., and M. Genc. 2008. Transforming disadvantages into advantages: developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies 39 (6):957–979. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikova, D. 2009. Performance of foreign subsidiaries: does psychic distance matter? International Business Review 18 (1):38–49. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, S. P., and C. S. Craig. 1983. Examining performance of U.S. multi-nationals in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies 14 (3):51–63. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, D., and S. Ferencikova. 2010. More than just national cultural distance: testing new distance scales on FDI in Slovakia. International Business Review 19 (1):46–58. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H. 2009. Location and the multinational enterprise: John Dunning’s thoughts on receiving the Journal of International Business Studies 2008 decade award. Journal of International Business Studies 40 (1):20–34. doi:10.1057/jibs.2008.75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H., and S. M. Lundan. 2008. Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 25 (4):573–593. doi:10.1007/s10490-007-9074-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, T., and S. Kuruvilla. 2005. International HRM: national business systems, organizational politics and the international division of labour in MNCs. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 16 (1):1–21. doi:10.1080/0958519042000295920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eralp, A. 1990. The politics of Turkish development strategies. In Turkish State, ed. A. Finkel and N. Sirman, 219–258. New York: Routledge: Turkish Society.
   Google Scholar
• Estrin, S., K. E. Meyer, M. Wright, and F. Foliano. 2008. Export propensity and intensity of subsidiaries in emerging economies. International Business Review 17 (5):574–586. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and F. T. Mavondo. 2002. Psychic distance and organizational performance: an empirical examination of international retailing operations. Journal of International Business Studies 33 (3):515–532. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., M. Wade, A. Delios, and P. W. Beamish. 2007. International diversification, subsidiary performance, and the mobility of knowledge resources. Strategic Management Journal 28 (10):1053–1064. doi:10.1002/smj.619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey, C. F., and I. Bjorkman. 2001. The effect of human resource management practices on MNC subsidiary performance in Russia. Journal of International Business Studies 32 (1):59–75. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghemawat, P. 2001. Distance still matters. The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review 79 (8):137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghemawat, P. 2003. Semiglobalization and international business strategy. Journal of International Business Studies 34 (2):138–152. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldszmidt, R. G. B., L. A. L. Brito, and F. C. de Vasconcelos. 2011. Country effect on firm performance: A multilevel approach. Journal of Business Research 64:273–279. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., and J. Freeman. 1977. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 29:149–164. doi:10.2307/2095567.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., and J. Freeman. 1989. Organizational ecology. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawawini, G., V. Subramanian, and P. Verdin. 2004. The home country in the age of globalization: how much does it matter for firm performance? Journal of World Business 39 (2):121–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., K. D. Brouthers, and I. Filatotchev. 2013. Resource-based and institutional perspectives on export channel selection and export performance. Journal of Management 39 (1):27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., J. Jianhong, and W. Jinmeng. 2015. Market seeking orientation and performance in China: the impact of institutional environment, subsidiary ownership structure and experience. Management International Review 55 (3):389–419. doi:10.1007/s11575-014-0227-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. E., and M. A. Peteraf. 2003. The dynamic resource-based view: capabilities lifecycle. Strategic Management Journal 24 (10):997–1010. doi:10.1002/smj.332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson, and H. Kim. 1997. International diversification: effects, on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 40 (4):767–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., T. Powell, L. Chung, and K. Mellahi. 2017. Institutional and resource based explanations for subsidiary performance. British Journal of Management 28 (3):407–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huther, J., and A. Shah. 1996. A simple measure of simple governance and its application to the debate on the appropriate level of fiscal decentralization. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hutzschenreuter, T., I. Kleindienst, and S. Lange. 2014. Added psychic distance stimuli and MNE performance: performance effects of added cultural, governance, geographic, and economic distance in MNEs' international expansion. Journal of International Management 20 (1):38–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, G., and R. Deeg. 2008. Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies 39 (4):540–561. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R., and G. Szulanski. 2004. Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies 35 (6):508–523. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., J. McMillan, and C. Woodruff. 2002. Property rights and finance. American Economic Review 92 (5):1335–1356. doi:10.1257/000282802762024539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafouros, M., and M. Aliyev. 2016. Institutions and foreign subsidiary growth in transition economies: the role of intangible assets and capabilities. Journal of Management Studies 53 (4):580–607. doi:10.1111/joms.12169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2003. Governance matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996–2002. Washington D.C.: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., and K. Palepu. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review 75:41–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konara, P., and V. Shirodkar. 2018. Regulatory institutional distance and MNCs' subsidiary performance: Climbing up vs. climbing down the institutional ladder. Journal of International Management 24 (4):333–347. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2018.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostova, T. 1997. Country institutional profiles: Concept and measurement. Academy of Management Proceedings 1997 (1):180–189. doi:10.5465/ambpp.1997.4981338.
   Google Scholar
• Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review 24 (2):308–324. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1893938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottaridi, C., D. Giakoulas, and D. Manolopoulos. 2019. Escapism FDI from developed economies: The role of regulatory context and corporate taxation. International Business Review 28 (1):36–27. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecraw, D. J. 1983. Performance of transnational corporations in less developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies 14 (1):15–34. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J. W., and P. W. Beamish. 2001. The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal 22 (6–7):565–586. doi:10.1002/smj.184.abs.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J. W., and D. Xu. 2006. Growth and survival of international joint ventures: an external − internal legitimacy perspective. Journal of Management 32 (3):426–448. doi:10.1177/0149206305281399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X., and C. Chung. 2005. Keeping it all in the family: the role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (3):404–439. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Y. 2001. Determinants of local responsiveness: perspectives from foreign subsidiaries in an emerging market. Journal of Management 27 (4):451–477. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00103-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., and R. L. Tung. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: a springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 38 (4):481–498. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, R., and Z. Jin. 2016. Exploring the institutional perspective on international business expansion: towards a more detailed conceptual framework. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge 1 (2):117–124. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhok, A., S. Li, and R.L. Priem. 2010. The resource-based view revisited: comparative firm advantage, willingness- based isolating mechanisms and competitive heterogeneity. European Management Review 7 (2):91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhija, M. 2003. Comparing the resource-based and market-based views of the firm: Empirical evidence from Czech privatization. Strategic Management Journal 24 (5):433–451. doi:10.1057/emr.2010.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makino, S., and A. Delios. 1996. Local knowledge transfer and performance: Implications for alliance formation in Asia. Journal of International Business Studies 27 (5):905–927. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolopoulos, D. 2014. Sources of funding for decentralized R&D activity: effects of MNE subsidiaries' entry choice and laboratory roles. Multinational Business Review 22 (1):34–58.
   Google Scholar
• Manolopoulos, D. 2018. Entrepreneurship and multinational subsidiaries’ performance in an era of financial crisis and economic uncertainty. Journal of East-West Business 24 (3):170–187. doi:10.1080/10669868.2018.1427649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolopoulos, D., and I. Vavouras. 2014. The impact of local institutional context on export intensity. Statistical Review 8 (1-2):67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Manolopoulos, D., E. Chatzopoulou, and C. Kottaridi. 2018. Resources, home institutional context and SMEs’ exporting: direct relationships and contingency effects. International Business Review 27 (5):993–1006. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskus, K. E. 2000. Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Mellahi, K., M. Demirbag, D. G. Collings, E. Tatoglu, and M. Hughes. 2013. Similarly different: a comparison of HRM practices in MNE subsidiaries and local firms in Turkey. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 24 (12):2339–2368. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.781434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W., and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2):340–363. doi:10.1086/226550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailova, S., and W. Zhan. 2015. Dynamic capabilities and innovation in MNC subsidiaries. Journal of World Business 50 (3):576–583. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2014.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorderhaven, N., and A.-W. Harzing. 2003. The “country-of-origin effect” in multinational corporations: sources, mechanisms and moderating conditions. International Business Review 43 (2):47–66.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review 16 (1):145–179. doi:10.2307/258610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özen, S., and K. A. Akkemik. 2012. Does illegitimate corporate behavior follow the forms of polity? The Turkish experience. Journal of Management Studies 49 (3):515–537. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01007.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, S. L., and D. M. Brock. 2002. The determinants of subsidiary management research: review and theoretical analysis. International Business Review 11 (2):139–163. doi:10.1016/S0969-5931(01)00053-1.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, M. W. 2001. The resource-based view and international business. Journal of Management 27 (6):803–829. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00124-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, M. W., S. L. Sun, B. Pinkham, and H. Chen. 2009. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives 23 (3):63–81. doi:10.5465/amp.2009.43479264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peteraf, M., and M. Bergen. 2003. Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: a market based and resource-based framework. Strategic Management Journal 24 (10):1027–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press. doi:10.1002/smj.325.
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., and G. Hamel. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68 (3):79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkumar, A. S., and V. Swaroop. 2009. Public spending and outcomes: Does governance matter? Washington D.C.: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 1991. Policy uncertainty and private investment in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics 36 (2):229–242. doi:10.1016/0304-3878(91)90034-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugman, A. M., and A. Verbeke. 2001. Subsidiary specific advantages in multinational enetrprises. Strategic Management Journal 22 (3):237–250. doi:10.1002/smj.153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 1991. Unpacking institutional arguments. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio, 164–182. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, J. M. 1998. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Science 44 (4):571–585. doi:10.1287/mnsc.44.4.571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, F., and B. S. Frey. 1985. Economic and political determinants of foreign direct investment. World Development 13 (2):161–175. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(85)90002-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, Y., and S. Lioukas. 2001. An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal 22 (10):907–934. doi:10.1002/smj.174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, J., and C. Gomez. 2011. MNEs and corruption: the impact of national institutions and subsidiary strategy. Strategic Management Journal 32 (3):280–300. doi:10.1002/smj.874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, M., and S. Watson. 2006. How interdependence affects subsidiary performance. Journal of Business Research 59 (8):916–924. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, F., X. Liu, L. Gao, and E. Xia. 2018. Expatriates, subsidiary autonomy and the overseas subsidiary performance of MNEs from an emerging economy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 29 (11):1799–1826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. A. 2010. What do the worldwide governance indicators measure? The European Journal of Development Research 22 (1):31–54. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2009.32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapczynski, P., and E. R. Banalieva. 2016. Institutional difference, organizational experience, and foreign affiliate performance: evidence from Polish firms. Journal of World Business 51:826–842. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. 2014. Theories for competitive advantage. In Being practical with theory: A window into business research, ed. H. Hasan, 33–43. Australia: Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, R. M., M. Yasar, and P. J. C. Maurisson. 2010. Property rights institutions and firm performance: A cross-country analysis. World Development 39 (4):648–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5 (2):171–180. doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2000. The quality of growth. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 1994. Governance: The world bank experience. Washington D.C.: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., C. Wang, J. Hong, P. Piperopoulos, and H. Zhuo. 2016. Internationalization and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: the role of host-country institutional development. Journal of World Business 51 (2):251–263. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2015.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, D., and O. Shenkar. 2002. Note: Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review 27 (4):608–618. doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7566108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar