Trade Effects of the EU–South Korea Free Trade Agreement in the Automotive Industry

References

• ACEA (European Automobile Manufacturers Association). 2019. The automobile industry pocket guide 2019/2020. https://www.acea.be/uploads/publications/ACEA_Pocket_Guide_2019-2020.pdf (accessed October 21, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E. 1979. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review 69: 106–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E., and E. van Wincoop. 2003. Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review 93 (1):170–192. doi: 10.1257/000282803321455214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreosso-O’Callaghan, B. 2009. Economic structural complementarity: How viable is the Korea-EU FTA? Journal of Economic Studies 36 (2):147–167. doi: 10.1108/01443580910955042.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, S. L., Y. Yotov, and T. Zylkin. 2019. On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: Lessons from twenty years of trade integration. Journal of International Economics 116 (2019):206–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2018.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, S. L., and J. H. Bergstrand. 2007. Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade. Journal of International Economics 71 (1):72–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baier, S. L., J. Bergstrand, and M. Feng. 2014. Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade. Journal of International Economics 93 (2):339–350. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. 2013. Trade and industrialization after globalization’s second unbundling: How building and joining a supply chain are different and why it matters. In Globalization in an age of crisis: Multilateral economic cooperation in the twenty-first century, ed. R. C. Feenstra and A. M. Taylor, 165–212. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. 2014. WTO 2.0: Governance of 21st century trade. The Review of International Organizations 9 (2):261–283. doi: 10.1007/s11558-014-9186-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. 2016. The world trade organization and the future of multilateralism. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (1):95–116. doi: 10.1257/jep.30.1.95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H. 1990. The heckscher-ohlin-samuelson model, the linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. The Economic Journal 100 (403):1216–1229. doi: 10.2307/2233969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H., and P. Egger. 2013. Gravity equation and economic frictions in the world economy. In Palgrave handbook of international trade. ed. D. Bernhofen, R. Falvey, D. Greenaway, K. Udo, 532–570. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J., S. Baier, E. R. Sunesen, and M. H. Thelle. 2011. Ex-post assessment of six EU free trade agreements. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Economics. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/may/tradoc_147905.pdf (accessed April 09, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, L.S. 1997. An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade. American Economic Review 87:520–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, M., F. van Oort, and G. J. Linders. 2009. On the specification of the gravity model of trade: Zeros, excess zeros and zero-inflated estimation. Spatial Economic Analysis 4 (2):167–190. doi: 10.1080/17421770902834327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEPII (Centre d’Études Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales). 2017. Databases. http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/bdd_modele.asp (accessed July 10, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, T. 2008. Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade. American Economic Review 98 (4):1707–1721. doi: 10.1257/aer.98.4.1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, J. 2018. The Hydra revisited: Expectations and perceptions of the impact of the EU-Korea free trade agreement. Asia Europe Journal 16 (1):19–35. doi: 10.1007/s10308-017-0481-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieślik, A., and J. Hagemejer. 2009. Assessing the impact of the EU-sponsored trade liberalization in the MENA countries. Journal of Economic Integration 24 (2):343–369. doi: 10.11130/jei.2009.24.2.343.
   Google Scholar
• Cipollina, M., and L. Salvatici. 2010. Reciprocal trade agreements in gravity models: A meta-analysis. Review of International Economics 18 (1):63–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2009.00877.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. H., R. Jurenas, M. D. Platzer, and M. E. Manyin. 2011. The EU-South Korea free trade agreement and its implications for the United States. Congressional research service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41534.pdf (accessed July 09, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• de Backer, K., and S. Miroudot. 2014. Mapping global value chains. ECB Working Paper No. 1677. Frankfurt, Germany: European Central Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, A. V. 1998. Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? in In Regionalization of the world economy. ed. J. A., Frankel, 7–32. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Decreux, Y., C. Milner, and N. Peridy. 2010. The economic impact of the free trade agreement (FTA) between the European Union and Korea. CEPII/ATLASS. http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/rr/rr2010_02.pdf (accessed July 10, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer, I. 2018. EU Japan EPA text analysis - easy on the ambition. http://borderlex.eu/eu-japan-epa-text-analysis-easy-on-the-ambition (accessed October 27, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, J., and S. Kortum. 2002. Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica 70 (5):1741–1779. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eicher, T. S., and C. Henn. 2011. In search of WTO trade effects: Preferential trade agreements promote trade strongly, but unevenly. Journal of International Economics 83 (2):137–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erixon, F., and H. Lee-Makiyama. 2010. Stepping into Asia’s growth markets: Dispelling myths about the EU-Korea free trade agreement. ECIPE policy briefs http://ecipe.org/app/uploads/2014/12/stepping-into-asias-growth-markets-dispelling-myths-about-the-eu-korea-free-trade-agreement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006. Global Europe competing in the world. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/october/tradoc_130376.pdf (accessed April 09, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. EU-South Korea free trade agreement: A quick reading guide. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/october/tradoc_145203.pdf (accessed March 19, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. Evaluation of the implementation of the free trade agreement between the EU and its member states and the republic of Korea. Interim technical report part 1: Synthesis report. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/june/tradoc_155673.pdf (accessed May 26, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R. C., and G. H. Hanson. 1999. The impact of outsourcing and high-technology capital on wages: Estimates for the United States, 1979–1990. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3):907–940. doi: 10.1162/003355399556179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felbermayr, G., F. Kimura, T. Okubo, and M. Steininger. 2019. Quantifying the EU-Japan economic partnership agreement. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 51:110–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jjie.2018.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forizs, V., and L. Nilsson. 2016. Trade effects of the EU-Korea free trade agreement: A comparative analysis of expected and observed outcomes. European Commission. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/september/tradoc_154972.pdf (accessed October 27, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Francois, J. F. 2007. Economic impact of a potential free trade agreement (FTA) between the European Union and South Korea. Copenhagen Economics. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2007/march/tradoc_134017.pdf (accessed April 09, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Frigant, V., and M. Zumpe. 2017. Regionalisation or globalisation of automotive production networks? Lessons from import patterns of four European Countries. Growth and Change 48 (4):661–681. doi: 10.1111/grow.12207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallouj, F. 2002. Innovation in services and the attendant old and new myths. The Journal of Socio-Economics 31 (2):137–154. doi: 10.1016/S1053-5357(01)00126-3.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, M. 2013. From idealism to realism? EU preferential trade agreement policy. Journal of Contemporary Research 9 (4):521–541.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Herrera, E. 2013. Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade. Empirical Economics 44 (3):1087–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgoni, S., A. Amighini, and M. Smith. 2018. Automotive international trade networks: A Comparative analysis over the last two decades. Network Science 6 (4):571–606. doi: 10.1017/nws.2018.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J. H., and D. M. Lambert. 2008. Do regional trade agreements increase members’ agricultural trade? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (3):765–782. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01134.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G., and E. Rossi-Hansberg. 2008. Trading tasks: A simple theory of offshoring. American Economic Review 98 (5):1978–1997. doi: 10.1257/aer.98.5.1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, S. S., H. T. Edwards, G. Glania, H. Kim, H. Lee, J. Matthes, and M. Tekce. 2007. A qualitative analysis of a potential free trade agreement between the European Union and South Korea. CEPR and KIEP. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2007/december/tradoc_136964.pdf (accessed April 09, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Gylfason, T., I. Martinez-Zarzoso, and P. M. Wijkman. 2015. Free trade agreements, institutions and the exports of eastern partnership countries. Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (6):1214–1229. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, K., and T. Mayer. 2014. Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. In Handbook of international economics, ed. G. Gita, H, Elhanan, R, Kenneth, 131–195. Oxford, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. 1984. A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations. Journal of Political Economy 92 (3):451–471. doi: 10.1086/261236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. 1987. Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 1 (1):62–81. doi: 10.1016/0889-1583(87)90027-X.
   Google Scholar
• Helpman, E., and P. Krugman. 1985. Market structure and foreign trade. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hipp, C., and H. Grupp. 2005. Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific measurement concepts and typologies. Research Policy 34 (4):517–535. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean, S., and J. C. Bureau. 2016. Do regional trade agreements really boost trade? Evidence from agricultural products. Review of World Economics 152 (3):477–499. doi: 10.1007/s10290-016-0253-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R., and H. Kierzkowski. 2001. A framework for fragmentation. In Fragmentation: New production patterns in the world economy, ed. S. Arndt and H. Kierzkowski, 17–34. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, T. 2014. Do we really know that trade agreements increase trade. Review of World Economics 150 (3):443–469. doi: 10.1007/s10290-014-0188-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman, R., Z. Wang, and S. J. Wei. 2014. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports. American Economic Review 104 (2):459–494. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.2.459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, C., and L. Nilsson. 2017. The EU-Korea FTA: Anticipation, trade policy uncertainty and impact. Review of World Economics 153 (1):179–198. doi: 10.1007/s10290-016-0261-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDuffie, J. P. 2013. Modularity-as-property, modularization-as-process, and modularity-as-frame: Lessons from product architecture initiatives in the global automotive industry. Global Strategy Journal 3 (1):8–40. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-5805.2012.01048.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, J. R. 1984. Multinationals, multi-plant economies, and the gains from trade. Journal of International Economics 16 (3–4):205–226. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(84)80001-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, J. R., and A. J. Venables. 1998. Multinational firms and the new trade theory. Journal of International Economics 46 (2):183–203. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00052-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, J. R., and A. J. Venables. 2000. The theory of endowment, intra-industry, and multinational trade. Journal of International Economics 52 (2):209–234. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00055-0..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Zarzoso, I., N. L D. Felicitas, and N. Horsewood. 2009. Are regional trading agreements beneficial? Static and dynamic panel gravity models. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 20 (1):46–65. doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2008.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, T., and S. Zignago. 2011. Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: The GeoDist database. http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2011/wp2011-25.pdf (accessed April 10, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Melitz, M. J. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71 (6):1695–1725. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalski, B. 2018. EU-Korea FTA and its impact on V4 economies. A comparative analysis of trade sophistication and intra-industry trade. Comparative Economic Research 21 (1):5–23. doi: 10.2478/cer-2018-0001.
   Google Scholar
• Montalbano, P., and S. Nenci. 2014. Assessing the trade impact of the European neighbourhood policy on the EU-MED free trade area. Applied Economics 46 (7):730–740. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2013.851776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudambi, R. 2008. Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography 8 (5):699–725. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujahid, I., and M. Kalkuhl. 2016. Do trade agreements increase food trade? The World Economy 39 (11):1812–1833. doi: 10.1111/twec.12324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Structural analysis databases (STAN). http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=BTDIXE_I3 (accessed March 19, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Orefice, G., and N. Rocha. 2013. Deep integration and production networks: An empirical analysis. The World Economy 37:106–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlínek, P. 2018. Global production networks, foreign direct investment, and supplier linkages in the integrated peripheries of the automotive industry. Economic Geography 94 (2):141–165. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1393313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelkmans, J. 2017. Business dimensions of EU’s new FTA’s. Journal of European Integration 39 (7):781–794. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1372432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletiere, D., and K. A. Reinert. 2010. World exports of new and used automobiles: A gravity model comparison among the European Union, Japan and the United States. International Economic Journal 24 (1):103–110. doi: 10.1080/10168731003589709.
   Google Scholar
• Peridy, N. J., and J. Abedini. 2008. The growing influence of emerging countries in the world car industry: An estimation of export potentials in a world trade model. Global Economy Journal 8 (3):1850143–1850129. doi: 10.2202/1524-5861.1394.
   Google Scholar
• Platzer, M. D. 2010. Pending U.S. and EU free trade agreements with South Korea: Possible implications for automobile and other manufacturing industries. Congressional Research Service. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491026/m1/1/high_res_d/R41389_2010Sep01.pdf (accessed April 09, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Santos Silva, J. M. C., and S. Tenreyro. 2006. The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4):641–658. doi: 10.1162/rest.88.4.641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siles-Brügge, G. 2011. Resisting protectionism after the crisis: Strategic economic discourse and the EU–Korea free trade agreement. New Political Economy 16 (5):627–653. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2011.602187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soejachmoen, M. P. 2016. Globalization of the automotive industry: Is Indonesia missing out? Asian Economic Papers 15 (1):1–19. doi: 10.1162/ASEP_a_00394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgeon, T., J. van Biesebroeck, and G. Gereffi. 2008. Value chains, networks and clusters: Reframing the global automotive industry. Journal of Economic Geography 8 (3):297–321. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, A., and S. J. Wei. 2007. The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. Journal of International Economics 72 (1):151–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., and M. R. Reed. 2010. Impacts of free trade agreements on agricultural trade creation and diversion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92 (5):1351–1363. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aaq076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szalavetz, A. 2019. Digitalisation, automation and upgrading in global value chains – Factory economy actors versus lead companies. Post-Communist Economies 31 (5):646–670. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2019.1578584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmer, M.P., E. Dietzenbacher, B. Los, R. Stehrer, and G.J. de Vries. 2015. An illustrated user guide to the world input–output database: The case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics 23 (3):575–605. doi: 10.1111/roie.12178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timsina, K. P., and R. J. Culas. 2019. Do free trade agreements increase Australian trade: An application of Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood estimator? Journal of East-West Business. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1080/10669868.2019.1685056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, J. 1962. Shaping the world economy; Suggestions for an international economic policy New York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.
   Google Scholar
• UN COMTRADE. 2017. United Nations International Trade Statistics Database. https://comtrade.un.org/data/ (accessed April 09, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2019. TRAINS. The global database on non-tariff measures 2019. https://trains.unctad.org/Forms/TableView.aspx?mode=modify (accessed July 3, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Vollrath, T. L., M. J. Gehlhar, and C. B. Hallahan. 2009. Bilateral import protection, free trade agreements, and other factors influencing trade flows in agriculture and clothing. Journal of Agricultural Economics 60 (2):298–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2008.00186.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. 2016. Does deep integration promote trade development? The International Trade Journal 30 (5):415–433. doi: 10.1080/08853908.2016.1218809.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., S. J. Wei, and K. Zhu. 2013. Quantifying international production sharing at the bilateral and sector levels. NBER Working Paper 19677. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, D., Z. Chen, and A. Rose. 2019. Estimating economic impacts of the US-South Korea free trade agreement. Economic Systems Research 31 (3):305–323. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2018.1506980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WTO. 2012. Factual presentation, free trade agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea (goods and services). https://docsonline.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/ExportFile.aspx?id=105843&filename=Q/WT/REG/296-1R1.pdf (accessed April 09, 2017).
   Google Scholar