Note takers who review are less vulnerable to the influence of stereotypes than note takers who do not review

References

• Barnett , J.E. , di Vesta , F.J. , & Rogozinski , J.T. 1981 . What is learned in note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology , 73 ( 2 ), 181 – 192 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton , S.L. , Kiewra , K.A. , Whitfill , J.M. , & Dennison , R. 1993 . Encoding and external-storage effects on writing processes . Journal of Educational Psychology , 85 ( 2 ), 267 – 280 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer , M. , Judd , C.M. , & Jacquelin , V. 2001 . The communication of social stereotypes: The effects of group discussion and information distribution on stereotypic appraisals . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 81 ( 3 ), 463 – 475 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretzing , B.H. , & Kulhavy , R.W. 1979 . Notetaking and depth of processing . Contemporary Educational Psychology , 4 ( 2 ), 145 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown , R.J. , & Carr , T.H. 1989 . Automaticity in skill acquisition: Mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance . Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 15 ( 4 ), 686 – 700 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnstein , E. and Vinokur , A. 1977 . Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 13 : 315 – 332 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzard , D.S. 1951 . Jury note-taking in criminal trials . The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science , 42 ( 4 ), 490 – 493 .
   Google Scholar
• Carrier , C.A. , & Titus , A. 1979 . The effects of notetaking: A review of studies . Contemporary Educational Psychology , 4 ( 4 ), 299 – 314 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter , J.F. , & Van Matre , N.H. 1975 . Note taking versus note having . Journal of Educational Psychology , 67 ( 6 ), 900 – 904 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken , S. , & Eagly , A.H. 1983 . Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 45 ( 2 ), 241 – 256 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken , S. , Liberman , A. and Eagly , A. 1989 . “ Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context ” . In Unintended thought , Edited by: Uleman , J.S. and Bargh , J.A. 212 – 252 . New York : The Guilford Press .
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken , S. , & Maheswaran , D. 1994 . Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 66 ( 3 ), 460 – 473 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth , P.C. 1989 . Are twelve heads better than one? Law and Contemporary Problems , 52 ( 4 ), 205 – 224 .
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar , L.R. , Priester , J.R. , Petty , R.E. , & Wegener , D.T. 1998 . The impact of attitude accessibility on elaboration of persuasive messages . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 24 ( 4 ), 339 – 352 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald , J.M. 2000 . Younger and older jurors: The influence of environmental supports on memory performance and decision making in complex trials . Journal of Gerontology , 55B ( 6 ), 323 – 331 .
   Google Scholar
• ForsterLee , L. , Fox , G.B. , Forsterlee , R. , & Ho , R. 2004 . The effects of a victim impact statement and gender on juror information processing in a criminal trial: Does the punishment fit the crime? Australian Psychologist , 39 ( 1 ), 57 – 67 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ForsterLee , L. , & Horowitz , I.A. 1997 . Enhancing juror competence in a complex trial . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 11 ( 4 ), 305 – 319 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ForsterLee , L. , Horowitz , I.A. , & Bourgeois , M. 1994 . Effects of notetaking on verdicts and evidence processing in a civil trial . Law and Human Behavior , 18 ( 5 ), 567 – 578 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley , J. , & Davies , I.K. 1978 . Note-taking: A critical review . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 15 ( 3 ), 207 – 224 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer , L. , & Penrod , S. 1994 . Juror notetaking and question asking during trials . Law and Human Behavior , 18 ( 2 ), 121 – 150 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickling , L.P. , Hickling , E.J. , Sison , G.F. , & Radetsky , S. 1984 . The effect of note-taking on a simulated clinical interview . Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied , 116 ( 2 ), 235 – 240 .
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz , I.A. , & ForsterLee , L. 2001 . The effects of note-taking and trial transcript access on mock jury decisions in a complex civil trial . Law and Human Behavior , 25 ( 4 ), 373 – 391 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard , J. , Turrisi , R. and Wan , C.K. 1990 . Interaction effects in multiple regression , Newbury Park , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Kiewra , K.A. 1983 . The process of review: A levels of processing approach . Contemporary Educational Psychology , 8 ( 4 ), 366 – 374 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra , K.A. 1985 . Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative . Educational Psychologist , 20 ( 1 ), 23 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra , K.A. 1987 . Notetaking and review: The research and its implications . Instructional Science , 16 ( 3 ), 233 – 249 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra , K.A. 1989 . A review of note-taking: The encoding storage paradigm and beyond . Educational Psychology Review , 1 ( 2 ), 147 – 172 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra , K.A. , Benton , S.L. , Kim , S. , Risch , N. , & Christensen , M. 1995 . Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance . Contemporary Educational Psychology , 20 ( 2 ), 172 – 187 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra , K.A. , DuBois , N.F. , Christensen , M. , Kim , S. , & Lindberg , N. 1989 . A more equitable account of the note-taking functions in learning from lecture and from text . Instructional Science , 18 ( 3 ), 217 – 232 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra , K.A. , DuBois , N.F. , Christian , D. , & McShane , A. 1988 . Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review . Journal of Educational Psychology , 80 ( 4 ), 595 – 597 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra , K.A. , DuBois , N.F. , Christian , D. , McShane , A. , Meyerhoffer , M. , & Roskelley , D. 1991 . Note-taking functions and techniques . Journal of Educational Psychology , 83 ( 2 ), 240 – 245 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra , K.A. , & Fletcher , H.J. 1984 . The relationship between levels of note-taking and achievement . Human Learning , 3 ( 4 ), 273 – 280 .
   Google Scholar
• Knight , L.J. , & McKelvie , S.J. 1986 . Effects of attendance, note-taking, and review on memory for a lecture: Encoding vs. external storage functions of notes . Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science , 18 ( 1 ), 52 – 61 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi , K. 2006 . Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review . Educational Psychology , 26 ( 3 ), 459 – 477 .
   Google Scholar
• Lamb , M.E. , Orbach , Y. , Sternberg , K.J. , Hershkowitz , I. , & Horowitz , D. 2000 . Accuracy of investigators' verbatim notes of their forensic interviews with alleged child abuse victims . Law and Human Behavior , 24 ( 6 ), 699 – 708 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London , K. , & Nunez , N. 2000 . The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence . Journal of Applied Psychology , 85 ( 6 ), 932 – 939 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhofer , R.S. 1998 . Jury trial techniques in complex civil litigation . University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform , 32 ( 2 ), 335 – 347 .
   Google Scholar
• Lowrey , T.M. 1998 . The effects of syntactic complexity on advertising persuasiveness . Journal of Consumer Psychology , 7 ( 2 ), 187 – 206 .
   Google Scholar
• Macrae , C.N. , Milne , A.B. , & Bodenhausen , G.V. 1994 . Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 66 ( 1 ), 37 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy , M.L. , Nunez , N. , & Dammeyer , M.M. 1999 . The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' reasoning skills . Law and Human Behavior , 23 ( 5 ), 557 – 575 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin , M.A. 1982 . Questions to witnesses and notetaking by the jury as aids in understanding complex litigation . New England Law Review , 18 : 687 – 713 .
   Google Scholar
• Middendorf , C.H. , & Macan , T.H. 2002 . Note-taking in the employment interview: Effects on recall and judgments . Journal of Applied Psychology , 87 ( 2 ), 293 – 303 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz , G.B. 2005 . Social cognition: Understanding self and others . New York : The Guilford Press .
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Law Reform Commission . 2008 . Consultation Paper 4: Jury Directions 10. Enhancing Juror Comprehension . www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/lrc/ll_lrc.nsf/pages/LRC_cp04chp10_
   Google Scholar
• Pashler , H. 1994 . Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory . Psychological Bulletin , 116 ( 2 ), 220 – 245 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler , H. and Johnston , J.C. 1998 . “ Attentional limitations in dual task performance ” . In Attention , Edited by: Pashler , H. 155 – 189 . East Sussex , , UK : Psychology Press .
   Google Scholar
• Penrod , S. , & Heuer , L. 1997 . Tweaking commonsense – Assessing aids to jury decision making . Psychology Public Policy and Law , 3 ( 2–3 ), 259 – 284 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peper , R.J. , & Mayer , R.E. 1978 . Note taking as a generative activity . Journal of Educational Psychology , 70 ( 4 ), 514 – 522 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty , R.E. and Cacioppo , J.T. 1986 . The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion . Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 19 : 124 – 205 .
   Google Scholar
• Priester , J.R. , & Petty , R.E. 2003 . The influence of spokesperson trustworthiness on message elaboration, attitude strength, and advertising effectiveness . Journal of Consumer Psychology , 13 ( 4 ), 408 – 421 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratneshwar , S. , & Chaiken , S. 1991 . Comprehension's role in persuasion: The case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues . Journal of Consumer Research , 18 ( 1 ), 52 – 62 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhan , D.L. , Eisner , S.L. , & Robinson , R.J. 1994 . Notetaking can aid juror recall . Law and Human Behavior , 18 ( 1 ), 53 – 61 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand , L.B. and Reiss , S.A. 1985 . A report on seven experiments conducted by district court judges in the second circuit . New York University Law Review , 60 : 423 – 497 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier , D. and Kramer , J.H. 1983 . Sex-based differences in the sentencing of adult criminal defendants: An empirical test and theoretical overview . Sociology and Social Research , 66 : 289 – 304 .
   Google Scholar
• Tran , T.A.T. , & Lawson , M. 2001 . Students' procedures for reviewing lecture notes . International Education Journal , 2 ( 4 ), 278 – 293 .
   Google Scholar
• Vinokur , A. , & Burnstein , E. 1978 . Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion . European Journal of Social Psychology , 8 ( 3 ), 335 – 348 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar