Cautioning jurors regarding co-witness discussion: the impact of judicial warnings

References

• Benton , T.R. , Ross , D.F. , Bradshaw , E. , Thomas , W.N. and Bradshaw , G.S. 2006 . Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 20 : 115 – 129 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonstein , R. and Geiselman , R.E. 1990 . Effects of witnessing conditions and expert witness testimony on credibility of an eyewitness . American Journal of Forensic Psychology , 8 : 11 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein , B.H. 1999 . The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? . Law and Human Behavior , 23 : 75 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray , R.M. and Kerr , N.L. 1979 . Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behavior: Some methodological considerations . Law and Human Behavior , 3 : 107 – 119 .
   Google Scholar
• Cutler , B.L. , Dexter , H.R. and Penrod , S.D. 1989 . Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 7 : 215 – 255 .
   Google Scholar
• Cutler , B.L. , Dexter , H.R. and Penrod , S.D. 1990 . Nonadversarial methods for improving juror sensitivity to eyewitness evidence . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 20 : 1197 – 1207 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler , B.L. and Penrod , S.D. 1995 . Mistaken identification: Eyewitnesses, psychology and the law , New York , NY : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Cutler , B.L. , Penrod , S.D. and Dexter , H.R. 1989 . The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury . Law and Human Behavior , 13 : 311 – 332 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devenport , J.L. and Cutler , B.L. 2004 . Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments . Law and Human Behavior , 28 : 569 – 576 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devenport , J.L. , Stinson , V. , Cutler , B.L. and Kravitz , D.A. 2002 . How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? Jurors' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures . Journal of Applied Psychology , 87 : 1042 – 1054 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evidence Act NSW 1995 . Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ea199580
   Google Scholar
• Fox , S.G. and Walters , G.A. 1986 . The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock-juror judgment . Law and Human Behavior , 10 : 215 – 228 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert , F. , Memon , A. , Allan , K. and Wright , D.B. 2004 . Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation . Legal and Criminological Psychology , 9 : 215 – 227 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein , A.G. , Chance , J.E. and Schneller , G.R. 1989 . Frequency of eyewitness identification in criminal cases: A survey of prosecutors . Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 27 : 71
   Google Scholar
• Greene , E. 1988 . Judge's instruction on eyewitness testimony: Evaluation and revision . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 18 : 252 – 276 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris , C.B. , Paterson , H.M. and Kemp , R.I. 2008 . Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together? . Memory , 16 : 213 – 230 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie , R. 1993 . Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making , New York , NY : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Judicial Commission of New South Wales . 2007 . Criminal trial courts bench book . Retrieved from http://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/ctcbb/main.html
   Google Scholar
• Kassin , S.M. , Tubb , V.A. , Hosch , H.M. and Memon , A. 2001 . On the “general acceptance” of eyewitness testimony research . American Psychologist , 56 : 405 – 416 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzev , R.D. and Wishart , S.S. 1985 . The impact of judicial commentary concerning eyewitness identifications on jury decision making . The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology , 76 : 733 – 745 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr , N.L. , Nerenz , D. and Herrick , D. 1979 . Role playing and the study of jury behavior . Social Methods and Research , 7 : 337 – 355 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer , G.P. and Kerr , N.L. 1989 . Laboratory simulation and bias in the study of juror behavior: A methodological note . Law and Human Behavior , 13 : 89 – 100 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leippe , M.R. 1995 . The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 1 : 909 – 959 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leippe , M.R. , Eisenstadt , D. , Rauch , S.M. and Seib , H.M. 2004 . Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts . Journal of Applied Psychology , 89 : 524 – 541 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus , E.F. 1975 . Leading questions and the eyewitness report . Cognitive Psychology , 7 : 560 – 572 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus , E.F. 1977 . Shifting human color memory . Memory & Cognition , 5 : 696 – 699 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus , E.F. 1979 . Eyewitness testimony , Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Loftus , E.F. 1983 . Silence is not golden . American Psychologist , 38 : 564 – 572 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus , E.F. 1992 . When a lie becomes a memory's truth: Memory distortion after exposure to misinformation . Current Directions in Psychological Science , 1 : 121 – 123 .
   Google Scholar
• Martire , K.A. and Kemp , R.I. 2009 . The impact of eyewitness expert evidence and judicial instruction on juror ability to evaluate eyewitness testimony . Law and Human Behavior , 3 : 225 – 236 .
   Google Scholar
• Martire , K.A. , & Kemp , R.I. 2011 . Can experts help jurors to evaluate eyewitness evidence: A review of eyewitness expert effects . Legal and Criminological Psychology , 16 , 24 – 36 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey , M. , Egeth , H. and McKenna , J. 1986 . The experimental psychologist in Court: The ethics of expert testimony . Law and Human Behavior , 10 : 1 – 13 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock , B.B. Jr . 1962 . The serial position effect of free recall . Journal of Memory and Language , 24 : 290 – 303 .
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Justice . 2003 . Eyewitness evidence: A trainer's manual for law enforcement . Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/nij/eyewitness/188678
   Google Scholar
• Paterson , H.M. and Kemp , R.I. 2005 . Co-witness discussion: A survey of police officers' attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour . Psychiatry, Psychology and Law , 12 : 424 – 434 .
   Google Scholar
• Paterson , H.M. and Kemp , R.I. 2006a . Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion . Psychology, Crime, Law , 12 : 181 – 191 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson , H.M. and Kemp , R.I. 2006b . Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: The power of co-witness suggestion . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 20 : 1083 – 1099 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty , R.E. and Cacioppo , J.T. 1984 . The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 46 : 69 – 81 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty , R.E. and Cacioppo , J.T. 1986 . Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change , New York , NY : Springer-Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Roediger , H.L. III , Meade , M.L. and Bergman , E.T. 2001 . Social contagion of memory . Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 8 ( 2 ) : 365 – 371 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheck , B. , Neufeld , P. and Dwyer , J. 2000 . Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted , New York , NY : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Skagerberg , E.M. and Wright , D.B. 2008 . The prevalence of co-witnesses and co-witness discussions in real eyewitnesses . Psychology, Crime & Law , 14 : 513 – 521 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundby , S.E. 1997 . The jury as critic: An empirical look at how capital juries perceive expert and lay testimony . Virginia Law Review , 83 : 1109 – 1188 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky , A. and Kahneman , D. 1974 . Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases . Science , 185 : 1124 – 1131 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. v. Telfaire . 1972 , D.C. Cir. 469 F.2d 552 .
   Google Scholar
• Vidmar , N. 2005 . Expert evidence, the adversary system, and the jury . American Journal of Public Health , 95 : 137 – 143 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells , G.L. 1986 . Expert psychological testimony: Empirical and conceptual analysis of effects . Law and Human Behavior , 10 : 83 – 95 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells , G.L. , Lindsay , R.C.L. and Tousignant , J.P. 1980 . Effects of expert psychological advice on human performance in judging the validity of eyewitness testimony . Law and Human Behavior , 4 : 275 – 285 .
   Google Scholar
• Woocher , F.D. 1977 . Did your eyes deceive you? Expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification . Stanford Law Review , 29 : 969 – 1030 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright , D.B. and Davies , G.M. 1999 . “ Eyewitness testimony ” . In Handbook of applied cognition , Edited by: Durso , F.T. 789 – 818 . Chichester : John Wiley & Sons Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Wright , D.B. , Self , G. and Justice , C. 2000 . Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person . British Journal of Psychology , 91 : 189 – 202 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarmey , A.D. 1992 . The effects of dyadic discussion on ear witness recall . Basic & Applied Social Psychology , 13 : 251 – 263 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar