17,048
Views
98
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The online dating romance scam: causes and consequences of victimhood

&
Pages 261-283 | Received 16 Feb 2012, Accepted 17 Dec 2012, Published online: 28 Mar 2013

References

  • Action Fraud. (2011). Action fraud. Retrieved July 3, 2011, from http://www.actionfraud.org.uk/
  • Aransiola, J. O., & Asindemade, S. O. (2011). Understanding cybercrime perpetrators and the strategies they employ in Nigeria. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 759–763. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0307
  • Baker, L. R., & Oswald, D. L. (2010). Shyness and online social networking services. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 873. doi:10.1177/0265407510375261
  • BBC NEWS. (2007, October 4). UK police in Nigerian scam haul. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7027088.stm
  • Buchanan, T. (2007). Personality testing on the Internet: What we know and what we do not. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. KcKenna, T. Postmes, & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 447–459). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Buchanan, T., Johnson, J. A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). Implementing a five-factor personality inventory for use on the internet. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 115–127. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.115
  • Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J. (2009). Fraud typologies and victims of fraud. London: National Fraud Authority.
  • Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J. ( in press). Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families. Security Journal. doi:10.1057/sj.2012.11
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Costa, P., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
  • Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html
  • Evans, A. M., & Revelle, W. (2008). Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1585–1593. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011
  • Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 532. doi:10.1037/a0015808
  • Franken, R. E., Gibson, K. J., & Mohan, P. (1990). Sensation seeking and disclosure to close and casual friends. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 829–832. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(90)90192-T
  • Furnell, S. (2005). Internet threats to end-users: Hunting easy prey. Network Security, 2005(7), 5–9. doi:10.1016/S1353-4858(05)70258-0
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “Description of Personality”: The Big-Five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
  • Henderson, V. R., Hennessy, M., Barrett, D., Curtis, B., McCoy-Roth, M., Trentacoste, N., & Fishbein, M. (2005). When risky is attractive: Sensation seeking and romantic partner selection. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 311–325. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.010
  • Henderson, V. R., Hennessy, M., Barrett, D., Martin, S., & Fishbein, M. (2006). Tell me more: Sensation seeking and information seeking in evaluating romantic partners. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 611–630. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.06.002
  • Hollenbaugh, E. E. (2011). Motives for maintaining personal journal blogs. CyberPsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(1–2), 13–20. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0403
  • Hoyle, R. H., Stephenson, M. T., Palmgreen, P., Lorch, E. P., & Donohew, R. L. (2002). Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 401–414. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00032-0
  • Lawson, H. M., & Leck, K. (2006). Dynamics of internet dating. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 189–208. doi:10.1177/0894439305283402
  • Lea, S., Fischer, P., & Evans, K. (2009). The psychology of scams: Provoking and committing errors of judgement. A report for The Office of Fair Trading. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_protection/oft1070.pdf
  • Lee, J., & Soberon-Ferrer, H. (1997). Consumer vulnerability to fraud: Influencing factors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 31(1), 70–89. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.1997.tb00827.x
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction?. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9–31. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00246
  • National Fraud Authority. (2012). Annual fraud indicator. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/agencies-public-bodies/nfa/annual-fraud-indicator/annual-fraud-indicator-2012?view=Binary
  • Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011). The use of sexually explicit Internet material and its antecedents: A longitudinal comparison of adolescents and adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1015–1025. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9644-x
  • Rege, A. (2009). What's love got to do with it? Exploring online dating scams and identity fraud. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3, 494–512. Retrieved from http://www.cybercrimejournal.com/aunshulregedec2009.htm.
  • Reips, U.-D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256. doi:10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.243
  • Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20–40. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
  • Salu, A. O. (2004). Online crimes and advance fee fraud in Nigeria: Are available legal remedies adequate? Journal of Money Laundering Control, 8(2), 159–167. doi:10.1108/13685200510621091
  • Shover, N., Coffey, G. S., & Sanders, C. R. (2004). Dialing for dollars: Opportunities, justifications, and telemarketing fraud. Qualitative Sociology, 27(1), 59–75. doi:10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015544.69646.f1
  • SOCA. (2010). SOCA warns of ‘Romance Fraud’ kidnap threat. Retrieved August 13, 2012, from http://www.soca.gov.uk/news/press-releases/doc_download/96-soca-warns-of-romance-fraud-kidnap-threat.pdf
  • Sprecher, S., & Metts, S. (1989). Development of the ‘romantic beliefs scale’ and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387–411. doi:10.1177/0265407589064001
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Titus, R. M., & Gover, A. R. (2001). Personal fraud: The victims and the scams. Crime Prevention Studies, 12, 133–151. Retrieved from http://www.popcenter.org/library/crimeprevention/volume_12/08-Titus.pdf.
  • Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2009). Romantic Beliefs scores for a sample of online daters. Unpublished raw data.
  • Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2012a). Is it better to have loved and lost? The psychological impact of the Online Dating Romance Scam. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2012b). The online romance scam: A serious cybercrime. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(3), 181–183. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0352
  • Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2012c). The psychology of the online dating romance scam. Retrieved August 21, 2012, from http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/media/people/monica-whitty/Whitty_romance_scam_report.pdf
  • Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial biases of sensation seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 139–149. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.46.1.139

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.