Assessment of public attitudes towards sex offenders in an Australian population

References

• Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2007). Recent Increases in Australia's Fertitlity. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/0/0FC193CDB42A241BCA25732C00206FBC?opendocument
   Google Scholar
• Beck, V., & Travis, L. (2004). Sex offender notification and protective behavior. Violence and Victims, 19(3), 289–302. doi:10.1891/vivi.19.3.289.65762
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brannon, Y. N., Levenson, J. S., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. N. (2007). Attitudes about community notification: A comparison of sexual offenders and the non-offending public. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 369–379. doi:10.1007/s11194-007-9055-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. (1999). Public attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4(2), 239–252. doi:10.1348/135532599167879
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Deakin, J., & Spencer, J. (2008). What people think about the management of sex offenders in the community. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(3), 259–274. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2008.00519.x
   Google Scholar
• Burchfield, K. B. (2012). Assessing community residents’ perceptions of local registered sex offenders: Results from a pilot survey. Deviant Behavior, 33(4), 241–259. doi:10.1080/01639625.2011.573396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., Barry, J., & Nelson, D. (1963). Relation of the revised repression-sensitization scale to measures of self-description. Psychological Reports, 13(2), 323–334. doi:10.2466/pr0.1963.13.2.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo, A. A., & Brodsky, S. L. (2004). Citizen coping with community notification of released sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22(2), 239–252. doi:10.1002/bsl.566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, W. T., Wakeman, E. E., Miller, S. L., Clements, C. B., & Sun, F. (2008). The Community Attitudes Toward Sex Offenders Scale: The development of a psychometric assessment instrument. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(3), 251–259. doi:10.1177/1049731507310193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comartin, E. B., Kernsmith, P. D., & Kernsmith, R. M. (2009). Sanctions for sex offenders: Fear and public policy. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48(7), 605–619. doi:10.1080/10509670903196066
   Google Scholar
• Community Protection (Offender Reporting) Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2011 (WA) (Aus).
   Google Scholar
• Conley, T., Hill, K., Church, W., Stoeckel, E., & Allen, H. (2011). Assessing probation and community corrections workers’ attitudes toward sex offenders using the Community Attitudes Toward Sex Offenders (CATSO) Scale in a rural state. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 18(2), 75–85. doi:10.1080/10720162.2011.582775
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Victimization Scale ( Coulton, Korbin & Su, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Craun, S. W., & Theriot, M. T. (2009). Misperceptions of sex offender perpetration: Considering the impact of sex offender registration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(12), 2057–2072. doi:10.1177/0886260508327706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowne, D. R., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Duwe, G., & Donnay, W. (2008). The impact of Megan's Law on sex offender recidivism: The Minnesota experience. Criminology, 46(2), 411–446. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00114.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro, K. F. (1995). Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization risk. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fortney, T., Baker, J. N., & Levenson, J. (2009). A look in the mirror: Sexual abuse professionals’ perceptions about sex offenders. Victims and Offenders, 4(1), 42–57. doi:10.1080/15564880802561754
   Google Scholar
• Fortney, T., Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y., & Baker, J. (2007). Myths and facts about sex offenders: Implications for practice and public policy. Sex Offender Treatment, 2, 1–17. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/55.0.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gakhal, B., & Brown, S. J. (2011). A comparison of the general public's, forensic professionals’ and students’ attitudes towards female sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(1), 105–116. doi:10.1080/13552600.2010.540678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G. (1975). California psychological inventory, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogue, T. E. (1993). Attitudes towards prisoners and sexual offenders. In N. C. Clark, & G. Stephenson (Eds.), DCLP Occasional papers: Sexual offenders (pp. 27–32). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hogue, T. E., & Peebles, J. (1997). The influence of remorse, intent and attitudes toward sex offenders on judgments of a rapist. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 3(4), 249–259. doi:10.1080/10683169708410821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeglic, E. L., Mercado, C. C., & Levenson, J. S. (2012). The prevalence and correlates of depression and hopelessness among sex offenders subject to community notification and residence restriction legislation. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(1), 46–59. doi:10.1007/s12103-010-9096-9
   Google Scholar
• Jung, S., Jamieson, L., Buro, K., & DeCesare, J. (2012). Attitudes and decisions about sexual offenders: A comparison of laypersons and professionals. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22(3), 225–238. doi:10.1002/casp.1109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernsmith, P. D., Craun, S. W., & Foster, J. (2009). Public attitudes towards sexual offenders and sex offender registration. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18(3), 290–301. doi:10.1080/10538710902901663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjelsberg, E., & Loos, L. (2008). Conciliation or condemnation? Prison employees’ and young peoples’ attitudes towards sexual offenders. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7(1), 95–103. doi:10.1080/14999013.2008.9914406
   Google Scholar
• Letourneau, E. J., Levenson, J. S., Bandyopadhyay, D., Sinha, D., & Armstrong, K. S. (2010). Effects of South Carolina's sex offender registration and notification policy on adult recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 21(4), 435–458. doi:10.1177/0887403409353148
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 7, 137–161. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x
   Google Scholar
• Marteache, N. (2012). Deliberative processes and attitudes toward sex offenders in Spain. European Journal of Criminology, 9(2), 159–175. doi:10.1177/1477370811424400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melvin, K. B., Gramling, L. K., & Gardner, W. M. (1985). A scale to measure attitudes toward prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 12(2), 241–253. doi:10.1177/0093854885012002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M., Herlihy, B., & Oescher, J. (2002). A survey of counselor attitudes towards sex offenders. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 24(1), 51–67. Retrieved May 12, 2012, from http://ezproxy.deakin.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=6005111&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
   Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., & Barlow, A. A. (2010). Public attitudes toward sex offenders and their relationship to personality traits and demographic characteristics. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 28(6), 832–849. doi:10.1002/bsl.959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Paulhus Deception Scales: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Version 7. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. F., Forsyth, C. J., & Mullen-Quinn, C. J. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25(3), 215–232. doi:10.1080/01639620490431147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, P., Hirst, L., & Davies, M. (2011). An investigation into the effect of respondent gender, victim age, and perpetrator treatment on public attitudes towards sex offenders, sex offender treatment, and sex offender rehabilitation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(8), 511–530. doi:10.1080/10509674.2011.602472
   Google Scholar
• Sahlstrom, K. J., & Jeglic, E. L. (2008). Factors affecting attitudes toward juvenile sex offenders. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Research, Treatment, & Program Innovations for Victims, Survivors, Offenders, 17(2), 180–196.
   Google Scholar
• Sanghara, K. K., & Wilson, J. (2006). Stereotypes and attitudes about child sexual abusers: A comparison of experienced and inexperienced professionals in sex offender treatment. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(2), 229–244. doi:10.1348/135532505X68818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidler, K. (2010). Community management of sex offenders: Stigma versus support. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand, 2, 66–76. Retrieved May 12, 2012, from http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=052210567079497;res=IELFSC.
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Act, 1991 (Vic) (Aus).
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fiddell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Jennings, W. G. (2010). Assessing the impact of sex offender registration and community notification on sex-offending trajectories. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(5), 570–582. doi:10.1177/0093854810363570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Levenson, J. (2009). Stress experiences of family members of registered sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 27(4), 611–626. doi:10.1002/bsl.878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., Mustaine, E., & Payne, B. K. (2011). Community corrections professionals’ views of sex offenders, sex offender registration and community notification and residency restrictions. Federal Probation, 75(3), 45–50. Retrieved May 12, 2012, from http://ezproxy.deakin.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=72887082&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
   Google Scholar
• Valliant, P. M., Furac, C. J., & Antonowicz, D. H. (1994). Attitudes toward sex offenders by female undergraduate university students enrolled in a psychology program. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 22(2), 105–110. doi:10.2224/sbp.1994.22.2.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vess, J., Day, A., Powell, M., & Graffam, J. (2011). International sex offender registration laws: Research and evaluation issues based on a review of current scientific literature. Police Practice and Research 10.1080/15614263.2011.646744
   Google Scholar
• Vess, J., Langskaill, B., Day, A., Powell, M., & Graffam, J. (2011). A comparative analysis of Australian sex offender legislation for sex offender registries. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44(3), 404–424. doi:10.1177/0004865811419065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victorian Sex Offenders Registration Act 2004 (Vic) (Aus).
   Google Scholar
• Willis, G. M., Malinen, S., & Johnston, L. (2013). Demographic differences in public attitudes towards sex offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(2), 230–247. 10.1080/13218719.2012.658206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wnuk, D., Chapman, J. E., & Jeglic, E. L. (2006). Development and refinement of a measure of attitudes towards sex offender treatment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(3), 35–47. doi:10.1300/J076v43n03_03
   Google Scholar