Remembering remotely: would video-mediation impair witnesses' memory reports?

References

• Almerigogna, J., Ost, J., Bull, R., & Akehurst, L. (2007). A state of high anxiety: How non-supportive interviewers can increase the suggestibility of child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 963–974. doi:10.1002/acp.1311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, R., Lincoln, R., & Frank, M. G. (2002). The effect of rapport in forensic interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology, & Law, 9(1), 69–78. doi:10.1375/pplt.2002.9.1.69
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2009). Videoconferencing as a part of European e-justice: The essentials of videoconferencing in cross-border court proceedings. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2860/3549
   Google Scholar
• Dando, C. J., Wilcock, R., Behnkle, C., & Milne, R. (2011). Modifying the cognitive interview: Countenancing forensic application by enhancing practicability. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 491–511. doi:10.1080/10683160903334212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, P. (1976). Report to the secretary of state for the home department of the departmental committee on evidence of identification in criminal cases. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, S. S., Bowman, L. E., Wong, M., & Patton, M. M. (2010). Efficiency and cost: The impact of videoconferenced hearings on bail decisions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100, 869–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty-Sneddon, G., & McAuley, S. (2000). Influence of video-mediation on adult-child interviews: Implications for the use of the live link with child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 379–392. doi:10.1002/1099-0720(200007/08)14:4<379::AID-ACP664>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drolet, A. L., & Morris, M. W. (2000). Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(1), 26–50. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbesen, E. B., & Rienick, C. B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 745–762. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. L. (2012). User satisfaction and user experiences with Access Grid as a medium for social science research: A research note. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15, 355–367. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.597655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P. (2010). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 25–38. doi:10.1348/135532509X441891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., & Geiselman, E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield: Charles Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• French, L., Garry, M., & Mori, K. (2011). Relative – not absolute – judgments of credibility affect susceptibility to misinformation conveyed during discussion. Acta Psychologica, 136(1), 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullwood, C. (2007). The effect of mediation on impression formation: A comparison of face-to-face and video-mediated conditions. Applied Ergonomics, 38, 267–273. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2006.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullwood, C., & Finn, M. (2010). Video-mediated communication and impression formation: An integrative review. In A. C. Rayler (Ed.), Videoconferencing: Technology, impact, and applications (pp. 35–55). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 298–307. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533–543. doi:10.1002/acp.885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, G. S., Tobey, A. E., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., Orcutt, H., Thomas, S., Shapiro, C., & Sachsenmaier, T. (1998). Face-to-face confrontation: Effects of closed-circuit technology on children's eyewitness testimony and jurors' decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 165–203. doi:10.1023/A:1025742119977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, A. (2006). Videoconferencing in immigration proceedings. Pierce Law Review, 5, 59–90.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M. D. (2011). Mere physical distance and integrative agreements: When more space improves negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 7–15. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). From laboratory to the street: Capturing witness memory using the Self-Administered Interview. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 211–226. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Ost, J., Gabbert, F., Healey, S., & Lenton, E. (2008). “With a little help from my friends …”: The role of co-witness relationship in susceptibility to misinformation. Acta Psychologica, 127, 476–484. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. T., & Wiggins, E. C. (2006). Videoconferencing in criminal proceedings: Legal and empirical issues and directions for research. Law & Policy, 28, 211–227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2006.00224.x
   Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers' perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 323–330. doi:10.1080/00224549809600384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuivaniemi-Smith, H. J., Nash, R. A., Brodie, E. R., Mahoney, G., & Rynn, C. ( 2013). Producing facial composite sketches in remote cognitive interviews: A preliminary investigation. Psychology, Crime & Law. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2013.793339
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. S., Granhag, P. A., & Spjut, E. (2003). Children's recall and the cognitive interview: Do the positive effects hold over time? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 203–214. doi:10.1002/acp.863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassiter, G. D., & Meissner, C. A. (2010). Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice and policy recommendations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 340–372. doi:10.1037/a0020518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. E., Crosby, R. D., Wonderlich, S. A., Crow, S., Lancaster, K., Simonich, H., … Myers, T. A. (2008). A randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa delivered via telemedicine versus face-to-face. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 581–592. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2008.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, K. (1995). Live television link: An evaluation of its use by child witnesses in Scottish criminal trials. Edinburgh: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• O'Conaill, B., Whittaker, S., & Wilbur, S. (1993). Conversations over video conferences: An evaluation of the spoken aspects of video-mediated communication. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 389–428. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0804_4
   Google Scholar
• Odinot, G., & Wolters, G. (2006). Repeated recall, retention interval and the accuracy-confidence relation in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 973–985. doi:10.1002/acp.1263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin, A. B. (2004). Criminal justice and videoconferencing technology: The remote defendant. Tulane Law Review, 78, 1089–1167.
   Google Scholar
• Roos af Hjelmsäter, E., Strömwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). The Self-Administered Interview: A means of improving children's eyewitness performance? Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 897–911. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.582844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. C., & Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103, 734–760. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellen, A. J. (1995). Remote conversations: The effects of mediating talk with technology. Human-Computer Interaction, 10, 401–444. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skagerberg, E. M., & Wright, D. B. (2008). The prevalence of co-witnesses and co-witness discussions in real eyewitnesses. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 513–521. doi:10.1080/10683160801948980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storck, J., & Sproull, L. (1995). Through a glass darkly: What do people learn in videoconferences? Human Communication Research, 22, 197–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, S. G., Miles, J. A., & Levesque, L. L. (2001). The effects of videoconference, telephone, and face-to-face media on interviewer and applicant judgments in employment interviews. Journal of Management, 27, 363–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckey, M. R., & Brewer, N. (2003). The influence of schemas, stimulus ambiguity, and interview schedule on eyewitness memory over time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9,101–118. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.9.2.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallano, J. P., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport-building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock-crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 960–970. doi:10.1002/acp.1789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderhallen, M., Vervaeke, G., & Holmberg, U. (2011). Witness and suspect perceptions of working alliance and interviewing style. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 110–130. doi:10.1002/jip.138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, A. (2008). Virtual justice in the bush: The use of court technology in remote and regional Australia. Journal of Law, Information and Science, 19, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, R. A., Dauphinais, K. A., & Safer, M. A. (2007). A tripartite solution to eyewitness error. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97, 807–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar