Providing eyewitnesses with initial retrieval support: what works at immediate and subsequent recall?

References

• Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. D., Craik, F. I. M., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1998). The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs. Psychology and Aging, 13, 405–423. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.3.405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., Liebel, L. M., & Scarberry, N. C. (1998). Repeated testing in eyewitness memory: A means to improve recall of a negative emotional event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 119–131. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199804)12:2<119::AID-ACP500>3.0.CO;2-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, P., Fisher, R. P., & Cutler, B. L. (1999). Examining the cognitive interview in a double-test paradigm. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 29–45. doi:10.1080/10683169908414992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castel, A. D., & Craik, F. I. M. (2003). The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information. Psychology and Aging, 18, 873–885. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R., Lincoln, R., & Frank, M. G. (2002). The effect of rapport in forensic interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 9, 69–78. doi:10.1375/pplt.2002.9.1.69
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159–180. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dando, C., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2009). The cognitive interview: The efficacy of a modified mental reinstatement of context procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 138–147. doi:10.1002/acp.1451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbesen, E. B., & Rienick, C. B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 745–762. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahsing, I. A., Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2004). The man behind the mask: Accuracy and predictors of eyewitness offender descriptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 722–729. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, J. M., Russell, E. J., Peace, K. A., & Christie, J. (2013). Of guns and geese: A meta-analytic review of the ‘weapon focus’ literature. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 35–66. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.599325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, A., & Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 333–345. doi:10.3758/BF03202501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Foos, P. W., & Fisher, R. P. (1988). Using tests as learning opportunities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 179–183. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 298–307. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawrylowicz, J., Memon, A., & Scoboria, A. (2014). Equipping witnesses with transferable skills: The self-administered interview©. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 315–325. doi:10.1080/1068316x.2013.777961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). From laboratory to the street: Capturing witness memory using the self-administered interview. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 211–226. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2014). Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory: The impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/acp.2984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K., Gabbert, F., Allan, K., & Carson, D. (2009, July). The effects of actual versus perceived memory quality on our susceptibility to memory conformity. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 323–330. doi:10.1080/00224549809600384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 3–27. doi:10.1080/10683169908414991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1994). Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 297–315. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.123.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, S. M. (2006). Dividing attention during a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 199–212. doi:10.1002/acp.1177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logie, R. H., Gilhooly, K. J., & Wynn, V. (1994). Counting on working-memory in arithmetic problem-solving. Memory & Cognition, 22, 395–410. doi:10.3758/BF03200866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logie, R. H., Maylor, E. A., Della Sala, S., & Smith, G. (2004). Working memory in event- and time-based prospective memory tasks: Effects of secondary demand and age. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 441–456. doi:10.1080/09541440340000114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, E. J., Tversky, B., & Hutson, M. (2005). How eyewitnesses talk about events: Implications for memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 531–544. doi:10.1002/acp.1095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, M. R., & Fisher, R. P. (1995). Facilitating children's eyewitness recall with the revised cognitive interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 510–516. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Fisher, R. P. (1991). Tests and test feedback as learning sources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 192–201. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(91)90037-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., Sporer, S. L., & Susa, K. J. (2008). A theoretical review and meta-analysis of the description-identification relationship in memory for faces. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 414–455. doi:10.1080/09541440701728581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 340–372. doi:10.1037/a0020518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Wark, L., Bull, R., & Köhnken, G. (1997). Isolating the effects of the cognitive interview techniques. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 179–197. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveh-Benjamin, M., Guez, J., & Marom, M. (2003). The effects of divided attention at encoding on item and associative memory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1021–1035. doi:10.3758/BF03196123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1996). Remembering as doing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 203. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00042308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. J. V., Jelicic, M., Verbeek, H., & Merckelbach, H. (2007). Poor working memory predicts false memories. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 213–232. doi:10.1080/09541440600760396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, J. P. (1986). Modified sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 826–831. doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context dependent memory. In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–33). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M. (1994). Theoretical principles of context-dependent memory. In M. Gruneberg & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Theoretical aspects of memory (pp. 168–195). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. G., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 342–353. doi:10.3758/BF03197465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 203–220. doi:10.3758/bf03197114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L., & Cohn, L. D. (2011). Meta-analysis. In B. D. Rosenfeld & S. D. Penrod (Eds.), Research methods in forensic psychology (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373. doi:10.1037/h0020071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Structure of memory traces. Psychological Review, 82, 261–275. doi:10.1037/h0076782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Marsh, E. J. (2000). Biased retellings of events yield biased memories. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 1–38. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallano, J. P., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport-building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock-crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 960–970. doi:10.1002/acp.1789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. M., & Holliday, R. E. (2007). Enhancing the recall of young, young-old and old-old adults with cognitive interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 19–43. doi:10.1002/acp.1260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar