The differential predictive validity of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory: the role of gender

References

• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27. doi: 10.1177/0011128705281756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Guzzo, L., Raynor, P., Rowe, R. C., Rettinger, L. J., Brews, A., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). Are the major risk/need factors predictive of both female and male reoffending? A test with the eight domains of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. doi:10.1177/0306624X10395716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baglivio, M., & Jackowski, K. (2013). Examining the validity of a juvenile offending risk assessment instrument across gender and race/ethnicity. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(1), 26–43. doi:10.1177/1541204012440107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, K., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. (2007). Assessing the risk of re-offending for juvenile offenders using the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 45(3/4), 85–108. doi:10.1300/J076v45n03_04
   Google Scholar
• Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 48–71. doi:10.1177/1557085105282897
   Google Scholar
• Blanchette, K., & Brown, S. L. (2006). The assessment and treatment of women offenders: An integrative perspective. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research practice and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Brumbraugh, S., Hardison, J. L., & Winterfield, L. A. (2010). Suitability of assessment instruments for delinquent girls. Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M. (2000). What to do about girls? Thinking about programs for young women. In M. McMahon (Ed.), Assessment to assistance: Programs for women in community corrections (pp. 139–170). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
   Google Scholar
• Emeka, T. Q., & Sorensen, J. R. (2009). Female juvenile risk: Is there a need for gendered assessment instruments? Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7(4), 313–330. doi:10.1177/1541204009334083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavazzi, S. M., Yarcheck, C. M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2006). Global risk indicators and the role of gender in a juvenile detention sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(5), 597–612. doi: 10.1177/0093854806288184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraghty, K. A., & Woodhams, J. (2015). The predictive validity of risk assessment tools for female offenders: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 25–38. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodkind, S. (2005). Gender-specific services in the juvenile justice system: A critical examination. Affilia, 20(1), 52–70. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javdani, S., Sadeh, N., & Verona, E. (2011). Gendered social forces: A review of the impact of institutionalized factors on women and girls’ criminal justice trajectories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(2), 161–211. doi:10.1037/a0021957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerig, P. K., & Schindler, S. R. (2013). Engendering the evidence base: A critical review of the conceptual and empirical foundations of gender-responsive interventions for girls’ delinquency. Laws, 2(3), 244–282. doi:10.3390/laws2030244
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, J. M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2001). Gender bias and juvenile justice revisited: A multiyear analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 173–191. doi:10.1177/0011128701047002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, M., Stockdale, K., & Wong, S. (2012). Short and long-term prediction of recidivism using the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory in a sample of serious young offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 1(1), 1–15. doi:10.1037/h0093927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onifade, E., Davidson, W., & Campbell, C. (2009). Risk assessment: The predictive validity of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory with African Americans and girls. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 7, 205–221. doi:10.1080/15377930903143544
   Google Scholar
• Onifade, E., Petersen, J., Bynum, T., & Davidson, W. (2011). Multilevel recidivism prediction: Incorporating neighborhood socioeconomic ecology in juvenile justice risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(8), 840–853. doi:10.1177/0093854811407026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury, E. J., Van Voorhis, P., & Spiropoulos, G. V. (2009). The predictive validity of a gender-responsive needs assessment: An exploratory study. Crime & Delinquency, 55(4), 550–585. doi:10.1177/0011128707308102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F., Hoge, R. D., & Gomez, L. (2005). Reliability and validity analyses of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 329–344. doi:10.1177/0093854804274373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S. (2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 449–462. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9071-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S. (2008). A meta-analysis of juvenile justice risk assessment instruments: Predictive validity by gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(11), 1367–1381. doi:10.1177/0093854808324377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., Luebbers, S., & Dolan, M. (2013). Gender and ethnicity in juvenile risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(4), 388–408. doi:10.1177/0093854812456776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sickmund, M., & Puzzanchera, C. (2014). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2014 national report. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice. Retrieved from http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/nr2014/downloads/NR2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van der Put, C. E., Deković, M., Hoeve, M., Stams, G. J. J., van der Laan, P. H., & Langewouters, F. E. (2014). Risk assessment of girls are there any sex differences in risk factors for re-offending and in risk profiles? Crime & Delinquency, 60(7), 1033–1056. doi:10.1177/0011128710384776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P. (2012). On behalf of women offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 11(2), 111–145. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., & Presser, L. (2001). Classification of women offenders: A national assessment of current practices. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E., Bauman, A., Holsinger, K., & Wright, E. (2007). Classifying women offenders: Achieving accurate pictures of risk and identifying gender-responsive needs. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati Center for Criminal Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E., Bauman, A., & Wright, E. (2007). Gender-responsive risk/need assessment: Final report prepared for the Maui CARE Project. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati Center for Criminal Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E., Wright, E., & Bauman, A. (2008). Achieving accurate pictures of risk and identifying gender responsive needs: Two new assessments for women offenders. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati Center for Criminal Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E., Salisbury, E., & Bauman, A. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 261–288. doi:10.1177/0093854809357442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitopolous, N., Peterson-Badali, M., & Skilling, T. (2012). The relationship between matching service to criminogenic need and recidivism in male and female youth: Examining the RNR principles in practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(8), 1025–1041. doi:10.1177/009385481244289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S. C., Muno, A., & Sullivan-Colglazier, C. (2015). Principles in practice: A multistate study of gender-responsive reforms in the juvenile justice system. Crime & Delinquency, 61(5), 742–766. doi:10.1177/0011128712449712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, E. M., Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E. J., & Bauman, A. (2012). Gender-responsive lessons learned and policy implications for women in prison a review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(12), 1612–1632. doi:10.1177/0093854812451088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahn, M., Agnew, R., Fishbein, D., Miller, S., Winn, D., Dakoff, G., … Chesney-Lind, M. (2010). Causes and correlates of girls’ delinquency. Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Zahn, M., Hawkins, S., Chiancone, J., & Whitworth, A. (2008). The girls study group – charting the way to delinquency prevention for girls. Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar