The effect of the presence and seating position of an interpreter on eliciting information and cues to deceit

References

• Akca, C., & Elkilic, G. (2011). The effects of age and production mode on the bilingual performance of Turkish learners of English in a serial recall task. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 9–17. doi:10.1080/00207594.2010.503762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, B. P., & Konstan, J. A. (2006). On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 685–708. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R. (2010). The investigative interviewing of children and other vulnerable witnesses: Psychological research and working/professional practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 5–23. doi:10.1348/014466509X440160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridgeshire Police. (2015). Language services procedure. Retrieved from Freedom of Information request at http://www.cambs.police.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Cross Cultural, Rapport-Based Interrogation (Version 5). (2010). Retrieved August 2, 2014, from https://www.aclu.org/files/fbimappingfoia/20120727/ACLURM036782.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva, C. S., & Leach, A. M. (2013). Detecting deception in second-language speakers. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 115–127. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02030.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeb, H., Granhag, P. A., Vrij, A., Strömwall, L., Mann, S., & Hope, L. (2016, under review). Detecting deceptive drawings of suspects who are familiar with their alibi.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Army. (2006). Human intelligence collector operations (Field Manual 2-22.3). Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army (United States of America).
   Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskell, T., Blickensderfer, E. L., & Salas, E. (2013). Is three a crowd? Examining rapport in investigative interviews. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 17, 1–13. doi:10.1037/a0029686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., & Costa, A. (2015). Lying in a native and foreign language. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 22, 1124–1129. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0781-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Michael, S. W., & Brandon, S. E. (2013). Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a psychologically based credibility assessment tool. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 33–41. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R., & Michael, S. W. (2014). Detecting deception in non-native English speakers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 226–237. doi:10.1002/acp.2990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewens, S., Akehurst, L., Leach, A.-M., & Vrij, A. (under review). Police investigators’ procedures relating to, and perceptions of, interviews involving interpreters.
   Google Scholar
• Ewens, S., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Jo, E., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). The effect of interpreters on eliciting information, cues to deceit and rapport. Legal and Criminological Psychology. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P. (2010). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 25–38. doi:10.1348/135532509X441891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J. (2001). Revising the language of New South Wales police procedures: Applied linguistics in action. Applied Linguistics, 22, 439–469. doi:10.1093/applin/22.4.439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189–200. doi:10.1080/10683160701645181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–102). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., Wolf, A. G., Vrij, A., & Roos af Hjelmsäter, E. (2011). Detecting deception in suspects: Verbal cues as a function of interview strategy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 643–656. doi:10.1080/10683160903446982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y. (2012). Cooperative principle in English and Chinese cultures. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2, 132–137. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.1.132-137
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, G. (1957). Leadership and the spatial factor in small groups. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 269–272. doi:10.1037/h0047234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., & Lehman, D. R. (2001). Cultural differences in self-evaluation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 434–443. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. P. (2010). Exploring factors affecting the use of oral communication strategies. Department of Applied Foreign Languages. Lunghwa University of Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.lhu.edu.tw/m/oaa/synthetic/publish/publish/30/8.%E9%BB%83%E7%A7%8B%E8%90%8D-Exploring%20Factors%20Affecting%20the%20Use%20of%20Oral%20Communication%20Strategies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, N. (2008). Telephone interpreting. A comprehensive guide to the profession. Bloomington: Trafford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leins, D. A., Fisher, R. P., & Ross, S. J. (2013). Exploring liars’ strategies for creating deceptive reports. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 141–151. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02041.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S., Vrij, A., Shaw, D. J., Leal, S., Ewens, S., Hillman, J., …  Fisher, R. P. (2012). Two heads are better than one? How to effectively use two interviewers to elicit cues to deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 324–340. doi:10.1111/j.20448333.2012.02055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masip, J., Sporer, S., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 11, 99–122. doi:10.1080/10683160410001726356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2012). Does the truth come out in the writing? SCAN as a lie detection tool. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 68–76. doi:10.1007/s10979-011-9264-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). Exploiting liars’ verbal strategies by examining the verifiability of details. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 227–239. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02069.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., & Goodmon, L. B. (2003). Disrupting attention: The need for retrieval cues in working memory theories. Memory and Cognition, 31, 65–76. doi:10.3758/BF03196083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozolins, U. (2011). Telephone interpreting: Understanding practice and identifying research needs. Translation & Interpreting, 3, 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Russano, M. B., Narchet, F. M., & Kleinman, S. M. (2014). Analysts, interpreters and intelligence interrogations: Perceptions and insights. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 829–846. doi:10.1002/acp.3070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russano, M. B., Narchet, F. M., Kleinman, S. M., & Meissner, C. M. (2014). Structured interviews of experienced HUMINT interrogators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 847–859. doi:10.1002/acp.3069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1985). Social anxiety and communication about the self. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 171–192. doi:10.1177/0261927X8543002
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. J., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Hillman, J., Granhag, P. A., & Fisher, R. P. (2015). Mimicry and investigative interviewing: Using deliberate mimicry to elicit information and cues to deceit. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. doi:10.1002/jip.1438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soufan, A. H. (2011). The black banners: The inside story of 9/11 and the war against al-Qaeda. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: language and Cognitive, 4, 105–122. doi:10.1017/S1366728901000220
   Google Scholar
• Van ‘t Veer, A. E., Stel, M., & van Beest, I. (2014). Limited capacity to lie: Cognitive load interferes with being dishonest. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 199–206. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2351377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, M. (2009). An investigation into police officers and interpreters training for the interview process – a case study (Unpublished BA (Hons.) dissertation). University of Wales, Newport.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 110–117. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Lying about flying: The first experiment to detect false intent. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 17, 611–620. doi: 10.1080/10683160903418213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). Eliciting reliable information in investigative interviews. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 129–136. doi:10.1177/2372732214548592
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, B., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253–265. doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fisher, R. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 499–518. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9066-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Nahari, G., Isitt, R., & Leal, S. (2016). Using the verifiability lie detection approach in an insurance claim setting. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. doi:10.1002/jip.1458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadensjö, C. (1999). Telephone interpreting & the synchronization of talk in social Interaction. The Translator, 5, 247–264. doi:10.1080/13556509.1999.10799043
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, S. J., Kebbell, M. R., Moston, S., & Westera, N. (2014). Perceptions and profiles of interviews with interpreters: A police survey. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48, 53–72. doi:10.1177/0004865814524583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. P., Xue, G. M., Chen, C. S., Xue, F., & Dong, Q. (2007). Neural bases of asymmetric language switching in second-langauage learners: An ER-fMRI study. NeuroImage, 35, 862–870. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Jundi, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Have you been there before? The effect of experience and question expectedness on lying about intentions. Acta Psychologica, 141, 178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar