Prison sentences: last resort or the default sanction?

References

• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. doi: 10.1037/a0018362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antunes, M. J. (2013). Consequências jurídicas do crime. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, A. (1996). Sentencing. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds). The Oxford handbook of criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bales, W. D., & Piquero, A. R. (2012). Assessing the impact of imprisonment on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 71–101. doi: 10.1007/s11292-011-9139-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijersbergen, K. A., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2016). Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 63–82. doi: 10.1177/0093854815609643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, R. A., & Lemon, N. F. (1981). Training, experience, and magistrates’ sentencing philosophies – A longitudinal study. Law and Human Behavior, 5(2/3), 123–139.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, J. A., & Koehler, J. J. (2014). Cruel and unusual punishments: A comparison of public and judicial opinion. Jurimetrics, 54(2). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2334963
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W. T., Lurigio, A. J., & Weaver, F. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 107–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Rodrigues, A., & Sacau, A. (2012). Letting the field show us the way – A mixed methodology to understand judicial decision making. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 2(5), 92–97. doi: 10.5923/j.ijap.20120205.03
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Rodrigues, A., & Sacau, A. (2014). Sentence pronouncements: What judges say when sentencing. European Journal of Criminology, 11(3), 379–397. doi: 10.1177/1477370813500887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Rodrigues, A., & Sacau, A. (2015). Judges’ perception on causes of criminality and justifications for crime. European Journal of Probation, 7(2), 124–142. doi: 10.1177/2066220315595906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J. C., Mears, D. P., & Bales, W. D. (2014). Assessing the effectiveness of correctional sanctions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 317–347. doi: 10.1007/s10940-013-9205-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., & Nagin, S. D. (2011). Prison do not reduce recidivism: The high cost of ignoring science. The Prison Journal, 91(3_suppl), 48S–65S. doi: 10.1177/0032885511415224
   Google Scholar
• de Keijser, J. W., van der Leeden, R., & Jackson, J. L. (2002). From moral theory to penal attitudes and back: A theoretically integrated modeling approach. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 317–335. doi:10.1002/bsl.494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, J. d. F. (2001). Temas básicos da doutrina penal. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Direção Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais. Retrieved from http://www.dgrs.mj.pt/web/rs/estat
   Google Scholar
• Durlauf, S. N., & Nagin, D. S. (2011). Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced? Criminology & Public Policy, 10(1), 13–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00680.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1999). Vigiar e punir: A história da violência nas prisões. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Cullen, F. T. (1999). The effects of prison sentences on recidivism. Ontario: Public Works and Government Services Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Sporer, S. L. (2010). Unconscious influences in sentencing decisions: A research review of psychological sources of disparity. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42(1), 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henham, R. (2012). Penal ideology, sentencing and the legitimacy of trial justice. Crime, Law and Social Change, 57, 77–98. doi: 10.1007/s10611-011-9342-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth, J. (1971). Sentencing as a human process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press in association with the Centre of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Ifill, S. (2009). Judicial diversity, 13 Green Bag 2d, 45-58. Retrieved from http://www.greenbag.org/v13n1/v13n1_ifill.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, I. R. (1973). Prison: The judge’s dilemma. Fordham Law Review, 41(3), 495–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleck, G., Sever, B., Li, S., & Gertz, M. (2005). The missing link in general deterrence research. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 43(3), 623–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstad, A. (1996). Imprisonment as rehabilitation: Offenders’ assessment of why it does not work. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(4), 323–335. doi: 10.1016/0047-2352(96)00020-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320. doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listwan, S. J., Sullivan, C. J., Agnew, R., Cullen, F. T., & Colvin, M. (2013). The pains of imprisonment revisited: The impact of strain on inmate recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 30(1), 144–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, A. (2012). Judicial diversity: Is disagreement a positive objective in law? University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series, 41, 1–37. Retrieved from http://law.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1373&context=unswwps-flrps12
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, D. L. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, G. (2005). How judges sentence. Sydney: The Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, N. (2010). Consistency in sentencing. Judicial Studies Institute Journal, 2, 14–54.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, N. (2014). When is prison a last resort? Definitional problems and judicial interpretations. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/30477822/When_is_prison_a_last_resort_Definitional_Problems_and_Judicial_Interpretations
   Google Scholar
• Matsueda, R. L., Kreager, D. A., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71(February), 95–122.
   Google Scholar
• McFatter, R. M. (1978). Sentencing strategies and justice: Effects of punishment philosophy on sentencing decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1490–1500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mears, D. P., Cochran, J. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2015). Incarceration heterogeneity and its implications for assessing the effectiveness of imprisonment on recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(7), 691–712.
   Google Scholar
• Minucci, A., & Monster, M. (2004). It’s about time to hear their stories: Impediments to rehabilitation at a Canadian provincial correctional facility for women. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 515–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, N. T., May, D. C., & Wood, P. B. (2008). Offenders, judges, and officers rate the relative severity of alternative sanctions compared to prison. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46(3), 49–70. doi: 10.1080/10509670802143276
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R. (2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 100(3), 765–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, J. M. (2010). Ethical dilemmas and decisions in criminal justice (6th ed.). Wadsworth, OH: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, R. (2008). How judges think. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, D. (2011). Does imprisonment deter? A review of the evidence. Melbourne Victoria: Sentencing Advisory Council.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 445–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobral, J., & Prieto, A. (1994). Psicologia y ley – Un examen de las decisiones judiciales. Madrid: Eudema, S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2002). How do judges decide – The search of fairness and justice in punishment. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, G. M. (1992). The psychology of criminal justice. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tata, C. (2016). How can prison sentencing be reduced in Scotland? Scottish Justice Matters, 4(1), 23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Tombs, J., & Jagger, E. (2006). Denying responsibility – Sentencers’ accounts of their decisions to imprison. The British Journal of Criminology, 46, 803–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Prison Brief – Institute for Criminal Policy Research. Retrieved from www.prisonstudies.org
   Google Scholar